How to dissect a rectangle to obtain an equal square?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
There are several propositions and constructions in Euclid's Elements that relate to the squaring of a rectangle, e.g.
Proposition II.5: If a straight line is cut into equal and unequal segments, then the rectangle contained by the unequal segments of the whole together with the square on the straight line between the points of section equals the square on the half.
Proposition II.14: To construct a square equal to a given rectilinear figure.
Proposition VI.13: To find a mean proportional to two given straight lines.
But none of these resemble the "proof without words" (which isn't found in the Elements) that any rectangle can be dissected and rearranged to obtain an equal square:
Performing this dissection essentially means to construct the angle $alpha$ - everything else follows.
My question is:
How do I specifically construct the angle $alpha$ when given an arbitrary
rectangle?
geometry euclidean-geometry alternative-proof
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
There are several propositions and constructions in Euclid's Elements that relate to the squaring of a rectangle, e.g.
Proposition II.5: If a straight line is cut into equal and unequal segments, then the rectangle contained by the unequal segments of the whole together with the square on the straight line between the points of section equals the square on the half.
Proposition II.14: To construct a square equal to a given rectilinear figure.
Proposition VI.13: To find a mean proportional to two given straight lines.
But none of these resemble the "proof without words" (which isn't found in the Elements) that any rectangle can be dissected and rearranged to obtain an equal square:
Performing this dissection essentially means to construct the angle $alpha$ - everything else follows.
My question is:
How do I specifically construct the angle $alpha$ when given an arbitrary
rectangle?
geometry euclidean-geometry alternative-proof
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
There are several propositions and constructions in Euclid's Elements that relate to the squaring of a rectangle, e.g.
Proposition II.5: If a straight line is cut into equal and unequal segments, then the rectangle contained by the unequal segments of the whole together with the square on the straight line between the points of section equals the square on the half.
Proposition II.14: To construct a square equal to a given rectilinear figure.
Proposition VI.13: To find a mean proportional to two given straight lines.
But none of these resemble the "proof without words" (which isn't found in the Elements) that any rectangle can be dissected and rearranged to obtain an equal square:
Performing this dissection essentially means to construct the angle $alpha$ - everything else follows.
My question is:
How do I specifically construct the angle $alpha$ when given an arbitrary
rectangle?
geometry euclidean-geometry alternative-proof
There are several propositions and constructions in Euclid's Elements that relate to the squaring of a rectangle, e.g.
Proposition II.5: If a straight line is cut into equal and unequal segments, then the rectangle contained by the unequal segments of the whole together with the square on the straight line between the points of section equals the square on the half.
Proposition II.14: To construct a square equal to a given rectilinear figure.
Proposition VI.13: To find a mean proportional to two given straight lines.
But none of these resemble the "proof without words" (which isn't found in the Elements) that any rectangle can be dissected and rearranged to obtain an equal square:
Performing this dissection essentially means to construct the angle $alpha$ - everything else follows.
My question is:
How do I specifically construct the angle $alpha$ when given an arbitrary
rectangle?
geometry euclidean-geometry alternative-proof
geometry euclidean-geometry alternative-proof
asked 2 hours ago
Hans Stricker
5,37723883
5,37723883
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
You do not actually have to construct $alpha$. This is the diagram I drew for a very similar question, only with "rectangle" replaced by "triangle". Then again, I went through a rectangle in order to get to a square.
I recap what I said. In what follows, $a>b$ are the rectangle's sides and $m=sqrtab$ is their geometric mean.
From one vertex draw a cut to the long opposite side, creating a right triangle with legs $m$ and $b$. On the long side incident to said vertex, erect a perpendicular cut at the point $a-m$ from the vertex, that stops at the first cut (this second cut has length $m-b$). This creates three pieces, which rearrange into a square.
If $a>4b$, bisect the rectangle parallel to its short side and stack the halves on top of each other until $ale4b$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
First construct (CAR) the square size.
Reference : Compass-and-straightedge construction of the square root of a given line?
You rotate your rectangle horizontally (put rectangle largest edge below AB).
Intersect circle center A radius h (height of rectangle, smallest edge) with AB to get C (like on picture to get C-A-B). So AC = h.
Draw semicircle centered midpoint of CB through C and B.
Intersect with orthogonal line to AB through A to get D.
Because of similarities : AC/AD = AD/AB implying AD^2 = h AB. So AD is square size.
Then construct alpha.
Draw another picture with a long segment (AE..) with square size ADFE on it.
Intersect circle center D length AB with the long segment.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
You do not actually have to construct $alpha$. This is the diagram I drew for a very similar question, only with "rectangle" replaced by "triangle". Then again, I went through a rectangle in order to get to a square.
I recap what I said. In what follows, $a>b$ are the rectangle's sides and $m=sqrtab$ is their geometric mean.
From one vertex draw a cut to the long opposite side, creating a right triangle with legs $m$ and $b$. On the long side incident to said vertex, erect a perpendicular cut at the point $a-m$ from the vertex, that stops at the first cut (this second cut has length $m-b$). This creates three pieces, which rearrange into a square.
If $a>4b$, bisect the rectangle parallel to its short side and stack the halves on top of each other until $ale4b$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
You do not actually have to construct $alpha$. This is the diagram I drew for a very similar question, only with "rectangle" replaced by "triangle". Then again, I went through a rectangle in order to get to a square.
I recap what I said. In what follows, $a>b$ are the rectangle's sides and $m=sqrtab$ is their geometric mean.
From one vertex draw a cut to the long opposite side, creating a right triangle with legs $m$ and $b$. On the long side incident to said vertex, erect a perpendicular cut at the point $a-m$ from the vertex, that stops at the first cut (this second cut has length $m-b$). This creates three pieces, which rearrange into a square.
If $a>4b$, bisect the rectangle parallel to its short side and stack the halves on top of each other until $ale4b$.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
You do not actually have to construct $alpha$. This is the diagram I drew for a very similar question, only with "rectangle" replaced by "triangle". Then again, I went through a rectangle in order to get to a square.
I recap what I said. In what follows, $a>b$ are the rectangle's sides and $m=sqrtab$ is their geometric mean.
From one vertex draw a cut to the long opposite side, creating a right triangle with legs $m$ and $b$. On the long side incident to said vertex, erect a perpendicular cut at the point $a-m$ from the vertex, that stops at the first cut (this second cut has length $m-b$). This creates three pieces, which rearrange into a square.
If $a>4b$, bisect the rectangle parallel to its short side and stack the halves on top of each other until $ale4b$.
You do not actually have to construct $alpha$. This is the diagram I drew for a very similar question, only with "rectangle" replaced by "triangle". Then again, I went through a rectangle in order to get to a square.
I recap what I said. In what follows, $a>b$ are the rectangle's sides and $m=sqrtab$ is their geometric mean.
From one vertex draw a cut to the long opposite side, creating a right triangle with legs $m$ and $b$. On the long side incident to said vertex, erect a perpendicular cut at the point $a-m$ from the vertex, that stops at the first cut (this second cut has length $m-b$). This creates three pieces, which rearrange into a square.
If $a>4b$, bisect the rectangle parallel to its short side and stack the halves on top of each other until $ale4b$.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago


Parcly Taxel
39.8k137097
39.8k137097
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
First construct (CAR) the square size.
Reference : Compass-and-straightedge construction of the square root of a given line?
You rotate your rectangle horizontally (put rectangle largest edge below AB).
Intersect circle center A radius h (height of rectangle, smallest edge) with AB to get C (like on picture to get C-A-B). So AC = h.
Draw semicircle centered midpoint of CB through C and B.
Intersect with orthogonal line to AB through A to get D.
Because of similarities : AC/AD = AD/AB implying AD^2 = h AB. So AD is square size.
Then construct alpha.
Draw another picture with a long segment (AE..) with square size ADFE on it.
Intersect circle center D length AB with the long segment.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
First construct (CAR) the square size.
Reference : Compass-and-straightedge construction of the square root of a given line?
You rotate your rectangle horizontally (put rectangle largest edge below AB).
Intersect circle center A radius h (height of rectangle, smallest edge) with AB to get C (like on picture to get C-A-B). So AC = h.
Draw semicircle centered midpoint of CB through C and B.
Intersect with orthogonal line to AB through A to get D.
Because of similarities : AC/AD = AD/AB implying AD^2 = h AB. So AD is square size.
Then construct alpha.
Draw another picture with a long segment (AE..) with square size ADFE on it.
Intersect circle center D length AB with the long segment.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
First construct (CAR) the square size.
Reference : Compass-and-straightedge construction of the square root of a given line?
You rotate your rectangle horizontally (put rectangle largest edge below AB).
Intersect circle center A radius h (height of rectangle, smallest edge) with AB to get C (like on picture to get C-A-B). So AC = h.
Draw semicircle centered midpoint of CB through C and B.
Intersect with orthogonal line to AB through A to get D.
Because of similarities : AC/AD = AD/AB implying AD^2 = h AB. So AD is square size.
Then construct alpha.
Draw another picture with a long segment (AE..) with square size ADFE on it.
Intersect circle center D length AB with the long segment.
First construct (CAR) the square size.
Reference : Compass-and-straightedge construction of the square root of a given line?
You rotate your rectangle horizontally (put rectangle largest edge below AB).
Intersect circle center A radius h (height of rectangle, smallest edge) with AB to get C (like on picture to get C-A-B). So AC = h.
Draw semicircle centered midpoint of CB through C and B.
Intersect with orthogonal line to AB through A to get D.
Because of similarities : AC/AD = AD/AB implying AD^2 = h AB. So AD is square size.
Then construct alpha.
Draw another picture with a long segment (AE..) with square size ADFE on it.
Intersect circle center D length AB with the long segment.
answered 1 hour ago


Dominique Laurain
261
261
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2983950%2fhow-to-dissect-a-rectangle-to-obtain-an-equal-square%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password