Combinatorial proof identity

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1













Give a combinatorial proof of the following identity: $$binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3.$$




I've been working on this proof for hours, however I'm not able to show LHS = RHS-
I completely understand binomial theorem and few combinatorial proofs but not able to succeed this one.
Help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    Give a combinatorial proof of the following identity: $$binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3.$$




    I've been working on this proof for hours, however I'm not able to show LHS = RHS-
    I completely understand binomial theorem and few combinatorial proofs but not able to succeed this one.
    Help would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      Give a combinatorial proof of the following identity: $$binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3.$$




      I've been working on this proof for hours, however I'm not able to show LHS = RHS-
      I completely understand binomial theorem and few combinatorial proofs but not able to succeed this one.
      Help would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question
















      Give a combinatorial proof of the following identity: $$binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3.$$




      I've been working on this proof for hours, however I'm not able to show LHS = RHS-
      I completely understand binomial theorem and few combinatorial proofs but not able to succeed this one.
      Help would be appreciated.







      combinatorics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 44 mins ago









      Tianlalu

      2,001629




      2,001629










      asked 59 mins ago









      m.saza

      202




      202




















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Arrange $3n$ balls into 3 rows and each row contains $n$ balls.



          There are $binomn3$ ways to select $3$ balls from them. We can group the ways into $3$ categories:



          1. Select one ball from each row. There are $n$ choices for each row, this contribute $n^3$ ways of pick the balls.


          2. Select two balls from one row and one ball from another row. There are $3 times 2$ ways to select the rows. Since there are $binomn2$ ways to select two balls from a row and $n$ ways to select one balls from a row, this contribute $6 binomn2 n$ ways to pick the balls.


          3. Select three balls from a single row. There are $3$ ways to select the row and $binomn3$ ways to select three balls from that particular row. This contributes $3binomn3$ ways.


          These $3$ categories of choicing doesn't overlap and exhaust all possible ways to select three balls. As a result,



          $$binom3n3 = n^3 + 6binomn2 n + 3binomn3$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Great answer +1!
            – Rushabh Mehta
            36 mins ago

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          $$3nchoose3=3nchoose3+6nnchoose2+n^3$$$$frac12ncdot(3n-1)cdot(3n-2)=frac12ncdot(n-1)cdot(n-2)+3n^2cdot(n-1)+n^3$$Can you take it from here?






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Why do people post algebraic solutions when the OP is asking specifically (in boldface) for a combinatorial proof? Not gonna vote down algebraic solutions though. Just saying. And +1 only to Achille Hui.
            – Ken Draco
            19 mins ago






          • 1




            @KenDraco I might have misread the question at first. Oops!
            – Rushabh Mehta
            17 mins ago










          • I got it. I myself am prone to such things. I just mean all the answers below -:)
            – Ken Draco
            8 mins ago


















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          $2!=2, 3!=6$, so:



          $$binom3n3=frac n2(3n-1)(3n-2)$$
          $$3binomn3=frac n2(n-1)(n-2)$$
          $$6nbinomn2=3n^2(n-1)$$



          I used that $$fracx!(x-a)!=x^underlinex-a=prod_n=0^a-1(x-n)$$



          See falling factorials






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 2




            This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
            – Mark S.
            41 mins ago

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Brute force:



          $27n^3 - 27n^2+ 6n = 27n^3 - 27n^2 + 6n$



          $27n^3 - 9n^2 - 18n^2 + 6n = 3n^3 - 3n^2 - 6n^2 + 6n + 18n^3 - 18n^2 + 6n^3$



          $(9n^2 - 3n)(3n - 2) = (3n^2 - 3n)(n - 2) + 18n^2(n-1) + 6n^3$



          $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2) = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2) + 3(6n)n(n-1) + 6n^3$



          $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2)/6 = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2)/6 + (6n)n(n-1)/2 + n^3$



          $binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3$






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            A proof that thinks about combination (as in choosing n objects from m objects) is better because it trains intuition. But for simple problems, algebra and brute force is sufficient.
            – R zu
            48 mins ago







          • 2




            This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
            – Mark S.
            40 mins ago

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Notice that the LHS is:



          $$frac3n times (3n-1) times (3n-2)3! = fracn times (3n-1) times (3n-2)2$$
          $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



          For the RHS:



          $$3 times fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)3! + 6n times fracntimes(n-1)2! + frac2n^32$$



          $$Longrightarrow fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)2 + frac6n^2 times(n-1)2 + frac2n^32$$



          $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



          Hence, RHS=LHS.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2983705%2fcombinatorial-proof-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes








            5 Answers
            5






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote













            Arrange $3n$ balls into 3 rows and each row contains $n$ balls.



            There are $binomn3$ ways to select $3$ balls from them. We can group the ways into $3$ categories:



            1. Select one ball from each row. There are $n$ choices for each row, this contribute $n^3$ ways of pick the balls.


            2. Select two balls from one row and one ball from another row. There are $3 times 2$ ways to select the rows. Since there are $binomn2$ ways to select two balls from a row and $n$ ways to select one balls from a row, this contribute $6 binomn2 n$ ways to pick the balls.


            3. Select three balls from a single row. There are $3$ ways to select the row and $binomn3$ ways to select three balls from that particular row. This contributes $3binomn3$ ways.


            These $3$ categories of choicing doesn't overlap and exhaust all possible ways to select three balls. As a result,



            $$binom3n3 = n^3 + 6binomn2 n + 3binomn3$$






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Great answer +1!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              36 mins ago














            up vote
            4
            down vote













            Arrange $3n$ balls into 3 rows and each row contains $n$ balls.



            There are $binomn3$ ways to select $3$ balls from them. We can group the ways into $3$ categories:



            1. Select one ball from each row. There are $n$ choices for each row, this contribute $n^3$ ways of pick the balls.


            2. Select two balls from one row and one ball from another row. There are $3 times 2$ ways to select the rows. Since there are $binomn2$ ways to select two balls from a row and $n$ ways to select one balls from a row, this contribute $6 binomn2 n$ ways to pick the balls.


            3. Select three balls from a single row. There are $3$ ways to select the row and $binomn3$ ways to select three balls from that particular row. This contributes $3binomn3$ ways.


            These $3$ categories of choicing doesn't overlap and exhaust all possible ways to select three balls. As a result,



            $$binom3n3 = n^3 + 6binomn2 n + 3binomn3$$






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Great answer +1!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              36 mins ago












            up vote
            4
            down vote










            up vote
            4
            down vote









            Arrange $3n$ balls into 3 rows and each row contains $n$ balls.



            There are $binomn3$ ways to select $3$ balls from them. We can group the ways into $3$ categories:



            1. Select one ball from each row. There are $n$ choices for each row, this contribute $n^3$ ways of pick the balls.


            2. Select two balls from one row and one ball from another row. There are $3 times 2$ ways to select the rows. Since there are $binomn2$ ways to select two balls from a row and $n$ ways to select one balls from a row, this contribute $6 binomn2 n$ ways to pick the balls.


            3. Select three balls from a single row. There are $3$ ways to select the row and $binomn3$ ways to select three balls from that particular row. This contributes $3binomn3$ ways.


            These $3$ categories of choicing doesn't overlap and exhaust all possible ways to select three balls. As a result,



            $$binom3n3 = n^3 + 6binomn2 n + 3binomn3$$






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Arrange $3n$ balls into 3 rows and each row contains $n$ balls.



            There are $binomn3$ ways to select $3$ balls from them. We can group the ways into $3$ categories:



            1. Select one ball from each row. There are $n$ choices for each row, this contribute $n^3$ ways of pick the balls.


            2. Select two balls from one row and one ball from another row. There are $3 times 2$ ways to select the rows. Since there are $binomn2$ ways to select two balls from a row and $n$ ways to select one balls from a row, this contribute $6 binomn2 n$ ways to pick the balls.


            3. Select three balls from a single row. There are $3$ ways to select the row and $binomn3$ ways to select three balls from that particular row. This contributes $3binomn3$ ways.


            These $3$ categories of choicing doesn't overlap and exhaust all possible ways to select three balls. As a result,



            $$binom3n3 = n^3 + 6binomn2 n + 3binomn3$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 41 mins ago









            achille hui

            92.2k5127248




            92.2k5127248











            • Great answer +1!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              36 mins ago
















            • Great answer +1!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              36 mins ago















            Great answer +1!
            – Rushabh Mehta
            36 mins ago




            Great answer +1!
            – Rushabh Mehta
            36 mins ago










            up vote
            2
            down vote













            $$3nchoose3=3nchoose3+6nnchoose2+n^3$$$$frac12ncdot(3n-1)cdot(3n-2)=frac12ncdot(n-1)cdot(n-2)+3n^2cdot(n-1)+n^3$$Can you take it from here?






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • Why do people post algebraic solutions when the OP is asking specifically (in boldface) for a combinatorial proof? Not gonna vote down algebraic solutions though. Just saying. And +1 only to Achille Hui.
              – Ken Draco
              19 mins ago






            • 1




              @KenDraco I might have misread the question at first. Oops!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              17 mins ago










            • I got it. I myself am prone to such things. I just mean all the answers below -:)
              – Ken Draco
              8 mins ago















            up vote
            2
            down vote













            $$3nchoose3=3nchoose3+6nnchoose2+n^3$$$$frac12ncdot(3n-1)cdot(3n-2)=frac12ncdot(n-1)cdot(n-2)+3n^2cdot(n-1)+n^3$$Can you take it from here?






            share|cite|improve this answer






















            • Why do people post algebraic solutions when the OP is asking specifically (in boldface) for a combinatorial proof? Not gonna vote down algebraic solutions though. Just saying. And +1 only to Achille Hui.
              – Ken Draco
              19 mins ago






            • 1




              @KenDraco I might have misread the question at first. Oops!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              17 mins ago










            • I got it. I myself am prone to such things. I just mean all the answers below -:)
              – Ken Draco
              8 mins ago













            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            $$3nchoose3=3nchoose3+6nnchoose2+n^3$$$$frac12ncdot(3n-1)cdot(3n-2)=frac12ncdot(n-1)cdot(n-2)+3n^2cdot(n-1)+n^3$$Can you take it from here?






            share|cite|improve this answer














            $$3nchoose3=3nchoose3+6nnchoose2+n^3$$$$frac12ncdot(3n-1)cdot(3n-2)=frac12ncdot(n-1)cdot(n-2)+3n^2cdot(n-1)+n^3$$Can you take it from here?







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 41 mins ago

























            answered 51 mins ago









            Rushabh Mehta

            3,760530




            3,760530











            • Why do people post algebraic solutions when the OP is asking specifically (in boldface) for a combinatorial proof? Not gonna vote down algebraic solutions though. Just saying. And +1 only to Achille Hui.
              – Ken Draco
              19 mins ago






            • 1




              @KenDraco I might have misread the question at first. Oops!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              17 mins ago










            • I got it. I myself am prone to such things. I just mean all the answers below -:)
              – Ken Draco
              8 mins ago

















            • Why do people post algebraic solutions when the OP is asking specifically (in boldface) for a combinatorial proof? Not gonna vote down algebraic solutions though. Just saying. And +1 only to Achille Hui.
              – Ken Draco
              19 mins ago






            • 1




              @KenDraco I might have misread the question at first. Oops!
              – Rushabh Mehta
              17 mins ago










            • I got it. I myself am prone to such things. I just mean all the answers below -:)
              – Ken Draco
              8 mins ago
















            Why do people post algebraic solutions when the OP is asking specifically (in boldface) for a combinatorial proof? Not gonna vote down algebraic solutions though. Just saying. And +1 only to Achille Hui.
            – Ken Draco
            19 mins ago




            Why do people post algebraic solutions when the OP is asking specifically (in boldface) for a combinatorial proof? Not gonna vote down algebraic solutions though. Just saying. And +1 only to Achille Hui.
            – Ken Draco
            19 mins ago




            1




            1




            @KenDraco I might have misread the question at first. Oops!
            – Rushabh Mehta
            17 mins ago




            @KenDraco I might have misread the question at first. Oops!
            – Rushabh Mehta
            17 mins ago












            I got it. I myself am prone to such things. I just mean all the answers below -:)
            – Ken Draco
            8 mins ago





            I got it. I myself am prone to such things. I just mean all the answers below -:)
            – Ken Draco
            8 mins ago











            up vote
            0
            down vote













            $2!=2, 3!=6$, so:



            $$binom3n3=frac n2(3n-1)(3n-2)$$
            $$3binomn3=frac n2(n-1)(n-2)$$
            $$6nbinomn2=3n^2(n-1)$$



            I used that $$fracx!(x-a)!=x^underlinex-a=prod_n=0^a-1(x-n)$$



            See falling factorials






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              41 mins ago














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            $2!=2, 3!=6$, so:



            $$binom3n3=frac n2(3n-1)(3n-2)$$
            $$3binomn3=frac n2(n-1)(n-2)$$
            $$6nbinomn2=3n^2(n-1)$$



            I used that $$fracx!(x-a)!=x^underlinex-a=prod_n=0^a-1(x-n)$$



            See falling factorials






            share|cite|improve this answer
















            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              41 mins ago












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            $2!=2, 3!=6$, so:



            $$binom3n3=frac n2(3n-1)(3n-2)$$
            $$3binomn3=frac n2(n-1)(n-2)$$
            $$6nbinomn2=3n^2(n-1)$$



            I used that $$fracx!(x-a)!=x^underlinex-a=prod_n=0^a-1(x-n)$$



            See falling factorials






            share|cite|improve this answer












            $2!=2, 3!=6$, so:



            $$binom3n3=frac n2(3n-1)(3n-2)$$
            $$3binomn3=frac n2(n-1)(n-2)$$
            $$6nbinomn2=3n^2(n-1)$$



            I used that $$fracx!(x-a)!=x^underlinex-a=prod_n=0^a-1(x-n)$$



            See falling factorials







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 48 mins ago









            Rhys Hughes

            4,3741327




            4,3741327







            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              41 mins ago












            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              41 mins ago







            2




            2




            This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
            – Mark S.
            41 mins ago




            This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
            – Mark S.
            41 mins ago










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Brute force:



            $27n^3 - 27n^2+ 6n = 27n^3 - 27n^2 + 6n$



            $27n^3 - 9n^2 - 18n^2 + 6n = 3n^3 - 3n^2 - 6n^2 + 6n + 18n^3 - 18n^2 + 6n^3$



            $(9n^2 - 3n)(3n - 2) = (3n^2 - 3n)(n - 2) + 18n^2(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2) = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2) + 3(6n)n(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2)/6 = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2)/6 + (6n)n(n-1)/2 + n^3$



            $binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3$






            share|cite|improve this answer


















            • 1




              A proof that thinks about combination (as in choosing n objects from m objects) is better because it trains intuition. But for simple problems, algebra and brute force is sufficient.
              – R zu
              48 mins ago







            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              40 mins ago














            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Brute force:



            $27n^3 - 27n^2+ 6n = 27n^3 - 27n^2 + 6n$



            $27n^3 - 9n^2 - 18n^2 + 6n = 3n^3 - 3n^2 - 6n^2 + 6n + 18n^3 - 18n^2 + 6n^3$



            $(9n^2 - 3n)(3n - 2) = (3n^2 - 3n)(n - 2) + 18n^2(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2) = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2) + 3(6n)n(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2)/6 = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2)/6 + (6n)n(n-1)/2 + n^3$



            $binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3$






            share|cite|improve this answer


















            • 1




              A proof that thinks about combination (as in choosing n objects from m objects) is better because it trains intuition. But for simple problems, algebra and brute force is sufficient.
              – R zu
              48 mins ago







            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              40 mins ago












            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Brute force:



            $27n^3 - 27n^2+ 6n = 27n^3 - 27n^2 + 6n$



            $27n^3 - 9n^2 - 18n^2 + 6n = 3n^3 - 3n^2 - 6n^2 + 6n + 18n^3 - 18n^2 + 6n^3$



            $(9n^2 - 3n)(3n - 2) = (3n^2 - 3n)(n - 2) + 18n^2(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2) = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2) + 3(6n)n(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2)/6 = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2)/6 + (6n)n(n-1)/2 + n^3$



            $binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Brute force:



            $27n^3 - 27n^2+ 6n = 27n^3 - 27n^2 + 6n$



            $27n^3 - 9n^2 - 18n^2 + 6n = 3n^3 - 3n^2 - 6n^2 + 6n + 18n^3 - 18n^2 + 6n^3$



            $(9n^2 - 3n)(3n - 2) = (3n^2 - 3n)(n - 2) + 18n^2(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2) = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2) + 3(6n)n(n-1) + 6n^3$



            $3n(3n - 1)(3n - 2)/6 = 3n(n - 1)(n - 2)/6 + (6n)n(n-1)/2 + n^3$



            $binom3n3 =3binomn3 +6nbinomn2 +n^3$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 43 mins ago

























            answered 50 mins ago









            R zu

            2379




            2379







            • 1




              A proof that thinks about combination (as in choosing n objects from m objects) is better because it trains intuition. But for simple problems, algebra and brute force is sufficient.
              – R zu
              48 mins ago







            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              40 mins ago












            • 1




              A proof that thinks about combination (as in choosing n objects from m objects) is better because it trains intuition. But for simple problems, algebra and brute force is sufficient.
              – R zu
              48 mins ago







            • 2




              This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
              – Mark S.
              40 mins ago







            1




            1




            A proof that thinks about combination (as in choosing n objects from m objects) is better because it trains intuition. But for simple problems, algebra and brute force is sufficient.
            – R zu
            48 mins ago





            A proof that thinks about combination (as in choosing n objects from m objects) is better because it trains intuition. But for simple problems, algebra and brute force is sufficient.
            – R zu
            48 mins ago





            2




            2




            This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
            – Mark S.
            40 mins ago




            This would be an algebraic proof, not a combinatorial proof.
            – Mark S.
            40 mins ago










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Notice that the LHS is:



            $$frac3n times (3n-1) times (3n-2)3! = fracn times (3n-1) times (3n-2)2$$
            $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



            For the RHS:



            $$3 times fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)3! + 6n times fracntimes(n-1)2! + frac2n^32$$



            $$Longrightarrow fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)2 + frac6n^2 times(n-1)2 + frac2n^32$$



            $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



            Hence, RHS=LHS.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Notice that the LHS is:



              $$frac3n times (3n-1) times (3n-2)3! = fracn times (3n-1) times (3n-2)2$$
              $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



              For the RHS:



              $$3 times fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)3! + 6n times fracntimes(n-1)2! + frac2n^32$$



              $$Longrightarrow fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)2 + frac6n^2 times(n-1)2 + frac2n^32$$



              $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



              Hence, RHS=LHS.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                Notice that the LHS is:



                $$frac3n times (3n-1) times (3n-2)3! = fracn times (3n-1) times (3n-2)2$$
                $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



                For the RHS:



                $$3 times fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)3! + 6n times fracntimes(n-1)2! + frac2n^32$$



                $$Longrightarrow fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)2 + frac6n^2 times(n-1)2 + frac2n^32$$



                $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



                Hence, RHS=LHS.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Notice that the LHS is:



                $$frac3n times (3n-1) times (3n-2)3! = fracn times (3n-1) times (3n-2)2$$
                $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



                For the RHS:



                $$3 times fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)3! + 6n times fracntimes(n-1)2! + frac2n^32$$



                $$Longrightarrow fracntimes(n-1)times(n-2)2 + frac6n^2 times(n-1)2 + frac2n^32$$



                $$to frac9n^3-9n^2+2n2$$



                Hence, RHS=LHS.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 21 mins ago

























                answered 30 mins ago









                Maged Saeed

                419215




                419215



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2983705%2fcombinatorial-proof-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                    One-line joke