Why is Thugs of Hindostan miss-spelt?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












India is also known as Bharat & Hindustan in the Indian Subcontinent.



The upcoming Aamir Khan, Amitabh Bachchan movie is titled Thugs of Hindostan. It is set in 1700 India under British rule. I was wondering why they miss-spelt Hindustan.



It's not like they could get in any legal trouble using the name of an actual place/country. Gangs of Wasseypur, which was a critical & popular hit, was also set in a real town in India with the same name. It could also not get into any political trouble as it is set in a British ruled India & is about the rebellion for freedom.



So why did the producers decided to miss-spell Hindustan as Hindostan. As far as I know & could search, India was never referred to as Hindostan in its history.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    miss-spelt is .
    – Jason P Sallinger
    55 mins ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












India is also known as Bharat & Hindustan in the Indian Subcontinent.



The upcoming Aamir Khan, Amitabh Bachchan movie is titled Thugs of Hindostan. It is set in 1700 India under British rule. I was wondering why they miss-spelt Hindustan.



It's not like they could get in any legal trouble using the name of an actual place/country. Gangs of Wasseypur, which was a critical & popular hit, was also set in a real town in India with the same name. It could also not get into any political trouble as it is set in a British ruled India & is about the rebellion for freedom.



So why did the producers decided to miss-spell Hindustan as Hindostan. As far as I know & could search, India was never referred to as Hindostan in its history.










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    miss-spelt is .
    – Jason P Sallinger
    55 mins ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











India is also known as Bharat & Hindustan in the Indian Subcontinent.



The upcoming Aamir Khan, Amitabh Bachchan movie is titled Thugs of Hindostan. It is set in 1700 India under British rule. I was wondering why they miss-spelt Hindustan.



It's not like they could get in any legal trouble using the name of an actual place/country. Gangs of Wasseypur, which was a critical & popular hit, was also set in a real town in India with the same name. It could also not get into any political trouble as it is set in a British ruled India & is about the rebellion for freedom.



So why did the producers decided to miss-spell Hindustan as Hindostan. As far as I know & could search, India was never referred to as Hindostan in its history.










share|improve this question















India is also known as Bharat & Hindustan in the Indian Subcontinent.



The upcoming Aamir Khan, Amitabh Bachchan movie is titled Thugs of Hindostan. It is set in 1700 India under British rule. I was wondering why they miss-spelt Hindustan.



It's not like they could get in any legal trouble using the name of an actual place/country. Gangs of Wasseypur, which was a critical & popular hit, was also set in a real town in India with the same name. It could also not get into any political trouble as it is set in a British ruled India & is about the rebellion for freedom.



So why did the producers decided to miss-spell Hindustan as Hindostan. As far as I know & could search, India was never referred to as Hindostan in its history.







production title thugs-of-hindostan






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Napoleon Wilson♦

40.6k31250485




40.6k31250485










asked 1 hour ago









KharoBangdo

3,72793672




3,72793672







  • 1




    miss-spelt is .
    – Jason P Sallinger
    55 mins ago












  • 1




    miss-spelt is .
    – Jason P Sallinger
    55 mins ago







1




1




miss-spelt is .
– Jason P Sallinger
55 mins ago




miss-spelt is .
– Jason P Sallinger
55 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













Unfortunately, Wikipedia indicates that, at least for a short time, it WAS known as Hindostan as evidenced by this 1864 image map.



enter image description here



Indeed, earlier spellings included Hindoostan!



Unfortunately, this mispelling or geographical error was not uncommon in British history.




Rennel produced an atlas titled the Memoir of a Map of Hindoostan or the Mogul Empire in 1792, which was in fact a map of the Indian subcontinent. Rennel thus conflated the three notions, 'India', 'Hindustan' and the Mughal Empire.



Wikipedia




One assumes that the producers were attempting some form of authenticity with their title to reflect attitudes at the time.






share|improve this answer






















  • You got there just before with the very same map. @KharoBangdo ... spelling, particularly in the past was very flexible and not standardized.
    – iandotkelly♦
    1 hour ago










  • +1 great find. Although, 'u' can be replaced with 'oo' for writing the word & still be the same phonetically. Anyways, if no one else comes up with a better answer, I'll accept this
    – KharoBangdo
    1 hour ago


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













Unfortunately, Wikipedia indicates that, at least for a short time, it WAS known as Hindostan as evidenced by this 1864 image map.



enter image description here



Indeed, earlier spellings included Hindoostan!



Unfortunately, this mispelling or geographical error was not uncommon in British history.




Rennel produced an atlas titled the Memoir of a Map of Hindoostan or the Mogul Empire in 1792, which was in fact a map of the Indian subcontinent. Rennel thus conflated the three notions, 'India', 'Hindustan' and the Mughal Empire.



Wikipedia




One assumes that the producers were attempting some form of authenticity with their title to reflect attitudes at the time.






share|improve this answer






















  • You got there just before with the very same map. @KharoBangdo ... spelling, particularly in the past was very flexible and not standardized.
    – iandotkelly♦
    1 hour ago










  • +1 great find. Although, 'u' can be replaced with 'oo' for writing the word & still be the same phonetically. Anyways, if no one else comes up with a better answer, I'll accept this
    – KharoBangdo
    1 hour ago














up vote
3
down vote













Unfortunately, Wikipedia indicates that, at least for a short time, it WAS known as Hindostan as evidenced by this 1864 image map.



enter image description here



Indeed, earlier spellings included Hindoostan!



Unfortunately, this mispelling or geographical error was not uncommon in British history.




Rennel produced an atlas titled the Memoir of a Map of Hindoostan or the Mogul Empire in 1792, which was in fact a map of the Indian subcontinent. Rennel thus conflated the three notions, 'India', 'Hindustan' and the Mughal Empire.



Wikipedia




One assumes that the producers were attempting some form of authenticity with their title to reflect attitudes at the time.






share|improve this answer






















  • You got there just before with the very same map. @KharoBangdo ... spelling, particularly in the past was very flexible and not standardized.
    – iandotkelly♦
    1 hour ago










  • +1 great find. Although, 'u' can be replaced with 'oo' for writing the word & still be the same phonetically. Anyways, if no one else comes up with a better answer, I'll accept this
    – KharoBangdo
    1 hour ago












up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









Unfortunately, Wikipedia indicates that, at least for a short time, it WAS known as Hindostan as evidenced by this 1864 image map.



enter image description here



Indeed, earlier spellings included Hindoostan!



Unfortunately, this mispelling or geographical error was not uncommon in British history.




Rennel produced an atlas titled the Memoir of a Map of Hindoostan or the Mogul Empire in 1792, which was in fact a map of the Indian subcontinent. Rennel thus conflated the three notions, 'India', 'Hindustan' and the Mughal Empire.



Wikipedia




One assumes that the producers were attempting some form of authenticity with their title to reflect attitudes at the time.






share|improve this answer














Unfortunately, Wikipedia indicates that, at least for a short time, it WAS known as Hindostan as evidenced by this 1864 image map.



enter image description here



Indeed, earlier spellings included Hindoostan!



Unfortunately, this mispelling or geographical error was not uncommon in British history.




Rennel produced an atlas titled the Memoir of a Map of Hindoostan or the Mogul Empire in 1792, which was in fact a map of the Indian subcontinent. Rennel thus conflated the three notions, 'India', 'Hindustan' and the Mughal Empire.



Wikipedia




One assumes that the producers were attempting some form of authenticity with their title to reflect attitudes at the time.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









Paulie_D

75.3k14263252




75.3k14263252











  • You got there just before with the very same map. @KharoBangdo ... spelling, particularly in the past was very flexible and not standardized.
    – iandotkelly♦
    1 hour ago










  • +1 great find. Although, 'u' can be replaced with 'oo' for writing the word & still be the same phonetically. Anyways, if no one else comes up with a better answer, I'll accept this
    – KharoBangdo
    1 hour ago
















  • You got there just before with the very same map. @KharoBangdo ... spelling, particularly in the past was very flexible and not standardized.
    – iandotkelly♦
    1 hour ago










  • +1 great find. Although, 'u' can be replaced with 'oo' for writing the word & still be the same phonetically. Anyways, if no one else comes up with a better answer, I'll accept this
    – KharoBangdo
    1 hour ago















You got there just before with the very same map. @KharoBangdo ... spelling, particularly in the past was very flexible and not standardized.
– iandotkelly♦
1 hour ago




You got there just before with the very same map. @KharoBangdo ... spelling, particularly in the past was very flexible and not standardized.
– iandotkelly♦
1 hour ago












+1 great find. Although, 'u' can be replaced with 'oo' for writing the word & still be the same phonetically. Anyways, if no one else comes up with a better answer, I'll accept this
– KharoBangdo
1 hour ago




+1 great find. Although, 'u' can be replaced with 'oo' for writing the word & still be the same phonetically. Anyways, if no one else comes up with a better answer, I'll accept this
– KharoBangdo
1 hour ago


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery