I fear I am being set up to be fired by my direct manager. How to save my job?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
128
down vote

favorite
16












I've received nothing but praise for months since I started working as a developer at this company. I've introduced a few changes (scrum, Slack, peer review) that upper management loves. Suddenly, things changed.



My direct manager does not like some of the changes. It seems like he doesn't like change in general (he started this job while I was still in primary school, and he is old enough to be my father), and I suspect he fears I may be after his job.



His goal seems to be to get rid of me. He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do and retracted my scheduled raise. He gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly. He's telling upper management I'm doing badly. He's setting me up to be fired. He has the authority to do so, only my contract doesn't allow him to do so without cause.



I know about CYA. I'm logging my hours, writing down as much as possible, making a plan, etc. I successfully negotiated an internal transfer to a different team, but that doesn't happen until I finish this project that is way over my head. I need to protect myself until I'm ready to transfer.



I've carefully polled my coworkers on what they think of my manager. Other developers don't trust him and don't want to work for him, even other employees managed by him (except one, who gets all the projects). I can't really get the other managers to comment.



How would you advise I handle this? Go to upper management (all employees are on first name basis with the CEO)? Go to HR? If so, what do I say without sounding paranoid? Gather evidence and hope he doesn't fire me before I can switch teams?



I have noticed that upper management seems to be setting up some extra checks on our team. And they approved of my transfer. Maybe they're on to something.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 24




    How does 'nothing but praise' = official warning and retracted raise? And how were you implementing these changes without your direct managers permission or him excercising a veto?
    – Kilisi
    Sep 28 at 9:27






  • 9




    @Kilisi First comment: I suspect the manager fears I may be after his job. Second comment: One example: We were discussing peer review in a break, a team member suggested I pitch it in the next team meeting. I did. Team was enthousiastic, manager wasn't, but said "we'll try it".
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:36







  • 9




    @Kilisi The warning and raise retraction happened pretty recently. I've been putting my head down since. But I do not intend to be mediocre because I might hurt someone's pride.
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:44











  • How "way over your head" is the project after which you can transfer? Won't teammates help? If they pitch in? if you do overtime? Perhaps there's a ready solution that can be bought?
    – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
    2 days ago






  • 11




    It might make sense to change the title of this question. "Thrown under the bus" usually means used as a scapegoat for something that went wrong but [mostly] wasn't your fault. Here it sounds more like you're just being sabotaged by a jealous or irrationally hateful manager.
    – R..
    yesterday
















up vote
128
down vote

favorite
16












I've received nothing but praise for months since I started working as a developer at this company. I've introduced a few changes (scrum, Slack, peer review) that upper management loves. Suddenly, things changed.



My direct manager does not like some of the changes. It seems like he doesn't like change in general (he started this job while I was still in primary school, and he is old enough to be my father), and I suspect he fears I may be after his job.



His goal seems to be to get rid of me. He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do and retracted my scheduled raise. He gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly. He's telling upper management I'm doing badly. He's setting me up to be fired. He has the authority to do so, only my contract doesn't allow him to do so without cause.



I know about CYA. I'm logging my hours, writing down as much as possible, making a plan, etc. I successfully negotiated an internal transfer to a different team, but that doesn't happen until I finish this project that is way over my head. I need to protect myself until I'm ready to transfer.



I've carefully polled my coworkers on what they think of my manager. Other developers don't trust him and don't want to work for him, even other employees managed by him (except one, who gets all the projects). I can't really get the other managers to comment.



How would you advise I handle this? Go to upper management (all employees are on first name basis with the CEO)? Go to HR? If so, what do I say without sounding paranoid? Gather evidence and hope he doesn't fire me before I can switch teams?



I have noticed that upper management seems to be setting up some extra checks on our team. And they approved of my transfer. Maybe they're on to something.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 24




    How does 'nothing but praise' = official warning and retracted raise? And how were you implementing these changes without your direct managers permission or him excercising a veto?
    – Kilisi
    Sep 28 at 9:27






  • 9




    @Kilisi First comment: I suspect the manager fears I may be after his job. Second comment: One example: We were discussing peer review in a break, a team member suggested I pitch it in the next team meeting. I did. Team was enthousiastic, manager wasn't, but said "we'll try it".
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:36







  • 9




    @Kilisi The warning and raise retraction happened pretty recently. I've been putting my head down since. But I do not intend to be mediocre because I might hurt someone's pride.
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:44











  • How "way over your head" is the project after which you can transfer? Won't teammates help? If they pitch in? if you do overtime? Perhaps there's a ready solution that can be bought?
    – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
    2 days ago






  • 11




    It might make sense to change the title of this question. "Thrown under the bus" usually means used as a scapegoat for something that went wrong but [mostly] wasn't your fault. Here it sounds more like you're just being sabotaged by a jealous or irrationally hateful manager.
    – R..
    yesterday












up vote
128
down vote

favorite
16









up vote
128
down vote

favorite
16






16





I've received nothing but praise for months since I started working as a developer at this company. I've introduced a few changes (scrum, Slack, peer review) that upper management loves. Suddenly, things changed.



My direct manager does not like some of the changes. It seems like he doesn't like change in general (he started this job while I was still in primary school, and he is old enough to be my father), and I suspect he fears I may be after his job.



His goal seems to be to get rid of me. He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do and retracted my scheduled raise. He gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly. He's telling upper management I'm doing badly. He's setting me up to be fired. He has the authority to do so, only my contract doesn't allow him to do so without cause.



I know about CYA. I'm logging my hours, writing down as much as possible, making a plan, etc. I successfully negotiated an internal transfer to a different team, but that doesn't happen until I finish this project that is way over my head. I need to protect myself until I'm ready to transfer.



I've carefully polled my coworkers on what they think of my manager. Other developers don't trust him and don't want to work for him, even other employees managed by him (except one, who gets all the projects). I can't really get the other managers to comment.



How would you advise I handle this? Go to upper management (all employees are on first name basis with the CEO)? Go to HR? If so, what do I say without sounding paranoid? Gather evidence and hope he doesn't fire me before I can switch teams?



I have noticed that upper management seems to be setting up some extra checks on our team. And they approved of my transfer. Maybe they're on to something.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I've received nothing but praise for months since I started working as a developer at this company. I've introduced a few changes (scrum, Slack, peer review) that upper management loves. Suddenly, things changed.



My direct manager does not like some of the changes. It seems like he doesn't like change in general (he started this job while I was still in primary school, and he is old enough to be my father), and I suspect he fears I may be after his job.



His goal seems to be to get rid of me. He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do and retracted my scheduled raise. He gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly. He's telling upper management I'm doing badly. He's setting me up to be fired. He has the authority to do so, only my contract doesn't allow him to do so without cause.



I know about CYA. I'm logging my hours, writing down as much as possible, making a plan, etc. I successfully negotiated an internal transfer to a different team, but that doesn't happen until I finish this project that is way over my head. I need to protect myself until I'm ready to transfer.



I've carefully polled my coworkers on what they think of my manager. Other developers don't trust him and don't want to work for him, even other employees managed by him (except one, who gets all the projects). I can't really get the other managers to comment.



How would you advise I handle this? Go to upper management (all employees are on first name basis with the CEO)? Go to HR? If so, what do I say without sounding paranoid? Gather evidence and hope he doesn't fire me before I can switch teams?



I have noticed that upper management seems to be setting up some extra checks on our team. And they approved of my transfer. Maybe they're on to something.







management manager unprofessional-behavior termination netherlands






share|improve this question









New contributor




Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 mins ago









sleske

9,80633655




9,80633655






New contributor




Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Sep 28 at 9:09









Anonymous

433227




433227




New contributor




Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Anonymous is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 24




    How does 'nothing but praise' = official warning and retracted raise? And how were you implementing these changes without your direct managers permission or him excercising a veto?
    – Kilisi
    Sep 28 at 9:27






  • 9




    @Kilisi First comment: I suspect the manager fears I may be after his job. Second comment: One example: We were discussing peer review in a break, a team member suggested I pitch it in the next team meeting. I did. Team was enthousiastic, manager wasn't, but said "we'll try it".
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:36







  • 9




    @Kilisi The warning and raise retraction happened pretty recently. I've been putting my head down since. But I do not intend to be mediocre because I might hurt someone's pride.
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:44











  • How "way over your head" is the project after which you can transfer? Won't teammates help? If they pitch in? if you do overtime? Perhaps there's a ready solution that can be bought?
    – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
    2 days ago






  • 11




    It might make sense to change the title of this question. "Thrown under the bus" usually means used as a scapegoat for something that went wrong but [mostly] wasn't your fault. Here it sounds more like you're just being sabotaged by a jealous or irrationally hateful manager.
    – R..
    yesterday












  • 24




    How does 'nothing but praise' = official warning and retracted raise? And how were you implementing these changes without your direct managers permission or him excercising a veto?
    – Kilisi
    Sep 28 at 9:27






  • 9




    @Kilisi First comment: I suspect the manager fears I may be after his job. Second comment: One example: We were discussing peer review in a break, a team member suggested I pitch it in the next team meeting. I did. Team was enthousiastic, manager wasn't, but said "we'll try it".
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:36







  • 9




    @Kilisi The warning and raise retraction happened pretty recently. I've been putting my head down since. But I do not intend to be mediocre because I might hurt someone's pride.
    – Anonymous
    Sep 28 at 9:44











  • How "way over your head" is the project after which you can transfer? Won't teammates help? If they pitch in? if you do overtime? Perhaps there's a ready solution that can be bought?
    – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
    2 days ago






  • 11




    It might make sense to change the title of this question. "Thrown under the bus" usually means used as a scapegoat for something that went wrong but [mostly] wasn't your fault. Here it sounds more like you're just being sabotaged by a jealous or irrationally hateful manager.
    – R..
    yesterday







24




24




How does 'nothing but praise' = official warning and retracted raise? And how were you implementing these changes without your direct managers permission or him excercising a veto?
– Kilisi
Sep 28 at 9:27




How does 'nothing but praise' = official warning and retracted raise? And how were you implementing these changes without your direct managers permission or him excercising a veto?
– Kilisi
Sep 28 at 9:27




9




9




@Kilisi First comment: I suspect the manager fears I may be after his job. Second comment: One example: We were discussing peer review in a break, a team member suggested I pitch it in the next team meeting. I did. Team was enthousiastic, manager wasn't, but said "we'll try it".
– Anonymous
Sep 28 at 9:36





@Kilisi First comment: I suspect the manager fears I may be after his job. Second comment: One example: We were discussing peer review in a break, a team member suggested I pitch it in the next team meeting. I did. Team was enthousiastic, manager wasn't, but said "we'll try it".
– Anonymous
Sep 28 at 9:36





9




9




@Kilisi The warning and raise retraction happened pretty recently. I've been putting my head down since. But I do not intend to be mediocre because I might hurt someone's pride.
– Anonymous
Sep 28 at 9:44





@Kilisi The warning and raise retraction happened pretty recently. I've been putting my head down since. But I do not intend to be mediocre because I might hurt someone's pride.
– Anonymous
Sep 28 at 9:44













How "way over your head" is the project after which you can transfer? Won't teammates help? If they pitch in? if you do overtime? Perhaps there's a ready solution that can be bought?
– LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
2 days ago




How "way over your head" is the project after which you can transfer? Won't teammates help? If they pitch in? if you do overtime? Perhaps there's a ready solution that can be bought?
– LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
2 days ago




11




11




It might make sense to change the title of this question. "Thrown under the bus" usually means used as a scapegoat for something that went wrong but [mostly] wasn't your fault. Here it sounds more like you're just being sabotaged by a jealous or irrationally hateful manager.
– R..
yesterday




It might make sense to change the title of this question. "Thrown under the bus" usually means used as a scapegoat for something that went wrong but [mostly] wasn't your fault. Here it sounds more like you're just being sabotaged by a jealous or irrationally hateful manager.
– R..
yesterday










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
193
down vote



accepted










This sounds like someone actively trying to sabotage your position in this company. In a situation like this, it's plain bullying. It's time to end the pleasantries and fight back hard whenever anything like this occurs.



So as soon as something like this happens:




He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do




Then you reply, copying HR and the CEO in (if that would be appropriate in your company), and state something to the effect of:




I have received this warning dated (x), for (y). This is a complete fabrication, these events never occurred, and I therefore contest this allegation in the strongest possible fashion. I'd like to request a formal meeting to discuss this matter.




You then attend the meeting with HR, present your version of events with all the evidence you have, and the allegation should go away at that point.



Likewise for this point:




He gives me tasks that take months with a team to do alone and complains when I don't finish them quickly.




You should immediately push back when you get a task in this fashion with a breakdown of the man hours required, ask when it needs to be completed by, and then specifically ask how he's going to deal with the discrepancy between hours and time. (Are you going to be paid overtime? Are you going to be allocated a team? Is he going to drop some of the required features?)



Again, when your raise was taken away - you push back, you ask why, you involve HR, go through the official channels and get it sorted out.



Quite honestly, if it were me I'd be looking for employment elsewhere rather than trasferring within the same company. You never know what influence or friends this manager may have elsewhere otherwise.






share|improve this answer




















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    – Snow♦
    23 hours ago

















up vote
51
down vote














I suspect he fears I may be after his job.




Prove him right.



On top of following the suggestions listed by berry120; I'd talk to the head of department and tell them you've introduced a collection of new policies, but they're not liked by your manager - and you'd like to lead a team to prove their effectiveness.



If he doesn't want to use modern practices, that's absolutely up to him; and your effort will be reverted. It will also be his death knell though if you push back and highlight that the practices they like he doesn't. Use the fact that they like what you've introduced to demonstrate that you can keep adding value ...






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    6
    down vote













    I would ask for advice from HR - as on the face of what you've written it appears your manager is bullying you.




    • gave me an official warning for something I didn't do

    • retracted my scheduled raise

    • gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly

    • tells upper management I'm doing badly



    ...if you have evidence of his negative comments to upper management that would help, though even if you've overheard these comments I'd still raise them with HR. Even though you have your transfer it'll be good for the firm to know why and to help prevent the same thing happening again with someone else. They'll have a process in place which might be better than going direct to senior management / CEO.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 6




      As @Kilisi has pointed out: do not tell HR you think you're being set up to be fired!
      – Matthew E Cornish
      Sep 28 at 10:11






    • 7




      Advice from HR?
      – Strawberry
      Sep 28 at 12:13






    • 5




      I wouldn't go asking HR for advice. That's really not their job.
      – Strawberry
      Sep 28 at 12:18






    • 19




      "[HR] should be your first port of call when you have issues you can't take up with management." I couldn't disagree more. HR are not there to help you: they are there to perform general CYA for the company and management, and to minimise company exposure for employee-related mess-ups. (They might tell you that they are on your side or act like it. Don't buy it.) Unions, on the other hand... literally there to serve your interests and usually have confidential legal services available for members. Annual dues are probably less than you'd pay a lawyer just for a one-off consultation.
      – tmgr
      Sep 28 at 18:04






    • 8




      @tmgr The "HR is not your friend" line doesn't quite apply here. This is because the manager's behavior is so egregious that HR's interests in protecting the company and OP's interests in being treated fairly overlap. If HR doesn't take his side, the inevitable lawsuit against the company, should OP pursue it, will be even more black-and-white.
      – Kevin
      Sep 28 at 22:03

















    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Let me see if I can cut to the core of what you are saying because everyone else seems to misunderstand what you actually have done: you implemented a few soft features like morning meetings and chat software. Upper management heard that a new dev was implementing soft features and naturally they loved it (because all they do is implement soft features and they love to see initiative). Then, when it came to actually implementing hard features (developing software), you are incapable.



    Everyone else is impressed by your initiative, but I'm going to be honest, what I see is someone with more gusto than programming skills. A lot of devs come into the industry like this, with much HN/SO/reddit gusto about what software development should be about and minimal skills.



    Implementing soft features is easy. Impressing execs in the short term is easy. Developing software is hard. It is a day in, day out grind. Software takes a long time to implement, development takes a long time to get good at.



    Take one step back as a process advocate, take one step forward as a grinder. Give it a few years to congeal and crystallize.



    As for your manager, he has a real problem on his hands. He has wild card with no real skills. He seems justified in his opinion.



    Tone down the divisiveness and just program.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 8




      I don't think I see anything in the post that indicates that all the OP has done so far has been "soft features". If he's been there for "months" (presumably 3-6) I'm guessing he's done some coding as well.
      – DaveG
      Sep 28 at 17:06






    • 6




      I don't know what basis there is to conclude the OP is incapable. They could be, or they could be extremely capable, and without more information, we can't know which. They were accepted for a transfer, which might provide some indication that another team considers them capable enough to do the job. The OP didn't say they were incapable of doing the assigned tasks, but rather that the manager complained about how long they took. It's possible that the OP is slower than others or that the manager has unreasonable exceptions, and we don't know which is the case there either.
      – Zach Lipton
      2 days ago






    • 1




      What are soft and hard features? Is it like soft and hard skills? Do you mean that changes to coding process is a soft feature?
      – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
      2 days ago






    • 3




      It sounds like the assigned tasks were estimated by the manager, not the coder. You can't hold failing them against the developer. Especially if the developer knows at the moment of assignment that the estimation is BS.
      – Erik
      yesterday






    • 3




      Accusing the OP of being a fraud without any proof doesn't seem very polite.
      – algiogia
      15 hours ago

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    First, I'm sincerely sorry for you; I've been in your situation just a few months ago.



    Whether you plan to leave or stay, FIND A NEW JOB NOW! This is the surest way to CYA and a new job offer is your capital to fight the bully without restraint and without devastating consequences should you lose the fight.



    Meanwhile, don't give him the opportunity to emotionally attack you. If he never does his acts in the presence of certain people (e.g. the CEO), make a note of that so that when those people are away and your manager is here, you know to go take a dump or join water cooler chat somewhere else. You want to preserve your physical and mental health as you fight this long, ugly battle.



    If he comes to your cubicle because he just saw the code you've assembled under 5 minutes to do an ad hoc one-time test that you shared with your team on Slack, and declares in a voice loud enough for the whole office to hear: "you wrote this wrong, do you even code?" You work him through the lousy but pragmatic code and speak to him in an equally loud voice "... So in this specific case, we arrive at 1 + 1 = 2. Is 1 + 1 not equal to 2?" He would soften his tone, smile at you and try to change the topic or focus on other irrelevant aspects of the code because he just made a fool of himself.



    If your manager is also technical and writes programs as part of his job, review his code. You might find vulnerabilities to SQL injections everywhere, amateurish crap fixable with only an extra two lines of code. Hack it and try it (delete a table you created specifically to demo this security hole). Wait for the right opportunity to make a public (or private) display of it.



    If your manager ever referred to his subordinates as "brats" in IM, take a screenshot of that and save copies of it. You could also secretly record your manager verbally abusing you if you want to take the risk. Yes, it is illegal to record a conversation without the participants' knowledge and consent, but you need all the evidence you can get your hands on to expose what an a-hole your "manager" really is and how his toxicity will ruin the company. However, only consider doing this if you are sure the CEO is neither stupid, soft nor evil, and also not if that manager is keeping the company hostage, as, together with allies if possible, you're going to talk directly to the CEO as soon as you receive a decent/great job offer letter and present the manager as a liability/risk and totally replaceable employee to the company and help the CEO arrive at the conclusion to fire this bully, or resign on the spot and wish the CEO good luck if this doesn't work out.



    Your manager will not stop undermining you. He will give you tasks with tight or impossible deadlines, or tasks that have little to no visibility if you do a great job but high (negative) visibility if you do a bad job, or both. For example, maintaining RDMS databases with very high read and write volumes when you're not even an aspiring DBA rookie.



    I was able to judge the CEO at my last job was stupid in my first meeting with him, and his company was held hostage by a senior staff who would soon be joined by a manager bully, so I didn't follow through with my suggestion of bringing this matter to the CEO. Therefore, I don't know if what I've said is sound or even realistic, as I'm not well-versed in office politics. But luck was on my side and I'm now working the best job I've had out of my last 4 in 3 years despite only obtaining a verbal job offer when I gave my notice because I couldn't take it anymore. I wish things work out for the better for you, too. You don't deserve to be treated like shit; he does.






    share|improve this answer





























      up vote
      -1
      down vote













      This has happened to me recently, and I did transfer within the organisation (different company, same corporation) to a position underneath a CEO who saw my potential and the work I had done and showed his appreciation for them by approaching me with a job offer as soon as the rumour mill reached him.



      If upper management is aware of both the success of the changes you introduced and the fact that you introduced them, then there is likely someone there who values your contribution to the company. You built a check with your successes, now is the time to cash it.



      Do approach this person directly. You are already in line for a transfer so your goal is not to find a solution or get your manager fired or whatever. Your goal is to secure the successes you have made for the company. Outline the changes and their benefits for the company and voice your concern that they might be reverted after you leave the position. Discuss with upper management that your concern is for your team mates and the success of the team and you want to make sure to leave the team in the best possible way. Ask what steps you need to take to ensure that your legacy lives on without you (in less poetic words maybe) and outline that your manager is a hindrance in this process and not a help, which is the reason you went past him.



      Also outline the bullying efforts he has conducted and tell that you fear that he is trying to set you up even now, possibly as a means to undermine the changes made and to sabotage your transfer. This is an important point! You found a solution to the situation, which frankly speaking is a management responsibility, and you acted on it and he is trying to undermine it. This is bad for the company! A conflict was solved and is now being reheated for no reason. This is not in the interest of the company. This is the point you should stress.



      If the shit hits the fan, you will be in a 100% better position if you told about it before. I made this mistake and waited until the situation could not be resolved anymore. It came to the point where one of us had to leave. I didn't want his job (too much administrative work) so I gladly went to our sister company instead of trying to oust him. I see you made the same choice, so stop competing with him. Try to reduce the conflict to a minimum but keep CYA.



      We have little information about the details of your situation. You need to evaluate these carefully, at best with a person you trust and who knows at least some of it. Spouse, best friend, etc. - not a co-worker! Office politics can be complicated and there are surely details you didn't mention.



      Don't underestimate the impact that you can make. In my case, the problematic manager did not survive me leaving. A short time after I changed positions, the rumour mill told me that he is exiting the company "at his own choice".






      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        -1
        down vote













        An alternative perspective:



        You are a new developer at the company, but the things you have introduced (scrum, Slack, peer review) are management things. You are undercutting the authority of your manager, especially bringing these things up at team meetings where the manager has had no time to think them over. Maybe the manager doesn't like the scrum style, thinks Slack is distracting, and peer review not a good use of time for the current projects. Maybe they had never heard about them before and resent being effectively forced to implement them... And worse now you are fostering discontent among the team by canvassing their opinions about the manager.



        If you want to introduce new processes, go discuss it with the manager first, get them on side with your ideas. Give them time to think about it, and adapt it how they see fit.



        Stop doing the rounds, incepting ideas about the manager with your colleagues.



        Think if some of the coding criticism is valid - are the tasks really that hard? Put in a good effort to get them done.



        It might be difficult, but perhaps you could have a one on one talk with the manager to see what you could be doing better, and maybe clear the air a bit.






        share|improve this answer




















        • It sounds like there's a real possibility that this is what's going on! It's also possible that it's a combination of effects: new dev doesn't yet know how to push back against unreasonable manager time demands AND is undercutting the manager by trying to do mgr's job and now fomenting discontent among other staff (not intentionally, but out of naivete--it takes a while in the workforce to "get it").
          – bob
          15 hours ago











        • He's undercutting sure, but this isn't the way management should go about rolling back his changes.
          – Steve
          15 hours ago

















        up vote
        -3
        down vote













        I'd probably stop rocking the boat. When you start working in a new place you need to adapt to their ways of working, not look like a control freak trying to change too many things. Sure you could maybe improve things or whatever, but sometimes it's better to accept things and try to work with the current systems. Trying to change things early on is a great way to rub people up the wrong way.



        If you want to implement change, do it slowly and make sure you have the right people on board, otherwise these sort of politics can come into play.



        As far as the project being over your head, if a project is over your head then you need to tell someone. The longer your leave it the more serious it will become. Always tell people what resources you will need for a job (including support from other staff). It's important to establish roles in each project.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.













        • 21




          Not the downvoter, but I do disagree wit your answer: He was doing a good job, upper management liked his changes. Then suddenly that changed. That rarely happens naturally
          – Martijn
          Sep 28 at 13:03











        • @Martijn: Does upper management actually know the effect of his changes on productivity (I'd guess not), or are they just hearing some lately-popular buzzwords, and acting like cheerleaders?
          – jamesqf
          Sep 28 at 16:06






        • 3




          While this may or may not be good advice for his next job, I don't think it will work at his current one. The die is cast, and either he or his boss (or both) is going to lose.
          – Jim Clay
          Sep 28 at 16:10










        • I think the challenge here is we're assuming that OP, who is new to their job, is able to make an accurate assessment of their situation. That's often not the case for new employees (definitely wasn't for me when I started) due to the Dunning Kruger Effect. It can take a few years of experience under your belt to be able to accurately assess your job situation. So OP could very likely be reading things all wrong. I think the assessment made in this answer is much more likely, and deserves more upvotes.
          – bob
          15 hours ago


















        up vote
        -4
        down vote













        You are too good for your position.



        Of course no one is ever going to tell you that, since it would likely give you hubris.



        Instead, they will try to make it so uncomfortable for you that you will start looking for a better suited position. That way, they will have your self image under much stricter checks. Both the current employer and a future employer don't want some guy with uncontrollable hubris.






        share|improve this answer






















        • He admitted that he was incapable of doing his position. You only have his word for it that his manager is 'out to get him'.
          – Jamie Clinton
          Sep 28 at 17:02










        • @JamieClinton : He could have documented the praise and the raise and the rest of the positive things before the change as well as the negative things after the change. Actions speak louder than words sometimes.
          – mathreadler
          Sep 28 at 17:04










        • I just disagree strongly on what actions we are seeing here. I don't see anything important. If he would have said, just once, that he had an excellent track record as a coder, my opinion would be 180 degrees different.
          – Jamie Clinton
          Sep 28 at 17:12










        • @JamieClinton some of the best can be quite humble and some of the worst are boasty and hopelessly clueless of how clueless they are. Just because someone says they are good it doesn't prove it.
          – mathreadler
          Sep 28 at 17:15






        • 2




          This doesn't appear to be providing an actionable solution, just commentary on the situation, so I'm flagging it as not an answer.
          – doppelgreener
          8 hours ago










        Your Answer







        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "423"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: false,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        noCode: true, onDemand: false,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Anonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119909%2fi-fear-i-am-being-set-up-to-be-fired-by-my-direct-manager-how-to-save-my-job%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest

























        StackExchange.ready(function ()
        $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
        var showEditor = function()
        $("#show-editor-button").hide();
        $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
        StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
        ;

        var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
        if(useFancy == 'True')
        var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
        var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
        var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

        $(this).loadPopup(
        url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
        loaded: function(popup)
        var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
        var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
        var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

        pTitle.text(popupTitle);
        pBody.html(popupBody);
        pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

        )
        else
        var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
        if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
        showEditor();


        );
        );






        9 Answers
        9






        active

        oldest

        votes








        9 Answers
        9






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        193
        down vote



        accepted










        This sounds like someone actively trying to sabotage your position in this company. In a situation like this, it's plain bullying. It's time to end the pleasantries and fight back hard whenever anything like this occurs.



        So as soon as something like this happens:




        He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do




        Then you reply, copying HR and the CEO in (if that would be appropriate in your company), and state something to the effect of:




        I have received this warning dated (x), for (y). This is a complete fabrication, these events never occurred, and I therefore contest this allegation in the strongest possible fashion. I'd like to request a formal meeting to discuss this matter.




        You then attend the meeting with HR, present your version of events with all the evidence you have, and the allegation should go away at that point.



        Likewise for this point:




        He gives me tasks that take months with a team to do alone and complains when I don't finish them quickly.




        You should immediately push back when you get a task in this fashion with a breakdown of the man hours required, ask when it needs to be completed by, and then specifically ask how he's going to deal with the discrepancy between hours and time. (Are you going to be paid overtime? Are you going to be allocated a team? Is he going to drop some of the required features?)



        Again, when your raise was taken away - you push back, you ask why, you involve HR, go through the official channels and get it sorted out.



        Quite honestly, if it were me I'd be looking for employment elsewhere rather than trasferring within the same company. You never know what influence or friends this manager may have elsewhere otherwise.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
          – Snow♦
          23 hours ago














        up vote
        193
        down vote



        accepted










        This sounds like someone actively trying to sabotage your position in this company. In a situation like this, it's plain bullying. It's time to end the pleasantries and fight back hard whenever anything like this occurs.



        So as soon as something like this happens:




        He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do




        Then you reply, copying HR and the CEO in (if that would be appropriate in your company), and state something to the effect of:




        I have received this warning dated (x), for (y). This is a complete fabrication, these events never occurred, and I therefore contest this allegation in the strongest possible fashion. I'd like to request a formal meeting to discuss this matter.




        You then attend the meeting with HR, present your version of events with all the evidence you have, and the allegation should go away at that point.



        Likewise for this point:




        He gives me tasks that take months with a team to do alone and complains when I don't finish them quickly.




        You should immediately push back when you get a task in this fashion with a breakdown of the man hours required, ask when it needs to be completed by, and then specifically ask how he's going to deal with the discrepancy between hours and time. (Are you going to be paid overtime? Are you going to be allocated a team? Is he going to drop some of the required features?)



        Again, when your raise was taken away - you push back, you ask why, you involve HR, go through the official channels and get it sorted out.



        Quite honestly, if it were me I'd be looking for employment elsewhere rather than trasferring within the same company. You never know what influence or friends this manager may have elsewhere otherwise.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
          – Snow♦
          23 hours ago












        up vote
        193
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        193
        down vote



        accepted






        This sounds like someone actively trying to sabotage your position in this company. In a situation like this, it's plain bullying. It's time to end the pleasantries and fight back hard whenever anything like this occurs.



        So as soon as something like this happens:




        He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do




        Then you reply, copying HR and the CEO in (if that would be appropriate in your company), and state something to the effect of:




        I have received this warning dated (x), for (y). This is a complete fabrication, these events never occurred, and I therefore contest this allegation in the strongest possible fashion. I'd like to request a formal meeting to discuss this matter.




        You then attend the meeting with HR, present your version of events with all the evidence you have, and the allegation should go away at that point.



        Likewise for this point:




        He gives me tasks that take months with a team to do alone and complains when I don't finish them quickly.




        You should immediately push back when you get a task in this fashion with a breakdown of the man hours required, ask when it needs to be completed by, and then specifically ask how he's going to deal with the discrepancy between hours and time. (Are you going to be paid overtime? Are you going to be allocated a team? Is he going to drop some of the required features?)



        Again, when your raise was taken away - you push back, you ask why, you involve HR, go through the official channels and get it sorted out.



        Quite honestly, if it were me I'd be looking for employment elsewhere rather than trasferring within the same company. You never know what influence or friends this manager may have elsewhere otherwise.






        share|improve this answer












        This sounds like someone actively trying to sabotage your position in this company. In a situation like this, it's plain bullying. It's time to end the pleasantries and fight back hard whenever anything like this occurs.



        So as soon as something like this happens:




        He gave me an official warning for something I didn't do




        Then you reply, copying HR and the CEO in (if that would be appropriate in your company), and state something to the effect of:




        I have received this warning dated (x), for (y). This is a complete fabrication, these events never occurred, and I therefore contest this allegation in the strongest possible fashion. I'd like to request a formal meeting to discuss this matter.




        You then attend the meeting with HR, present your version of events with all the evidence you have, and the allegation should go away at that point.



        Likewise for this point:




        He gives me tasks that take months with a team to do alone and complains when I don't finish them quickly.




        You should immediately push back when you get a task in this fashion with a breakdown of the man hours required, ask when it needs to be completed by, and then specifically ask how he's going to deal with the discrepancy between hours and time. (Are you going to be paid overtime? Are you going to be allocated a team? Is he going to drop some of the required features?)



        Again, when your raise was taken away - you push back, you ask why, you involve HR, go through the official channels and get it sorted out.



        Quite honestly, if it were me I'd be looking for employment elsewhere rather than trasferring within the same company. You never know what influence or friends this manager may have elsewhere otherwise.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 28 at 10:10









        berry120

        8,32441132




        8,32441132











        • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
          – Snow♦
          23 hours ago
















        • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
          – Snow♦
          23 hours ago















        Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
        – Snow♦
        23 hours ago




        Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
        – Snow♦
        23 hours ago












        up vote
        51
        down vote














        I suspect he fears I may be after his job.




        Prove him right.



        On top of following the suggestions listed by berry120; I'd talk to the head of department and tell them you've introduced a collection of new policies, but they're not liked by your manager - and you'd like to lead a team to prove their effectiveness.



        If he doesn't want to use modern practices, that's absolutely up to him; and your effort will be reverted. It will also be his death knell though if you push back and highlight that the practices they like he doesn't. Use the fact that they like what you've introduced to demonstrate that you can keep adding value ...






        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          51
          down vote














          I suspect he fears I may be after his job.




          Prove him right.



          On top of following the suggestions listed by berry120; I'd talk to the head of department and tell them you've introduced a collection of new policies, but they're not liked by your manager - and you'd like to lead a team to prove their effectiveness.



          If he doesn't want to use modern practices, that's absolutely up to him; and your effort will be reverted. It will also be his death knell though if you push back and highlight that the practices they like he doesn't. Use the fact that they like what you've introduced to demonstrate that you can keep adding value ...






          share|improve this answer






















            up vote
            51
            down vote










            up vote
            51
            down vote










            I suspect he fears I may be after his job.




            Prove him right.



            On top of following the suggestions listed by berry120; I'd talk to the head of department and tell them you've introduced a collection of new policies, but they're not liked by your manager - and you'd like to lead a team to prove their effectiveness.



            If he doesn't want to use modern practices, that's absolutely up to him; and your effort will be reverted. It will also be his death knell though if you push back and highlight that the practices they like he doesn't. Use the fact that they like what you've introduced to demonstrate that you can keep adding value ...






            share|improve this answer













            I suspect he fears I may be after his job.




            Prove him right.



            On top of following the suggestions listed by berry120; I'd talk to the head of department and tell them you've introduced a collection of new policies, but they're not liked by your manager - and you'd like to lead a team to prove their effectiveness.



            If he doesn't want to use modern practices, that's absolutely up to him; and your effort will be reverted. It will also be his death knell though if you push back and highlight that the practices they like he doesn't. Use the fact that they like what you've introduced to demonstrate that you can keep adding value ...







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Sep 28 at 16:12









            UKMonkey

            1,868512




            1,868512




















                up vote
                6
                down vote













                I would ask for advice from HR - as on the face of what you've written it appears your manager is bullying you.




                • gave me an official warning for something I didn't do

                • retracted my scheduled raise

                • gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly

                • tells upper management I'm doing badly



                ...if you have evidence of his negative comments to upper management that would help, though even if you've overheard these comments I'd still raise them with HR. Even though you have your transfer it'll be good for the firm to know why and to help prevent the same thing happening again with someone else. They'll have a process in place which might be better than going direct to senior management / CEO.






                share|improve this answer
















                • 6




                  As @Kilisi has pointed out: do not tell HR you think you're being set up to be fired!
                  – Matthew E Cornish
                  Sep 28 at 10:11






                • 7




                  Advice from HR?
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:13






                • 5




                  I wouldn't go asking HR for advice. That's really not their job.
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:18






                • 19




                  "[HR] should be your first port of call when you have issues you can't take up with management." I couldn't disagree more. HR are not there to help you: they are there to perform general CYA for the company and management, and to minimise company exposure for employee-related mess-ups. (They might tell you that they are on your side or act like it. Don't buy it.) Unions, on the other hand... literally there to serve your interests and usually have confidential legal services available for members. Annual dues are probably less than you'd pay a lawyer just for a one-off consultation.
                  – tmgr
                  Sep 28 at 18:04






                • 8




                  @tmgr The "HR is not your friend" line doesn't quite apply here. This is because the manager's behavior is so egregious that HR's interests in protecting the company and OP's interests in being treated fairly overlap. If HR doesn't take his side, the inevitable lawsuit against the company, should OP pursue it, will be even more black-and-white.
                  – Kevin
                  Sep 28 at 22:03














                up vote
                6
                down vote













                I would ask for advice from HR - as on the face of what you've written it appears your manager is bullying you.




                • gave me an official warning for something I didn't do

                • retracted my scheduled raise

                • gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly

                • tells upper management I'm doing badly



                ...if you have evidence of his negative comments to upper management that would help, though even if you've overheard these comments I'd still raise them with HR. Even though you have your transfer it'll be good for the firm to know why and to help prevent the same thing happening again with someone else. They'll have a process in place which might be better than going direct to senior management / CEO.






                share|improve this answer
















                • 6




                  As @Kilisi has pointed out: do not tell HR you think you're being set up to be fired!
                  – Matthew E Cornish
                  Sep 28 at 10:11






                • 7




                  Advice from HR?
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:13






                • 5




                  I wouldn't go asking HR for advice. That's really not their job.
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:18






                • 19




                  "[HR] should be your first port of call when you have issues you can't take up with management." I couldn't disagree more. HR are not there to help you: they are there to perform general CYA for the company and management, and to minimise company exposure for employee-related mess-ups. (They might tell you that they are on your side or act like it. Don't buy it.) Unions, on the other hand... literally there to serve your interests and usually have confidential legal services available for members. Annual dues are probably less than you'd pay a lawyer just for a one-off consultation.
                  – tmgr
                  Sep 28 at 18:04






                • 8




                  @tmgr The "HR is not your friend" line doesn't quite apply here. This is because the manager's behavior is so egregious that HR's interests in protecting the company and OP's interests in being treated fairly overlap. If HR doesn't take his side, the inevitable lawsuit against the company, should OP pursue it, will be even more black-and-white.
                  – Kevin
                  Sep 28 at 22:03












                up vote
                6
                down vote










                up vote
                6
                down vote









                I would ask for advice from HR - as on the face of what you've written it appears your manager is bullying you.




                • gave me an official warning for something I didn't do

                • retracted my scheduled raise

                • gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly

                • tells upper management I'm doing badly



                ...if you have evidence of his negative comments to upper management that would help, though even if you've overheard these comments I'd still raise them with HR. Even though you have your transfer it'll be good for the firm to know why and to help prevent the same thing happening again with someone else. They'll have a process in place which might be better than going direct to senior management / CEO.






                share|improve this answer












                I would ask for advice from HR - as on the face of what you've written it appears your manager is bullying you.




                • gave me an official warning for something I didn't do

                • retracted my scheduled raise

                • gives me solo tasks that would take a team months to do and complains when I don't finish them quickly

                • tells upper management I'm doing badly



                ...if you have evidence of his negative comments to upper management that would help, though even if you've overheard these comments I'd still raise them with HR. Even though you have your transfer it'll be good for the firm to know why and to help prevent the same thing happening again with someone else. They'll have a process in place which might be better than going direct to senior management / CEO.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Sep 28 at 10:07









                Matthew E Cornish

                66317




                66317







                • 6




                  As @Kilisi has pointed out: do not tell HR you think you're being set up to be fired!
                  – Matthew E Cornish
                  Sep 28 at 10:11






                • 7




                  Advice from HR?
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:13






                • 5




                  I wouldn't go asking HR for advice. That's really not their job.
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:18






                • 19




                  "[HR] should be your first port of call when you have issues you can't take up with management." I couldn't disagree more. HR are not there to help you: they are there to perform general CYA for the company and management, and to minimise company exposure for employee-related mess-ups. (They might tell you that they are on your side or act like it. Don't buy it.) Unions, on the other hand... literally there to serve your interests and usually have confidential legal services available for members. Annual dues are probably less than you'd pay a lawyer just for a one-off consultation.
                  – tmgr
                  Sep 28 at 18:04






                • 8




                  @tmgr The "HR is not your friend" line doesn't quite apply here. This is because the manager's behavior is so egregious that HR's interests in protecting the company and OP's interests in being treated fairly overlap. If HR doesn't take his side, the inevitable lawsuit against the company, should OP pursue it, will be even more black-and-white.
                  – Kevin
                  Sep 28 at 22:03












                • 6




                  As @Kilisi has pointed out: do not tell HR you think you're being set up to be fired!
                  – Matthew E Cornish
                  Sep 28 at 10:11






                • 7




                  Advice from HR?
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:13






                • 5




                  I wouldn't go asking HR for advice. That's really not their job.
                  – Strawberry
                  Sep 28 at 12:18






                • 19




                  "[HR] should be your first port of call when you have issues you can't take up with management." I couldn't disagree more. HR are not there to help you: they are there to perform general CYA for the company and management, and to minimise company exposure for employee-related mess-ups. (They might tell you that they are on your side or act like it. Don't buy it.) Unions, on the other hand... literally there to serve your interests and usually have confidential legal services available for members. Annual dues are probably less than you'd pay a lawyer just for a one-off consultation.
                  – tmgr
                  Sep 28 at 18:04






                • 8




                  @tmgr The "HR is not your friend" line doesn't quite apply here. This is because the manager's behavior is so egregious that HR's interests in protecting the company and OP's interests in being treated fairly overlap. If HR doesn't take his side, the inevitable lawsuit against the company, should OP pursue it, will be even more black-and-white.
                  – Kevin
                  Sep 28 at 22:03







                6




                6




                As @Kilisi has pointed out: do not tell HR you think you're being set up to be fired!
                – Matthew E Cornish
                Sep 28 at 10:11




                As @Kilisi has pointed out: do not tell HR you think you're being set up to be fired!
                – Matthew E Cornish
                Sep 28 at 10:11




                7




                7




                Advice from HR?
                – Strawberry
                Sep 28 at 12:13




                Advice from HR?
                – Strawberry
                Sep 28 at 12:13




                5




                5




                I wouldn't go asking HR for advice. That's really not their job.
                – Strawberry
                Sep 28 at 12:18




                I wouldn't go asking HR for advice. That's really not their job.
                – Strawberry
                Sep 28 at 12:18




                19




                19




                "[HR] should be your first port of call when you have issues you can't take up with management." I couldn't disagree more. HR are not there to help you: they are there to perform general CYA for the company and management, and to minimise company exposure for employee-related mess-ups. (They might tell you that they are on your side or act like it. Don't buy it.) Unions, on the other hand... literally there to serve your interests and usually have confidential legal services available for members. Annual dues are probably less than you'd pay a lawyer just for a one-off consultation.
                – tmgr
                Sep 28 at 18:04




                "[HR] should be your first port of call when you have issues you can't take up with management." I couldn't disagree more. HR are not there to help you: they are there to perform general CYA for the company and management, and to minimise company exposure for employee-related mess-ups. (They might tell you that they are on your side or act like it. Don't buy it.) Unions, on the other hand... literally there to serve your interests and usually have confidential legal services available for members. Annual dues are probably less than you'd pay a lawyer just for a one-off consultation.
                – tmgr
                Sep 28 at 18:04




                8




                8




                @tmgr The "HR is not your friend" line doesn't quite apply here. This is because the manager's behavior is so egregious that HR's interests in protecting the company and OP's interests in being treated fairly overlap. If HR doesn't take his side, the inevitable lawsuit against the company, should OP pursue it, will be even more black-and-white.
                – Kevin
                Sep 28 at 22:03




                @tmgr The "HR is not your friend" line doesn't quite apply here. This is because the manager's behavior is so egregious that HR's interests in protecting the company and OP's interests in being treated fairly overlap. If HR doesn't take his side, the inevitable lawsuit against the company, should OP pursue it, will be even more black-and-white.
                – Kevin
                Sep 28 at 22:03










                up vote
                5
                down vote













                Let me see if I can cut to the core of what you are saying because everyone else seems to misunderstand what you actually have done: you implemented a few soft features like morning meetings and chat software. Upper management heard that a new dev was implementing soft features and naturally they loved it (because all they do is implement soft features and they love to see initiative). Then, when it came to actually implementing hard features (developing software), you are incapable.



                Everyone else is impressed by your initiative, but I'm going to be honest, what I see is someone with more gusto than programming skills. A lot of devs come into the industry like this, with much HN/SO/reddit gusto about what software development should be about and minimal skills.



                Implementing soft features is easy. Impressing execs in the short term is easy. Developing software is hard. It is a day in, day out grind. Software takes a long time to implement, development takes a long time to get good at.



                Take one step back as a process advocate, take one step forward as a grinder. Give it a few years to congeal and crystallize.



                As for your manager, he has a real problem on his hands. He has wild card with no real skills. He seems justified in his opinion.



                Tone down the divisiveness and just program.






                share|improve this answer
















                • 8




                  I don't think I see anything in the post that indicates that all the OP has done so far has been "soft features". If he's been there for "months" (presumably 3-6) I'm guessing he's done some coding as well.
                  – DaveG
                  Sep 28 at 17:06






                • 6




                  I don't know what basis there is to conclude the OP is incapable. They could be, or they could be extremely capable, and without more information, we can't know which. They were accepted for a transfer, which might provide some indication that another team considers them capable enough to do the job. The OP didn't say they were incapable of doing the assigned tasks, but rather that the manager complained about how long they took. It's possible that the OP is slower than others or that the manager has unreasonable exceptions, and we don't know which is the case there either.
                  – Zach Lipton
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  What are soft and hard features? Is it like soft and hard skills? Do you mean that changes to coding process is a soft feature?
                  – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
                  2 days ago






                • 3




                  It sounds like the assigned tasks were estimated by the manager, not the coder. You can't hold failing them against the developer. Especially if the developer knows at the moment of assignment that the estimation is BS.
                  – Erik
                  yesterday






                • 3




                  Accusing the OP of being a fraud without any proof doesn't seem very polite.
                  – algiogia
                  15 hours ago














                up vote
                5
                down vote













                Let me see if I can cut to the core of what you are saying because everyone else seems to misunderstand what you actually have done: you implemented a few soft features like morning meetings and chat software. Upper management heard that a new dev was implementing soft features and naturally they loved it (because all they do is implement soft features and they love to see initiative). Then, when it came to actually implementing hard features (developing software), you are incapable.



                Everyone else is impressed by your initiative, but I'm going to be honest, what I see is someone with more gusto than programming skills. A lot of devs come into the industry like this, with much HN/SO/reddit gusto about what software development should be about and minimal skills.



                Implementing soft features is easy. Impressing execs in the short term is easy. Developing software is hard. It is a day in, day out grind. Software takes a long time to implement, development takes a long time to get good at.



                Take one step back as a process advocate, take one step forward as a grinder. Give it a few years to congeal and crystallize.



                As for your manager, he has a real problem on his hands. He has wild card with no real skills. He seems justified in his opinion.



                Tone down the divisiveness and just program.






                share|improve this answer
















                • 8




                  I don't think I see anything in the post that indicates that all the OP has done so far has been "soft features". If he's been there for "months" (presumably 3-6) I'm guessing he's done some coding as well.
                  – DaveG
                  Sep 28 at 17:06






                • 6




                  I don't know what basis there is to conclude the OP is incapable. They could be, or they could be extremely capable, and without more information, we can't know which. They were accepted for a transfer, which might provide some indication that another team considers them capable enough to do the job. The OP didn't say they were incapable of doing the assigned tasks, but rather that the manager complained about how long they took. It's possible that the OP is slower than others or that the manager has unreasonable exceptions, and we don't know which is the case there either.
                  – Zach Lipton
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  What are soft and hard features? Is it like soft and hard skills? Do you mean that changes to coding process is a soft feature?
                  – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
                  2 days ago






                • 3




                  It sounds like the assigned tasks were estimated by the manager, not the coder. You can't hold failing them against the developer. Especially if the developer knows at the moment of assignment that the estimation is BS.
                  – Erik
                  yesterday






                • 3




                  Accusing the OP of being a fraud without any proof doesn't seem very polite.
                  – algiogia
                  15 hours ago












                up vote
                5
                down vote










                up vote
                5
                down vote









                Let me see if I can cut to the core of what you are saying because everyone else seems to misunderstand what you actually have done: you implemented a few soft features like morning meetings and chat software. Upper management heard that a new dev was implementing soft features and naturally they loved it (because all they do is implement soft features and they love to see initiative). Then, when it came to actually implementing hard features (developing software), you are incapable.



                Everyone else is impressed by your initiative, but I'm going to be honest, what I see is someone with more gusto than programming skills. A lot of devs come into the industry like this, with much HN/SO/reddit gusto about what software development should be about and minimal skills.



                Implementing soft features is easy. Impressing execs in the short term is easy. Developing software is hard. It is a day in, day out grind. Software takes a long time to implement, development takes a long time to get good at.



                Take one step back as a process advocate, take one step forward as a grinder. Give it a few years to congeal and crystallize.



                As for your manager, he has a real problem on his hands. He has wild card with no real skills. He seems justified in his opinion.



                Tone down the divisiveness and just program.






                share|improve this answer












                Let me see if I can cut to the core of what you are saying because everyone else seems to misunderstand what you actually have done: you implemented a few soft features like morning meetings and chat software. Upper management heard that a new dev was implementing soft features and naturally they loved it (because all they do is implement soft features and they love to see initiative). Then, when it came to actually implementing hard features (developing software), you are incapable.



                Everyone else is impressed by your initiative, but I'm going to be honest, what I see is someone with more gusto than programming skills. A lot of devs come into the industry like this, with much HN/SO/reddit gusto about what software development should be about and minimal skills.



                Implementing soft features is easy. Impressing execs in the short term is easy. Developing software is hard. It is a day in, day out grind. Software takes a long time to implement, development takes a long time to get good at.



                Take one step back as a process advocate, take one step forward as a grinder. Give it a few years to congeal and crystallize.



                As for your manager, he has a real problem on his hands. He has wild card with no real skills. He seems justified in his opinion.



                Tone down the divisiveness and just program.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Sep 28 at 17:00









                Jamie Clinton

                2196




                2196







                • 8




                  I don't think I see anything in the post that indicates that all the OP has done so far has been "soft features". If he's been there for "months" (presumably 3-6) I'm guessing he's done some coding as well.
                  – DaveG
                  Sep 28 at 17:06






                • 6




                  I don't know what basis there is to conclude the OP is incapable. They could be, or they could be extremely capable, and without more information, we can't know which. They were accepted for a transfer, which might provide some indication that another team considers them capable enough to do the job. The OP didn't say they were incapable of doing the assigned tasks, but rather that the manager complained about how long they took. It's possible that the OP is slower than others or that the manager has unreasonable exceptions, and we don't know which is the case there either.
                  – Zach Lipton
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  What are soft and hard features? Is it like soft and hard skills? Do you mean that changes to coding process is a soft feature?
                  – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
                  2 days ago






                • 3




                  It sounds like the assigned tasks were estimated by the manager, not the coder. You can't hold failing them against the developer. Especially if the developer knows at the moment of assignment that the estimation is BS.
                  – Erik
                  yesterday






                • 3




                  Accusing the OP of being a fraud without any proof doesn't seem very polite.
                  – algiogia
                  15 hours ago












                • 8




                  I don't think I see anything in the post that indicates that all the OP has done so far has been "soft features". If he's been there for "months" (presumably 3-6) I'm guessing he's done some coding as well.
                  – DaveG
                  Sep 28 at 17:06






                • 6




                  I don't know what basis there is to conclude the OP is incapable. They could be, or they could be extremely capable, and without more information, we can't know which. They were accepted for a transfer, which might provide some indication that another team considers them capable enough to do the job. The OP didn't say they were incapable of doing the assigned tasks, but rather that the manager complained about how long they took. It's possible that the OP is slower than others or that the manager has unreasonable exceptions, and we don't know which is the case there either.
                  – Zach Lipton
                  2 days ago






                • 1




                  What are soft and hard features? Is it like soft and hard skills? Do you mean that changes to coding process is a soft feature?
                  – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
                  2 days ago






                • 3




                  It sounds like the assigned tasks were estimated by the manager, not the coder. You can't hold failing them against the developer. Especially if the developer knows at the moment of assignment that the estimation is BS.
                  – Erik
                  yesterday






                • 3




                  Accusing the OP of being a fraud without any proof doesn't seem very polite.
                  – algiogia
                  15 hours ago







                8




                8




                I don't think I see anything in the post that indicates that all the OP has done so far has been "soft features". If he's been there for "months" (presumably 3-6) I'm guessing he's done some coding as well.
                – DaveG
                Sep 28 at 17:06




                I don't think I see anything in the post that indicates that all the OP has done so far has been "soft features". If he's been there for "months" (presumably 3-6) I'm guessing he's done some coding as well.
                – DaveG
                Sep 28 at 17:06




                6




                6




                I don't know what basis there is to conclude the OP is incapable. They could be, or they could be extremely capable, and without more information, we can't know which. They were accepted for a transfer, which might provide some indication that another team considers them capable enough to do the job. The OP didn't say they were incapable of doing the assigned tasks, but rather that the manager complained about how long they took. It's possible that the OP is slower than others or that the manager has unreasonable exceptions, and we don't know which is the case there either.
                – Zach Lipton
                2 days ago




                I don't know what basis there is to conclude the OP is incapable. They could be, or they could be extremely capable, and without more information, we can't know which. They were accepted for a transfer, which might provide some indication that another team considers them capable enough to do the job. The OP didn't say they were incapable of doing the assigned tasks, but rather that the manager complained about how long they took. It's possible that the OP is slower than others or that the manager has unreasonable exceptions, and we don't know which is the case there either.
                – Zach Lipton
                2 days ago




                1




                1




                What are soft and hard features? Is it like soft and hard skills? Do you mean that changes to coding process is a soft feature?
                – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
                2 days ago




                What are soft and hard features? Is it like soft and hard skills? Do you mean that changes to coding process is a soft feature?
                – LIttle Ancient Forest Kami
                2 days ago




                3




                3




                It sounds like the assigned tasks were estimated by the manager, not the coder. You can't hold failing them against the developer. Especially if the developer knows at the moment of assignment that the estimation is BS.
                – Erik
                yesterday




                It sounds like the assigned tasks were estimated by the manager, not the coder. You can't hold failing them against the developer. Especially if the developer knows at the moment of assignment that the estimation is BS.
                – Erik
                yesterday




                3




                3




                Accusing the OP of being a fraud without any proof doesn't seem very polite.
                – algiogia
                15 hours ago




                Accusing the OP of being a fraud without any proof doesn't seem very polite.
                – algiogia
                15 hours ago










                up vote
                0
                down vote













                First, I'm sincerely sorry for you; I've been in your situation just a few months ago.



                Whether you plan to leave or stay, FIND A NEW JOB NOW! This is the surest way to CYA and a new job offer is your capital to fight the bully without restraint and without devastating consequences should you lose the fight.



                Meanwhile, don't give him the opportunity to emotionally attack you. If he never does his acts in the presence of certain people (e.g. the CEO), make a note of that so that when those people are away and your manager is here, you know to go take a dump or join water cooler chat somewhere else. You want to preserve your physical and mental health as you fight this long, ugly battle.



                If he comes to your cubicle because he just saw the code you've assembled under 5 minutes to do an ad hoc one-time test that you shared with your team on Slack, and declares in a voice loud enough for the whole office to hear: "you wrote this wrong, do you even code?" You work him through the lousy but pragmatic code and speak to him in an equally loud voice "... So in this specific case, we arrive at 1 + 1 = 2. Is 1 + 1 not equal to 2?" He would soften his tone, smile at you and try to change the topic or focus on other irrelevant aspects of the code because he just made a fool of himself.



                If your manager is also technical and writes programs as part of his job, review his code. You might find vulnerabilities to SQL injections everywhere, amateurish crap fixable with only an extra two lines of code. Hack it and try it (delete a table you created specifically to demo this security hole). Wait for the right opportunity to make a public (or private) display of it.



                If your manager ever referred to his subordinates as "brats" in IM, take a screenshot of that and save copies of it. You could also secretly record your manager verbally abusing you if you want to take the risk. Yes, it is illegal to record a conversation without the participants' knowledge and consent, but you need all the evidence you can get your hands on to expose what an a-hole your "manager" really is and how his toxicity will ruin the company. However, only consider doing this if you are sure the CEO is neither stupid, soft nor evil, and also not if that manager is keeping the company hostage, as, together with allies if possible, you're going to talk directly to the CEO as soon as you receive a decent/great job offer letter and present the manager as a liability/risk and totally replaceable employee to the company and help the CEO arrive at the conclusion to fire this bully, or resign on the spot and wish the CEO good luck if this doesn't work out.



                Your manager will not stop undermining you. He will give you tasks with tight or impossible deadlines, or tasks that have little to no visibility if you do a great job but high (negative) visibility if you do a bad job, or both. For example, maintaining RDMS databases with very high read and write volumes when you're not even an aspiring DBA rookie.



                I was able to judge the CEO at my last job was stupid in my first meeting with him, and his company was held hostage by a senior staff who would soon be joined by a manager bully, so I didn't follow through with my suggestion of bringing this matter to the CEO. Therefore, I don't know if what I've said is sound or even realistic, as I'm not well-versed in office politics. But luck was on my side and I'm now working the best job I've had out of my last 4 in 3 years despite only obtaining a verbal job offer when I gave my notice because I couldn't take it anymore. I wish things work out for the better for you, too. You don't deserve to be treated like shit; he does.






                share|improve this answer


























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  First, I'm sincerely sorry for you; I've been in your situation just a few months ago.



                  Whether you plan to leave or stay, FIND A NEW JOB NOW! This is the surest way to CYA and a new job offer is your capital to fight the bully without restraint and without devastating consequences should you lose the fight.



                  Meanwhile, don't give him the opportunity to emotionally attack you. If he never does his acts in the presence of certain people (e.g. the CEO), make a note of that so that when those people are away and your manager is here, you know to go take a dump or join water cooler chat somewhere else. You want to preserve your physical and mental health as you fight this long, ugly battle.



                  If he comes to your cubicle because he just saw the code you've assembled under 5 minutes to do an ad hoc one-time test that you shared with your team on Slack, and declares in a voice loud enough for the whole office to hear: "you wrote this wrong, do you even code?" You work him through the lousy but pragmatic code and speak to him in an equally loud voice "... So in this specific case, we arrive at 1 + 1 = 2. Is 1 + 1 not equal to 2?" He would soften his tone, smile at you and try to change the topic or focus on other irrelevant aspects of the code because he just made a fool of himself.



                  If your manager is also technical and writes programs as part of his job, review his code. You might find vulnerabilities to SQL injections everywhere, amateurish crap fixable with only an extra two lines of code. Hack it and try it (delete a table you created specifically to demo this security hole). Wait for the right opportunity to make a public (or private) display of it.



                  If your manager ever referred to his subordinates as "brats" in IM, take a screenshot of that and save copies of it. You could also secretly record your manager verbally abusing you if you want to take the risk. Yes, it is illegal to record a conversation without the participants' knowledge and consent, but you need all the evidence you can get your hands on to expose what an a-hole your "manager" really is and how his toxicity will ruin the company. However, only consider doing this if you are sure the CEO is neither stupid, soft nor evil, and also not if that manager is keeping the company hostage, as, together with allies if possible, you're going to talk directly to the CEO as soon as you receive a decent/great job offer letter and present the manager as a liability/risk and totally replaceable employee to the company and help the CEO arrive at the conclusion to fire this bully, or resign on the spot and wish the CEO good luck if this doesn't work out.



                  Your manager will not stop undermining you. He will give you tasks with tight or impossible deadlines, or tasks that have little to no visibility if you do a great job but high (negative) visibility if you do a bad job, or both. For example, maintaining RDMS databases with very high read and write volumes when you're not even an aspiring DBA rookie.



                  I was able to judge the CEO at my last job was stupid in my first meeting with him, and his company was held hostage by a senior staff who would soon be joined by a manager bully, so I didn't follow through with my suggestion of bringing this matter to the CEO. Therefore, I don't know if what I've said is sound or even realistic, as I'm not well-versed in office politics. But luck was on my side and I'm now working the best job I've had out of my last 4 in 3 years despite only obtaining a verbal job offer when I gave my notice because I couldn't take it anymore. I wish things work out for the better for you, too. You don't deserve to be treated like shit; he does.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    First, I'm sincerely sorry for you; I've been in your situation just a few months ago.



                    Whether you plan to leave or stay, FIND A NEW JOB NOW! This is the surest way to CYA and a new job offer is your capital to fight the bully without restraint and without devastating consequences should you lose the fight.



                    Meanwhile, don't give him the opportunity to emotionally attack you. If he never does his acts in the presence of certain people (e.g. the CEO), make a note of that so that when those people are away and your manager is here, you know to go take a dump or join water cooler chat somewhere else. You want to preserve your physical and mental health as you fight this long, ugly battle.



                    If he comes to your cubicle because he just saw the code you've assembled under 5 minutes to do an ad hoc one-time test that you shared with your team on Slack, and declares in a voice loud enough for the whole office to hear: "you wrote this wrong, do you even code?" You work him through the lousy but pragmatic code and speak to him in an equally loud voice "... So in this specific case, we arrive at 1 + 1 = 2. Is 1 + 1 not equal to 2?" He would soften his tone, smile at you and try to change the topic or focus on other irrelevant aspects of the code because he just made a fool of himself.



                    If your manager is also technical and writes programs as part of his job, review his code. You might find vulnerabilities to SQL injections everywhere, amateurish crap fixable with only an extra two lines of code. Hack it and try it (delete a table you created specifically to demo this security hole). Wait for the right opportunity to make a public (or private) display of it.



                    If your manager ever referred to his subordinates as "brats" in IM, take a screenshot of that and save copies of it. You could also secretly record your manager verbally abusing you if you want to take the risk. Yes, it is illegal to record a conversation without the participants' knowledge and consent, but you need all the evidence you can get your hands on to expose what an a-hole your "manager" really is and how his toxicity will ruin the company. However, only consider doing this if you are sure the CEO is neither stupid, soft nor evil, and also not if that manager is keeping the company hostage, as, together with allies if possible, you're going to talk directly to the CEO as soon as you receive a decent/great job offer letter and present the manager as a liability/risk and totally replaceable employee to the company and help the CEO arrive at the conclusion to fire this bully, or resign on the spot and wish the CEO good luck if this doesn't work out.



                    Your manager will not stop undermining you. He will give you tasks with tight or impossible deadlines, or tasks that have little to no visibility if you do a great job but high (negative) visibility if you do a bad job, or both. For example, maintaining RDMS databases with very high read and write volumes when you're not even an aspiring DBA rookie.



                    I was able to judge the CEO at my last job was stupid in my first meeting with him, and his company was held hostage by a senior staff who would soon be joined by a manager bully, so I didn't follow through with my suggestion of bringing this matter to the CEO. Therefore, I don't know if what I've said is sound or even realistic, as I'm not well-versed in office politics. But luck was on my side and I'm now working the best job I've had out of my last 4 in 3 years despite only obtaining a verbal job offer when I gave my notice because I couldn't take it anymore. I wish things work out for the better for you, too. You don't deserve to be treated like shit; he does.






                    share|improve this answer














                    First, I'm sincerely sorry for you; I've been in your situation just a few months ago.



                    Whether you plan to leave or stay, FIND A NEW JOB NOW! This is the surest way to CYA and a new job offer is your capital to fight the bully without restraint and without devastating consequences should you lose the fight.



                    Meanwhile, don't give him the opportunity to emotionally attack you. If he never does his acts in the presence of certain people (e.g. the CEO), make a note of that so that when those people are away and your manager is here, you know to go take a dump or join water cooler chat somewhere else. You want to preserve your physical and mental health as you fight this long, ugly battle.



                    If he comes to your cubicle because he just saw the code you've assembled under 5 minutes to do an ad hoc one-time test that you shared with your team on Slack, and declares in a voice loud enough for the whole office to hear: "you wrote this wrong, do you even code?" You work him through the lousy but pragmatic code and speak to him in an equally loud voice "... So in this specific case, we arrive at 1 + 1 = 2. Is 1 + 1 not equal to 2?" He would soften his tone, smile at you and try to change the topic or focus on other irrelevant aspects of the code because he just made a fool of himself.



                    If your manager is also technical and writes programs as part of his job, review his code. You might find vulnerabilities to SQL injections everywhere, amateurish crap fixable with only an extra two lines of code. Hack it and try it (delete a table you created specifically to demo this security hole). Wait for the right opportunity to make a public (or private) display of it.



                    If your manager ever referred to his subordinates as "brats" in IM, take a screenshot of that and save copies of it. You could also secretly record your manager verbally abusing you if you want to take the risk. Yes, it is illegal to record a conversation without the participants' knowledge and consent, but you need all the evidence you can get your hands on to expose what an a-hole your "manager" really is and how his toxicity will ruin the company. However, only consider doing this if you are sure the CEO is neither stupid, soft nor evil, and also not if that manager is keeping the company hostage, as, together with allies if possible, you're going to talk directly to the CEO as soon as you receive a decent/great job offer letter and present the manager as a liability/risk and totally replaceable employee to the company and help the CEO arrive at the conclusion to fire this bully, or resign on the spot and wish the CEO good luck if this doesn't work out.



                    Your manager will not stop undermining you. He will give you tasks with tight or impossible deadlines, or tasks that have little to no visibility if you do a great job but high (negative) visibility if you do a bad job, or both. For example, maintaining RDMS databases with very high read and write volumes when you're not even an aspiring DBA rookie.



                    I was able to judge the CEO at my last job was stupid in my first meeting with him, and his company was held hostage by a senior staff who would soon be joined by a manager bully, so I didn't follow through with my suggestion of bringing this matter to the CEO. Therefore, I don't know if what I've said is sound or even realistic, as I'm not well-versed in office politics. But luck was on my side and I'm now working the best job I've had out of my last 4 in 3 years despite only obtaining a verbal job offer when I gave my notice because I couldn't take it anymore. I wish things work out for the better for you, too. You don't deserve to be treated like shit; he does.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Sep 28 at 17:09

























                    answered Sep 28 at 16:27









                    Gao

                    21627




                    21627




















                        up vote
                        -1
                        down vote













                        This has happened to me recently, and I did transfer within the organisation (different company, same corporation) to a position underneath a CEO who saw my potential and the work I had done and showed his appreciation for them by approaching me with a job offer as soon as the rumour mill reached him.



                        If upper management is aware of both the success of the changes you introduced and the fact that you introduced them, then there is likely someone there who values your contribution to the company. You built a check with your successes, now is the time to cash it.



                        Do approach this person directly. You are already in line for a transfer so your goal is not to find a solution or get your manager fired or whatever. Your goal is to secure the successes you have made for the company. Outline the changes and their benefits for the company and voice your concern that they might be reverted after you leave the position. Discuss with upper management that your concern is for your team mates and the success of the team and you want to make sure to leave the team in the best possible way. Ask what steps you need to take to ensure that your legacy lives on without you (in less poetic words maybe) and outline that your manager is a hindrance in this process and not a help, which is the reason you went past him.



                        Also outline the bullying efforts he has conducted and tell that you fear that he is trying to set you up even now, possibly as a means to undermine the changes made and to sabotage your transfer. This is an important point! You found a solution to the situation, which frankly speaking is a management responsibility, and you acted on it and he is trying to undermine it. This is bad for the company! A conflict was solved and is now being reheated for no reason. This is not in the interest of the company. This is the point you should stress.



                        If the shit hits the fan, you will be in a 100% better position if you told about it before. I made this mistake and waited until the situation could not be resolved anymore. It came to the point where one of us had to leave. I didn't want his job (too much administrative work) so I gladly went to our sister company instead of trying to oust him. I see you made the same choice, so stop competing with him. Try to reduce the conflict to a minimum but keep CYA.



                        We have little information about the details of your situation. You need to evaluate these carefully, at best with a person you trust and who knows at least some of it. Spouse, best friend, etc. - not a co-worker! Office politics can be complicated and there are surely details you didn't mention.



                        Don't underestimate the impact that you can make. In my case, the problematic manager did not survive me leaving. A short time after I changed positions, the rumour mill told me that he is exiting the company "at his own choice".






                        share|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          -1
                          down vote













                          This has happened to me recently, and I did transfer within the organisation (different company, same corporation) to a position underneath a CEO who saw my potential and the work I had done and showed his appreciation for them by approaching me with a job offer as soon as the rumour mill reached him.



                          If upper management is aware of both the success of the changes you introduced and the fact that you introduced them, then there is likely someone there who values your contribution to the company. You built a check with your successes, now is the time to cash it.



                          Do approach this person directly. You are already in line for a transfer so your goal is not to find a solution or get your manager fired or whatever. Your goal is to secure the successes you have made for the company. Outline the changes and their benefits for the company and voice your concern that they might be reverted after you leave the position. Discuss with upper management that your concern is for your team mates and the success of the team and you want to make sure to leave the team in the best possible way. Ask what steps you need to take to ensure that your legacy lives on without you (in less poetic words maybe) and outline that your manager is a hindrance in this process and not a help, which is the reason you went past him.



                          Also outline the bullying efforts he has conducted and tell that you fear that he is trying to set you up even now, possibly as a means to undermine the changes made and to sabotage your transfer. This is an important point! You found a solution to the situation, which frankly speaking is a management responsibility, and you acted on it and he is trying to undermine it. This is bad for the company! A conflict was solved and is now being reheated for no reason. This is not in the interest of the company. This is the point you should stress.



                          If the shit hits the fan, you will be in a 100% better position if you told about it before. I made this mistake and waited until the situation could not be resolved anymore. It came to the point where one of us had to leave. I didn't want his job (too much administrative work) so I gladly went to our sister company instead of trying to oust him. I see you made the same choice, so stop competing with him. Try to reduce the conflict to a minimum but keep CYA.



                          We have little information about the details of your situation. You need to evaluate these carefully, at best with a person you trust and who knows at least some of it. Spouse, best friend, etc. - not a co-worker! Office politics can be complicated and there are surely details you didn't mention.



                          Don't underestimate the impact that you can make. In my case, the problematic manager did not survive me leaving. A short time after I changed positions, the rumour mill told me that he is exiting the company "at his own choice".






                          share|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            -1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            -1
                            down vote









                            This has happened to me recently, and I did transfer within the organisation (different company, same corporation) to a position underneath a CEO who saw my potential and the work I had done and showed his appreciation for them by approaching me with a job offer as soon as the rumour mill reached him.



                            If upper management is aware of both the success of the changes you introduced and the fact that you introduced them, then there is likely someone there who values your contribution to the company. You built a check with your successes, now is the time to cash it.



                            Do approach this person directly. You are already in line for a transfer so your goal is not to find a solution or get your manager fired or whatever. Your goal is to secure the successes you have made for the company. Outline the changes and their benefits for the company and voice your concern that they might be reverted after you leave the position. Discuss with upper management that your concern is for your team mates and the success of the team and you want to make sure to leave the team in the best possible way. Ask what steps you need to take to ensure that your legacy lives on without you (in less poetic words maybe) and outline that your manager is a hindrance in this process and not a help, which is the reason you went past him.



                            Also outline the bullying efforts he has conducted and tell that you fear that he is trying to set you up even now, possibly as a means to undermine the changes made and to sabotage your transfer. This is an important point! You found a solution to the situation, which frankly speaking is a management responsibility, and you acted on it and he is trying to undermine it. This is bad for the company! A conflict was solved and is now being reheated for no reason. This is not in the interest of the company. This is the point you should stress.



                            If the shit hits the fan, you will be in a 100% better position if you told about it before. I made this mistake and waited until the situation could not be resolved anymore. It came to the point where one of us had to leave. I didn't want his job (too much administrative work) so I gladly went to our sister company instead of trying to oust him. I see you made the same choice, so stop competing with him. Try to reduce the conflict to a minimum but keep CYA.



                            We have little information about the details of your situation. You need to evaluate these carefully, at best with a person you trust and who knows at least some of it. Spouse, best friend, etc. - not a co-worker! Office politics can be complicated and there are surely details you didn't mention.



                            Don't underestimate the impact that you can make. In my case, the problematic manager did not survive me leaving. A short time after I changed positions, the rumour mill told me that he is exiting the company "at his own choice".






                            share|improve this answer












                            This has happened to me recently, and I did transfer within the organisation (different company, same corporation) to a position underneath a CEO who saw my potential and the work I had done and showed his appreciation for them by approaching me with a job offer as soon as the rumour mill reached him.



                            If upper management is aware of both the success of the changes you introduced and the fact that you introduced them, then there is likely someone there who values your contribution to the company. You built a check with your successes, now is the time to cash it.



                            Do approach this person directly. You are already in line for a transfer so your goal is not to find a solution or get your manager fired or whatever. Your goal is to secure the successes you have made for the company. Outline the changes and their benefits for the company and voice your concern that they might be reverted after you leave the position. Discuss with upper management that your concern is for your team mates and the success of the team and you want to make sure to leave the team in the best possible way. Ask what steps you need to take to ensure that your legacy lives on without you (in less poetic words maybe) and outline that your manager is a hindrance in this process and not a help, which is the reason you went past him.



                            Also outline the bullying efforts he has conducted and tell that you fear that he is trying to set you up even now, possibly as a means to undermine the changes made and to sabotage your transfer. This is an important point! You found a solution to the situation, which frankly speaking is a management responsibility, and you acted on it and he is trying to undermine it. This is bad for the company! A conflict was solved and is now being reheated for no reason. This is not in the interest of the company. This is the point you should stress.



                            If the shit hits the fan, you will be in a 100% better position if you told about it before. I made this mistake and waited until the situation could not be resolved anymore. It came to the point where one of us had to leave. I didn't want his job (too much administrative work) so I gladly went to our sister company instead of trying to oust him. I see you made the same choice, so stop competing with him. Try to reduce the conflict to a minimum but keep CYA.



                            We have little information about the details of your situation. You need to evaluate these carefully, at best with a person you trust and who knows at least some of it. Spouse, best friend, etc. - not a co-worker! Office politics can be complicated and there are surely details you didn't mention.



                            Don't underestimate the impact that you can make. In my case, the problematic manager did not survive me leaving. A short time after I changed positions, the rumour mill told me that he is exiting the company "at his own choice".







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 days ago









                            Tom

                            1,656412




                            1,656412




















                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote













                                An alternative perspective:



                                You are a new developer at the company, but the things you have introduced (scrum, Slack, peer review) are management things. You are undercutting the authority of your manager, especially bringing these things up at team meetings where the manager has had no time to think them over. Maybe the manager doesn't like the scrum style, thinks Slack is distracting, and peer review not a good use of time for the current projects. Maybe they had never heard about them before and resent being effectively forced to implement them... And worse now you are fostering discontent among the team by canvassing their opinions about the manager.



                                If you want to introduce new processes, go discuss it with the manager first, get them on side with your ideas. Give them time to think about it, and adapt it how they see fit.



                                Stop doing the rounds, incepting ideas about the manager with your colleagues.



                                Think if some of the coding criticism is valid - are the tasks really that hard? Put in a good effort to get them done.



                                It might be difficult, but perhaps you could have a one on one talk with the manager to see what you could be doing better, and maybe clear the air a bit.






                                share|improve this answer




















                                • It sounds like there's a real possibility that this is what's going on! It's also possible that it's a combination of effects: new dev doesn't yet know how to push back against unreasonable manager time demands AND is undercutting the manager by trying to do mgr's job and now fomenting discontent among other staff (not intentionally, but out of naivete--it takes a while in the workforce to "get it").
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago











                                • He's undercutting sure, but this isn't the way management should go about rolling back his changes.
                                  – Steve
                                  15 hours ago














                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote













                                An alternative perspective:



                                You are a new developer at the company, but the things you have introduced (scrum, Slack, peer review) are management things. You are undercutting the authority of your manager, especially bringing these things up at team meetings where the manager has had no time to think them over. Maybe the manager doesn't like the scrum style, thinks Slack is distracting, and peer review not a good use of time for the current projects. Maybe they had never heard about them before and resent being effectively forced to implement them... And worse now you are fostering discontent among the team by canvassing their opinions about the manager.



                                If you want to introduce new processes, go discuss it with the manager first, get them on side with your ideas. Give them time to think about it, and adapt it how they see fit.



                                Stop doing the rounds, incepting ideas about the manager with your colleagues.



                                Think if some of the coding criticism is valid - are the tasks really that hard? Put in a good effort to get them done.



                                It might be difficult, but perhaps you could have a one on one talk with the manager to see what you could be doing better, and maybe clear the air a bit.






                                share|improve this answer




















                                • It sounds like there's a real possibility that this is what's going on! It's also possible that it's a combination of effects: new dev doesn't yet know how to push back against unreasonable manager time demands AND is undercutting the manager by trying to do mgr's job and now fomenting discontent among other staff (not intentionally, but out of naivete--it takes a while in the workforce to "get it").
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago











                                • He's undercutting sure, but this isn't the way management should go about rolling back his changes.
                                  – Steve
                                  15 hours ago












                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                -1
                                down vote









                                An alternative perspective:



                                You are a new developer at the company, but the things you have introduced (scrum, Slack, peer review) are management things. You are undercutting the authority of your manager, especially bringing these things up at team meetings where the manager has had no time to think them over. Maybe the manager doesn't like the scrum style, thinks Slack is distracting, and peer review not a good use of time for the current projects. Maybe they had never heard about them before and resent being effectively forced to implement them... And worse now you are fostering discontent among the team by canvassing their opinions about the manager.



                                If you want to introduce new processes, go discuss it with the manager first, get them on side with your ideas. Give them time to think about it, and adapt it how they see fit.



                                Stop doing the rounds, incepting ideas about the manager with your colleagues.



                                Think if some of the coding criticism is valid - are the tasks really that hard? Put in a good effort to get them done.



                                It might be difficult, but perhaps you could have a one on one talk with the manager to see what you could be doing better, and maybe clear the air a bit.






                                share|improve this answer












                                An alternative perspective:



                                You are a new developer at the company, but the things you have introduced (scrum, Slack, peer review) are management things. You are undercutting the authority of your manager, especially bringing these things up at team meetings where the manager has had no time to think them over. Maybe the manager doesn't like the scrum style, thinks Slack is distracting, and peer review not a good use of time for the current projects. Maybe they had never heard about them before and resent being effectively forced to implement them... And worse now you are fostering discontent among the team by canvassing their opinions about the manager.



                                If you want to introduce new processes, go discuss it with the manager first, get them on side with your ideas. Give them time to think about it, and adapt it how they see fit.



                                Stop doing the rounds, incepting ideas about the manager with your colleagues.



                                Think if some of the coding criticism is valid - are the tasks really that hard? Put in a good effort to get them done.



                                It might be difficult, but perhaps you could have a one on one talk with the manager to see what you could be doing better, and maybe clear the air a bit.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered yesterday









                                geometrikal

                                85779




                                85779











                                • It sounds like there's a real possibility that this is what's going on! It's also possible that it's a combination of effects: new dev doesn't yet know how to push back against unreasonable manager time demands AND is undercutting the manager by trying to do mgr's job and now fomenting discontent among other staff (not intentionally, but out of naivete--it takes a while in the workforce to "get it").
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago











                                • He's undercutting sure, but this isn't the way management should go about rolling back his changes.
                                  – Steve
                                  15 hours ago
















                                • It sounds like there's a real possibility that this is what's going on! It's also possible that it's a combination of effects: new dev doesn't yet know how to push back against unreasonable manager time demands AND is undercutting the manager by trying to do mgr's job and now fomenting discontent among other staff (not intentionally, but out of naivete--it takes a while in the workforce to "get it").
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago











                                • He's undercutting sure, but this isn't the way management should go about rolling back his changes.
                                  – Steve
                                  15 hours ago















                                It sounds like there's a real possibility that this is what's going on! It's also possible that it's a combination of effects: new dev doesn't yet know how to push back against unreasonable manager time demands AND is undercutting the manager by trying to do mgr's job and now fomenting discontent among other staff (not intentionally, but out of naivete--it takes a while in the workforce to "get it").
                                – bob
                                15 hours ago





                                It sounds like there's a real possibility that this is what's going on! It's also possible that it's a combination of effects: new dev doesn't yet know how to push back against unreasonable manager time demands AND is undercutting the manager by trying to do mgr's job and now fomenting discontent among other staff (not intentionally, but out of naivete--it takes a while in the workforce to "get it").
                                – bob
                                15 hours ago













                                He's undercutting sure, but this isn't the way management should go about rolling back his changes.
                                – Steve
                                15 hours ago




                                He's undercutting sure, but this isn't the way management should go about rolling back his changes.
                                – Steve
                                15 hours ago










                                up vote
                                -3
                                down vote













                                I'd probably stop rocking the boat. When you start working in a new place you need to adapt to their ways of working, not look like a control freak trying to change too many things. Sure you could maybe improve things or whatever, but sometimes it's better to accept things and try to work with the current systems. Trying to change things early on is a great way to rub people up the wrong way.



                                If you want to implement change, do it slowly and make sure you have the right people on board, otherwise these sort of politics can come into play.



                                As far as the project being over your head, if a project is over your head then you need to tell someone. The longer your leave it the more serious it will become. Always tell people what resources you will need for a job (including support from other staff). It's important to establish roles in each project.






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.













                                • 21




                                  Not the downvoter, but I do disagree wit your answer: He was doing a good job, upper management liked his changes. Then suddenly that changed. That rarely happens naturally
                                  – Martijn
                                  Sep 28 at 13:03











                                • @Martijn: Does upper management actually know the effect of his changes on productivity (I'd guess not), or are they just hearing some lately-popular buzzwords, and acting like cheerleaders?
                                  – jamesqf
                                  Sep 28 at 16:06






                                • 3




                                  While this may or may not be good advice for his next job, I don't think it will work at his current one. The die is cast, and either he or his boss (or both) is going to lose.
                                  – Jim Clay
                                  Sep 28 at 16:10










                                • I think the challenge here is we're assuming that OP, who is new to their job, is able to make an accurate assessment of their situation. That's often not the case for new employees (definitely wasn't for me when I started) due to the Dunning Kruger Effect. It can take a few years of experience under your belt to be able to accurately assess your job situation. So OP could very likely be reading things all wrong. I think the assessment made in this answer is much more likely, and deserves more upvotes.
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago















                                up vote
                                -3
                                down vote













                                I'd probably stop rocking the boat. When you start working in a new place you need to adapt to their ways of working, not look like a control freak trying to change too many things. Sure you could maybe improve things or whatever, but sometimes it's better to accept things and try to work with the current systems. Trying to change things early on is a great way to rub people up the wrong way.



                                If you want to implement change, do it slowly and make sure you have the right people on board, otherwise these sort of politics can come into play.



                                As far as the project being over your head, if a project is over your head then you need to tell someone. The longer your leave it the more serious it will become. Always tell people what resources you will need for a job (including support from other staff). It's important to establish roles in each project.






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.













                                • 21




                                  Not the downvoter, but I do disagree wit your answer: He was doing a good job, upper management liked his changes. Then suddenly that changed. That rarely happens naturally
                                  – Martijn
                                  Sep 28 at 13:03











                                • @Martijn: Does upper management actually know the effect of his changes on productivity (I'd guess not), or are they just hearing some lately-popular buzzwords, and acting like cheerleaders?
                                  – jamesqf
                                  Sep 28 at 16:06






                                • 3




                                  While this may or may not be good advice for his next job, I don't think it will work at his current one. The die is cast, and either he or his boss (or both) is going to lose.
                                  – Jim Clay
                                  Sep 28 at 16:10










                                • I think the challenge here is we're assuming that OP, who is new to their job, is able to make an accurate assessment of their situation. That's often not the case for new employees (definitely wasn't for me when I started) due to the Dunning Kruger Effect. It can take a few years of experience under your belt to be able to accurately assess your job situation. So OP could very likely be reading things all wrong. I think the assessment made in this answer is much more likely, and deserves more upvotes.
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago













                                up vote
                                -3
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                -3
                                down vote









                                I'd probably stop rocking the boat. When you start working in a new place you need to adapt to their ways of working, not look like a control freak trying to change too many things. Sure you could maybe improve things or whatever, but sometimes it's better to accept things and try to work with the current systems. Trying to change things early on is a great way to rub people up the wrong way.



                                If you want to implement change, do it slowly and make sure you have the right people on board, otherwise these sort of politics can come into play.



                                As far as the project being over your head, if a project is over your head then you need to tell someone. The longer your leave it the more serious it will become. Always tell people what resources you will need for a job (including support from other staff). It's important to establish roles in each project.






                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                I'd probably stop rocking the boat. When you start working in a new place you need to adapt to their ways of working, not look like a control freak trying to change too many things. Sure you could maybe improve things or whatever, but sometimes it's better to accept things and try to work with the current systems. Trying to change things early on is a great way to rub people up the wrong way.



                                If you want to implement change, do it slowly and make sure you have the right people on board, otherwise these sort of politics can come into play.



                                As far as the project being over your head, if a project is over your head then you need to tell someone. The longer your leave it the more serious it will become. Always tell people what resources you will need for a job (including support from other staff). It's important to establish roles in each project.







                                share|improve this answer










                                New contributor




                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Sep 28 at 10:31





















                                New contributor




                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                answered Sep 28 at 10:15









                                John M

                                911




                                911




                                New contributor




                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                New contributor





                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                John M is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.







                                • 21




                                  Not the downvoter, but I do disagree wit your answer: He was doing a good job, upper management liked his changes. Then suddenly that changed. That rarely happens naturally
                                  – Martijn
                                  Sep 28 at 13:03











                                • @Martijn: Does upper management actually know the effect of his changes on productivity (I'd guess not), or are they just hearing some lately-popular buzzwords, and acting like cheerleaders?
                                  – jamesqf
                                  Sep 28 at 16:06






                                • 3




                                  While this may or may not be good advice for his next job, I don't think it will work at his current one. The die is cast, and either he or his boss (or both) is going to lose.
                                  – Jim Clay
                                  Sep 28 at 16:10










                                • I think the challenge here is we're assuming that OP, who is new to their job, is able to make an accurate assessment of their situation. That's often not the case for new employees (definitely wasn't for me when I started) due to the Dunning Kruger Effect. It can take a few years of experience under your belt to be able to accurately assess your job situation. So OP could very likely be reading things all wrong. I think the assessment made in this answer is much more likely, and deserves more upvotes.
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago













                                • 21




                                  Not the downvoter, but I do disagree wit your answer: He was doing a good job, upper management liked his changes. Then suddenly that changed. That rarely happens naturally
                                  – Martijn
                                  Sep 28 at 13:03











                                • @Martijn: Does upper management actually know the effect of his changes on productivity (I'd guess not), or are they just hearing some lately-popular buzzwords, and acting like cheerleaders?
                                  – jamesqf
                                  Sep 28 at 16:06






                                • 3




                                  While this may or may not be good advice for his next job, I don't think it will work at his current one. The die is cast, and either he or his boss (or both) is going to lose.
                                  – Jim Clay
                                  Sep 28 at 16:10










                                • I think the challenge here is we're assuming that OP, who is new to their job, is able to make an accurate assessment of their situation. That's often not the case for new employees (definitely wasn't for me when I started) due to the Dunning Kruger Effect. It can take a few years of experience under your belt to be able to accurately assess your job situation. So OP could very likely be reading things all wrong. I think the assessment made in this answer is much more likely, and deserves more upvotes.
                                  – bob
                                  15 hours ago








                                21




                                21




                                Not the downvoter, but I do disagree wit your answer: He was doing a good job, upper management liked his changes. Then suddenly that changed. That rarely happens naturally
                                – Martijn
                                Sep 28 at 13:03





                                Not the downvoter, but I do disagree wit your answer: He was doing a good job, upper management liked his changes. Then suddenly that changed. That rarely happens naturally
                                – Martijn
                                Sep 28 at 13:03













                                @Martijn: Does upper management actually know the effect of his changes on productivity (I'd guess not), or are they just hearing some lately-popular buzzwords, and acting like cheerleaders?
                                – jamesqf
                                Sep 28 at 16:06




                                @Martijn: Does upper management actually know the effect of his changes on productivity (I'd guess not), or are they just hearing some lately-popular buzzwords, and acting like cheerleaders?
                                – jamesqf
                                Sep 28 at 16:06




                                3




                                3




                                While this may or may not be good advice for his next job, I don't think it will work at his current one. The die is cast, and either he or his boss (or both) is going to lose.
                                – Jim Clay
                                Sep 28 at 16:10




                                While this may or may not be good advice for his next job, I don't think it will work at his current one. The die is cast, and either he or his boss (or both) is going to lose.
                                – Jim Clay
                                Sep 28 at 16:10












                                I think the challenge here is we're assuming that OP, who is new to their job, is able to make an accurate assessment of their situation. That's often not the case for new employees (definitely wasn't for me when I started) due to the Dunning Kruger Effect. It can take a few years of experience under your belt to be able to accurately assess your job situation. So OP could very likely be reading things all wrong. I think the assessment made in this answer is much more likely, and deserves more upvotes.
                                – bob
                                15 hours ago





                                I think the challenge here is we're assuming that OP, who is new to their job, is able to make an accurate assessment of their situation. That's often not the case for new employees (definitely wasn't for me when I started) due to the Dunning Kruger Effect. It can take a few years of experience under your belt to be able to accurately assess your job situation. So OP could very likely be reading things all wrong. I think the assessment made in this answer is much more likely, and deserves more upvotes.
                                – bob
                                15 hours ago











                                up vote
                                -4
                                down vote













                                You are too good for your position.



                                Of course no one is ever going to tell you that, since it would likely give you hubris.



                                Instead, they will try to make it so uncomfortable for you that you will start looking for a better suited position. That way, they will have your self image under much stricter checks. Both the current employer and a future employer don't want some guy with uncontrollable hubris.






                                share|improve this answer






















                                • He admitted that he was incapable of doing his position. You only have his word for it that his manager is 'out to get him'.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:02










                                • @JamieClinton : He could have documented the praise and the raise and the rest of the positive things before the change as well as the negative things after the change. Actions speak louder than words sometimes.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:04










                                • I just disagree strongly on what actions we are seeing here. I don't see anything important. If he would have said, just once, that he had an excellent track record as a coder, my opinion would be 180 degrees different.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:12










                                • @JamieClinton some of the best can be quite humble and some of the worst are boasty and hopelessly clueless of how clueless they are. Just because someone says they are good it doesn't prove it.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:15






                                • 2




                                  This doesn't appear to be providing an actionable solution, just commentary on the situation, so I'm flagging it as not an answer.
                                  – doppelgreener
                                  8 hours ago














                                up vote
                                -4
                                down vote













                                You are too good for your position.



                                Of course no one is ever going to tell you that, since it would likely give you hubris.



                                Instead, they will try to make it so uncomfortable for you that you will start looking for a better suited position. That way, they will have your self image under much stricter checks. Both the current employer and a future employer don't want some guy with uncontrollable hubris.






                                share|improve this answer






















                                • He admitted that he was incapable of doing his position. You only have his word for it that his manager is 'out to get him'.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:02










                                • @JamieClinton : He could have documented the praise and the raise and the rest of the positive things before the change as well as the negative things after the change. Actions speak louder than words sometimes.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:04










                                • I just disagree strongly on what actions we are seeing here. I don't see anything important. If he would have said, just once, that he had an excellent track record as a coder, my opinion would be 180 degrees different.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:12










                                • @JamieClinton some of the best can be quite humble and some of the worst are boasty and hopelessly clueless of how clueless they are. Just because someone says they are good it doesn't prove it.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:15






                                • 2




                                  This doesn't appear to be providing an actionable solution, just commentary on the situation, so I'm flagging it as not an answer.
                                  – doppelgreener
                                  8 hours ago












                                up vote
                                -4
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                -4
                                down vote









                                You are too good for your position.



                                Of course no one is ever going to tell you that, since it would likely give you hubris.



                                Instead, they will try to make it so uncomfortable for you that you will start looking for a better suited position. That way, they will have your self image under much stricter checks. Both the current employer and a future employer don't want some guy with uncontrollable hubris.






                                share|improve this answer














                                You are too good for your position.



                                Of course no one is ever going to tell you that, since it would likely give you hubris.



                                Instead, they will try to make it so uncomfortable for you that you will start looking for a better suited position. That way, they will have your self image under much stricter checks. Both the current employer and a future employer don't want some guy with uncontrollable hubris.







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 2 days ago









                                Peter Mortensen

                                47447




                                47447










                                answered Sep 28 at 15:54









                                mathreadler

                                24319




                                24319











                                • He admitted that he was incapable of doing his position. You only have his word for it that his manager is 'out to get him'.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:02










                                • @JamieClinton : He could have documented the praise and the raise and the rest of the positive things before the change as well as the negative things after the change. Actions speak louder than words sometimes.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:04










                                • I just disagree strongly on what actions we are seeing here. I don't see anything important. If he would have said, just once, that he had an excellent track record as a coder, my opinion would be 180 degrees different.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:12










                                • @JamieClinton some of the best can be quite humble and some of the worst are boasty and hopelessly clueless of how clueless they are. Just because someone says they are good it doesn't prove it.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:15






                                • 2




                                  This doesn't appear to be providing an actionable solution, just commentary on the situation, so I'm flagging it as not an answer.
                                  – doppelgreener
                                  8 hours ago
















                                • He admitted that he was incapable of doing his position. You only have his word for it that his manager is 'out to get him'.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:02










                                • @JamieClinton : He could have documented the praise and the raise and the rest of the positive things before the change as well as the negative things after the change. Actions speak louder than words sometimes.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:04










                                • I just disagree strongly on what actions we are seeing here. I don't see anything important. If he would have said, just once, that he had an excellent track record as a coder, my opinion would be 180 degrees different.
                                  – Jamie Clinton
                                  Sep 28 at 17:12










                                • @JamieClinton some of the best can be quite humble and some of the worst are boasty and hopelessly clueless of how clueless they are. Just because someone says they are good it doesn't prove it.
                                  – mathreadler
                                  Sep 28 at 17:15






                                • 2




                                  This doesn't appear to be providing an actionable solution, just commentary on the situation, so I'm flagging it as not an answer.
                                  – doppelgreener
                                  8 hours ago















                                He admitted that he was incapable of doing his position. You only have his word for it that his manager is 'out to get him'.
                                – Jamie Clinton
                                Sep 28 at 17:02




                                He admitted that he was incapable of doing his position. You only have his word for it that his manager is 'out to get him'.
                                – Jamie Clinton
                                Sep 28 at 17:02












                                @JamieClinton : He could have documented the praise and the raise and the rest of the positive things before the change as well as the negative things after the change. Actions speak louder than words sometimes.
                                – mathreadler
                                Sep 28 at 17:04




                                @JamieClinton : He could have documented the praise and the raise and the rest of the positive things before the change as well as the negative things after the change. Actions speak louder than words sometimes.
                                – mathreadler
                                Sep 28 at 17:04












                                I just disagree strongly on what actions we are seeing here. I don't see anything important. If he would have said, just once, that he had an excellent track record as a coder, my opinion would be 180 degrees different.
                                – Jamie Clinton
                                Sep 28 at 17:12




                                I just disagree strongly on what actions we are seeing here. I don't see anything important. If he would have said, just once, that he had an excellent track record as a coder, my opinion would be 180 degrees different.
                                – Jamie Clinton
                                Sep 28 at 17:12












                                @JamieClinton some of the best can be quite humble and some of the worst are boasty and hopelessly clueless of how clueless they are. Just because someone says they are good it doesn't prove it.
                                – mathreadler
                                Sep 28 at 17:15




                                @JamieClinton some of the best can be quite humble and some of the worst are boasty and hopelessly clueless of how clueless they are. Just because someone says they are good it doesn't prove it.
                                – mathreadler
                                Sep 28 at 17:15




                                2




                                2




                                This doesn't appear to be providing an actionable solution, just commentary on the situation, so I'm flagging it as not an answer.
                                – doppelgreener
                                8 hours ago




                                This doesn't appear to be providing an actionable solution, just commentary on the situation, so I'm flagging it as not an answer.
                                – doppelgreener
                                8 hours ago










                                Anonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded


















                                Anonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Anonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Anonymous is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119909%2fi-fear-i-am-being-set-up-to-be-fired-by-my-direct-manager-how-to-save-my-job%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest

















































































                                Comments

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                What does second last employer means? [closed]

                                Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                                One-line joke