Is it true that two isomorphic subgroups are in the same orbit (group acting on all its subgroups)?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












If two subgroups are in the same orbit (with group acting on all of its subgroups by conjugation), they are isomorphic. But is the reverse true?






abstract-algebra group-theory







share|cite|improve this question





















  • No. This would roughly say that all autos must be inner, which isn't so.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago










  • What autos and inner stands for? And what result are you citing?
    – Daniel Li
    1 hour ago










  • Doesn't matter, due to TomGrubb's suggestion. But, "automorphisms" and "inner automorphisms."
    – Randall
    1 hour ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












If two subgroups are in the same orbit (with group acting on all of its subgroups by conjugation), they are isomorphic. But is the reverse true?






abstract-algebra group-theory







share|cite|improve this question





















  • No. This would roughly say that all autos must be inner, which isn't so.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago










  • What autos and inner stands for? And what result are you citing?
    – Daniel Li
    1 hour ago










  • Doesn't matter, due to TomGrubb's suggestion. But, "automorphisms" and "inner automorphisms."
    – Randall
    1 hour ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











If two subgroups are in the same orbit (with group acting on all of its subgroups by conjugation), they are isomorphic. But is the reverse true?






abstract-algebra group-theory







share|cite|improve this question













If two subgroups are in the same orbit (with group acting on all of its subgroups by conjugation), they are isomorphic. But is the reverse true?






abstract-algebra group-theory




abstract-algebra group-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









Daniel Li

508212




508212











  • No. This would roughly say that all autos must be inner, which isn't so.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago










  • What autos and inner stands for? And what result are you citing?
    – Daniel Li
    1 hour ago










  • Doesn't matter, due to TomGrubb's suggestion. But, "automorphisms" and "inner automorphisms."
    – Randall
    1 hour ago
















  • No. This would roughly say that all autos must be inner, which isn't so.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago










  • What autos and inner stands for? And what result are you citing?
    – Daniel Li
    1 hour ago










  • Doesn't matter, due to TomGrubb's suggestion. But, "automorphisms" and "inner automorphisms."
    – Randall
    1 hour ago















No. This would roughly say that all autos must be inner, which isn't so.
– Randall
1 hour ago




No. This would roughly say that all autos must be inner, which isn't so.
– Randall
1 hour ago












What autos and inner stands for? And what result are you citing?
– Daniel Li
1 hour ago




What autos and inner stands for? And what result are you citing?
– Daniel Li
1 hour ago












Doesn't matter, due to TomGrubb's suggestion. But, "automorphisms" and "inner automorphisms."
– Randall
1 hour ago




Doesn't matter, due to TomGrubb's suggestion. But, "automorphisms" and "inner automorphisms."
– Randall
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Hint: Conjugation in abelian groups is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • LOL, amazingly simple.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2938855%2fis-it-true-that-two-isomorphic-subgroups-are-in-the-same-orbit-group-acting-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
6
down vote













Hint: Conjugation in abelian groups is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • LOL, amazingly simple.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago














up vote
6
down vote













Hint: Conjugation in abelian groups is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • LOL, amazingly simple.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago












up vote
6
down vote










up vote
6
down vote









Hint: Conjugation in abelian groups is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer












Hint: Conjugation in abelian groups is trivial.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 1 hour ago









TomGrubb

10.5k11337




10.5k11337











  • LOL, amazingly simple.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago
















  • LOL, amazingly simple.
    – Randall
    1 hour ago















LOL, amazingly simple.
– Randall
1 hour ago




LOL, amazingly simple.
– Randall
1 hour ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2938855%2fis-it-true-that-two-isomorphic-subgroups-are-in-the-same-orbit-group-acting-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
Read more

Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugins nextgis share | improve this question edited 3 hours ago PolyGeo ♦ 51.9k 17 77 233 asked 4 hours ago IanGS 16 4 New contributor IanGS is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugin...
Read more

One-line joke

A one-liner is a joke that is delivered in a single line. A good one-liner is said to be pithy - concise and meaningful. [1] Comedians and actors use this comedic method as part of their act, e.g. Jimmy Carr, Tommy Cooper, Rodney Dangerfield, Norm Macdonald, Ken Dodd, Stewart Francis, Zach Galifianakis, Mitch Hedberg, Anthony Jeselnik, Milton Jones, Shappi Khorsandi, Jay London, Mark Linn-Baker, Demetri Martin, Groucho Marx, Dan Mintz, Emo Philips, Tim Vine, Steven Wright and Henny Youngman and Arnold Schwarzenegger. [ citation needed ] Many fictional characters are also known to deliver one-liners, including James Bond, who usually includes pithy and laconic quips after disposing of a villain. [ citation needed ] Examples "A baby seal walks into a club." "A dyslexic man walks into a bra." (Anonymous) "There are three types of people, those who can count and those who can't." "Venison's dear, isn't it?" (Jimmy Carr) "An escala...
Read more