Difference between grouping 16th note
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I found two different way to group 16th note in diffirent sheetmusic. I would like know if both are same or different as I am just a begunner to the world of music notes.
sheet-music
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I found two different way to group 16th note in diffirent sheetmusic. I would like know if both are same or different as I am just a begunner to the world of music notes.
sheet-music
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I found two different way to group 16th note in diffirent sheetmusic. I would like know if both are same or different as I am just a begunner to the world of music notes.
sheet-music
I found two different way to group 16th note in diffirent sheetmusic. I would like know if both are same or different as I am just a begunner to the world of music notes.
sheet-music
sheet-music
asked 1 hour ago
Sooraj
39519
39519
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
They could be the same, could be different. It can depend where they are in a bar, and what the time signature is. A lot of us still prefer to see 4/4 bars that split (to the reader) into two equal halves. The top version would, if it shows beats 2 and 3, not align to that ideal. But the bottom version would. If, in 4/4, the top version was on beats 1 and 2, or 3 and 4, it would work fine.
It can also be indicative of phrasing, although slurs do a much better job.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I would read them both the same way. This is just differences in publishing style. My guess is that the first one is an older style.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
They could be the same, could be different. It can depend where they are in a bar, and what the time signature is. A lot of us still prefer to see 4/4 bars that split (to the reader) into two equal halves. The top version would, if it shows beats 2 and 3, not align to that ideal. But the bottom version would. If, in 4/4, the top version was on beats 1 and 2, or 3 and 4, it would work fine.
It can also be indicative of phrasing, although slurs do a much better job.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
They could be the same, could be different. It can depend where they are in a bar, and what the time signature is. A lot of us still prefer to see 4/4 bars that split (to the reader) into two equal halves. The top version would, if it shows beats 2 and 3, not align to that ideal. But the bottom version would. If, in 4/4, the top version was on beats 1 and 2, or 3 and 4, it would work fine.
It can also be indicative of phrasing, although slurs do a much better job.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
They could be the same, could be different. It can depend where they are in a bar, and what the time signature is. A lot of us still prefer to see 4/4 bars that split (to the reader) into two equal halves. The top version would, if it shows beats 2 and 3, not align to that ideal. But the bottom version would. If, in 4/4, the top version was on beats 1 and 2, or 3 and 4, it would work fine.
It can also be indicative of phrasing, although slurs do a much better job.
They could be the same, could be different. It can depend where they are in a bar, and what the time signature is. A lot of us still prefer to see 4/4 bars that split (to the reader) into two equal halves. The top version would, if it shows beats 2 and 3, not align to that ideal. But the bottom version would. If, in 4/4, the top version was on beats 1 and 2, or 3 and 4, it would work fine.
It can also be indicative of phrasing, although slurs do a much better job.
answered 38 mins ago
Tim
89.5k1091227
89.5k1091227
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I would read them both the same way. This is just differences in publishing style. My guess is that the first one is an older style.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I would read them both the same way. This is just differences in publishing style. My guess is that the first one is an older style.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I would read them both the same way. This is just differences in publishing style. My guess is that the first one is an older style.
I would read them both the same way. This is just differences in publishing style. My guess is that the first one is an older style.
answered 1 hour ago
Heather S.
2,217215
2,217215
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f75064%2fdifference-between-grouping-16th-note%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password