Does damage from the +1 Talon Longsword from LMoP count as magical damage?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












One of my players has Talon, a +1 Longsword that deals slashing damage.



In regards to a creature that has "resistance to damage from non-magical weapons", does Talon deal magical or non-magical damage?










share|improve this question



















  • 3




    I don't see how this is a duplicate of the linked question. I believe this question is "Is a +1 longsword magical?" while the linked question is about what magic items do
    – lucasvw
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    Whereas I don't see how they aren't duplicates. "Does damage from a +1 weapon count as magical damage (for the purposes of bypassing a creature's 'resistance to damage from non-magical weapons' as implied by the body text)?" and "Do magic weapons bypass a monsters' resistance to non-magic weapons?" are, in my mind, exactly the same. If the OP is in fact asking if a +1 longsword is magical then that needs to be clarified.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    Is this a standard item or a homebrew?
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • @NautArch it is Talon, the +1 Longsword that is written into the Lost Mines of Phandelver campaign.
    – BradenA8
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    If other descriptions don't contradict this, a +X weapon is always magical. "Magical" isn't a damage type (it's still slashing damage) it's just a different source.
    – Cubic
    15 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












One of my players has Talon, a +1 Longsword that deals slashing damage.



In regards to a creature that has "resistance to damage from non-magical weapons", does Talon deal magical or non-magical damage?










share|improve this question



















  • 3




    I don't see how this is a duplicate of the linked question. I believe this question is "Is a +1 longsword magical?" while the linked question is about what magic items do
    – lucasvw
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    Whereas I don't see how they aren't duplicates. "Does damage from a +1 weapon count as magical damage (for the purposes of bypassing a creature's 'resistance to damage from non-magical weapons' as implied by the body text)?" and "Do magic weapons bypass a monsters' resistance to non-magic weapons?" are, in my mind, exactly the same. If the OP is in fact asking if a +1 longsword is magical then that needs to be clarified.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    Is this a standard item or a homebrew?
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • @NautArch it is Talon, the +1 Longsword that is written into the Lost Mines of Phandelver campaign.
    – BradenA8
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    If other descriptions don't contradict this, a +X weapon is always magical. "Magical" isn't a damage type (it's still slashing damage) it's just a different source.
    – Cubic
    15 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











One of my players has Talon, a +1 Longsword that deals slashing damage.



In regards to a creature that has "resistance to damage from non-magical weapons", does Talon deal magical or non-magical damage?










share|improve this question















One of my players has Talon, a +1 Longsword that deals slashing damage.



In regards to a creature that has "resistance to damage from non-magical weapons", does Talon deal magical or non-magical damage?







dnd-5e magic-items weapons damage-resistance






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 mins ago









NautArch

47.7k6168322




47.7k6168322










asked 1 hour ago









BradenA8

765416




765416







  • 3




    I don't see how this is a duplicate of the linked question. I believe this question is "Is a +1 longsword magical?" while the linked question is about what magic items do
    – lucasvw
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    Whereas I don't see how they aren't duplicates. "Does damage from a +1 weapon count as magical damage (for the purposes of bypassing a creature's 'resistance to damage from non-magical weapons' as implied by the body text)?" and "Do magic weapons bypass a monsters' resistance to non-magic weapons?" are, in my mind, exactly the same. If the OP is in fact asking if a +1 longsword is magical then that needs to be clarified.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    Is this a standard item or a homebrew?
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • @NautArch it is Talon, the +1 Longsword that is written into the Lost Mines of Phandelver campaign.
    – BradenA8
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    If other descriptions don't contradict this, a +X weapon is always magical. "Magical" isn't a damage type (it's still slashing damage) it's just a different source.
    – Cubic
    15 mins ago












  • 3




    I don't see how this is a duplicate of the linked question. I believe this question is "Is a +1 longsword magical?" while the linked question is about what magic items do
    – lucasvw
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    Whereas I don't see how they aren't duplicates. "Does damage from a +1 weapon count as magical damage (for the purposes of bypassing a creature's 'resistance to damage from non-magical weapons' as implied by the body text)?" and "Do magic weapons bypass a monsters' resistance to non-magic weapons?" are, in my mind, exactly the same. If the OP is in fact asking if a +1 longsword is magical then that needs to be clarified.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago







  • 1




    Is this a standard item or a homebrew?
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • @NautArch it is Talon, the +1 Longsword that is written into the Lost Mines of Phandelver campaign.
    – BradenA8
    40 mins ago






  • 1




    If other descriptions don't contradict this, a +X weapon is always magical. "Magical" isn't a damage type (it's still slashing damage) it's just a different source.
    – Cubic
    15 mins ago







3




3




I don't see how this is a duplicate of the linked question. I believe this question is "Is a +1 longsword magical?" while the linked question is about what magic items do
– lucasvw
1 hour ago




I don't see how this is a duplicate of the linked question. I believe this question is "Is a +1 longsword magical?" while the linked question is about what magic items do
– lucasvw
1 hour ago




2




2




Whereas I don't see how they aren't duplicates. "Does damage from a +1 weapon count as magical damage (for the purposes of bypassing a creature's 'resistance to damage from non-magical weapons' as implied by the body text)?" and "Do magic weapons bypass a monsters' resistance to non-magic weapons?" are, in my mind, exactly the same. If the OP is in fact asking if a +1 longsword is magical then that needs to be clarified.
– Purple Monkey
1 hour ago





Whereas I don't see how they aren't duplicates. "Does damage from a +1 weapon count as magical damage (for the purposes of bypassing a creature's 'resistance to damage from non-magical weapons' as implied by the body text)?" and "Do magic weapons bypass a monsters' resistance to non-magic weapons?" are, in my mind, exactly the same. If the OP is in fact asking if a +1 longsword is magical then that needs to be clarified.
– Purple Monkey
1 hour ago





1




1




Is this a standard item or a homebrew?
– NautArch
1 hour ago




Is this a standard item or a homebrew?
– NautArch
1 hour ago












@NautArch it is Talon, the +1 Longsword that is written into the Lost Mines of Phandelver campaign.
– BradenA8
40 mins ago




@NautArch it is Talon, the +1 Longsword that is written into the Lost Mines of Phandelver campaign.
– BradenA8
40 mins ago




1




1




If other descriptions don't contradict this, a +X weapon is always magical. "Magical" isn't a damage type (it's still slashing damage) it's just a different source.
– Cubic
15 mins ago




If other descriptions don't contradict this, a +X weapon is always magical. "Magical" isn't a damage type (it's still slashing damage) it's just a different source.
– Cubic
15 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Ask your DM



The only item in published material that matches this description is a +1 weapon (DMG 213), which is a magical item and thus bypasses resistance to non-magical attacks.



However your DM is free to invent any item. Possibly the sword is of such craftsmanship that it performs better in combat. In that case it might not be considered a magical item and to overcome resistance to non-magical attacks.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    Just a minor nit-pick... there is no such thing as magical damage. There are damage types and they are from a magical attack or they are not. Monster Manual Errata's first entry might be worth referencing.
    – Slagmoth
    16 mins ago










  • @Slagmoth True, addressed.
    – Szega
    8 mins ago










  • OP provided more details as to what their +1 Longsword actually is (and is from). You may need to update your answer.
    – NautArch
    6 mins ago











  • @KorvinStarmast I don't have LMoP so can't reference where that item is detailed nor what its entry actually says. I had started an answer until I realized I couldn't give it enough weight with citation tbh.
    – Slagmoth
    41 secs ago










  • Your last two sentences are about items from previous editions. They don't fit this edition, though you are correct that a DM could create them. @Slagmoth Ok, fair enough.
    – KorvinStarmast
    35 secs ago


















up vote
1
down vote













Yes



In this case the answer is yes, as Talon is a magical item which confers a bonus of +1 to attack and damage it counts as a magical item for the purposes of negating damage resistance.





share




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134271%2fdoes-damage-from-the-1-talon-longsword-from-lmop-count-as-magical-damage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Ask your DM



    The only item in published material that matches this description is a +1 weapon (DMG 213), which is a magical item and thus bypasses resistance to non-magical attacks.



    However your DM is free to invent any item. Possibly the sword is of such craftsmanship that it performs better in combat. In that case it might not be considered a magical item and to overcome resistance to non-magical attacks.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      Just a minor nit-pick... there is no such thing as magical damage. There are damage types and they are from a magical attack or they are not. Monster Manual Errata's first entry might be worth referencing.
      – Slagmoth
      16 mins ago










    • @Slagmoth True, addressed.
      – Szega
      8 mins ago










    • OP provided more details as to what their +1 Longsword actually is (and is from). You may need to update your answer.
      – NautArch
      6 mins ago











    • @KorvinStarmast I don't have LMoP so can't reference where that item is detailed nor what its entry actually says. I had started an answer until I realized I couldn't give it enough weight with citation tbh.
      – Slagmoth
      41 secs ago










    • Your last two sentences are about items from previous editions. They don't fit this edition, though you are correct that a DM could create them. @Slagmoth Ok, fair enough.
      – KorvinStarmast
      35 secs ago















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Ask your DM



    The only item in published material that matches this description is a +1 weapon (DMG 213), which is a magical item and thus bypasses resistance to non-magical attacks.



    However your DM is free to invent any item. Possibly the sword is of such craftsmanship that it performs better in combat. In that case it might not be considered a magical item and to overcome resistance to non-magical attacks.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      Just a minor nit-pick... there is no such thing as magical damage. There are damage types and they are from a magical attack or they are not. Monster Manual Errata's first entry might be worth referencing.
      – Slagmoth
      16 mins ago










    • @Slagmoth True, addressed.
      – Szega
      8 mins ago










    • OP provided more details as to what their +1 Longsword actually is (and is from). You may need to update your answer.
      – NautArch
      6 mins ago











    • @KorvinStarmast I don't have LMoP so can't reference where that item is detailed nor what its entry actually says. I had started an answer until I realized I couldn't give it enough weight with citation tbh.
      – Slagmoth
      41 secs ago










    • Your last two sentences are about items from previous editions. They don't fit this edition, though you are correct that a DM could create them. @Slagmoth Ok, fair enough.
      – KorvinStarmast
      35 secs ago













    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    Ask your DM



    The only item in published material that matches this description is a +1 weapon (DMG 213), which is a magical item and thus bypasses resistance to non-magical attacks.



    However your DM is free to invent any item. Possibly the sword is of such craftsmanship that it performs better in combat. In that case it might not be considered a magical item and to overcome resistance to non-magical attacks.






    share|improve this answer














    Ask your DM



    The only item in published material that matches this description is a +1 weapon (DMG 213), which is a magical item and thus bypasses resistance to non-magical attacks.



    However your DM is free to invent any item. Possibly the sword is of such craftsmanship that it performs better in combat. In that case it might not be considered a magical item and to overcome resistance to non-magical attacks.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 11 mins ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    Szega

    35.5k4147180




    35.5k4147180







    • 1




      Just a minor nit-pick... there is no such thing as magical damage. There are damage types and they are from a magical attack or they are not. Monster Manual Errata's first entry might be worth referencing.
      – Slagmoth
      16 mins ago










    • @Slagmoth True, addressed.
      – Szega
      8 mins ago










    • OP provided more details as to what their +1 Longsword actually is (and is from). You may need to update your answer.
      – NautArch
      6 mins ago











    • @KorvinStarmast I don't have LMoP so can't reference where that item is detailed nor what its entry actually says. I had started an answer until I realized I couldn't give it enough weight with citation tbh.
      – Slagmoth
      41 secs ago










    • Your last two sentences are about items from previous editions. They don't fit this edition, though you are correct that a DM could create them. @Slagmoth Ok, fair enough.
      – KorvinStarmast
      35 secs ago













    • 1




      Just a minor nit-pick... there is no such thing as magical damage. There are damage types and they are from a magical attack or they are not. Monster Manual Errata's first entry might be worth referencing.
      – Slagmoth
      16 mins ago










    • @Slagmoth True, addressed.
      – Szega
      8 mins ago










    • OP provided more details as to what their +1 Longsword actually is (and is from). You may need to update your answer.
      – NautArch
      6 mins ago











    • @KorvinStarmast I don't have LMoP so can't reference where that item is detailed nor what its entry actually says. I had started an answer until I realized I couldn't give it enough weight with citation tbh.
      – Slagmoth
      41 secs ago










    • Your last two sentences are about items from previous editions. They don't fit this edition, though you are correct that a DM could create them. @Slagmoth Ok, fair enough.
      – KorvinStarmast
      35 secs ago








    1




    1




    Just a minor nit-pick... there is no such thing as magical damage. There are damage types and they are from a magical attack or they are not. Monster Manual Errata's first entry might be worth referencing.
    – Slagmoth
    16 mins ago




    Just a minor nit-pick... there is no such thing as magical damage. There are damage types and they are from a magical attack or they are not. Monster Manual Errata's first entry might be worth referencing.
    – Slagmoth
    16 mins ago












    @Slagmoth True, addressed.
    – Szega
    8 mins ago




    @Slagmoth True, addressed.
    – Szega
    8 mins ago












    OP provided more details as to what their +1 Longsword actually is (and is from). You may need to update your answer.
    – NautArch
    6 mins ago





    OP provided more details as to what their +1 Longsword actually is (and is from). You may need to update your answer.
    – NautArch
    6 mins ago













    @KorvinStarmast I don't have LMoP so can't reference where that item is detailed nor what its entry actually says. I had started an answer until I realized I couldn't give it enough weight with citation tbh.
    – Slagmoth
    41 secs ago




    @KorvinStarmast I don't have LMoP so can't reference where that item is detailed nor what its entry actually says. I had started an answer until I realized I couldn't give it enough weight with citation tbh.
    – Slagmoth
    41 secs ago












    Your last two sentences are about items from previous editions. They don't fit this edition, though you are correct that a DM could create them. @Slagmoth Ok, fair enough.
    – KorvinStarmast
    35 secs ago





    Your last two sentences are about items from previous editions. They don't fit this edition, though you are correct that a DM could create them. @Slagmoth Ok, fair enough.
    – KorvinStarmast
    35 secs ago













    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Yes



    In this case the answer is yes, as Talon is a magical item which confers a bonus of +1 to attack and damage it counts as a magical item for the purposes of negating damage resistance.





    share
























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Yes



      In this case the answer is yes, as Talon is a magical item which confers a bonus of +1 to attack and damage it counts as a magical item for the purposes of negating damage resistance.





      share






















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Yes



        In this case the answer is yes, as Talon is a magical item which confers a bonus of +1 to attack and damage it counts as a magical item for the purposes of negating damage resistance.





        share












        Yes



        In this case the answer is yes, as Talon is a magical item which confers a bonus of +1 to attack and damage it counts as a magical item for the purposes of negating damage resistance.






        share











        share


        share










        answered 4 mins ago









        Josh

        1,485416




        1,485416



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134271%2fdoes-damage-from-the-1-talon-longsword-from-lmop-count-as-magical-damage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery