What do truncated Histogram spikes indicate
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I teach a class in fine art printing. During my last class we were looking at an image in LightRoom CC Classic and someone asked why the midtone spike in the image histogram was exceeded the top limit. So, it was cut off at the top. Since then, I have noticed this is rather common. But, I have no idea why it is or what it indicates. The response appear to be out of the graphic range of the histogram. But, so what?
histogram
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I teach a class in fine art printing. During my last class we were looking at an image in LightRoom CC Classic and someone asked why the midtone spike in the image histogram was exceeded the top limit. So, it was cut off at the top. Since then, I have noticed this is rather common. But, I have no idea why it is or what it indicates. The response appear to be out of the graphic range of the histogram. But, so what?
histogram
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I teach a class in fine art printing. During my last class we were looking at an image in LightRoom CC Classic and someone asked why the midtone spike in the image histogram was exceeded the top limit. So, it was cut off at the top. Since then, I have noticed this is rather common. But, I have no idea why it is or what it indicates. The response appear to be out of the graphic range of the histogram. But, so what?
histogram
New contributor
I teach a class in fine art printing. During my last class we were looking at an image in LightRoom CC Classic and someone asked why the midtone spike in the image histogram was exceeded the top limit. So, it was cut off at the top. Since then, I have noticed this is rather common. But, I have no idea why it is or what it indicates. The response appear to be out of the graphic range of the histogram. But, so what?
histogram
histogram
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
Paul Schillinger
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
It doesn't exceed the top of the histogram scale. That may appear common, only because histograms are always normalized. Data is intentionally scaled so that the peak value reaches the top (this shows low values better). And the exact count is unimportant. The range of distribution is the only thing important.
So all histograms approximately reach the full height possible (some one data value reaches the top). A histogram consisting of one spike of all pixels with only a single value will reach the top (clipping for example). Or a smooth histogram with a very wide full even range will also reach the top. However, some extreme rounding of data counts is of course necessary, because there are megapixels of values, but only a few possible pixels of histogram video display to show it. Any flat top of a peak is due to this necessary rounding.
As tonal things are adjusted, the heights may jump around, because the height does NOT represent brightness, it represents a count of pixels with that brightness, normalized to reach the top.
2
I think this answer is clearer than those in the similar question photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/â¦
â dmkonlinux
34 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
It doesn't exceed the top of the histogram scale. That may appear common, only because histograms are always normalized. Data is intentionally scaled so that the peak value reaches the top (this shows low values better). And the exact count is unimportant. The range of distribution is the only thing important.
So all histograms approximately reach the full height possible (some one data value reaches the top). A histogram consisting of one spike of all pixels with only a single value will reach the top (clipping for example). Or a smooth histogram with a very wide full even range will also reach the top. However, some extreme rounding of data counts is of course necessary, because there are megapixels of values, but only a few possible pixels of histogram video display to show it. Any flat top of a peak is due to this necessary rounding.
As tonal things are adjusted, the heights may jump around, because the height does NOT represent brightness, it represents a count of pixels with that brightness, normalized to reach the top.
2
I think this answer is clearer than those in the similar question photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/â¦
â dmkonlinux
34 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
It doesn't exceed the top of the histogram scale. That may appear common, only because histograms are always normalized. Data is intentionally scaled so that the peak value reaches the top (this shows low values better). And the exact count is unimportant. The range of distribution is the only thing important.
So all histograms approximately reach the full height possible (some one data value reaches the top). A histogram consisting of one spike of all pixels with only a single value will reach the top (clipping for example). Or a smooth histogram with a very wide full even range will also reach the top. However, some extreme rounding of data counts is of course necessary, because there are megapixels of values, but only a few possible pixels of histogram video display to show it. Any flat top of a peak is due to this necessary rounding.
As tonal things are adjusted, the heights may jump around, because the height does NOT represent brightness, it represents a count of pixels with that brightness, normalized to reach the top.
2
I think this answer is clearer than those in the similar question photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/â¦
â dmkonlinux
34 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
It doesn't exceed the top of the histogram scale. That may appear common, only because histograms are always normalized. Data is intentionally scaled so that the peak value reaches the top (this shows low values better). And the exact count is unimportant. The range of distribution is the only thing important.
So all histograms approximately reach the full height possible (some one data value reaches the top). A histogram consisting of one spike of all pixels with only a single value will reach the top (clipping for example). Or a smooth histogram with a very wide full even range will also reach the top. However, some extreme rounding of data counts is of course necessary, because there are megapixels of values, but only a few possible pixels of histogram video display to show it. Any flat top of a peak is due to this necessary rounding.
As tonal things are adjusted, the heights may jump around, because the height does NOT represent brightness, it represents a count of pixels with that brightness, normalized to reach the top.
It doesn't exceed the top of the histogram scale. That may appear common, only because histograms are always normalized. Data is intentionally scaled so that the peak value reaches the top (this shows low values better). And the exact count is unimportant. The range of distribution is the only thing important.
So all histograms approximately reach the full height possible (some one data value reaches the top). A histogram consisting of one spike of all pixels with only a single value will reach the top (clipping for example). Or a smooth histogram with a very wide full even range will also reach the top. However, some extreme rounding of data counts is of course necessary, because there are megapixels of values, but only a few possible pixels of histogram video display to show it. Any flat top of a peak is due to this necessary rounding.
As tonal things are adjusted, the heights may jump around, because the height does NOT represent brightness, it represents a count of pixels with that brightness, normalized to reach the top.
edited 11 mins ago
answered 43 mins ago
WayneF
9,2361923
9,2361923
2
I think this answer is clearer than those in the similar question photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/â¦
â dmkonlinux
34 mins ago
add a comment |Â
2
I think this answer is clearer than those in the similar question photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/â¦
â dmkonlinux
34 mins ago
2
2
I think this answer is clearer than those in the similar question photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/â¦
â dmkonlinux
34 mins ago
I think this answer is clearer than those in the similar question photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2913/â¦
â dmkonlinux
34 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Paul Schillinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Paul Schillinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Paul Schillinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Paul Schillinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102343%2fwhat-do-truncated-histogram-spikes-indicate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password