Infinite finitely presented simple group (or more generally with trivial profinite completion) that is not amalgamated free product

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












As is described in the title. Is there a finitely presented group $G$, with trivial profinite completion $widehatG=0$, which is not amalgamated free product?



For example, the famous example Higman groups are all amalgamated free product.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 5




    Thompson’s groups T and V are finitely presented infinite simple groups with Serre’s property FA; in particular, they don’t split.
    – HJRW
    6 hours ago










  • Any finite simple group clearly has property FA, and hence is not an amalgamated free product.
    – Igor Belegradek
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @IgorBelegradek, that's true, but a finite simple group is equal to its profinite completion.
    – HJRW
    1 hour ago










  • Among infinite finitely presented simple groups, it is usually harder to to find non-FA groups than FA-groups. The first non-FA such groups are Burger-Mozes' groups. Checking that groups such as Thompson's group T or V have FA is quite easy. Also I'm not sure what is meant by "famous Higman groups". There's one famous Higman group (indeed an amalgam), generalizations (not called Higman groups as far as I know), and unrelated "Thompson-Higman groups" (which have FA).
    – YCor
    20 mins ago











  • It's always misleading when the question in the text does not match that in the title (of course the question can specify, but here it's the contrary, as simple groups are mentioned in the title and not the text).
    – YCor
    16 mins ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












As is described in the title. Is there a finitely presented group $G$, with trivial profinite completion $widehatG=0$, which is not amalgamated free product?



For example, the famous example Higman groups are all amalgamated free product.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 5




    Thompson’s groups T and V are finitely presented infinite simple groups with Serre’s property FA; in particular, they don’t split.
    – HJRW
    6 hours ago










  • Any finite simple group clearly has property FA, and hence is not an amalgamated free product.
    – Igor Belegradek
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @IgorBelegradek, that's true, but a finite simple group is equal to its profinite completion.
    – HJRW
    1 hour ago










  • Among infinite finitely presented simple groups, it is usually harder to to find non-FA groups than FA-groups. The first non-FA such groups are Burger-Mozes' groups. Checking that groups such as Thompson's group T or V have FA is quite easy. Also I'm not sure what is meant by "famous Higman groups". There's one famous Higman group (indeed an amalgam), generalizations (not called Higman groups as far as I know), and unrelated "Thompson-Higman groups" (which have FA).
    – YCor
    20 mins ago











  • It's always misleading when the question in the text does not match that in the title (of course the question can specify, but here it's the contrary, as simple groups are mentioned in the title and not the text).
    – YCor
    16 mins ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











As is described in the title. Is there a finitely presented group $G$, with trivial profinite completion $widehatG=0$, which is not amalgamated free product?



For example, the famous example Higman groups are all amalgamated free product.










share|cite|improve this question















As is described in the title. Is there a finitely presented group $G$, with trivial profinite completion $widehatG=0$, which is not amalgamated free product?



For example, the famous example Higman groups are all amalgamated free product.







gr.group-theory geometric-group-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 18 mins ago









YCor

26.2k379124




26.2k379124










asked 6 hours ago









Bruno

1307




1307







  • 5




    Thompson’s groups T and V are finitely presented infinite simple groups with Serre’s property FA; in particular, they don’t split.
    – HJRW
    6 hours ago










  • Any finite simple group clearly has property FA, and hence is not an amalgamated free product.
    – Igor Belegradek
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @IgorBelegradek, that's true, but a finite simple group is equal to its profinite completion.
    – HJRW
    1 hour ago










  • Among infinite finitely presented simple groups, it is usually harder to to find non-FA groups than FA-groups. The first non-FA such groups are Burger-Mozes' groups. Checking that groups such as Thompson's group T or V have FA is quite easy. Also I'm not sure what is meant by "famous Higman groups". There's one famous Higman group (indeed an amalgam), generalizations (not called Higman groups as far as I know), and unrelated "Thompson-Higman groups" (which have FA).
    – YCor
    20 mins ago











  • It's always misleading when the question in the text does not match that in the title (of course the question can specify, but here it's the contrary, as simple groups are mentioned in the title and not the text).
    – YCor
    16 mins ago












  • 5




    Thompson’s groups T and V are finitely presented infinite simple groups with Serre’s property FA; in particular, they don’t split.
    – HJRW
    6 hours ago










  • Any finite simple group clearly has property FA, and hence is not an amalgamated free product.
    – Igor Belegradek
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @IgorBelegradek, that's true, but a finite simple group is equal to its profinite completion.
    – HJRW
    1 hour ago










  • Among infinite finitely presented simple groups, it is usually harder to to find non-FA groups than FA-groups. The first non-FA such groups are Burger-Mozes' groups. Checking that groups such as Thompson's group T or V have FA is quite easy. Also I'm not sure what is meant by "famous Higman groups". There's one famous Higman group (indeed an amalgam), generalizations (not called Higman groups as far as I know), and unrelated "Thompson-Higman groups" (which have FA).
    – YCor
    20 mins ago











  • It's always misleading when the question in the text does not match that in the title (of course the question can specify, but here it's the contrary, as simple groups are mentioned in the title and not the text).
    – YCor
    16 mins ago







5




5




Thompson’s groups T and V are finitely presented infinite simple groups with Serre’s property FA; in particular, they don’t split.
– HJRW
6 hours ago




Thompson’s groups T and V are finitely presented infinite simple groups with Serre’s property FA; in particular, they don’t split.
– HJRW
6 hours ago












Any finite simple group clearly has property FA, and hence is not an amalgamated free product.
– Igor Belegradek
1 hour ago




Any finite simple group clearly has property FA, and hence is not an amalgamated free product.
– Igor Belegradek
1 hour ago




1




1




@IgorBelegradek, that's true, but a finite simple group is equal to its profinite completion.
– HJRW
1 hour ago




@IgorBelegradek, that's true, but a finite simple group is equal to its profinite completion.
– HJRW
1 hour ago












Among infinite finitely presented simple groups, it is usually harder to to find non-FA groups than FA-groups. The first non-FA such groups are Burger-Mozes' groups. Checking that groups such as Thompson's group T or V have FA is quite easy. Also I'm not sure what is meant by "famous Higman groups". There's one famous Higman group (indeed an amalgam), generalizations (not called Higman groups as far as I know), and unrelated "Thompson-Higman groups" (which have FA).
– YCor
20 mins ago





Among infinite finitely presented simple groups, it is usually harder to to find non-FA groups than FA-groups. The first non-FA such groups are Burger-Mozes' groups. Checking that groups such as Thompson's group T or V have FA is quite easy. Also I'm not sure what is meant by "famous Higman groups". There's one famous Higman group (indeed an amalgam), generalizations (not called Higman groups as far as I know), and unrelated "Thompson-Higman groups" (which have FA).
– YCor
20 mins ago













It's always misleading when the question in the text does not match that in the title (of course the question can specify, but here it's the contrary, as simple groups are mentioned in the title and not the text).
– YCor
16 mins ago




It's always misleading when the question in the text does not match that in the title (of course the question can specify, but here it's the contrary, as simple groups are mentioned in the title and not the text).
– YCor
16 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote



accepted










I'm going to flesh out my comment above to an answer. Thompson's groups $T$ and $V$ are famous examples of finitely presented infinite simple groups.



In this paper of Dan Farley, it is shown that $T$ and $V$ have Serre's property FA, which means that every time they act on a tree there is a global fixed point. (Farley says that this statement is originally due to Ken Brown.) When applied to the Bass--Serre tree of a splitting, it follows that any such splitting of $T$ or $V$ is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I see. Thanks for the explanation.
    – Bruno
    3 hours ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f313663%2finfinite-finitely-presented-simple-group-or-more-generally-with-trivial-profini%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
7
down vote



accepted










I'm going to flesh out my comment above to an answer. Thompson's groups $T$ and $V$ are famous examples of finitely presented infinite simple groups.



In this paper of Dan Farley, it is shown that $T$ and $V$ have Serre's property FA, which means that every time they act on a tree there is a global fixed point. (Farley says that this statement is originally due to Ken Brown.) When applied to the Bass--Serre tree of a splitting, it follows that any such splitting of $T$ or $V$ is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I see. Thanks for the explanation.
    – Bruno
    3 hours ago














up vote
7
down vote



accepted










I'm going to flesh out my comment above to an answer. Thompson's groups $T$ and $V$ are famous examples of finitely presented infinite simple groups.



In this paper of Dan Farley, it is shown that $T$ and $V$ have Serre's property FA, which means that every time they act on a tree there is a global fixed point. (Farley says that this statement is originally due to Ken Brown.) When applied to the Bass--Serre tree of a splitting, it follows that any such splitting of $T$ or $V$ is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer






















  • I see. Thanks for the explanation.
    – Bruno
    3 hours ago












up vote
7
down vote



accepted







up vote
7
down vote



accepted






I'm going to flesh out my comment above to an answer. Thompson's groups $T$ and $V$ are famous examples of finitely presented infinite simple groups.



In this paper of Dan Farley, it is shown that $T$ and $V$ have Serre's property FA, which means that every time they act on a tree there is a global fixed point. (Farley says that this statement is originally due to Ken Brown.) When applied to the Bass--Serre tree of a splitting, it follows that any such splitting of $T$ or $V$ is trivial.






share|cite|improve this answer














I'm going to flesh out my comment above to an answer. Thompson's groups $T$ and $V$ are famous examples of finitely presented infinite simple groups.



In this paper of Dan Farley, it is shown that $T$ and $V$ have Serre's property FA, which means that every time they act on a tree there is a global fixed point. (Farley says that this statement is originally due to Ken Brown.) When applied to the Bass--Serre tree of a splitting, it follows that any such splitting of $T$ or $V$ is trivial.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 5 hours ago

























answered 5 hours ago









HJRW

17.9k250115




17.9k250115











  • I see. Thanks for the explanation.
    – Bruno
    3 hours ago
















  • I see. Thanks for the explanation.
    – Bruno
    3 hours ago















I see. Thanks for the explanation.
– Bruno
3 hours ago




I see. Thanks for the explanation.
– Bruno
3 hours ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f313663%2finfinite-finitely-presented-simple-group-or-more-generally-with-trivial-profini%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery