A variation on the subset relation with an underlying squiggle

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

up vote
2
down vote

favorite

1

I'm looking for a variation on the subseteq relation, but with an underlying squiggle instead of a line. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the square in the last printed line of following example.

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= square
endalign*
enddocument

I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.

symbols

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  stix has subsetapprox but with 2 squiggles.
  – CarLaTeX
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: This would work, except I get a LaTeX Error: Too many symbol fonts declared. when I try to use the package stix in my actual document (not the sample one listed in my post above).
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: Upon further inspection, it appears there are three packages in my preamble that clash with stix, namely mathrsfs, stmaryrd, and unicode-math (I should note that I use the lualatex format with the scrbook document class). The first two packages produce the error message listed in my previous comment, whereas the third package produces the error message Command 'mathbfit' already defined. Is there a way to resolve these errors, so I can use stix's subsetapprox command?
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

favorite

1

I'm looking for a variation on the subseteq relation, but with an underlying squiggle instead of a line. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the square in the last printed line of following example.

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= square
endalign*
enddocument

I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.

symbols

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  stix has subsetapprox but with 2 squiggles.
  – CarLaTeX
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: This would work, except I get a LaTeX Error: Too many symbol fonts declared. when I try to use the package stix in my actual document (not the sample one listed in my post above).
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: Upon further inspection, it appears there are three packages in my preamble that clash with stix, namely mathrsfs, stmaryrd, and unicode-math (I should note that I use the lualatex format with the scrbook document class). The first two packages produce the error message listed in my previous comment, whereas the third package produces the error message Command 'mathbfit' already defined. Is there a way to resolve these errors, so I can use stix's subsetapprox command?
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

favorite

1

up vote
2
down vote

favorite

1

1

I'm looking for a variation on the subseteq relation, but with an underlying squiggle instead of a line. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the square in the last printed line of following example.

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= square
endalign*
enddocument

I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.

symbols

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

I'm looking for a variation on the subseteq relation, but with an underlying squiggle instead of a line. In other words, I'm looking for the symbol to substitute for the square in the last printed line of following example.

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb
begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= square
endalign*
enddocument

I couldn't find any matching symbol using detexify.

symbols

symbols

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

edited 3 hours ago

edited 3 hours ago

edited 3 hours ago

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

asked 3 hours ago

Evan Aad

3,50211227

3,50211227

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  stix has subsetapprox but with 2 squiggles.
  – CarLaTeX
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: This would work, except I get a LaTeX Error: Too many symbol fonts declared. when I try to use the package stix in my actual document (not the sample one listed in my post above).
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: Upon further inspection, it appears there are three packages in my preamble that clash with stix, namely mathrsfs, stmaryrd, and unicode-math (I should note that I use the lualatex format with the scrbook document class). The first two packages produce the error message listed in my previous comment, whereas the third package produces the error message Command 'mathbfit' already defined. Is there a way to resolve these errors, so I can use stix's subsetapprox command?
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  stix has subsetapprox but with 2 squiggles.
  – CarLaTeX
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: This would work, except I get a LaTeX Error: Too many symbol fonts declared. when I try to use the package stix in my actual document (not the sample one listed in my post above).
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @CarLaTeX: Upon further inspection, it appears there are three packages in my preamble that clash with stix, namely mathrsfs, stmaryrd, and unicode-math (I should note that I use the lualatex format with the scrbook document class). The first two packages produce the error message listed in my previous comment, whereas the third package produces the error message Command 'mathbfit' already defined. Is there a way to resolve these errors, so I can use stix's subsetapprox command?
  – Evan Aad
  2 hours ago
  
  

  
  
  
  

1

1

stix has subsetapprox but with 2 squiggles.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago

stix has subsetapprox but with 2 squiggles.
– CarLaTeX
2 hours ago

@CarLaTeX: This would work, except I get a LaTeX Error: Too many symbol fonts declared. when I try to use the package stix in my actual document (not the sample one listed in my post above).
– Evan Aad
2 hours ago

@CarLaTeX: This would work, except I get a LaTeX Error: Too many symbol fonts declared. when I try to use the package stix in my actual document (not the sample one listed in my post above).
– Evan Aad
2 hours ago

@CarLaTeX: Upon further inspection, it appears there are three packages in my preamble that clash with stix, namely mathrsfs, stmaryrd, and unicode-math (I should note that I use the lualatex format with the scrbook document class). The first two packages produce the error message listed in my previous comment, whereas the third package produces the error message Command 'mathbfit' already defined. Is there a way to resolve these errors, so I can use stix's subsetapprox command?
– Evan Aad
2 hours ago

@CarLaTeX: Upon further inspection, it appears there are three packages in my preamble that clash with stix, namely mathrsfs, stmaryrd, and unicode-math (I should note that I use the lualatex format with the scrbook document class). The first two packages produce the error message listed in my previous comment, whereas the third package produces the error message Command 'mathbfit' already defined. Is there a way to resolve these errors, so I can use stix's subsetapprox command?
– Evan Aad
2 hours ago

add a comment | 

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

up vote
2
down vote



accepted

If stix package gives you some incompatibilities, you can define your own symbol, without any additional package:

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb

newcommandsubsetsimmathrelooalignraise.4exhbox$subset$cr$raise-.9exhbox$sim$$

begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= subsetsim
endalign*
[ precsim lesssim subsetsim ]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 9 mins ago

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Thanks you! Is there a way to lower the squiggle a little bit, so the vertical space between the subset symbol and the squiggle resembles that used in precsim and lesssim?
  – Evan Aad
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad Of course, instead of raise-.8ex you can put a bigger value. I'm modifying.
  – CarLaTeX
  13 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See my renewed answer. You can also furtherly refine...
  – CarLaTeX
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See campa's answer, it's better than mine.
  – CarLaTeX
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

You can do that with the accents package:

documentclass[border=2pt]standalone

usepackageamssymb, accents %
newcommandsubsetsimmathrelunderaccentmkern6musimsubset
newcommandsupsetsimmathrelunderaccentbacksimmkern2musupset%stackMathmathrelstackinsetc0exc-1exsimsubset

begindocument

 $ E subsetsim F iff F supsetsim E$

enddocument 

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

A slight improvement of CarLaTeX's answer which scales correctly in scriptstyle and scriptscriptstyle.

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

newcommand*subsetsimmathrelmathpalettesubsetsimauxrelax
newcommand*subsetsimaux[2]%
 setbox0=hboxmathsurround=0pt$#1sim$%
 ooalignraise.5ht0hbox$#1subset$crlowerht0box0


begindocument
$precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim$
enddocument

The difference with the built-in symbols is visible in scriptstyle and obvious in scriptscriptstyle but I think one can live with it.

share|improve this answer

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I was just replying that I didn't know mathpalette :)
  – CarLaTeX
  8 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456848%2fa-variation-on-the-subset-relation-with-an-underlying-squiggle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

up vote
2
down vote



accepted

If stix package gives you some incompatibilities, you can define your own symbol, without any additional package:

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb

newcommandsubsetsimmathrelooalignraise.4exhbox$subset$cr$raise-.9exhbox$sim$$

begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= subsetsim
endalign*
[ precsim lesssim subsetsim ]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 9 mins ago

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Thanks you! Is there a way to lower the squiggle a little bit, so the vertical space between the subset symbol and the squiggle resembles that used in precsim and lesssim?
  – Evan Aad
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad Of course, instead of raise-.8ex you can put a bigger value. I'm modifying.
  – CarLaTeX
  13 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See my renewed answer. You can also furtherly refine...
  – CarLaTeX
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See campa's answer, it's better than mine.
  – CarLaTeX
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote



accepted

If stix package gives you some incompatibilities, you can define your own symbol, without any additional package:

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb

newcommandsubsetsimmathrelooalignraise.4exhbox$subset$cr$raise-.9exhbox$sim$$

begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= subsetsim
endalign*
[ precsim lesssim subsetsim ]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 9 mins ago

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Thanks you! Is there a way to lower the squiggle a little bit, so the vertical space between the subset symbol and the squiggle resembles that used in precsim and lesssim?
  – Evan Aad
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad Of course, instead of raise-.8ex you can put a bigger value. I'm modifying.
  – CarLaTeX
  13 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See my renewed answer. You can also furtherly refine...
  – CarLaTeX
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See campa's answer, it's better than mine.
  – CarLaTeX
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote



accepted

up vote
2
down vote



accepted

If stix package gives you some incompatibilities, you can define your own symbol, without any additional package:

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb

newcommandsubsetsimmathrelooalignraise.4exhbox$subset$cr$raise-.9exhbox$sim$$

begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= subsetsim
endalign*
[ precsim lesssim subsetsim ]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 9 mins ago

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

If stix package gives you some incompatibilities, you can define your own symbol, without any additional package:

documentclassamsart
usepackageamssymb

newcommandsubsetsimmathrelooalignraise.4exhbox$subset$cr$raise-.9exhbox$sim$$

begindocument
beginalign*
prec + sim &= precsim\
< + sim &= lesssim\
subset + sim &= subsetsim
endalign*
[ precsim lesssim subsetsim ]
enddocument

share|improve this answer

edited 9 mins ago

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

edited 9 mins ago

edited 9 mins ago

edited 9 mins ago

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

answered 1 hour ago

CarLaTeX

26.2k444116

26.2k444116

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Thanks you! Is there a way to lower the squiggle a little bit, so the vertical space between the subset symbol and the squiggle resembles that used in precsim and lesssim?
  – Evan Aad
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad Of course, instead of raise-.8ex you can put a bigger value. I'm modifying.
  – CarLaTeX
  13 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See my renewed answer. You can also furtherly refine...
  – CarLaTeX
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See campa's answer, it's better than mine.
  – CarLaTeX
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  Thanks you! Is there a way to lower the squiggle a little bit, so the vertical space between the subset symbol and the squiggle resembles that used in precsim and lesssim?
  – Evan Aad
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad Of course, instead of raise-.8ex you can put a bigger value. I'm modifying.
  – CarLaTeX
  13 mins ago
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See my renewed answer. You can also furtherly refine...
  – CarLaTeX
  9 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  @EvanAad See campa's answer, it's better than mine.
  – CarLaTeX
  7 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

Thanks you! Is there a way to lower the squiggle a little bit, so the vertical space between the subset symbol and the squiggle resembles that used in precsim and lesssim?
– Evan Aad
15 mins ago

Thanks you! Is there a way to lower the squiggle a little bit, so the vertical space between the subset symbol and the squiggle resembles that used in precsim and lesssim?
– Evan Aad
15 mins ago

1

1

@EvanAad Of course, instead of raise-.8ex you can put a bigger value. I'm modifying.
– CarLaTeX
13 mins ago

@EvanAad Of course, instead of raise-.8ex you can put a bigger value. I'm modifying.
– CarLaTeX
13 mins ago

@EvanAad See my renewed answer. You can also furtherly refine...
– CarLaTeX
9 mins ago

@EvanAad See my renewed answer. You can also furtherly refine...
– CarLaTeX
9 mins ago

@EvanAad See campa's answer, it's better than mine.
– CarLaTeX
7 mins ago

@EvanAad See campa's answer, it's better than mine.
– CarLaTeX
7 mins ago

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

You can do that with the accents package:

documentclass[border=2pt]standalone

usepackageamssymb, accents %
newcommandsubsetsimmathrelunderaccentmkern6musimsubset
newcommandsupsetsimmathrelunderaccentbacksimmkern2musupset%stackMathmathrelstackinsetc0exc-1exsimsubset

begindocument

 $ E subsetsim F iff F supsetsim E$

enddocument 

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

You can do that with the accents package:

documentclass[border=2pt]standalone

usepackageamssymb, accents %
newcommandsubsetsimmathrelunderaccentmkern6musimsubset
newcommandsupsetsimmathrelunderaccentbacksimmkern2musupset%stackMathmathrelstackinsetc0exc-1exsimsubset

begindocument

 $ E subsetsim F iff F supsetsim E$

enddocument 

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

up vote
2
down vote

You can do that with the accents package:

documentclass[border=2pt]standalone

usepackageamssymb, accents %
newcommandsubsetsimmathrelunderaccentmkern6musimsubset
newcommandsupsetsimmathrelunderaccentbacksimmkern2musupset%stackMathmathrelstackinsetc0exc-1exsimsubset

begindocument

 $ E subsetsim F iff F supsetsim E$

enddocument 

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

You can do that with the accents package:

documentclass[border=2pt]standalone

usepackageamssymb, accents %
newcommandsubsetsimmathrelunderaccentmkern6musimsubset
newcommandsupsetsimmathrelunderaccentbacksimmkern2musupset%stackMathmathrelstackinsetc0exc-1exsimsubset

begindocument

 $ E subsetsim F iff F supsetsim E$

enddocument 

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

answered 1 hour ago

Bernard

159k765192

159k765192

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

A slight improvement of CarLaTeX's answer which scales correctly in scriptstyle and scriptscriptstyle.

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

newcommand*subsetsimmathrelmathpalettesubsetsimauxrelax
newcommand*subsetsimaux[2]%
 setbox0=hboxmathsurround=0pt$#1sim$%
 ooalignraise.5ht0hbox$#1subset$crlowerht0box0


begindocument
$precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim$
enddocument

The difference with the built-in symbols is visible in scriptstyle and obvious in scriptscriptstyle but I think one can live with it.

share|improve this answer

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I was just replying that I didn't know mathpalette :)
  – CarLaTeX
  8 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

A slight improvement of CarLaTeX's answer which scales correctly in scriptstyle and scriptscriptstyle.

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

newcommand*subsetsimmathrelmathpalettesubsetsimauxrelax
newcommand*subsetsimaux[2]%
 setbox0=hboxmathsurround=0pt$#1sim$%
 ooalignraise.5ht0hbox$#1subset$crlowerht0box0


begindocument
$precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim$
enddocument

The difference with the built-in symbols is visible in scriptstyle and obvious in scriptscriptstyle but I think one can live with it.

share|improve this answer

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I was just replying that I didn't know mathpalette :)
  – CarLaTeX
  8 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

up vote
2
down vote

up vote
2
down vote

A slight improvement of CarLaTeX's answer which scales correctly in scriptstyle and scriptscriptstyle.

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

newcommand*subsetsimmathrelmathpalettesubsetsimauxrelax
newcommand*subsetsimaux[2]%
 setbox0=hboxmathsurround=0pt$#1sim$%
 ooalignraise.5ht0hbox$#1subset$crlowerht0box0


begindocument
$precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim$
enddocument

The difference with the built-in symbols is visible in scriptstyle and obvious in scriptscriptstyle but I think one can live with it.

share|improve this answer

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

A slight improvement of CarLaTeX's answer which scales correctly in scriptstyle and scriptscriptstyle.

documentclassarticle

usepackageamssymb

newcommand*subsetsimmathrelmathpalettesubsetsimauxrelax
newcommand*subsetsimaux[2]%
 setbox0=hboxmathsurround=0pt$#1sim$%
 ooalignraise.5ht0hbox$#1subset$crlowerht0box0


begindocument
$precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim_precsim lesssim subsetsim$
enddocument

The difference with the built-in symbols is visible in scriptstyle and obvious in scriptscriptstyle but I think one can live with it.

share|improve this answer

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

answered 14 mins ago

campa

6,10221437

6,10221437

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I was just replying that I didn't know mathpalette :)
  – CarLaTeX
  8 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  I was just replying that I didn't know mathpalette :)
  – CarLaTeX
  8 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

I was just replying that I didn't know mathpalette :)
– CarLaTeX
8 mins ago

I was just replying that I didn't know mathpalette :)
– CarLaTeX
8 mins ago

add a comment | 

 

draft saved

draft discarded

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456848%2fa-variation-on-the-subset-relation-with-an-underlying-squiggle%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Name Email

Name

Email

Name Email

Name

Email