Too many ni particles in one sentence?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I know, generally, multiples of the same particles in a sentence is okaaay, but perhaps not natural-sounding in everyday conversation? I'm trying to create longer sentences by stringing together clauses:



ninjaっぽいになるために、日光に行った。



Can any particles be dropped here? What should I change? As I understand, へ is used to emphasize direction, but I feel like I should be emphasizing the actual location.






particle-に







share|improve this question









New contributor




idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • @Chocolate oh okay, because っぽい is used to describe the becoming, it needs to be conjugated...
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I know, generally, multiples of the same particles in a sentence is okaaay, but perhaps not natural-sounding in everyday conversation? I'm trying to create longer sentences by stringing together clauses:



ninjaっぽいになるために、日光に行った。



Can any particles be dropped here? What should I change? As I understand, へ is used to emphasize direction, but I feel like I should be emphasizing the actual location.






particle-に







share|improve this question









New contributor




idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • @Chocolate oh okay, because っぽい is used to describe the becoming, it needs to be conjugated...
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I know, generally, multiples of the same particles in a sentence is okaaay, but perhaps not natural-sounding in everyday conversation? I'm trying to create longer sentences by stringing together clauses:



ninjaっぽいになるために、日光に行った。



Can any particles be dropped here? What should I change? As I understand, へ is used to emphasize direction, but I feel like I should be emphasizing the actual location.






particle-に







share|improve this question









New contributor




idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I know, generally, multiples of the same particles in a sentence is okaaay, but perhaps not natural-sounding in everyday conversation? I'm trying to create longer sentences by stringing together clauses:



ninjaっぽいになるために、日光に行った。



Can any particles be dropped here? What should I change? As I understand, へ is used to emphasize direction, but I feel like I should be emphasizing the actual location.






particle-に




particle-に






share|improve this question









New contributor




idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Flaw♦

14.4k441121




14.4k441121






New contributor




idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









idkgaijin

83




83




New contributor




idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






idkgaijin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • @Chocolate oh okay, because っぽい is used to describe the becoming, it needs to be conjugated...
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago
















  • @Chocolate oh okay, because っぽい is used to describe the becoming, it needs to be conjugated...
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago















@Chocolate oh okay, because っぽい is used to describe the becoming, it needs to be conjugated...
– idkgaijin
2 hours ago




@Chocolate oh okay, because っぽい is used to describe the becoming, it needs to be conjugated...
– idkgaijin
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










「～っぽいになる」 is grammatically incorrect. 「～っぽい」 conjugates to 「～っぽく」 in the adverbial/continuative form. cf: 「かわいい」→「かわいく」



日光に行った can be rephrased as 日光へ行った without changing the meaning. (～ヘ行った sounds a tiny little bit more formal to my native ear.)



So you can say:




Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光に行った。

Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光へ行った。




(You could also drop the に in ために, as in 「Ninjaっぽくなるため、日光へ行った。」 but this would sound pretty formal.)



You can also use 「なりたくて」, "wanting/hoping to be~", as in:




Ninjaっぽくなりたくて、日光に行った。







share|improve this answer






















  • Eh that's interesting - why does dropping the に in ために make it more formal?
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago










  • I can't say why... but 「V+ため～～」 often sounds more formal than 「V+ために～～」 when meaning "in order to~~" (purpose).
    – Chocolate
    2 hours ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






idkgaijin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61513%2ftoo-many-ni-particles-in-one-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










「～っぽいになる」 is grammatically incorrect. 「～っぽい」 conjugates to 「～っぽく」 in the adverbial/continuative form. cf: 「かわいい」→「かわいく」



日光に行った can be rephrased as 日光へ行った without changing the meaning. (～ヘ行った sounds a tiny little bit more formal to my native ear.)



So you can say:




Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光に行った。

Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光へ行った。




(You could also drop the に in ために, as in 「Ninjaっぽくなるため、日光へ行った。」 but this would sound pretty formal.)



You can also use 「なりたくて」, "wanting/hoping to be~", as in:




Ninjaっぽくなりたくて、日光に行った。







share|improve this answer






















  • Eh that's interesting - why does dropping the に in ために make it more formal?
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago










  • I can't say why... but 「V+ため～～」 often sounds more formal than 「V+ために～～」 when meaning "in order to~~" (purpose).
    – Chocolate
    2 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote



accepted










「～っぽいになる」 is grammatically incorrect. 「～っぽい」 conjugates to 「～っぽく」 in the adverbial/continuative form. cf: 「かわいい」→「かわいく」



日光に行った can be rephrased as 日光へ行った without changing the meaning. (～ヘ行った sounds a tiny little bit more formal to my native ear.)



So you can say:




Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光に行った。

Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光へ行った。




(You could also drop the に in ために, as in 「Ninjaっぽくなるため、日光へ行った。」 but this would sound pretty formal.)



You can also use 「なりたくて」, "wanting/hoping to be~", as in:




Ninjaっぽくなりたくて、日光に行った。







share|improve this answer






















  • Eh that's interesting - why does dropping the に in ために make it more formal?
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago










  • I can't say why... but 「V+ため～～」 often sounds more formal than 「V+ために～～」 when meaning "in order to~~" (purpose).
    – Chocolate
    2 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






「～っぽいになる」 is grammatically incorrect. 「～っぽい」 conjugates to 「～っぽく」 in the adverbial/continuative form. cf: 「かわいい」→「かわいく」



日光に行った can be rephrased as 日光へ行った without changing the meaning. (～ヘ行った sounds a tiny little bit more formal to my native ear.)



So you can say:




Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光に行った。

Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光へ行った。




(You could also drop the に in ために, as in 「Ninjaっぽくなるため、日光へ行った。」 but this would sound pretty formal.)



You can also use 「なりたくて」, "wanting/hoping to be~", as in:




Ninjaっぽくなりたくて、日光に行った。







share|improve this answer














「～っぽいになる」 is grammatically incorrect. 「～っぽい」 conjugates to 「～っぽく」 in the adverbial/continuative form. cf: 「かわいい」→「かわいく」



日光に行った can be rephrased as 日光へ行った without changing the meaning. (～ヘ行った sounds a tiny little bit more formal to my native ear.)



So you can say:




Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光に行った。

Ninjaっぽくなるために、日光へ行った。




(You could also drop the に in ために, as in 「Ninjaっぽくなるため、日光へ行った。」 but this would sound pretty formal.)



You can also use 「なりたくて」, "wanting/hoping to be~", as in:




Ninjaっぽくなりたくて、日光に行った。








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 2 hours ago









Chocolate

41.9k452104




41.9k452104











  • Eh that's interesting - why does dropping the に in ために make it more formal?
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago










  • I can't say why... but 「V+ため～～」 often sounds more formal than 「V+ために～～」 when meaning "in order to~~" (purpose).
    – Chocolate
    2 hours ago
















  • Eh that's interesting - why does dropping the に in ために make it more formal?
    – idkgaijin
    2 hours ago










  • I can't say why... but 「V+ため～～」 often sounds more formal than 「V+ために～～」 when meaning "in order to~~" (purpose).
    – Chocolate
    2 hours ago















Eh that's interesting - why does dropping the に in ために make it more formal?
– idkgaijin
2 hours ago




Eh that's interesting - why does dropping the に in ために make it more formal?
– idkgaijin
2 hours ago












I can't say why... but 「V+ため～～」 often sounds more formal than 「V+ために～～」 when meaning "in order to~~" (purpose).
– Chocolate
2 hours ago




I can't say why... but 「V+ため～～」 often sounds more formal than 「V+ために～～」 when meaning "in order to~~" (purpose).
– Chocolate
2 hours ago










idkgaijin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















idkgaijin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












idkgaijin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











idkgaijin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61513%2ftoo-many-ni-particles-in-one-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
Read more

Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugins nextgis share | improve this question edited 3 hours ago PolyGeo ♦ 51.9k 17 77 233 asked 4 hours ago IanGS 16 4 New contributor IanGS is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct. add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite Just acquired free version of NEXTGIS and trying to install the plugin for QGIS. It tells me it was not designed for version 3 of QGIS. How do I set up the QGIS-NEXTGIS interface then? qgis qgis-plugin...
Read more

Confectionery

Image
Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of ...
Read more