Mixing
Is this Onyx Spear homebrew magic weapon overpowered for a low-level (3-5) character?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm building a unique weapon that can be looted off a boss creature in a very early portion of my campaign (expected for characters level 3-5), and I want to ensure that I can fairly hand it out to players without worrying about it being overpowered.
The Onyx Spear
Weapon (glaive), uncommon (unique), 8 lbs.
1d10 piercing damage; Properties: Two-Handed, Reach, Thrown (60/∞), Special
This weapon gains +2 to all of its damage rolls.
The shaft of this weapon is composed of two rods in the shape of a double-helix composed of a material that resembles wrought iron. These two rods never touch each other, but they cannot be moved closer together or pulled further apart from each other, even if this weapon's magical properties are suspended. On one end of the shaft, each of the rods are joined to blades that have the physical appearance of being carved from Obsidian, shaped like curling flames.
Special. The weight of this weapon is strange and uncomfortable, as is its momentum and inertia. Characters cannot receive their proficiency bonus on attack rolls with this weapon, even if they have proficiency with this type of weapon. Any character that makes an attack roll with this weapon may roll 1d4-1 and add this value to their attack roll.
If this weapon is permitted to free-fall, it can not fall faster than 5 feet per round. So long as a part of this weapon is touching a floor or wall, it will not tip over as a result of gravity. If this weapon is thrown, it will not stop moving in that direction until it strikes an object, whereupon it will immediately stop without imparting momentum or damage. If this weapon has not touched an object, creature, or environment in more than an hour, all magical properties of the weapon are suspended until it does.
The first time any creature touches this weapon, they need to make a Wisdom saving throw (DC 15). On a failure, they are shocked by the weapon, taking 1d4 lightning damage and dropping the weapon. On a success, they hear unintelligible whispering in their head. This saving throw is only made once per creature, regardless of success or failure.
Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use. This property is relevant only when you attack with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.
Reach. This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it. This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
Thrown. This weapon can be thrown, using its attack roll. If this weapon strikes a target after being thrown, and the attack was not a critical hit, this weapon will deal no damage. If the attack was a critical hit, this weapon will deal damage as though it was a non-critical melee strike. For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage as they grab it.
The design considerations for this weapon are centered around the weapon feeling weird. Like there's something alien or otherworldly about its physical behavior, up to and including its physical design. It's part of a series of weapons that have similar, "strange" properties to them. The intention with this weapon (and the other weapons in the series) is not to necessarily create a weapon that's competitive with other magical items the party might acquire, just that their properties be weird and esoteric. So the weapon being underpowered is, as far as I'm concerned, perfectly acceptable.
I have a few principle concerns with how the weapon is balanced:
Unlike other 1d10 weapons, it does not have the Heavy property, meaning it can be used by Small characters without penalties. Does this have serious balance ramifications?
The +2 damage bonus is pretty substantial. This is intended to be counter-balanced by the 1d4-1 to attack rolls replacing their proficiency bonus, which on average results in a lower attack roll than simply applying proficiency. Is this enough to adequately balance the damage output?
It's not obvious to me that the other properties have exploitable features; are there concerns I should have for some of the more esoteric properties of the weapon?
I also welcome feedback on the general grammar/structure of the statblock.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons homebrew balance
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm building a unique weapon that can be looted off a boss creature in a very early portion of my campaign (expected for characters level 3-5), and I want to ensure that I can fairly hand it out to players without worrying about it being overpowered.
The Onyx Spear
Weapon (glaive), uncommon (unique), 8 lbs.
1d10 piercing damage; Properties: Two-Handed, Reach, Thrown (60/∞), Special
This weapon gains +2 to all of its damage rolls.
The shaft of this weapon is composed of two rods in the shape of a double-helix composed of a material that resembles wrought iron. These two rods never touch each other, but they cannot be moved closer together or pulled further apart from each other, even if this weapon's magical properties are suspended. On one end of the shaft, each of the rods are joined to blades that have the physical appearance of being carved from Obsidian, shaped like curling flames.
Special. The weight of this weapon is strange and uncomfortable, as is its momentum and inertia. Characters cannot receive their proficiency bonus on attack rolls with this weapon, even if they have proficiency with this type of weapon. Any character that makes an attack roll with this weapon may roll 1d4-1 and add this value to their attack roll.
If this weapon is permitted to free-fall, it can not fall faster than 5 feet per round. So long as a part of this weapon is touching a floor or wall, it will not tip over as a result of gravity. If this weapon is thrown, it will not stop moving in that direction until it strikes an object, whereupon it will immediately stop without imparting momentum or damage. If this weapon has not touched an object, creature, or environment in more than an hour, all magical properties of the weapon are suspended until it does.
The first time any creature touches this weapon, they need to make a Wisdom saving throw (DC 15). On a failure, they are shocked by the weapon, taking 1d4 lightning damage and dropping the weapon. On a success, they hear unintelligible whispering in their head. This saving throw is only made once per creature, regardless of success or failure.
Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use. This property is relevant only when you attack with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.
Reach. This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it. This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
Thrown. This weapon can be thrown, using its attack roll. If this weapon strikes a target after being thrown, and the attack was not a critical hit, this weapon will deal no damage. If the attack was a critical hit, this weapon will deal damage as though it was a non-critical melee strike. For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage as they grab it.
The design considerations for this weapon are centered around the weapon feeling weird. Like there's something alien or otherworldly about its physical behavior, up to and including its physical design. It's part of a series of weapons that have similar, "strange" properties to them. The intention with this weapon (and the other weapons in the series) is not to necessarily create a weapon that's competitive with other magical items the party might acquire, just that their properties be weird and esoteric. So the weapon being underpowered is, as far as I'm concerned, perfectly acceptable.
I have a few principle concerns with how the weapon is balanced:
Unlike other 1d10 weapons, it does not have the Heavy property, meaning it can be used by Small characters without penalties. Does this have serious balance ramifications?
The +2 damage bonus is pretty substantial. This is intended to be counter-balanced by the 1d4-1 to attack rolls replacing their proficiency bonus, which on average results in a lower attack roll than simply applying proficiency. Is this enough to adequately balance the damage output?
It's not obvious to me that the other properties have exploitable features; are there concerns I should have for some of the more esoteric properties of the weapon?
I also welcome feedback on the general grammar/structure of the statblock.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons homebrew balance
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
What world are you playing in? Is it high/medium/low magic?
– NautArch
28 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast The rarity category was intended to reflect the fact that the weapon is one-of-a-kind, not its relative power level. I can make it Uncommon if there's too many mechanical implications to the rarity, but it felt weird to describe a weapon that there's literally only one-of as "uncommon".
– Xirema
27 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast I've changed the rarity to Uncommon (Unique) to emphasize the intended power level of the item while still calling attention to its status as a unique item.
– Xirema
21 mins ago
Looking forward to the answers, other comments deleted.
– KorvinStarmast
20 mins ago
Also, why not make it do 1d12 damage instead of having +2 to damage?
– qazwsx
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I'm building a unique weapon that can be looted off a boss creature in a very early portion of my campaign (expected for characters level 3-5), and I want to ensure that I can fairly hand it out to players without worrying about it being overpowered.
The Onyx Spear
Weapon (glaive), uncommon (unique), 8 lbs.
1d10 piercing damage; Properties: Two-Handed, Reach, Thrown (60/∞), Special
This weapon gains +2 to all of its damage rolls.
The shaft of this weapon is composed of two rods in the shape of a double-helix composed of a material that resembles wrought iron. These two rods never touch each other, but they cannot be moved closer together or pulled further apart from each other, even if this weapon's magical properties are suspended. On one end of the shaft, each of the rods are joined to blades that have the physical appearance of being carved from Obsidian, shaped like curling flames.
Special. The weight of this weapon is strange and uncomfortable, as is its momentum and inertia. Characters cannot receive their proficiency bonus on attack rolls with this weapon, even if they have proficiency with this type of weapon. Any character that makes an attack roll with this weapon may roll 1d4-1 and add this value to their attack roll.
If this weapon is permitted to free-fall, it can not fall faster than 5 feet per round. So long as a part of this weapon is touching a floor or wall, it will not tip over as a result of gravity. If this weapon is thrown, it will not stop moving in that direction until it strikes an object, whereupon it will immediately stop without imparting momentum or damage. If this weapon has not touched an object, creature, or environment in more than an hour, all magical properties of the weapon are suspended until it does.
The first time any creature touches this weapon, they need to make a Wisdom saving throw (DC 15). On a failure, they are shocked by the weapon, taking 1d4 lightning damage and dropping the weapon. On a success, they hear unintelligible whispering in their head. This saving throw is only made once per creature, regardless of success or failure.
Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use. This property is relevant only when you attack with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.
Reach. This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it. This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
Thrown. This weapon can be thrown, using its attack roll. If this weapon strikes a target after being thrown, and the attack was not a critical hit, this weapon will deal no damage. If the attack was a critical hit, this weapon will deal damage as though it was a non-critical melee strike. For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage as they grab it.
The design considerations for this weapon are centered around the weapon feeling weird. Like there's something alien or otherworldly about its physical behavior, up to and including its physical design. It's part of a series of weapons that have similar, "strange" properties to them. The intention with this weapon (and the other weapons in the series) is not to necessarily create a weapon that's competitive with other magical items the party might acquire, just that their properties be weird and esoteric. So the weapon being underpowered is, as far as I'm concerned, perfectly acceptable.
I have a few principle concerns with how the weapon is balanced:
Unlike other 1d10 weapons, it does not have the Heavy property, meaning it can be used by Small characters without penalties. Does this have serious balance ramifications?
The +2 damage bonus is pretty substantial. This is intended to be counter-balanced by the 1d4-1 to attack rolls replacing their proficiency bonus, which on average results in a lower attack roll than simply applying proficiency. Is this enough to adequately balance the damage output?
It's not obvious to me that the other properties have exploitable features; are there concerns I should have for some of the more esoteric properties of the weapon?
I also welcome feedback on the general grammar/structure of the statblock.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons homebrew balance
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
I'm building a unique weapon that can be looted off a boss creature in a very early portion of my campaign (expected for characters level 3-5), and I want to ensure that I can fairly hand it out to players without worrying about it being overpowered.
The Onyx Spear
Weapon (glaive), uncommon (unique), 8 lbs.
1d10 piercing damage; Properties: Two-Handed, Reach, Thrown (60/∞), Special
This weapon gains +2 to all of its damage rolls.
The shaft of this weapon is composed of two rods in the shape of a double-helix composed of a material that resembles wrought iron. These two rods never touch each other, but they cannot be moved closer together or pulled further apart from each other, even if this weapon's magical properties are suspended. On one end of the shaft, each of the rods are joined to blades that have the physical appearance of being carved from Obsidian, shaped like curling flames.
Special. The weight of this weapon is strange and uncomfortable, as is its momentum and inertia. Characters cannot receive their proficiency bonus on attack rolls with this weapon, even if they have proficiency with this type of weapon. Any character that makes an attack roll with this weapon may roll 1d4-1 and add this value to their attack roll.
If this weapon is permitted to free-fall, it can not fall faster than 5 feet per round. So long as a part of this weapon is touching a floor or wall, it will not tip over as a result of gravity. If this weapon is thrown, it will not stop moving in that direction until it strikes an object, whereupon it will immediately stop without imparting momentum or damage. If this weapon has not touched an object, creature, or environment in more than an hour, all magical properties of the weapon are suspended until it does.
The first time any creature touches this weapon, they need to make a Wisdom saving throw (DC 15). On a failure, they are shocked by the weapon, taking 1d4 lightning damage and dropping the weapon. On a success, they hear unintelligible whispering in their head. This saving throw is only made once per creature, regardless of success or failure.
Two-Handed. This weapon requires two hands to use. This property is relevant only when you attack with the weapon, not when you simply hold it.
Reach. This weapon adds 5 feet to your reach when you attack with it. This property also determines your reach for opportunity attacks with a reach weapon.
Thrown. This weapon can be thrown, using its attack roll. If this weapon strikes a target after being thrown, and the attack was not a critical hit, this weapon will deal no damage. If the attack was a critical hit, this weapon will deal damage as though it was a non-critical melee strike. For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage as they grab it.
The design considerations for this weapon are centered around the weapon feeling weird. Like there's something alien or otherworldly about its physical behavior, up to and including its physical design. It's part of a series of weapons that have similar, "strange" properties to them. The intention with this weapon (and the other weapons in the series) is not to necessarily create a weapon that's competitive with other magical items the party might acquire, just that their properties be weird and esoteric. So the weapon being underpowered is, as far as I'm concerned, perfectly acceptable.
I have a few principle concerns with how the weapon is balanced:
Unlike other 1d10 weapons, it does not have the Heavy property, meaning it can be used by Small characters without penalties. Does this have serious balance ramifications?
The +2 damage bonus is pretty substantial. This is intended to be counter-balanced by the 1d4-1 to attack rolls replacing their proficiency bonus, which on average results in a lower attack roll than simply applying proficiency. Is this enough to adequately balance the damage output?
It's not obvious to me that the other properties have exploitable features; are there concerns I should have for some of the more esoteric properties of the weapon?
I also welcome feedback on the general grammar/structure of the statblock.
dnd-5e magic-items weapons homebrew balance
dnd-5e magic-items weapons homebrew balance
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
edited 5 mins ago
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
asked 37 mins ago
Xirema
5,3381437
5,3381437
What world are you playing in? Is it high/medium/low magic?
– NautArch
28 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast The rarity category was intended to reflect the fact that the weapon is one-of-a-kind, not its relative power level. I can make it Uncommon if there's too many mechanical implications to the rarity, but it felt weird to describe a weapon that there's literally only one-of as "uncommon".
– Xirema
27 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast I've changed the rarity to Uncommon (Unique) to emphasize the intended power level of the item while still calling attention to its status as a unique item.
– Xirema
21 mins ago
Looking forward to the answers, other comments deleted.
– KorvinStarmast
20 mins ago
Also, why not make it do 1d12 damage instead of having +2 to damage?
– qazwsx
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments
What world are you playing in? Is it high/medium/low magic?
– NautArch
28 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast The rarity category was intended to reflect the fact that the weapon is one-of-a-kind, not its relative power level. I can make it Uncommon if there's too many mechanical implications to the rarity, but it felt weird to describe a weapon that there's literally only one-of as "uncommon".
– Xirema
27 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast I've changed the rarity to Uncommon (Unique) to emphasize the intended power level of the item while still calling attention to its status as a unique item.
– Xirema
21 mins ago
Looking forward to the answers, other comments deleted.
– KorvinStarmast
20 mins ago
Also, why not make it do 1d12 damage instead of having +2 to damage?
– qazwsx
8 mins ago
What world are you playing in? Is it high/medium/low magic?
– NautArch
28 mins ago
What world are you playing in? Is it high/medium/low magic?
– NautArch
28 mins ago
1
1
@KorvinStarmast The rarity category was intended to reflect the fact that the weapon is one-of-a-kind, not its relative power level. I can make it Uncommon if there's too many mechanical implications to the rarity, but it felt weird to describe a weapon that there's literally only one-of as "uncommon".
– Xirema
27 mins ago
@KorvinStarmast The rarity category was intended to reflect the fact that the weapon is one-of-a-kind, not its relative power level. I can make it Uncommon if there's too many mechanical implications to the rarity, but it felt weird to describe a weapon that there's literally only one-of as "uncommon".
– Xirema
27 mins ago
1
1
@KorvinStarmast I've changed the rarity to Uncommon (Unique) to emphasize the intended power level of the item while still calling attention to its status as a unique item.
– Xirema
21 mins ago
@KorvinStarmast I've changed the rarity to Uncommon (Unique) to emphasize the intended power level of the item while still calling attention to its status as a unique item.
– Xirema
21 mins ago
Looking forward to the answers, other comments deleted.
– KorvinStarmast
20 mins ago
Looking forward to the answers, other comments deleted.
– KorvinStarmast
20 mins ago
Also, why not make it do 1d12 damage instead of having +2 to damage?
– qazwsx
8 mins ago
Also, why not make it do 1d12 damage instead of having +2 to damage?
– qazwsx
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Shall I compare thee to a Longsword +1?
Imagine a Longsword +1 that had to be used two-handed. We have 1d10+1 damage, twohanded, no heavy, no finesse. Perfectly balanced. Now imagine that we add an additional +1 damage, but also -2 to hit (stacking with the +1 from before, for net -1). Great Weapon Master trades -1 to hit for +2 damage, so what we have now is actually something underpowered. Given a proficiency bonus of +2 or +3 (for level 3-5), we have 1d10+2 damage, +1.5 to hit (ignoring Str mods).
Ignoring the thrown part of the Spear, we have a weapon that does 1d10+2 damage, with +1.5 (expected value of 1d4-1) to hit (ignoring Str mods), twohanded, no heavy, no finesse, reach. We are increasing a slightly underpowered weapon by +1 to hit (below level 5) and 5ft reach. Seems balanced to me.
As for the Throwing part...
The gravity interactions of the spear are mostly flavour, including that they effectively remove the ability to throw the spear for damage. While you could have some fun moments when you crit or that almost dead kobold tries to pick up the spear and gets shocked to death, they don't really do much mechanically.
It's balanced
It is a slight improvement on an underpowered item. Add to that the fact that it is a unique artifact and it is balanced. You could possibly make the +2 to damage require attunement if you are still worried.
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
This is not only not overpowered, but not much better than a normal weapon.
First, its thrown property is practically useless. Only doing damage on a critical hit means that 95% of the time, you would just be throwing your weapon away. Making your enemy receive 1d6 lightning damage is of negligible value if you have to throw your weapon away, and isn't much damage compared to even a crossbow.
A level 5 character with a str of 16 and a +3 proficiency would normally get +6 to hit, but this weapon would average +6.5 to hit. A normal +1 weapon would be better.
You'll regret the infinite throwing range when your characters try to throw it to the moon :)
I recommend allowing proficiency bonus, but only after attunement, and reducing the throwing range.
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
Technically, because of the 1 hour limitation before the spear loses its magical properties, the spear would fall back to Faerun before even breaking out of the atmosphere. I could consider just posting an explicit "5 miles" outer range though.
– Xirema
12 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
It's fine, but its awkwardness gets in the way.
Total, the strength of this weapon is effectively:
- No proficiency to hit, but instead get a "+2 to hit", which makes its accuracy worse when your proficiency bonus is +3, unless you're not proficient in martial weapons (in which case you wouldn't get proficiency to hit anyway, and thus makes this a +2 weapon).
- +2 damage
- Can deal 1d4 lightning damage, once per enemy (and once to yourself). Assuming average damage (2.5) and it zaps 40% of the time (generous) that's 1 bonus damage.
- Otherwise a fairly normal Glaive (in terms of power).
So, is it balanced? I guess? I wouldn't use it once my proficiency is +4, as my +2 to hit difference is too valuable compared to the +2 damage this spear provides.
I would never throw the thing for 1d4 damage that's nullified on a save. If I happened to roll a crit fail, depending on how you'd rule it, it could just fly off into the horizon, never to be seen again.
So in the end, it's just a fancy/weird glaive, but I'd rather just use a normal glaive for consistency, to be honest.
The main issue isn't the balance, though. It's the rule keeping.
At this point, with this weapon, you have to remind yourself that:
- You can't apply your Proficiency bonus
- You have to remember to roll 1d4-1 to hit every time you attack with it.
- It has a +2 to damage, separate from its to-hit "bonus"
- It deals 1d4 lightning damage on contact, with a wisdom 15 save, but only the first time it touches a creature.
- I have to keep track of which creatures I've already struck specifically with this weapon (would be confusing if an ally picked it up and started using it after I threw it)
- I have to remember that it has a throwing range, but it only deals damage on a crit, and only deals normal damage on that crit+1d4. And if I happen to miss, it just keeps going.
And...for what? Roughly +3 damage and roughly -1 to hit.
I'm all for complicated things that are worth the work, and are individual decisions to make (like Battlemaster), but this overcomplicates a number of things, for some of the least valuable benefits. That may be intentional, but your players will use it once or twice, and then get frustrated when they find this information out first-hand that it's not good as a weapon.
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
Actually, there is not a +2 to hit, but rather a +2 to damage.
– qazwsx
12 mins ago
Also, it does 1d6 per turn to a creature for 1 minute, the 1d4 is for you when you try to weild it for the first time.
– qazwsx
10 mins ago
@qazwsx +2 is based off of the 1d4-1 to hit that replaces the proficiency bonus. 1d4 is a 2.5, -1 makes it a 1.5, I rounded up for simplicity's sake.
– Daniel Zastoupil
10 mins ago
@qazwsx "For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage". I read that as, "After throwing this weapon, it's charged, and the first creature that's not you that grabs it will take 1d6 damage".
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx where the 1d4 damage is "When a creature first touches this weapon", which I'd include as part of hitting with the throwing aspect. It does not apply the 1d4 as part of the "throw attack was not a critical hit" aspect, as it says that "this weapon will deal no damage", and the 1d4 damage is coming from the weapon. It could easily be reworded to say that the "attack deals no damage" and then the 1d4 would apply after a non-crit throw, but I'm unsure if that's intentional.
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 2 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Shall I compare thee to a Longsword +1?
Imagine a Longsword +1 that had to be used two-handed. We have 1d10+1 damage, twohanded, no heavy, no finesse. Perfectly balanced. Now imagine that we add an additional +1 damage, but also -2 to hit (stacking with the +1 from before, for net -1). Great Weapon Master trades -1 to hit for +2 damage, so what we have now is actually something underpowered. Given a proficiency bonus of +2 or +3 (for level 3-5), we have 1d10+2 damage, +1.5 to hit (ignoring Str mods).
Ignoring the thrown part of the Spear, we have a weapon that does 1d10+2 damage, with +1.5 (expected value of 1d4-1) to hit (ignoring Str mods), twohanded, no heavy, no finesse, reach. We are increasing a slightly underpowered weapon by +1 to hit (below level 5) and 5ft reach. Seems balanced to me.
As for the Throwing part...
The gravity interactions of the spear are mostly flavour, including that they effectively remove the ability to throw the spear for damage. While you could have some fun moments when you crit or that almost dead kobold tries to pick up the spear and gets shocked to death, they don't really do much mechanically.
It's balanced
It is a slight improvement on an underpowered item. Add to that the fact that it is a unique artifact and it is balanced. You could possibly make the +2 to damage require attunement if you are still worried.
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Shall I compare thee to a Longsword +1?
Imagine a Longsword +1 that had to be used two-handed. We have 1d10+1 damage, twohanded, no heavy, no finesse. Perfectly balanced. Now imagine that we add an additional +1 damage, but also -2 to hit (stacking with the +1 from before, for net -1). Great Weapon Master trades -1 to hit for +2 damage, so what we have now is actually something underpowered. Given a proficiency bonus of +2 or +3 (for level 3-5), we have 1d10+2 damage, +1.5 to hit (ignoring Str mods).
Ignoring the thrown part of the Spear, we have a weapon that does 1d10+2 damage, with +1.5 (expected value of 1d4-1) to hit (ignoring Str mods), twohanded, no heavy, no finesse, reach. We are increasing a slightly underpowered weapon by +1 to hit (below level 5) and 5ft reach. Seems balanced to me.
As for the Throwing part...
The gravity interactions of the spear are mostly flavour, including that they effectively remove the ability to throw the spear for damage. While you could have some fun moments when you crit or that almost dead kobold tries to pick up the spear and gets shocked to death, they don't really do much mechanically.
It's balanced
It is a slight improvement on an underpowered item. Add to that the fact that it is a unique artifact and it is balanced. You could possibly make the +2 to damage require attunement if you are still worried.
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Shall I compare thee to a Longsword +1?
Imagine a Longsword +1 that had to be used two-handed. We have 1d10+1 damage, twohanded, no heavy, no finesse. Perfectly balanced. Now imagine that we add an additional +1 damage, but also -2 to hit (stacking with the +1 from before, for net -1). Great Weapon Master trades -1 to hit for +2 damage, so what we have now is actually something underpowered. Given a proficiency bonus of +2 or +3 (for level 3-5), we have 1d10+2 damage, +1.5 to hit (ignoring Str mods).
Ignoring the thrown part of the Spear, we have a weapon that does 1d10+2 damage, with +1.5 (expected value of 1d4-1) to hit (ignoring Str mods), twohanded, no heavy, no finesse, reach. We are increasing a slightly underpowered weapon by +1 to hit (below level 5) and 5ft reach. Seems balanced to me.
As for the Throwing part...
The gravity interactions of the spear are mostly flavour, including that they effectively remove the ability to throw the spear for damage. While you could have some fun moments when you crit or that almost dead kobold tries to pick up the spear and gets shocked to death, they don't really do much mechanically.
It's balanced
It is a slight improvement on an underpowered item. Add to that the fact that it is a unique artifact and it is balanced. You could possibly make the +2 to damage require attunement if you are still worried.
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
Shall I compare thee to a Longsword +1?
Imagine a Longsword +1 that had to be used two-handed. We have 1d10+1 damage, twohanded, no heavy, no finesse. Perfectly balanced. Now imagine that we add an additional +1 damage, but also -2 to hit (stacking with the +1 from before, for net -1). Great Weapon Master trades -1 to hit for +2 damage, so what we have now is actually something underpowered. Given a proficiency bonus of +2 or +3 (for level 3-5), we have 1d10+2 damage, +1.5 to hit (ignoring Str mods).
Ignoring the thrown part of the Spear, we have a weapon that does 1d10+2 damage, with +1.5 (expected value of 1d4-1) to hit (ignoring Str mods), twohanded, no heavy, no finesse, reach. We are increasing a slightly underpowered weapon by +1 to hit (below level 5) and 5ft reach. Seems balanced to me.
As for the Throwing part...
The gravity interactions of the spear are mostly flavour, including that they effectively remove the ability to throw the spear for damage. While you could have some fun moments when you crit or that almost dead kobold tries to pick up the spear and gets shocked to death, they don't really do much mechanically.
It's balanced
It is a slight improvement on an underpowered item. Add to that the fact that it is a unique artifact and it is balanced. You could possibly make the +2 to damage require attunement if you are still worried.
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
answered 20 mins ago
GreySage
12.3k44582
12.3k44582
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
This is not only not overpowered, but not much better than a normal weapon.
First, its thrown property is practically useless. Only doing damage on a critical hit means that 95% of the time, you would just be throwing your weapon away. Making your enemy receive 1d6 lightning damage is of negligible value if you have to throw your weapon away, and isn't much damage compared to even a crossbow.
A level 5 character with a str of 16 and a +3 proficiency would normally get +6 to hit, but this weapon would average +6.5 to hit. A normal +1 weapon would be better.
You'll regret the infinite throwing range when your characters try to throw it to the moon :)
I recommend allowing proficiency bonus, but only after attunement, and reducing the throwing range.
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
Technically, because of the 1 hour limitation before the spear loses its magical properties, the spear would fall back to Faerun before even breaking out of the atmosphere. I could consider just posting an explicit "5 miles" outer range though.
– Xirema
12 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
This is not only not overpowered, but not much better than a normal weapon.
First, its thrown property is practically useless. Only doing damage on a critical hit means that 95% of the time, you would just be throwing your weapon away. Making your enemy receive 1d6 lightning damage is of negligible value if you have to throw your weapon away, and isn't much damage compared to even a crossbow.
A level 5 character with a str of 16 and a +3 proficiency would normally get +6 to hit, but this weapon would average +6.5 to hit. A normal +1 weapon would be better.
You'll regret the infinite throwing range when your characters try to throw it to the moon :)
I recommend allowing proficiency bonus, but only after attunement, and reducing the throwing range.
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
Technically, because of the 1 hour limitation before the spear loses its magical properties, the spear would fall back to Faerun before even breaking out of the atmosphere. I could consider just posting an explicit "5 miles" outer range though.
– Xirema
12 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
This is not only not overpowered, but not much better than a normal weapon.
First, its thrown property is practically useless. Only doing damage on a critical hit means that 95% of the time, you would just be throwing your weapon away. Making your enemy receive 1d6 lightning damage is of negligible value if you have to throw your weapon away, and isn't much damage compared to even a crossbow.
A level 5 character with a str of 16 and a +3 proficiency would normally get +6 to hit, but this weapon would average +6.5 to hit. A normal +1 weapon would be better.
You'll regret the infinite throwing range when your characters try to throw it to the moon :)
I recommend allowing proficiency bonus, but only after attunement, and reducing the throwing range.
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
This is not only not overpowered, but not much better than a normal weapon.
First, its thrown property is practically useless. Only doing damage on a critical hit means that 95% of the time, you would just be throwing your weapon away. Making your enemy receive 1d6 lightning damage is of negligible value if you have to throw your weapon away, and isn't much damage compared to even a crossbow.
A level 5 character with a str of 16 and a +3 proficiency would normally get +6 to hit, but this weapon would average +6.5 to hit. A normal +1 weapon would be better.
You'll regret the infinite throwing range when your characters try to throw it to the moon :)
I recommend allowing proficiency bonus, but only after attunement, and reducing the throwing range.
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
answered 20 mins ago
qazwsx
685
685
Technically, because of the 1 hour limitation before the spear loses its magical properties, the spear would fall back to Faerun before even breaking out of the atmosphere. I could consider just posting an explicit "5 miles" outer range though.
– Xirema
12 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Technically, because of the 1 hour limitation before the spear loses its magical properties, the spear would fall back to Faerun before even breaking out of the atmosphere. I could consider just posting an explicit "5 miles" outer range though.
– Xirema
12 mins ago
Technically, because of the 1 hour limitation before the spear loses its magical properties, the spear would fall back to Faerun before even breaking out of the atmosphere. I could consider just posting an explicit "5 miles" outer range though.
– Xirema
12 mins ago
Technically, because of the 1 hour limitation before the spear loses its magical properties, the spear would fall back to Faerun before even breaking out of the atmosphere. I could consider just posting an explicit "5 miles" outer range though.
– Xirema
12 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
It's fine, but its awkwardness gets in the way.
Total, the strength of this weapon is effectively:
- No proficiency to hit, but instead get a "+2 to hit", which makes its accuracy worse when your proficiency bonus is +3, unless you're not proficient in martial weapons (in which case you wouldn't get proficiency to hit anyway, and thus makes this a +2 weapon).
- +2 damage
- Can deal 1d4 lightning damage, once per enemy (and once to yourself). Assuming average damage (2.5) and it zaps 40% of the time (generous) that's 1 bonus damage.
- Otherwise a fairly normal Glaive (in terms of power).
So, is it balanced? I guess? I wouldn't use it once my proficiency is +4, as my +2 to hit difference is too valuable compared to the +2 damage this spear provides.
I would never throw the thing for 1d4 damage that's nullified on a save. If I happened to roll a crit fail, depending on how you'd rule it, it could just fly off into the horizon, never to be seen again.
So in the end, it's just a fancy/weird glaive, but I'd rather just use a normal glaive for consistency, to be honest.
The main issue isn't the balance, though. It's the rule keeping.
At this point, with this weapon, you have to remind yourself that:
- You can't apply your Proficiency bonus
- You have to remember to roll 1d4-1 to hit every time you attack with it.
- It has a +2 to damage, separate from its to-hit "bonus"
- It deals 1d4 lightning damage on contact, with a wisdom 15 save, but only the first time it touches a creature.
- I have to keep track of which creatures I've already struck specifically with this weapon (would be confusing if an ally picked it up and started using it after I threw it)
- I have to remember that it has a throwing range, but it only deals damage on a crit, and only deals normal damage on that crit+1d4. And if I happen to miss, it just keeps going.
And...for what? Roughly +3 damage and roughly -1 to hit.
I'm all for complicated things that are worth the work, and are individual decisions to make (like Battlemaster), but this overcomplicates a number of things, for some of the least valuable benefits. That may be intentional, but your players will use it once or twice, and then get frustrated when they find this information out first-hand that it's not good as a weapon.
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
Actually, there is not a +2 to hit, but rather a +2 to damage.
– qazwsx
12 mins ago
Also, it does 1d6 per turn to a creature for 1 minute, the 1d4 is for you when you try to weild it for the first time.
– qazwsx
10 mins ago
@qazwsx +2 is based off of the 1d4-1 to hit that replaces the proficiency bonus. 1d4 is a 2.5, -1 makes it a 1.5, I rounded up for simplicity's sake.
– Daniel Zastoupil
10 mins ago
@qazwsx "For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage". I read that as, "After throwing this weapon, it's charged, and the first creature that's not you that grabs it will take 1d6 damage".
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx where the 1d4 damage is "When a creature first touches this weapon", which I'd include as part of hitting with the throwing aspect. It does not apply the 1d4 as part of the "throw attack was not a critical hit" aspect, as it says that "this weapon will deal no damage", and the 1d4 damage is coming from the weapon. It could easily be reworded to say that the "attack deals no damage" and then the 1d4 would apply after a non-crit throw, but I'm unsure if that's intentional.
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
It's fine, but its awkwardness gets in the way.
Total, the strength of this weapon is effectively:
- No proficiency to hit, but instead get a "+2 to hit", which makes its accuracy worse when your proficiency bonus is +3, unless you're not proficient in martial weapons (in which case you wouldn't get proficiency to hit anyway, and thus makes this a +2 weapon).
- +2 damage
- Can deal 1d4 lightning damage, once per enemy (and once to yourself). Assuming average damage (2.5) and it zaps 40% of the time (generous) that's 1 bonus damage.
- Otherwise a fairly normal Glaive (in terms of power).
So, is it balanced? I guess? I wouldn't use it once my proficiency is +4, as my +2 to hit difference is too valuable compared to the +2 damage this spear provides.
I would never throw the thing for 1d4 damage that's nullified on a save. If I happened to roll a crit fail, depending on how you'd rule it, it could just fly off into the horizon, never to be seen again.
So in the end, it's just a fancy/weird glaive, but I'd rather just use a normal glaive for consistency, to be honest.
The main issue isn't the balance, though. It's the rule keeping.
At this point, with this weapon, you have to remind yourself that:
- You can't apply your Proficiency bonus
- You have to remember to roll 1d4-1 to hit every time you attack with it.
- It has a +2 to damage, separate from its to-hit "bonus"
- It deals 1d4 lightning damage on contact, with a wisdom 15 save, but only the first time it touches a creature.
- I have to keep track of which creatures I've already struck specifically with this weapon (would be confusing if an ally picked it up and started using it after I threw it)
- I have to remember that it has a throwing range, but it only deals damage on a crit, and only deals normal damage on that crit+1d4. And if I happen to miss, it just keeps going.
And...for what? Roughly +3 damage and roughly -1 to hit.
I'm all for complicated things that are worth the work, and are individual decisions to make (like Battlemaster), but this overcomplicates a number of things, for some of the least valuable benefits. That may be intentional, but your players will use it once or twice, and then get frustrated when they find this information out first-hand that it's not good as a weapon.
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
Actually, there is not a +2 to hit, but rather a +2 to damage.
– qazwsx
12 mins ago
Also, it does 1d6 per turn to a creature for 1 minute, the 1d4 is for you when you try to weild it for the first time.
– qazwsx
10 mins ago
@qazwsx +2 is based off of the 1d4-1 to hit that replaces the proficiency bonus. 1d4 is a 2.5, -1 makes it a 1.5, I rounded up for simplicity's sake.
– Daniel Zastoupil
10 mins ago
@qazwsx "For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage". I read that as, "After throwing this weapon, it's charged, and the first creature that's not you that grabs it will take 1d6 damage".
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx where the 1d4 damage is "When a creature first touches this weapon", which I'd include as part of hitting with the throwing aspect. It does not apply the 1d4 as part of the "throw attack was not a critical hit" aspect, as it says that "this weapon will deal no damage", and the 1d4 damage is coming from the weapon. It could easily be reworded to say that the "attack deals no damage" and then the 1d4 would apply after a non-crit throw, but I'm unsure if that's intentional.
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
It's fine, but its awkwardness gets in the way.
Total, the strength of this weapon is effectively:
- No proficiency to hit, but instead get a "+2 to hit", which makes its accuracy worse when your proficiency bonus is +3, unless you're not proficient in martial weapons (in which case you wouldn't get proficiency to hit anyway, and thus makes this a +2 weapon).
- +2 damage
- Can deal 1d4 lightning damage, once per enemy (and once to yourself). Assuming average damage (2.5) and it zaps 40% of the time (generous) that's 1 bonus damage.
- Otherwise a fairly normal Glaive (in terms of power).
So, is it balanced? I guess? I wouldn't use it once my proficiency is +4, as my +2 to hit difference is too valuable compared to the +2 damage this spear provides.
I would never throw the thing for 1d4 damage that's nullified on a save. If I happened to roll a crit fail, depending on how you'd rule it, it could just fly off into the horizon, never to be seen again.
So in the end, it's just a fancy/weird glaive, but I'd rather just use a normal glaive for consistency, to be honest.
The main issue isn't the balance, though. It's the rule keeping.
At this point, with this weapon, you have to remind yourself that:
- You can't apply your Proficiency bonus
- You have to remember to roll 1d4-1 to hit every time you attack with it.
- It has a +2 to damage, separate from its to-hit "bonus"
- It deals 1d4 lightning damage on contact, with a wisdom 15 save, but only the first time it touches a creature.
- I have to keep track of which creatures I've already struck specifically with this weapon (would be confusing if an ally picked it up and started using it after I threw it)
- I have to remember that it has a throwing range, but it only deals damage on a crit, and only deals normal damage on that crit+1d4. And if I happen to miss, it just keeps going.
And...for what? Roughly +3 damage and roughly -1 to hit.
I'm all for complicated things that are worth the work, and are individual decisions to make (like Battlemaster), but this overcomplicates a number of things, for some of the least valuable benefits. That may be intentional, but your players will use it once or twice, and then get frustrated when they find this information out first-hand that it's not good as a weapon.
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
It's fine, but its awkwardness gets in the way.
Total, the strength of this weapon is effectively:
- No proficiency to hit, but instead get a "+2 to hit", which makes its accuracy worse when your proficiency bonus is +3, unless you're not proficient in martial weapons (in which case you wouldn't get proficiency to hit anyway, and thus makes this a +2 weapon).
- +2 damage
- Can deal 1d4 lightning damage, once per enemy (and once to yourself). Assuming average damage (2.5) and it zaps 40% of the time (generous) that's 1 bonus damage.
- Otherwise a fairly normal Glaive (in terms of power).
So, is it balanced? I guess? I wouldn't use it once my proficiency is +4, as my +2 to hit difference is too valuable compared to the +2 damage this spear provides.
I would never throw the thing for 1d4 damage that's nullified on a save. If I happened to roll a crit fail, depending on how you'd rule it, it could just fly off into the horizon, never to be seen again.
So in the end, it's just a fancy/weird glaive, but I'd rather just use a normal glaive for consistency, to be honest.
The main issue isn't the balance, though. It's the rule keeping.
At this point, with this weapon, you have to remind yourself that:
- You can't apply your Proficiency bonus
- You have to remember to roll 1d4-1 to hit every time you attack with it.
- It has a +2 to damage, separate from its to-hit "bonus"
- It deals 1d4 lightning damage on contact, with a wisdom 15 save, but only the first time it touches a creature.
- I have to keep track of which creatures I've already struck specifically with this weapon (would be confusing if an ally picked it up and started using it after I threw it)
- I have to remember that it has a throwing range, but it only deals damage on a crit, and only deals normal damage on that crit+1d4. And if I happen to miss, it just keeps going.
And...for what? Roughly +3 damage and roughly -1 to hit.
I'm all for complicated things that are worth the work, and are individual decisions to make (like Battlemaster), but this overcomplicates a number of things, for some of the least valuable benefits. That may be intentional, but your players will use it once or twice, and then get frustrated when they find this information out first-hand that it's not good as a weapon.
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
edited 3 mins ago
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
answered 13 mins ago
Daniel Zastoupil
4,6571053
4,6571053
Actually, there is not a +2 to hit, but rather a +2 to damage.
– qazwsx
12 mins ago
Also, it does 1d6 per turn to a creature for 1 minute, the 1d4 is for you when you try to weild it for the first time.
– qazwsx
10 mins ago
@qazwsx +2 is based off of the 1d4-1 to hit that replaces the proficiency bonus. 1d4 is a 2.5, -1 makes it a 1.5, I rounded up for simplicity's sake.
– Daniel Zastoupil
10 mins ago
@qazwsx "For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage". I read that as, "After throwing this weapon, it's charged, and the first creature that's not you that grabs it will take 1d6 damage".
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx where the 1d4 damage is "When a creature first touches this weapon", which I'd include as part of hitting with the throwing aspect. It does not apply the 1d4 as part of the "throw attack was not a critical hit" aspect, as it says that "this weapon will deal no damage", and the 1d4 damage is coming from the weapon. It could easily be reworded to say that the "attack deals no damage" and then the 1d4 would apply after a non-crit throw, but I'm unsure if that's intentional.
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 2 more comments
Actually, there is not a +2 to hit, but rather a +2 to damage.
– qazwsx
12 mins ago
Also, it does 1d6 per turn to a creature for 1 minute, the 1d4 is for you when you try to weild it for the first time.
– qazwsx
10 mins ago
@qazwsx +2 is based off of the 1d4-1 to hit that replaces the proficiency bonus. 1d4 is a 2.5, -1 makes it a 1.5, I rounded up for simplicity's sake.
– Daniel Zastoupil
10 mins ago
@qazwsx "For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage". I read that as, "After throwing this weapon, it's charged, and the first creature that's not you that grabs it will take 1d6 damage".
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx where the 1d4 damage is "When a creature first touches this weapon", which I'd include as part of hitting with the throwing aspect. It does not apply the 1d4 as part of the "throw attack was not a critical hit" aspect, as it says that "this weapon will deal no damage", and the 1d4 damage is coming from the weapon. It could easily be reworded to say that the "attack deals no damage" and then the 1d4 would apply after a non-crit throw, but I'm unsure if that's intentional.
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
Actually, there is not a +2 to hit, but rather a +2 to damage.
– qazwsx
12 mins ago
Actually, there is not a +2 to hit, but rather a +2 to damage.
– qazwsx
12 mins ago
Also, it does 1d6 per turn to a creature for 1 minute, the 1d4 is for you when you try to weild it for the first time.
– qazwsx
10 mins ago
Also, it does 1d6 per turn to a creature for 1 minute, the 1d4 is for you when you try to weild it for the first time.
– qazwsx
10 mins ago
@qazwsx +2 is based off of the 1d4-1 to hit that replaces the proficiency bonus. 1d4 is a 2.5, -1 makes it a 1.5, I rounded up for simplicity's sake.
– Daniel Zastoupil
10 mins ago
@qazwsx +2 is based off of the 1d4-1 to hit that replaces the proficiency bonus. 1d4 is a 2.5, -1 makes it a 1.5, I rounded up for simplicity's sake.
– Daniel Zastoupil
10 mins ago
@qazwsx "For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage". I read that as, "After throwing this weapon, it's charged, and the first creature that's not you that grabs it will take 1d6 damage".
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx "For one minute after being thrown, the first creature that attempts to grab this weapon, other than the creature that threw this weapon, will take 1d6 lightning damage". I read that as, "After throwing this weapon, it's charged, and the first creature that's not you that grabs it will take 1d6 damage".
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx where the 1d4 damage is "When a creature first touches this weapon", which I'd include as part of hitting with the throwing aspect. It does not apply the 1d4 as part of the "throw attack was not a critical hit" aspect, as it says that "this weapon will deal no damage", and the 1d4 damage is coming from the weapon. It could easily be reworded to say that the "attack deals no damage" and then the 1d4 would apply after a non-crit throw, but I'm unsure if that's intentional.
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
@qazwsx where the 1d4 damage is "When a creature first touches this weapon", which I'd include as part of hitting with the throwing aspect. It does not apply the 1d4 as part of the "throw attack was not a critical hit" aspect, as it says that "this weapon will deal no damage", and the 1d4 damage is coming from the weapon. It could easily be reworded to say that the "attack deals no damage" and then the 1d4 would apply after a non-crit throw, but I'm unsure if that's intentional.
– Daniel Zastoupil
8 mins ago
 |Â
show 2 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131711%2fis-this-onyx-spear-homebrew-magic-weapon-overpowered-for-a-low-level-3-5-chara%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
What world are you playing in? Is it high/medium/low magic?
– NautArch
28 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast The rarity category was intended to reflect the fact that the weapon is one-of-a-kind, not its relative power level. I can make it Uncommon if there's too many mechanical implications to the rarity, but it felt weird to describe a weapon that there's literally only one-of as "uncommon".
– Xirema
27 mins ago
1
@KorvinStarmast I've changed the rarity to Uncommon (Unique) to emphasize the intended power level of the item while still calling attention to its status as a unique item.
– Xirema
21 mins ago
Looking forward to the answers, other comments deleted.
– KorvinStarmast
20 mins ago
Also, why not make it do 1d12 damage instead of having +2 to damage?
– qazwsx
8 mins ago