Mixing
Can “so on†and “vice versa†mean the same?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The example sentence from a Mathematics book:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and so on.
I thought that we can use" vice versa" as well:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and vice versa.
Can anyone please tell me whether their usage is different to each other, if not then which one is most formal than the other?
meaning formality
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The example sentence from a Mathematics book:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and so on.
I thought that we can use" vice versa" as well:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and vice versa.
Can anyone please tell me whether their usage is different to each other, if not then which one is most formal than the other?
meaning formality
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
The example sentence from a Mathematics book:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and so on.
I thought that we can use" vice versa" as well:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and vice versa.
Can anyone please tell me whether their usage is different to each other, if not then which one is most formal than the other?
meaning formality
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
The example sentence from a Mathematics book:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and so on.
I thought that we can use" vice versa" as well:
0 is predecessor of 1 and 1 is successor of 0. Similarly 1 predecessor of 2 and 2 is successor of 1 and vice versa.
Can anyone please tell me whether their usage is different to each other, if not then which one is most formal than the other?
meaning formality
meaning formality
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
asked 10 hours ago
Ahmed
2,087729
2,087729
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No, "vice versa" means with the order changed, or with the relations reversed, or conversely. We use it to indicate that a statement would still be true if some of the words in the sentence (often the subject and object, it seems to me) were transposed.
At the moment, you may see that information at the Merriam Webster on-line entry, with an example: "...Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez... has endorsed Nixon (and vice versa)." The meaning is that if we switched the positions of the names to produce the claim that Nixon has endorsed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that resulting claim would be true.
But if you should say that 1 is the predecessor of 2 and 2 is the successor of 1 and vice versa, you would be saying that 2 is the predecessor of 1 and 1 is the successor of 2. That that statement would be incorrect; because in fact 2 is not the predecessor of 1 and 1 is not the successor of 2.
The two expressions (and so on, vice versa) seem perfectly proper to me in formal or informal contexts. But I suppose that the words "and so on," and the expression "etc.", are often used by lazy speakers to hint at further examples in a way that leaves us just guessing what they might be. So perhaps one should think twice before using them.
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
The two phrases so on and vice-versa mean different things and so are not interchangeable. So on indicates that you can keep generating examples or material -- often by following the example that was just provided (but not always). Vice-versa indicates an inversion. To illustrate vice versa, consider that the following sentences are equivalent:
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman, and the second baseman can throw to the first baseman.
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman and vice-versa.
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
"Vice versa" is the shortened form of taking two things that are reversible and describing that reversible...ness. "...and so on" is a continuation where you're forcing the reader/listener to infer the next steps through logic.
However, technically "and so on" can include "vice versa" if the list that you're summing up with "and so on" contains sets of reversible things. For (an overly contrived) example:
All of my siblings have happy marriages: I love my wife and she loves me. My brother loves his wife and she loves him. My sister loves her husband and he loves her. My other sister loves her husband and he loves her.
...could be turned into...
Myself, my brother, and my two sisters all have happy marriages: I love my wife and vice versa. My brother loves his wife and vice versa, and so on.
This is not the greatest example, but it's the best one that I could come up with.
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
No. Vice versa is used for swapping the order of 2 entities with similar relationship. so on is used for continuing a list of similar things. In your case, you are explaining the predecessor- successor relation between 2 consecutive numbers and after 2 such examples, your list continues. Hence "so on" is appropriate here. However, if the relation is similar from both ends, you can use vice versa e.g. 1 is neighbor to 2 and vice versa (meaning 1 & 2 share a similar relation to each other which is neighborhood and it means the same from both end, even when the positions are swapped)
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No, "vice versa" means with the order changed, or with the relations reversed, or conversely. We use it to indicate that a statement would still be true if some of the words in the sentence (often the subject and object, it seems to me) were transposed.
At the moment, you may see that information at the Merriam Webster on-line entry, with an example: "...Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez... has endorsed Nixon (and vice versa)." The meaning is that if we switched the positions of the names to produce the claim that Nixon has endorsed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that resulting claim would be true.
But if you should say that 1 is the predecessor of 2 and 2 is the successor of 1 and vice versa, you would be saying that 2 is the predecessor of 1 and 1 is the successor of 2. That that statement would be incorrect; because in fact 2 is not the predecessor of 1 and 1 is not the successor of 2.
The two expressions (and so on, vice versa) seem perfectly proper to me in formal or informal contexts. But I suppose that the words "and so on," and the expression "etc.", are often used by lazy speakers to hint at further examples in a way that leaves us just guessing what they might be. So perhaps one should think twice before using them.
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No, "vice versa" means with the order changed, or with the relations reversed, or conversely. We use it to indicate that a statement would still be true if some of the words in the sentence (often the subject and object, it seems to me) were transposed.
At the moment, you may see that information at the Merriam Webster on-line entry, with an example: "...Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez... has endorsed Nixon (and vice versa)." The meaning is that if we switched the positions of the names to produce the claim that Nixon has endorsed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that resulting claim would be true.
But if you should say that 1 is the predecessor of 2 and 2 is the successor of 1 and vice versa, you would be saying that 2 is the predecessor of 1 and 1 is the successor of 2. That that statement would be incorrect; because in fact 2 is not the predecessor of 1 and 1 is not the successor of 2.
The two expressions (and so on, vice versa) seem perfectly proper to me in formal or informal contexts. But I suppose that the words "and so on," and the expression "etc.", are often used by lazy speakers to hint at further examples in a way that leaves us just guessing what they might be. So perhaps one should think twice before using them.
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
No, "vice versa" means with the order changed, or with the relations reversed, or conversely. We use it to indicate that a statement would still be true if some of the words in the sentence (often the subject and object, it seems to me) were transposed.
At the moment, you may see that information at the Merriam Webster on-line entry, with an example: "...Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez... has endorsed Nixon (and vice versa)." The meaning is that if we switched the positions of the names to produce the claim that Nixon has endorsed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that resulting claim would be true.
But if you should say that 1 is the predecessor of 2 and 2 is the successor of 1 and vice versa, you would be saying that 2 is the predecessor of 1 and 1 is the successor of 2. That that statement would be incorrect; because in fact 2 is not the predecessor of 1 and 1 is not the successor of 2.
The two expressions (and so on, vice versa) seem perfectly proper to me in formal or informal contexts. But I suppose that the words "and so on," and the expression "etc.", are often used by lazy speakers to hint at further examples in a way that leaves us just guessing what they might be. So perhaps one should think twice before using them.
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
No, "vice versa" means with the order changed, or with the relations reversed, or conversely. We use it to indicate that a statement would still be true if some of the words in the sentence (often the subject and object, it seems to me) were transposed.
At the moment, you may see that information at the Merriam Webster on-line entry, with an example: "...Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez... has endorsed Nixon (and vice versa)." The meaning is that if we switched the positions of the names to produce the claim that Nixon has endorsed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, that resulting claim would be true.
But if you should say that 1 is the predecessor of 2 and 2 is the successor of 1 and vice versa, you would be saying that 2 is the predecessor of 1 and 1 is the successor of 2. That that statement would be incorrect; because in fact 2 is not the predecessor of 1 and 1 is not the successor of 2.
The two expressions (and so on, vice versa) seem perfectly proper to me in formal or informal contexts. But I suppose that the words "and so on," and the expression "etc.", are often used by lazy speakers to hint at further examples in a way that leaves us just guessing what they might be. So perhaps one should think twice before using them.
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
answered 10 hours ago
Chaim
1,920718
1,920718
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
The two phrases so on and vice-versa mean different things and so are not interchangeable. So on indicates that you can keep generating examples or material -- often by following the example that was just provided (but not always). Vice-versa indicates an inversion. To illustrate vice versa, consider that the following sentences are equivalent:
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman, and the second baseman can throw to the first baseman.
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman and vice-versa.
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
The two phrases so on and vice-versa mean different things and so are not interchangeable. So on indicates that you can keep generating examples or material -- often by following the example that was just provided (but not always). Vice-versa indicates an inversion. To illustrate vice versa, consider that the following sentences are equivalent:
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman, and the second baseman can throw to the first baseman.
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman and vice-versa.
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The two phrases so on and vice-versa mean different things and so are not interchangeable. So on indicates that you can keep generating examples or material -- often by following the example that was just provided (but not always). Vice-versa indicates an inversion. To illustrate vice versa, consider that the following sentences are equivalent:
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman, and the second baseman can throw to the first baseman.
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman and vice-versa.
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
The two phrases so on and vice-versa mean different things and so are not interchangeable. So on indicates that you can keep generating examples or material -- often by following the example that was just provided (but not always). Vice-versa indicates an inversion. To illustrate vice versa, consider that the following sentences are equivalent:
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman, and the second baseman can throw to the first baseman.
- The first baseman can throw to the second baseman and vice-versa.
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
answered 10 hours ago
JoshG
5777
5777
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
"Vice versa" is the shortened form of taking two things that are reversible and describing that reversible...ness. "...and so on" is a continuation where you're forcing the reader/listener to infer the next steps through logic.
However, technically "and so on" can include "vice versa" if the list that you're summing up with "and so on" contains sets of reversible things. For (an overly contrived) example:
All of my siblings have happy marriages: I love my wife and she loves me. My brother loves his wife and she loves him. My sister loves her husband and he loves her. My other sister loves her husband and he loves her.
...could be turned into...
Myself, my brother, and my two sisters all have happy marriages: I love my wife and vice versa. My brother loves his wife and vice versa, and so on.
This is not the greatest example, but it's the best one that I could come up with.
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
"Vice versa" is the shortened form of taking two things that are reversible and describing that reversible...ness. "...and so on" is a continuation where you're forcing the reader/listener to infer the next steps through logic.
However, technically "and so on" can include "vice versa" if the list that you're summing up with "and so on" contains sets of reversible things. For (an overly contrived) example:
All of my siblings have happy marriages: I love my wife and she loves me. My brother loves his wife and she loves him. My sister loves her husband and he loves her. My other sister loves her husband and he loves her.
...could be turned into...
Myself, my brother, and my two sisters all have happy marriages: I love my wife and vice versa. My brother loves his wife and vice versa, and so on.
This is not the greatest example, but it's the best one that I could come up with.
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
"Vice versa" is the shortened form of taking two things that are reversible and describing that reversible...ness. "...and so on" is a continuation where you're forcing the reader/listener to infer the next steps through logic.
However, technically "and so on" can include "vice versa" if the list that you're summing up with "and so on" contains sets of reversible things. For (an overly contrived) example:
All of my siblings have happy marriages: I love my wife and she loves me. My brother loves his wife and she loves him. My sister loves her husband and he loves her. My other sister loves her husband and he loves her.
...could be turned into...
Myself, my brother, and my two sisters all have happy marriages: I love my wife and vice versa. My brother loves his wife and vice versa, and so on.
This is not the greatest example, but it's the best one that I could come up with.
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
"Vice versa" is the shortened form of taking two things that are reversible and describing that reversible...ness. "...and so on" is a continuation where you're forcing the reader/listener to infer the next steps through logic.
However, technically "and so on" can include "vice versa" if the list that you're summing up with "and so on" contains sets of reversible things. For (an overly contrived) example:
All of my siblings have happy marriages: I love my wife and she loves me. My brother loves his wife and she loves him. My sister loves her husband and he loves her. My other sister loves her husband and he loves her.
...could be turned into...
Myself, my brother, and my two sisters all have happy marriages: I love my wife and vice versa. My brother loves his wife and vice versa, and so on.
This is not the greatest example, but it's the best one that I could come up with.
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
answered 10 hours ago
John Doe
1913
1913
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
No. Vice versa is used for swapping the order of 2 entities with similar relationship. so on is used for continuing a list of similar things. In your case, you are explaining the predecessor- successor relation between 2 consecutive numbers and after 2 such examples, your list continues. Hence "so on" is appropriate here. However, if the relation is similar from both ends, you can use vice versa e.g. 1 is neighbor to 2 and vice versa (meaning 1 & 2 share a similar relation to each other which is neighborhood and it means the same from both end, even when the positions are swapped)
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
No. Vice versa is used for swapping the order of 2 entities with similar relationship. so on is used for continuing a list of similar things. In your case, you are explaining the predecessor- successor relation between 2 consecutive numbers and after 2 such examples, your list continues. Hence "so on" is appropriate here. However, if the relation is similar from both ends, you can use vice versa e.g. 1 is neighbor to 2 and vice versa (meaning 1 & 2 share a similar relation to each other which is neighborhood and it means the same from both end, even when the positions are swapped)
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
No. Vice versa is used for swapping the order of 2 entities with similar relationship. so on is used for continuing a list of similar things. In your case, you are explaining the predecessor- successor relation between 2 consecutive numbers and after 2 such examples, your list continues. Hence "so on" is appropriate here. However, if the relation is similar from both ends, you can use vice versa e.g. 1 is neighbor to 2 and vice versa (meaning 1 & 2 share a similar relation to each other which is neighborhood and it means the same from both end, even when the positions are swapped)
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
No. Vice versa is used for swapping the order of 2 entities with similar relationship. so on is used for continuing a list of similar things. In your case, you are explaining the predecessor- successor relation between 2 consecutive numbers and after 2 such examples, your list continues. Hence "so on" is appropriate here. However, if the relation is similar from both ends, you can use vice versa e.g. 1 is neighbor to 2 and vice versa (meaning 1 & 2 share a similar relation to each other which is neighborhood and it means the same from both end, even when the positions are swapped)
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
answered 9 hours ago
bitknol
211
211
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
bitknol is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f464324%2fcan-so-on-and-vice-versa-mean-the-same%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password