Mixing
Template inheritance - how to resolve duplicate usage
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Some time ago my team and I decided to break out some often-used fields into components that can be inherited, a Heading field being one of them. We put the Heading field into it's own template and started using it as one of the base templates for other templates.
As we started using this component we discovered that when you have more than one component on the same page that uses it, the value of one of the Heading fields will be shared across all instances of that field on that page. My question is: Is there a way to make inherited fields unique to the parent item that uses it? Or are we just doing it wrong?
templates
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Some time ago my team and I decided to break out some often-used fields into components that can be inherited, a Heading field being one of them. We put the Heading field into it's own template and started using it as one of the base templates for other templates.
As we started using this component we discovered that when you have more than one component on the same page that uses it, the value of one of the Heading fields will be shared across all instances of that field on that page. My question is: Is there a way to make inherited fields unique to the parent item that uses it? Or are we just doing it wrong?
templates
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Some time ago my team and I decided to break out some often-used fields into components that can be inherited, a Heading field being one of them. We put the Heading field into it's own template and started using it as one of the base templates for other templates.
As we started using this component we discovered that when you have more than one component on the same page that uses it, the value of one of the Heading fields will be shared across all instances of that field on that page. My question is: Is there a way to make inherited fields unique to the parent item that uses it? Or are we just doing it wrong?
templates
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
Some time ago my team and I decided to break out some often-used fields into components that can be inherited, a Heading field being one of them. We put the Heading field into it's own template and started using it as one of the base templates for other templates.
As we started using this component we discovered that when you have more than one component on the same page that uses it, the value of one of the Heading fields will be shared across all instances of that field on that page. My question is: Is there a way to make inherited fields unique to the parent item that uses it? Or are we just doing it wrong?
templates
templates
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
asked 5 hours ago
Necromancer
335
335
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
A solid option is to build components that have a data source item rather than relying purely on fields defined on the page.
Here's a scenario to help explain what I mean:
Let's say you need to render a hero on the page, along with a few promotional items. I would imagine that the hero image is defined on the page, since many of those page types could use a hero. We add a Page Content component to render Content text and the Hero image.
I could add more fields to the page template, but why not have the component reference a data source designed specifically for what's need? So after some more development, improved styles... you add new components with data sources. We add two Promo components configured with local or global data sources.
Note: This was demoed with SXA. I encourage you to give that product a spin to see just how simple this can be.
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As Michael mentions, you are doing it wrong. You have a page item that has fields on it, and then building components that pull fields from the current context item. As Michael noted, you should always build components that are reusable with a data source (with fields) that are contained within another item. That way if you want to add 50 headline components to a page, you don't run into a scenario where you can't because you need to add another headline to your page template.
Having said all that, there is a way you can get around that. It's bad practice, and I highly recommend that you do not follow this. You could create on your headline component a rendering parameter. This rendering parameter would include the name of the field to pull from. Example, if you had on your context item 5 headline fields, such as (headline 1, headline 2, etc), you could specify in the rendering parameters that this component will pull in the value headline 1. Then on the second headline component on that same page, you could set the rendering parameters to pull from headline 2. This would also allow you to get around the issue of building 5 headline components for a page.
But like I said, this is a bad practice.
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
A solid option is to build components that have a data source item rather than relying purely on fields defined on the page.
Here's a scenario to help explain what I mean:
Let's say you need to render a hero on the page, along with a few promotional items. I would imagine that the hero image is defined on the page, since many of those page types could use a hero. We add a Page Content component to render Content text and the Hero image.
I could add more fields to the page template, but why not have the component reference a data source designed specifically for what's need? So after some more development, improved styles... you add new components with data sources. We add two Promo components configured with local or global data sources.
Note: This was demoed with SXA. I encourage you to give that product a spin to see just how simple this can be.
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
A solid option is to build components that have a data source item rather than relying purely on fields defined on the page.
Here's a scenario to help explain what I mean:
Let's say you need to render a hero on the page, along with a few promotional items. I would imagine that the hero image is defined on the page, since many of those page types could use a hero. We add a Page Content component to render Content text and the Hero image.
I could add more fields to the page template, but why not have the component reference a data source designed specifically for what's need? So after some more development, improved styles... you add new components with data sources. We add two Promo components configured with local or global data sources.
Note: This was demoed with SXA. I encourage you to give that product a spin to see just how simple this can be.
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
A solid option is to build components that have a data source item rather than relying purely on fields defined on the page.
Here's a scenario to help explain what I mean:
Let's say you need to render a hero on the page, along with a few promotional items. I would imagine that the hero image is defined on the page, since many of those page types could use a hero. We add a Page Content component to render Content text and the Hero image.
I could add more fields to the page template, but why not have the component reference a data source designed specifically for what's need? So after some more development, improved styles... you add new components with data sources. We add two Promo components configured with local or global data sources.
Note: This was demoed with SXA. I encourage you to give that product a spin to see just how simple this can be.
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
A solid option is to build components that have a data source item rather than relying purely on fields defined on the page.
Here's a scenario to help explain what I mean:
Let's say you need to render a hero on the page, along with a few promotional items. I would imagine that the hero image is defined on the page, since many of those page types could use a hero. We add a Page Content component to render Content text and the Hero image.
I could add more fields to the page template, but why not have the component reference a data source designed specifically for what's need? So after some more development, improved styles... you add new components with data sources. We add two Promo components configured with local or global data sources.
Note: This was demoed with SXA. I encourage you to give that product a spin to see just how simple this can be.
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
answered 5 hours ago
Michael West
7,27721245
7,27721245
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As Michael mentions, you are doing it wrong. You have a page item that has fields on it, and then building components that pull fields from the current context item. As Michael noted, you should always build components that are reusable with a data source (with fields) that are contained within another item. That way if you want to add 50 headline components to a page, you don't run into a scenario where you can't because you need to add another headline to your page template.
Having said all that, there is a way you can get around that. It's bad practice, and I highly recommend that you do not follow this. You could create on your headline component a rendering parameter. This rendering parameter would include the name of the field to pull from. Example, if you had on your context item 5 headline fields, such as (headline 1, headline 2, etc), you could specify in the rendering parameters that this component will pull in the value headline 1. Then on the second headline component on that same page, you could set the rendering parameters to pull from headline 2. This would also allow you to get around the issue of building 5 headline components for a page.
But like I said, this is a bad practice.
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
As Michael mentions, you are doing it wrong. You have a page item that has fields on it, and then building components that pull fields from the current context item. As Michael noted, you should always build components that are reusable with a data source (with fields) that are contained within another item. That way if you want to add 50 headline components to a page, you don't run into a scenario where you can't because you need to add another headline to your page template.
Having said all that, there is a way you can get around that. It's bad practice, and I highly recommend that you do not follow this. You could create on your headline component a rendering parameter. This rendering parameter would include the name of the field to pull from. Example, if you had on your context item 5 headline fields, such as (headline 1, headline 2, etc), you could specify in the rendering parameters that this component will pull in the value headline 1. Then on the second headline component on that same page, you could set the rendering parameters to pull from headline 2. This would also allow you to get around the issue of building 5 headline components for a page.
But like I said, this is a bad practice.
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
As Michael mentions, you are doing it wrong. You have a page item that has fields on it, and then building components that pull fields from the current context item. As Michael noted, you should always build components that are reusable with a data source (with fields) that are contained within another item. That way if you want to add 50 headline components to a page, you don't run into a scenario where you can't because you need to add another headline to your page template.
Having said all that, there is a way you can get around that. It's bad practice, and I highly recommend that you do not follow this. You could create on your headline component a rendering parameter. This rendering parameter would include the name of the field to pull from. Example, if you had on your context item 5 headline fields, such as (headline 1, headline 2, etc), you could specify in the rendering parameters that this component will pull in the value headline 1. Then on the second headline component on that same page, you could set the rendering parameters to pull from headline 2. This would also allow you to get around the issue of building 5 headline components for a page.
But like I said, this is a bad practice.
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
As Michael mentions, you are doing it wrong. You have a page item that has fields on it, and then building components that pull fields from the current context item. As Michael noted, you should always build components that are reusable with a data source (with fields) that are contained within another item. That way if you want to add 50 headline components to a page, you don't run into a scenario where you can't because you need to add another headline to your page template.
Having said all that, there is a way you can get around that. It's bad practice, and I highly recommend that you do not follow this. You could create on your headline component a rendering parameter. This rendering parameter would include the name of the field to pull from. Example, if you had on your context item 5 headline fields, such as (headline 1, headline 2, etc), you could specify in the rendering parameters that this component will pull in the value headline 1. Then on the second headline component on that same page, you could set the rendering parameters to pull from headline 2. This would also allow you to get around the issue of building 5 headline components for a page.
But like I said, this is a bad practice.
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
answered 24 mins ago
Dylan Young
2,6941836
2,6941836
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsitecore.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f13901%2ftemplate-inheritance-how-to-resolve-duplicate-usage%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password