Statement of Purpose, should one say “I did X …” or “My advisor and I did X .. ”?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like




I did X ...




or, should one (rightfully) say




My advisor and I / we did X ...




Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?



(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    You should write whatever is true.
    – Dan Fox
    2 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like




I did X ...




or, should one (rightfully) say




My advisor and I / we did X ...




Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?



(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)










share|improve this question



















  • 1




    You should write whatever is true.
    – Dan Fox
    2 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like




I did X ...




or, should one (rightfully) say




My advisor and I / we did X ...




Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?



(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)










share|improve this question















In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like




I did X ...




or, should one (rightfully) say




My advisor and I / we did X ...




Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?



(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)







phd united-states statement-of-purpose






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago

























asked 4 hours ago









Jalapeno Nachos

1,0153520




1,0153520







  • 1




    You should write whatever is true.
    – Dan Fox
    2 hours ago












  • 1




    You should write whatever is true.
    – Dan Fox
    2 hours ago







1




1




You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago




You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













I was taught that it should be “This was planned” and not “I / we planned this” or



“XXX was built or carried out” and not “ I built this” or



“analysis of the results show..” not “my or our analysis shows...”






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned” conveys next to no information.
    – knzhou
    51 mins ago

















up vote
2
down vote













This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.



You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.



Bad example:




My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.




Better example:




I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.




Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.






share|improve this answer






















  • This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
    – xLeitix
    14 mins ago











  • @xLeitix You’re right, edited!
    – knzhou
    7 mins ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117470%2fstatement-of-purpose-should-one-say-i-did-x-or-my-advisor-and-i-did-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













I was taught that it should be “This was planned” and not “I / we planned this” or



“XXX was built or carried out” and not “ I built this” or



“analysis of the results show..” not “my or our analysis shows...”






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned” conveys next to no information.
    – knzhou
    51 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote













I was taught that it should be “This was planned” and not “I / we planned this” or



“XXX was built or carried out” and not “ I built this” or



“analysis of the results show..” not “my or our analysis shows...”






share|improve this answer
















  • 2




    I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned” conveys next to no information.
    – knzhou
    51 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









I was taught that it should be “This was planned” and not “I / we planned this” or



“XXX was built or carried out” and not “ I built this” or



“analysis of the results show..” not “my or our analysis shows...”






share|improve this answer












I was taught that it should be “This was planned” and not “I / we planned this” or



“XXX was built or carried out” and not “ I built this” or



“analysis of the results show..” not “my or our analysis shows...”







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Solar Mike

8,85032038




8,85032038







  • 2




    I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned” conveys next to no information.
    – knzhou
    51 mins ago












  • 2




    I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned” conveys next to no information.
    – knzhou
    51 mins ago







2




2




I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned” conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago




I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned” conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago










up vote
2
down vote













This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.



You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.



Bad example:




My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.




Better example:




I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.




Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.






share|improve this answer






















  • This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
    – xLeitix
    14 mins ago











  • @xLeitix You’re right, edited!
    – knzhou
    7 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote













This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.



You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.



Bad example:




My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.




Better example:




I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.




Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.






share|improve this answer






















  • This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
    – xLeitix
    14 mins ago











  • @xLeitix You’re right, edited!
    – knzhou
    7 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.



You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.



Bad example:




My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.




Better example:




I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.




Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.






share|improve this answer














This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.



You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.



Bad example:




My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.




Better example:




I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.




Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 7 mins ago

























answered 27 mins ago









knzhou

1,103513




1,103513











  • This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
    – xLeitix
    14 mins ago











  • @xLeitix You’re right, edited!
    – knzhou
    7 mins ago
















  • This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
    – xLeitix
    14 mins ago











  • @xLeitix You’re right, edited!
    – knzhou
    7 mins ago















This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago





This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago













@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago




@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117470%2fstatement-of-purpose-should-one-say-i-did-x-or-my-advisor-and-i-did-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery