Statement of Purpose, should one say “I did X …†or “My advisor and I did X .. �
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like
I did X ...
or, should one (rightfully) say
My advisor and I / we did X ...
Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?
(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)
phd united-states statement-of-purpose
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like
I did X ...
or, should one (rightfully) say
My advisor and I / we did X ...
Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?
(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)
phd united-states statement-of-purpose
1
You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like
I did X ...
or, should one (rightfully) say
My advisor and I / we did X ...
Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?
(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)
phd united-states statement-of-purpose
In a statement of purpose for PhD applications, should one talk about their undergrad research like
I did X ...
or, should one (rightfully) say
My advisor and I / we did X ...
Would admissions committees be concerned that the applicant "lacks confidence", when they talk about their research work and emphasize that it's work between them and their advisor? Would committees rather hear the applicant talking solely about their own work?
(Option no. 1 seems a bit ... wrong.)
phd united-states statement-of-purpose
phd united-states statement-of-purpose
edited 3 hours ago
asked 4 hours ago
Jalapeno Nachos
1,0153520
1,0153520
1
You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
1
You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago
1
1
You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago
You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
I was taught that it should be “This was planned†and not “I / we planned this†or
“XXX was built or carried out†and not “ I built this†or
“analysis of the results show..†not “my or our analysis shows...â€Â
2
I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned†conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.
You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.
Bad example:
My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.
Better example:
I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.
Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.
This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago
@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
I was taught that it should be “This was planned†and not “I / we planned this†or
“XXX was built or carried out†and not “ I built this†or
“analysis of the results show..†not “my or our analysis shows...â€Â
2
I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned†conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I was taught that it should be “This was planned†and not “I / we planned this†or
“XXX was built or carried out†and not “ I built this†or
“analysis of the results show..†not “my or our analysis shows...â€Â
2
I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned†conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I was taught that it should be “This was planned†and not “I / we planned this†or
“XXX was built or carried out†and not “ I built this†or
“analysis of the results show..†not “my or our analysis shows...â€Â
I was taught that it should be “This was planned†and not “I / we planned this†or
“XXX was built or carried out†and not “ I built this†or
“analysis of the results show..†not “my or our analysis shows...â€Â
answered 3 hours ago
Solar Mike
8,85032038
8,85032038
2
I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned†conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
2
I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned†conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago
2
2
I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned†conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago
I was taught to avoid this. Nobody likes reading typical stale scientific writing with every sentence in passive voice. Saying “the experiment was planned†conveys next to no information.
– knzhou
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.
You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.
Bad example:
My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.
Better example:
I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.
Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.
This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago
@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.
You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.
Bad example:
My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.
Better example:
I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.
Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.
This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago
@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.
You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.
Bad example:
My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.
Better example:
I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.
Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.
This is an XY problem. Saying "I did X" repeatedly is wrong and offputting, and saying "My advisor and I did X" repeatedly sounds weak and annoying to read. Neither is the right option alone.
You should adjust the phrasing so that subjects are simple, mostly either "I" or "we", and explicitly credit yourself for things you actually did on their own. After all, you did have some independence, right? It's not like your advisor was over your shoulder every minute of every day.
Bad example:
My advisor and I were looking for a project in field X. My advisor gave me a project to apply X to Y, and my advisor and I planned the general strategy after my advisor taught me the basics, so that after two months, some progress was made, though my advisor decided that the data analysis would have to be redone. Later, a paper was drafted with the editorial support of my advisor, which is now, after having been submitted, under review, at Journal Y.
Better example:
I wanted research experience in field X and approached Prof P, who agreed to be my advisor. My project was to apply X to Y, and after a brief reading period I began two months of independent work, during which I picked up techniques A, B, and C. However, I found these techniques were not powerful enough for the problem at hand. We decided on a change of strategy, and I modified the analysis with techniques D and E, which I used to produce compelling results. We have written up and submitted these results to Journal Y.
Of course you would use fancier language in the real thing, but note how the second example makes you sound like an actual sentient human being, while the first makes you sound like you were just passively "along for the ride", even though it technically makes the exact same claims.
edited 7 mins ago
answered 27 mins ago
knzhou
1,103513
1,103513
This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago
@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago
add a comment |Â
This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago
@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago
This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago
This answer is very good, with (imo) one exception. I would avoid "my advisor directed me to" like the plague - if you have to write something like this, I would phrase it as "we decided" in this case.
– xLeitix
14 mins ago
@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago
@xLeitix You’re right, edited!
– knzhou
7 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117470%2fstatement-of-purpose-should-one-say-i-did-x-or-my-advisor-and-i-did-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
You should write whatever is true.
– Dan Fox
2 hours ago