slope of midway nodes not respecting global coordinate transform?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Consider this code:



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


This is the output:



output



So it seems that the sloped option somehow ignores the global coordinate transform matrix. There's nothing particular about yscale=-1, you can try with something else as well. It seems like the slope is computed using the literal node coordinates instead of the actual positions.



So is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? How to get a properly sloped label?



I'm using the tikz package from MacLive 2017 (how to check the exact version?)






tikz-pgf







share|improve this question

















  • 3




    Add transform shape either to the node options or to the tikzpicture options.
    – esdd
    1 hour ago















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Consider this code:



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


This is the output:



output



So it seems that the sloped option somehow ignores the global coordinate transform matrix. There's nothing particular about yscale=-1, you can try with something else as well. It seems like the slope is computed using the literal node coordinates instead of the actual positions.



So is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? How to get a properly sloped label?



I'm using the tikz package from MacLive 2017 (how to check the exact version?)






tikz-pgf







share|improve this question

















  • 3




    Add transform shape either to the node options or to the tikzpicture options.
    – esdd
    1 hour ago













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Consider this code:



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


This is the output:



output



So it seems that the sloped option somehow ignores the global coordinate transform matrix. There's nothing particular about yscale=-1, you can try with something else as well. It seems like the slope is computed using the literal node coordinates instead of the actual positions.



So is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? How to get a properly sloped label?



I'm using the tikz package from MacLive 2017 (how to check the exact version?)






tikz-pgf







share|improve this question













Consider this code:



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


This is the output:



output



So it seems that the sloped option somehow ignores the global coordinate transform matrix. There's nothing particular about yscale=-1, you can try with something else as well. It seems like the slope is computed using the literal node coordinates instead of the actual positions.



So is this a bug or am I doing something wrong? How to get a properly sloped label?



I'm using the tikz package from MacLive 2017 (how to check the exact version?)






tikz-pgf




tikz-pgf






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









gigabytes

1,3281018




1,3281018







  • 3




    Add transform shape either to the node options or to the tikzpicture options.
    – esdd
    1 hour ago













  • 3




    Add transform shape either to the node options or to the tikzpicture options.
    – esdd
    1 hour ago








3




3




Add transform shape either to the node options or to the tikzpicture options.
– esdd
1 hour ago





Add transform shape either to the node options or to the tikzpicture options.
– esdd
1 hour ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













One option is to use decorations.markings for that. (I do not get the desired result with transform shape, which has been suggested by esdd and is a great idea in general.)



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarydecorations.markings,calc
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling and verb|decorations.markings|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw[postaction=decorate,decoration=markings,
 mark=at position 0.5 with path (0,0) coordinate (aux0) (1,0) coordinate
 (aux1);
 pgftransformreset
 path let p1=($(aux1)-(aux0)$),n1=atan2(y1,x1) in 
 (aux0) node[rotate=n1]Label; ] (0,0) -- (2,2);
endtikzpicture

Sloped label with scaling and verb|transform shape|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture


Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer






















  • That is really more complex that a midway node, though..
    – gigabytes
    17 mins ago










  • @gigabytes Yes, it is. To be fair, one should say that transform shape would work fine if you were to add another yscale=-1, i.e. begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape] draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,yscale=-1] Label; endtikzpicture. And thanks for your legal advice!
    – marmot
    21 secs ago


















up vote
2
down vote













Here is another suggestion



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape,nodes=yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



Or



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,transform shape,yscale=-1] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument





share|improve this answer




















  • That obtains the desired output quite cleanly, thanks. But a main point of the question was also to know if the behavior is expected or if that's a bug. What do you think about it?
    – gigabytes
    9 mins ago


















up vote
1
down vote













Using transform shape works, but maybe the result is unexpected: 



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped, transform shape] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



...you are mirroring vertically everything...






share|improve this answer




















  • That's expected with the transform shape key, yes.. but was the sloped option expected to work in that way?
    – gigabytes
    16 mins ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458037%2fslope-of-midway-nodes-not-respecting-global-coordinate-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













One option is to use decorations.markings for that. (I do not get the desired result with transform shape, which has been suggested by esdd and is a great idea in general.)



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarydecorations.markings,calc
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling and verb|decorations.markings|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw[postaction=decorate,decoration=markings,
 mark=at position 0.5 with path (0,0) coordinate (aux0) (1,0) coordinate
 (aux1);
 pgftransformreset
 path let p1=($(aux1)-(aux0)$),n1=atan2(y1,x1) in 
 (aux0) node[rotate=n1]Label; ] (0,0) -- (2,2);
endtikzpicture

Sloped label with scaling and verb|transform shape|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture


Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer






















  • That is really more complex that a midway node, though..
    – gigabytes
    17 mins ago










  • @gigabytes Yes, it is. To be fair, one should say that transform shape would work fine if you were to add another yscale=-1, i.e. begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape] draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,yscale=-1] Label; endtikzpicture. And thanks for your legal advice!
    – marmot
    21 secs ago















up vote
3
down vote













One option is to use decorations.markings for that. (I do not get the desired result with transform shape, which has been suggested by esdd and is a great idea in general.)



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarydecorations.markings,calc
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling and verb|decorations.markings|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw[postaction=decorate,decoration=markings,
 mark=at position 0.5 with path (0,0) coordinate (aux0) (1,0) coordinate
 (aux1);
 pgftransformreset
 path let p1=($(aux1)-(aux0)$),n1=atan2(y1,x1) in 
 (aux0) node[rotate=n1]Label; ] (0,0) -- (2,2);
endtikzpicture

Sloped label with scaling and verb|transform shape|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture


Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer






















  • That is really more complex that a midway node, though..
    – gigabytes
    17 mins ago










  • @gigabytes Yes, it is. To be fair, one should say that transform shape would work fine if you were to add another yscale=-1, i.e. begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape] draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,yscale=-1] Label; endtikzpicture. And thanks for your legal advice!
    – marmot
    21 secs ago













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









One option is to use decorations.markings for that. (I do not get the desired result with transform shape, which has been suggested by esdd and is a great idea in general.)



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarydecorations.markings,calc
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling and verb|decorations.markings|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw[postaction=decorate,decoration=markings,
 mark=at position 0.5 with path (0,0) coordinate (aux0) (1,0) coordinate
 (aux1);
 pgftransformreset
 path let p1=($(aux1)-(aux0)$),n1=atan2(y1,x1) in 
 (aux0) node[rotate=n1]Label; ] (0,0) -- (2,2);
endtikzpicture

Sloped label with scaling and verb|transform shape|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture


Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer














One option is to use decorations.markings for that. (I do not get the desired result with transform shape, which has been suggested by esdd and is a great idea in general.)



documentclassarticle

usepackagetikz
usetikzlibrarydecorations.markings,calc
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling and verb|decorations.markings|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw[postaction=decorate,decoration=markings,
 mark=at position 0.5 with path (0,0) coordinate (aux0) (1,0) coordinate
 (aux1);
 pgftransformreset
 path let p1=($(aux1)-(aux0)$),n1=atan2(y1,x1) in 
 (aux0) node[rotate=n1]Label; ] (0,0) -- (2,2);
endtikzpicture

Sloped label with scaling and verb|transform shape|:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture


Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 25 mins ago

























answered 33 mins ago









marmot

70.9k476151




70.9k476151











  • That is really more complex that a midway node, though..
    – gigabytes
    17 mins ago










  • @gigabytes Yes, it is. To be fair, one should say that transform shape would work fine if you were to add another yscale=-1, i.e. begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape] draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,yscale=-1] Label; endtikzpicture. And thanks for your legal advice!
    – marmot
    21 secs ago

















  • That is really more complex that a midway node, though..
    – gigabytes
    17 mins ago










  • @gigabytes Yes, it is. To be fair, one should say that transform shape would work fine if you were to add another yscale=-1, i.e. begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape] draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,yscale=-1] Label; endtikzpicture. And thanks for your legal advice!
    – marmot
    21 secs ago
















That is really more complex that a midway node, though..
– gigabytes
17 mins ago




That is really more complex that a midway node, though..
– gigabytes
17 mins ago












@gigabytes Yes, it is. To be fair, one should say that transform shape would work fine if you were to add another yscale=-1, i.e. begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape] draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,yscale=-1] Label; endtikzpicture. And thanks for your legal advice!
– marmot
21 secs ago





@gigabytes Yes, it is. To be fair, one should say that transform shape would work fine if you were to add another yscale=-1, i.e. begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape] draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,yscale=-1] Label; endtikzpicture. And thanks for your legal advice!
– marmot
21 secs ago











up vote
2
down vote













Here is another suggestion



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape,nodes=yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



Or



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,transform shape,yscale=-1] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument





share|improve this answer




















  • That obtains the desired output quite cleanly, thanks. But a main point of the question was also to know if the behavior is expected or if that's a bug. What do you think about it?
    – gigabytes
    9 mins ago















up vote
2
down vote













Here is another suggestion



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape,nodes=yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



Or



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,transform shape,yscale=-1] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument





share|improve this answer




















  • That obtains the desired output quite cleanly, thanks. But a main point of the question was also to know if the behavior is expected or if that's a bug. What do you think about it?
    – gigabytes
    9 mins ago













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Here is another suggestion



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape,nodes=yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



Or



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,transform shape,yscale=-1] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument





share|improve this answer












Here is another suggestion



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1,transform shape,nodes=yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



Or



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz

begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0)nodex -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped,transform shape,yscale=-1] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 12 mins ago









esdd

56.9k34383




56.9k34383











  • That obtains the desired output quite cleanly, thanks. But a main point of the question was also to know if the behavior is expected or if that's a bug. What do you think about it?
    – gigabytes
    9 mins ago

















  • That obtains the desired output quite cleanly, thanks. But a main point of the question was also to know if the behavior is expected or if that's a bug. What do you think about it?
    – gigabytes
    9 mins ago
















That obtains the desired output quite cleanly, thanks. But a main point of the question was also to know if the behavior is expected or if that's a bug. What do you think about it?
– gigabytes
9 mins ago





That obtains the desired output quite cleanly, thanks. But a main point of the question was also to know if the behavior is expected or if that's a bug. What do you think about it?
– gigabytes
9 mins ago











up vote
1
down vote













Using transform shape works, but maybe the result is unexpected: 



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped, transform shape] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



...you are mirroring vertically everything...






share|improve this answer




















  • That's expected with the transform shape key, yes.. but was the sloped option expected to work in that way?
    – gigabytes
    16 mins ago














up vote
1
down vote













Using transform shape works, but maybe the result is unexpected: 



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped, transform shape] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



...you are mirroring vertically everything...






share|improve this answer




















  • That's expected with the transform shape key, yes.. but was the sloped option expected to work in that way?
    – gigabytes
    16 mins ago












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Using transform shape works, but maybe the result is unexpected: 



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped, transform shape] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



...you are mirroring vertically everything...






share|improve this answer












Using transform shape works, but maybe the result is unexpected: 



documentclassarticle
usepackagetikz
begindocument

Sloped label with scaling:

begintikzpicture[yscale=-1]
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped, transform shape] Label;
endtikzpicture

Sloped label without scaling:

begintikzpicture
 draw (0,0) -- (2,2) node[midway,sloped] Label;
endtikzpicture

enddocument


enter image description here



...you are mirroring vertically everything...







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 27 mins ago









Rmano

7,16021647




7,16021647











  • That's expected with the transform shape key, yes.. but was the sloped option expected to work in that way?
    – gigabytes
    16 mins ago
















  • That's expected with the transform shape key, yes.. but was the sloped option expected to work in that way?
    – gigabytes
    16 mins ago















That's expected with the transform shape key, yes.. but was the sloped option expected to work in that way?
– gigabytes
16 mins ago




That's expected with the transform shape key, yes.. but was the sloped option expected to work in that way?
– gigabytes
16 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f458037%2fslope-of-midway-nodes-not-respecting-global-coordinate-transform%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
Read more

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
Read more

Confectionery

Image
Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
Read more