Mixing
Is there a benefit of specifying the canonical URL for the homepage, or can search engines figure out common index, www, and https variants?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Currently I am considering adding a canonical tag onto the homepage of my website as there appear to be a few other URLs that Google and other search engines are picking up on. Realistically the preferred one is the https://www.example.com however, examples of others include:
http://www.example.comhttp://www.example.com/indexhttps://example.com/indexhttp://example.comhttps://example.com
Is there any real 'benefit' to adding this tag onto the homepage? I would like to think that in this day and age, most search engines are able to establish that these are the same destinations anyway.
From what I can see though, they do sometimes feed through differently into our analytics software, so there could be a benefit of doing this there?
seo google url canonical-url rel-canonical
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Currently I am considering adding a canonical tag onto the homepage of my website as there appear to be a few other URLs that Google and other search engines are picking up on. Realistically the preferred one is the https://www.example.com however, examples of others include:
http://www.example.comhttp://www.example.com/indexhttps://example.com/indexhttp://example.comhttps://example.com
Is there any real 'benefit' to adding this tag onto the homepage? I would like to think that in this day and age, most search engines are able to establish that these are the same destinations anyway.
From what I can see though, they do sometimes feed through differently into our analytics software, so there could be a benefit of doing this there?
seo google url canonical-url rel-canonical
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Currently I am considering adding a canonical tag onto the homepage of my website as there appear to be a few other URLs that Google and other search engines are picking up on. Realistically the preferred one is the https://www.example.com however, examples of others include:
http://www.example.comhttp://www.example.com/indexhttps://example.com/indexhttp://example.comhttps://example.com
Is there any real 'benefit' to adding this tag onto the homepage? I would like to think that in this day and age, most search engines are able to establish that these are the same destinations anyway.
From what I can see though, they do sometimes feed through differently into our analytics software, so there could be a benefit of doing this there?
seo google url canonical-url rel-canonical
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
Currently I am considering adding a canonical tag onto the homepage of my website as there appear to be a few other URLs that Google and other search engines are picking up on. Realistically the preferred one is the https://www.example.com however, examples of others include:
http://www.example.comhttp://www.example.com/indexhttps://example.com/indexhttp://example.comhttps://example.com
Is there any real 'benefit' to adding this tag onto the homepage? I would like to think that in this day and age, most search engines are able to establish that these are the same destinations anyway.
From what I can see though, they do sometimes feed through differently into our analytics software, so there could be a benefit of doing this there?
seo google url canonical-url rel-canonical
seo google url canonical-url rel-canonical
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
edited 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
65.6k1388237
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
asked 4 hours ago
Jvital
687
687
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Having different versions of you homepage as https, http or www and non-www could result in your homepage ranking on all different versions and splitting page rank, you wont get any duplication issues tho since Google can understand that is the homepage.
This is an easy issue which can be solved with 301 redirect, the answer can be canonical as well but i prefer the 301 in this case.
What you want to do is:
301 Redirect:
Pick your preferred version and points all versions of your homepage on that URL.
http://www.example.com > 301> https://example.com
http://www.example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
https://example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
http://example.com> 301> https://example.com
Make sure your homepage and every important page (and non) on your site has a self referring canonical.
The canonical way:
Here every user would be able to land on all versions but google will display only the original one and will pass the rank from all versions to the prefered.
http://www.example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://www.example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
You are correct that search engines are usually able to figure out the variants on their own these days. Google is especially good at detecting duplicate content on various URLs and choosing exactly one of them to rank. See What is duplicate content and how can I avoid being penalized for it on my site?
The advantage of using canonical tags is that you can control which version search engines prefer. If you don't specify, Google may choose to prefer a version that wouldn't be your first choice.
As far as analytics go, 301 redirects are a better choice compared to canonical tags. The canonical URL tag doesn't affect the URL in the browser address bar, nor does it affect which URL gets recorded in your site stats. The canonical tag would reduce the number of users that see alternate versions because search engines would send all visitors to the preferred version. However, users that type in the URL or visit through links still might see alternate versions. 301 redirects would solve the problem for all users, not just users that come through search engines.
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
Having different versions of you homepage as https, http or www and non-www could result in your homepage ranking on all different versions and splitting page rank, you wont get any duplication issues tho since Google can understand that is the homepage.
This is an easy issue which can be solved with 301 redirect, the answer can be canonical as well but i prefer the 301 in this case.
What you want to do is:
301 Redirect:
Pick your preferred version and points all versions of your homepage on that URL.
http://www.example.com > 301> https://example.com
http://www.example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
https://example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
http://example.com> 301> https://example.com
Make sure your homepage and every important page (and non) on your site has a self referring canonical.
The canonical way:
Here every user would be able to land on all versions but google will display only the original one and will pass the rank from all versions to the prefered.
http://www.example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://www.example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Having different versions of you homepage as https, http or www and non-www could result in your homepage ranking on all different versions and splitting page rank, you wont get any duplication issues tho since Google can understand that is the homepage.
This is an easy issue which can be solved with 301 redirect, the answer can be canonical as well but i prefer the 301 in this case.
What you want to do is:
301 Redirect:
Pick your preferred version and points all versions of your homepage on that URL.
http://www.example.com > 301> https://example.com
http://www.example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
https://example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
http://example.com> 301> https://example.com
Make sure your homepage and every important page (and non) on your site has a self referring canonical.
The canonical way:
Here every user would be able to land on all versions but google will display only the original one and will pass the rank from all versions to the prefered.
http://www.example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://www.example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Having different versions of you homepage as https, http or www and non-www could result in your homepage ranking on all different versions and splitting page rank, you wont get any duplication issues tho since Google can understand that is the homepage.
This is an easy issue which can be solved with 301 redirect, the answer can be canonical as well but i prefer the 301 in this case.
What you want to do is:
301 Redirect:
Pick your preferred version and points all versions of your homepage on that URL.
http://www.example.com > 301> https://example.com
http://www.example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
https://example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
http://example.com> 301> https://example.com
Make sure your homepage and every important page (and non) on your site has a self referring canonical.
The canonical way:
Here every user would be able to land on all versions but google will display only the original one and will pass the rank from all versions to the prefered.
http://www.example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://www.example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
Having different versions of you homepage as https, http or www and non-www could result in your homepage ranking on all different versions and splitting page rank, you wont get any duplication issues tho since Google can understand that is the homepage.
This is an easy issue which can be solved with 301 redirect, the answer can be canonical as well but i prefer the 301 in this case.
What you want to do is:
301 Redirect:
Pick your preferred version and points all versions of your homepage on that URL.
http://www.example.com > 301> https://example.com
http://www.example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
https://example.com/index> 301> https://example.com
http://example.com> 301> https://example.com
Make sure your homepage and every important page (and non) on your site has a self referring canonical.
The canonical way:
Here every user would be able to land on all versions but google will display only the original one and will pass the rank from all versions to the prefered.
http://www.example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://www.example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/index
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
http://example.com
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
https://example.com/
<link rel="canonical" href="https://www.example.com/" />
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
edited 14 mins ago
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
answered 4 hours ago
John Could
48410
48410
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
You are correct that search engines are usually able to figure out the variants on their own these days. Google is especially good at detecting duplicate content on various URLs and choosing exactly one of them to rank. See What is duplicate content and how can I avoid being penalized for it on my site?
The advantage of using canonical tags is that you can control which version search engines prefer. If you don't specify, Google may choose to prefer a version that wouldn't be your first choice.
As far as analytics go, 301 redirects are a better choice compared to canonical tags. The canonical URL tag doesn't affect the URL in the browser address bar, nor does it affect which URL gets recorded in your site stats. The canonical tag would reduce the number of users that see alternate versions because search engines would send all visitors to the preferred version. However, users that type in the URL or visit through links still might see alternate versions. 301 redirects would solve the problem for all users, not just users that come through search engines.
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
You are correct that search engines are usually able to figure out the variants on their own these days. Google is especially good at detecting duplicate content on various URLs and choosing exactly one of them to rank. See What is duplicate content and how can I avoid being penalized for it on my site?
The advantage of using canonical tags is that you can control which version search engines prefer. If you don't specify, Google may choose to prefer a version that wouldn't be your first choice.
As far as analytics go, 301 redirects are a better choice compared to canonical tags. The canonical URL tag doesn't affect the URL in the browser address bar, nor does it affect which URL gets recorded in your site stats. The canonical tag would reduce the number of users that see alternate versions because search engines would send all visitors to the preferred version. However, users that type in the URL or visit through links still might see alternate versions. 301 redirects would solve the problem for all users, not just users that come through search engines.
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
You are correct that search engines are usually able to figure out the variants on their own these days. Google is especially good at detecting duplicate content on various URLs and choosing exactly one of them to rank. See What is duplicate content and how can I avoid being penalized for it on my site?
The advantage of using canonical tags is that you can control which version search engines prefer. If you don't specify, Google may choose to prefer a version that wouldn't be your first choice.
As far as analytics go, 301 redirects are a better choice compared to canonical tags. The canonical URL tag doesn't affect the URL in the browser address bar, nor does it affect which URL gets recorded in your site stats. The canonical tag would reduce the number of users that see alternate versions because search engines would send all visitors to the preferred version. However, users that type in the URL or visit through links still might see alternate versions. 301 redirects would solve the problem for all users, not just users that come through search engines.
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
You are correct that search engines are usually able to figure out the variants on their own these days. Google is especially good at detecting duplicate content on various URLs and choosing exactly one of them to rank. See What is duplicate content and how can I avoid being penalized for it on my site?
The advantage of using canonical tags is that you can control which version search engines prefer. If you don't specify, Google may choose to prefer a version that wouldn't be your first choice.
As far as analytics go, 301 redirects are a better choice compared to canonical tags. The canonical URL tag doesn't affect the URL in the browser address bar, nor does it affect which URL gets recorded in your site stats. The canonical tag would reduce the number of users that see alternate versions because search engines would send all visitors to the preferred version. However, users that type in the URL or visit through links still might see alternate versions. 301 redirects would solve the problem for all users, not just users that come through search engines.
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
answered 3 hours ago
Stephen Ostermiller♦
65.6k1388237
65.6k1388237
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebmasters.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f118894%2fis-there-a-benefit-of-specifying-the-canonical-url-for-the-homepage-or-can-sear%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
