Mixing
What is the source for 5e defaulting to plain English readings of non-game terms?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
In many discussions involving rules interpretations the meaning of words is often called into question. Often, people will claim that if the game doesn't define the term that it defaults to the plain English reading of the word.
Is this stated somewhere explicitly in the rules or in developer comments? What is the source (or sources) for this claim?
dnd-5e
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
In many discussions involving rules interpretations the meaning of words is often called into question. Often, people will claim that if the game doesn't define the term that it defaults to the plain English reading of the word.
Is this stated somewhere explicitly in the rules or in developer comments? What is the source (or sources) for this claim?
dnd-5e
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
up vote
7
down vote
favorite
In many discussions involving rules interpretations the meaning of words is often called into question. Often, people will claim that if the game doesn't define the term that it defaults to the plain English reading of the word.
Is this stated somewhere explicitly in the rules or in developer comments? What is the source (or sources) for this claim?
dnd-5e
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
In many discussions involving rules interpretations the meaning of words is often called into question. Often, people will claim that if the game doesn't define the term that it defaults to the plain English reading of the word.
Is this stated somewhere explicitly in the rules or in developer comments? What is the source (or sources) for this claim?
dnd-5e
dnd-5e
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
asked 1 hour ago
Rubiksmoose
41.4k5204313
41.4k5204313
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Jeremy Crawford (who makes "official" rulings, see this related question) has affirmed that this is indeed the way the rules are supposed to be read in this tweet:
Unless the rules explicitly expand, narrow, or completely redefine a word, that word retains the meaning it has in idiomatic English. #DnD
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
3
Using “natural language†was one of the original design goals. If you could dig that up, that plus Crawford would provide the foundation and the affirmation of the foundation’s continued importance.
– SevenSidedDie♦
36 mins ago
@SevenSidedDie Apparently the original design goals are lost and my search is not turning out any differently. I may dig some more later.
– Sdjz
6 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
7
down vote
Jeremy Crawford (who makes "official" rulings, see this related question) has affirmed that this is indeed the way the rules are supposed to be read in this tweet:
Unless the rules explicitly expand, narrow, or completely redefine a word, that word retains the meaning it has in idiomatic English. #DnD
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
3
Using “natural language†was one of the original design goals. If you could dig that up, that plus Crawford would provide the foundation and the affirmation of the foundation’s continued importance.
– SevenSidedDie♦
36 mins ago
@SevenSidedDie Apparently the original design goals are lost and my search is not turning out any differently. I may dig some more later.
– Sdjz
6 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
Jeremy Crawford (who makes "official" rulings, see this related question) has affirmed that this is indeed the way the rules are supposed to be read in this tweet:
Unless the rules explicitly expand, narrow, or completely redefine a word, that word retains the meaning it has in idiomatic English. #DnD
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
3
Using “natural language†was one of the original design goals. If you could dig that up, that plus Crawford would provide the foundation and the affirmation of the foundation’s continued importance.
– SevenSidedDie♦
36 mins ago
@SevenSidedDie Apparently the original design goals are lost and my search is not turning out any differently. I may dig some more later.
– Sdjz
6 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
Jeremy Crawford (who makes "official" rulings, see this related question) has affirmed that this is indeed the way the rules are supposed to be read in this tweet:
Unless the rules explicitly expand, narrow, or completely redefine a word, that word retains the meaning it has in idiomatic English. #DnD
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
Jeremy Crawford (who makes "official" rulings, see this related question) has affirmed that this is indeed the way the rules are supposed to be read in this tweet:
Unless the rules explicitly expand, narrow, or completely redefine a word, that word retains the meaning it has in idiomatic English. #DnD
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
edited 43 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
answered 1 hour ago
Sdjz
9,16534489
9,16534489
3
Using “natural language†was one of the original design goals. If you could dig that up, that plus Crawford would provide the foundation and the affirmation of the foundation’s continued importance.
– SevenSidedDie♦
36 mins ago
@SevenSidedDie Apparently the original design goals are lost and my search is not turning out any differently. I may dig some more later.
– Sdjz
6 mins ago
add a comment |Â
3
Using “natural language†was one of the original design goals. If you could dig that up, that plus Crawford would provide the foundation and the affirmation of the foundation’s continued importance.
– SevenSidedDie♦
36 mins ago
@SevenSidedDie Apparently the original design goals are lost and my search is not turning out any differently. I may dig some more later.
– Sdjz
6 mins ago
3
3
Using “natural language†was one of the original design goals. If you could dig that up, that plus Crawford would provide the foundation and the affirmation of the foundation’s continued importance.
– SevenSidedDie♦
36 mins ago
Using “natural language†was one of the original design goals. If you could dig that up, that plus Crawford would provide the foundation and the affirmation of the foundation’s continued importance.
– SevenSidedDie♦
36 mins ago
@SevenSidedDie Apparently the original design goals are lost and my search is not turning out any differently. I may dig some more later.
– Sdjz
6 mins ago
@SevenSidedDie Apparently the original design goals are lost and my search is not turning out any differently. I may dig some more later.
– Sdjz
6 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135039%2fwhat-is-the-source-for-5e-defaulting-to-plain-english-readings-of-non-game-terms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password