Proof of quotient rule $(fracfg)'(x_0)=fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)-f(x_0)g'(x_0)g^2(x_0)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












$$left(fracfgright)'(x_0)=fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)-f(x_0)g'(x_0)g^2(x_0)$$



So, $frac1g.f=fracfg$, then $$fracfg'(x_0)=fracf(x)frac1g(x)-f(x_0)frac1g(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)fracfrac1g(x)-frac1g(x_0)x-x_0-frac1g(x_0)fracf(x)-f(x_0)x-x_0$$ I took the limit of everything as $x to x_0$ $$=f(x_0)frac1g'(x_0)-frac1g(x_0)f'(x_0)=fracf(x_0)g'(x_0)-fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)=fracg(x_0)f(x_0)-f'(x_0)g'(x_0)g'(x_0)g(x_0)$$ which clearly it's fake.



Where did I go wrong?
Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    $$left(fracfgright)'(x_0)=fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)-f(x_0)g'(x_0)g^2(x_0)$$



    So, $frac1g.f=fracfg$, then $$fracfg'(x_0)=fracf(x)frac1g(x)-f(x_0)frac1g(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)fracfrac1g(x)-frac1g(x_0)x-x_0-frac1g(x_0)fracf(x)-f(x_0)x-x_0$$ I took the limit of everything as $x to x_0$ $$=f(x_0)frac1g'(x_0)-frac1g(x_0)f'(x_0)=fracf(x_0)g'(x_0)-fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)=fracg(x_0)f(x_0)-f'(x_0)g'(x_0)g'(x_0)g(x_0)$$ which clearly it's fake.



    Where did I go wrong?
    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      $$left(fracfgright)'(x_0)=fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)-f(x_0)g'(x_0)g^2(x_0)$$



      So, $frac1g.f=fracfg$, then $$fracfg'(x_0)=fracf(x)frac1g(x)-f(x_0)frac1g(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)fracfrac1g(x)-frac1g(x_0)x-x_0-frac1g(x_0)fracf(x)-f(x_0)x-x_0$$ I took the limit of everything as $x to x_0$ $$=f(x_0)frac1g'(x_0)-frac1g(x_0)f'(x_0)=fracf(x_0)g'(x_0)-fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)=fracg(x_0)f(x_0)-f'(x_0)g'(x_0)g'(x_0)g(x_0)$$ which clearly it's fake.



      Where did I go wrong?
      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question















      $$left(fracfgright)'(x_0)=fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)-f(x_0)g'(x_0)g^2(x_0)$$



      So, $frac1g.f=fracfg$, then $$fracfg'(x_0)=fracf(x)frac1g(x)-f(x_0)frac1g(x_0)x-x_0=f(x)fracfrac1g(x)-frac1g(x_0)x-x_0-frac1g(x_0)fracf(x)-f(x_0)x-x_0$$ I took the limit of everything as $x to x_0$ $$=f(x_0)frac1g'(x_0)-frac1g(x_0)f'(x_0)=fracf(x_0)g'(x_0)-fracf'(x_0)g(x_0)=fracg(x_0)f(x_0)-f'(x_0)g'(x_0)g'(x_0)g(x_0)$$ which clearly it's fake.



      Where did I go wrong?
      Thank you!







      calculus real-analysis derivatives proof-writing






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 3 mins ago









      amWhy

      191k27222434




      191k27222434










      asked 32 mins ago









      parishilton

      537




      537




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          You are close. Note that instead of cancelling the term $fracfracf(x)g(x_0)x-x_0$ you actually subtract it twice. Second, note that the $$lim_x rightarrow x_0 fracfrac1g(x) - frac1g(x_0)x-x_0 = left(frac1g(x_0)right)'neq frac1g'(x_0).$$



          Instead of doing it this way, I like to prove the quotient rule using the product rule: $fracfg = f cdot g^-1$. $fracddx (fg^-1) = f'g^-1 - fg'g^-2 = fracf'g - fg'g^2.$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • Thank you!! I got it right now. I actually think your method is easier haha
            – parishilton
            4 mins ago

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          $(1/g)'neq 1/g'$ this is where you made the mistake.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2940072%2fproof-of-quotient-rule-fracfgx-0-fracfx-0gx-0-fx-0gx-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            You are close. Note that instead of cancelling the term $fracfracf(x)g(x_0)x-x_0$ you actually subtract it twice. Second, note that the $$lim_x rightarrow x_0 fracfrac1g(x) - frac1g(x_0)x-x_0 = left(frac1g(x_0)right)'neq frac1g'(x_0).$$



            Instead of doing it this way, I like to prove the quotient rule using the product rule: $fracfg = f cdot g^-1$. $fracddx (fg^-1) = f'g^-1 - fg'g^-2 = fracf'g - fg'g^2.$






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Thank you!! I got it right now. I actually think your method is easier haha
              – parishilton
              4 mins ago














            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            You are close. Note that instead of cancelling the term $fracfracf(x)g(x_0)x-x_0$ you actually subtract it twice. Second, note that the $$lim_x rightarrow x_0 fracfrac1g(x) - frac1g(x_0)x-x_0 = left(frac1g(x_0)right)'neq frac1g'(x_0).$$



            Instead of doing it this way, I like to prove the quotient rule using the product rule: $fracfg = f cdot g^-1$. $fracddx (fg^-1) = f'g^-1 - fg'g^-2 = fracf'g - fg'g^2.$






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • Thank you!! I got it right now. I actually think your method is easier haha
              – parishilton
              4 mins ago












            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted






            You are close. Note that instead of cancelling the term $fracfracf(x)g(x_0)x-x_0$ you actually subtract it twice. Second, note that the $$lim_x rightarrow x_0 fracfrac1g(x) - frac1g(x_0)x-x_0 = left(frac1g(x_0)right)'neq frac1g'(x_0).$$



            Instead of doing it this way, I like to prove the quotient rule using the product rule: $fracfg = f cdot g^-1$. $fracddx (fg^-1) = f'g^-1 - fg'g^-2 = fracf'g - fg'g^2.$






            share|cite|improve this answer












            You are close. Note that instead of cancelling the term $fracfracf(x)g(x_0)x-x_0$ you actually subtract it twice. Second, note that the $$lim_x rightarrow x_0 fracfrac1g(x) - frac1g(x_0)x-x_0 = left(frac1g(x_0)right)'neq frac1g'(x_0).$$



            Instead of doing it this way, I like to prove the quotient rule using the product rule: $fracfg = f cdot g^-1$. $fracddx (fg^-1) = f'g^-1 - fg'g^-2 = fracf'g - fg'g^2.$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 15 mins ago









            Neeyanth Kopparapu

            464




            464











            • Thank you!! I got it right now. I actually think your method is easier haha
              – parishilton
              4 mins ago
















            • Thank you!! I got it right now. I actually think your method is easier haha
              – parishilton
              4 mins ago















            Thank you!! I got it right now. I actually think your method is easier haha
            – parishilton
            4 mins ago




            Thank you!! I got it right now. I actually think your method is easier haha
            – parishilton
            4 mins ago










            up vote
            3
            down vote













            $(1/g)'neq 1/g'$ this is where you made the mistake.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              $(1/g)'neq 1/g'$ this is where you made the mistake.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                $(1/g)'neq 1/g'$ this is where you made the mistake.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                $(1/g)'neq 1/g'$ this is where you made the mistake.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 20 mins ago









                Singh

                323110




                323110



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2940072%2fproof-of-quotient-rule-fracfgx-0-fracfx-0gx-0-fx-0gx-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                    One-line joke