Is this map realistic/believeable?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I'm working on this map right now. Is this map realistic/believable? The continent would be about 5 million km² and lies in the temperate climate zone. The island would be the only empire, the rest would be city-states. Caellan, Aerigoth and Roymoi are home of barbarian tribes.



And are the names okay? I always struggle with names of cities, locations and so on.



enter image description here



I hope I got the tags right.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • To clarify, your continent is 5 million square kilometers? Is it in the area where there are a lot of volcanic activity?
    – Arkhaine
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, about that size. There is some volcanic activity, but not really worth mentioning.
    – Nesari
    9 hours ago










  • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. When you have a moment, Nesari, please add the reality-check tag to this question. Thanks!
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • Are you basing the Wyvern Mountains on volcanic ones like the Andes, rift-formed mountains like the Appalachians and The Great Dividing Range in Australia, or the Himalayas (which are the least likely)?
    – Jaycie Beveri
    7 hours ago










  • Welcome! I recommend removing the questions about the names. We won't be able to answer those. In general naming questions are out of scope for WB.SE because language is so deeply tied to your story.
    – Cort Ammon
    5 hours ago














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I'm working on this map right now. Is this map realistic/believable? The continent would be about 5 million km² and lies in the temperate climate zone. The island would be the only empire, the rest would be city-states. Caellan, Aerigoth and Roymoi are home of barbarian tribes.



And are the names okay? I always struggle with names of cities, locations and so on.



enter image description here



I hope I got the tags right.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • To clarify, your continent is 5 million square kilometers? Is it in the area where there are a lot of volcanic activity?
    – Arkhaine
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, about that size. There is some volcanic activity, but not really worth mentioning.
    – Nesari
    9 hours ago










  • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. When you have a moment, Nesari, please add the reality-check tag to this question. Thanks!
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • Are you basing the Wyvern Mountains on volcanic ones like the Andes, rift-formed mountains like the Appalachians and The Great Dividing Range in Australia, or the Himalayas (which are the least likely)?
    – Jaycie Beveri
    7 hours ago










  • Welcome! I recommend removing the questions about the names. We won't be able to answer those. In general naming questions are out of scope for WB.SE because language is so deeply tied to your story.
    – Cort Ammon
    5 hours ago












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I'm working on this map right now. Is this map realistic/believable? The continent would be about 5 million km² and lies in the temperate climate zone. The island would be the only empire, the rest would be city-states. Caellan, Aerigoth and Roymoi are home of barbarian tribes.



And are the names okay? I always struggle with names of cities, locations and so on.



enter image description here



I hope I got the tags right.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm working on this map right now. Is this map realistic/believable? The continent would be about 5 million km² and lies in the temperate climate zone. The island would be the only empire, the rest would be city-states. Caellan, Aerigoth and Roymoi are home of barbarian tribes.



And are the names okay? I always struggle with names of cities, locations and so on.



enter image description here



I hope I got the tags right.







geography worldbuilding-process map-making names






share|improve this question









New contributor




Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









RonJohn

13.1k12661




13.1k12661






New contributor




Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 10 hours ago









Nesari

241




241




New contributor




Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nesari is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • To clarify, your continent is 5 million square kilometers? Is it in the area where there are a lot of volcanic activity?
    – Arkhaine
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, about that size. There is some volcanic activity, but not really worth mentioning.
    – Nesari
    9 hours ago










  • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. When you have a moment, Nesari, please add the reality-check tag to this question. Thanks!
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • Are you basing the Wyvern Mountains on volcanic ones like the Andes, rift-formed mountains like the Appalachians and The Great Dividing Range in Australia, or the Himalayas (which are the least likely)?
    – Jaycie Beveri
    7 hours ago










  • Welcome! I recommend removing the questions about the names. We won't be able to answer those. In general naming questions are out of scope for WB.SE because language is so deeply tied to your story.
    – Cort Ammon
    5 hours ago
















  • To clarify, your continent is 5 million square kilometers? Is it in the area where there are a lot of volcanic activity?
    – Arkhaine
    9 hours ago










  • Yes, about that size. There is some volcanic activity, but not really worth mentioning.
    – Nesari
    9 hours ago










  • Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. When you have a moment, Nesari, please add the reality-check tag to this question. Thanks!
    – JBH
    7 hours ago










  • Are you basing the Wyvern Mountains on volcanic ones like the Andes, rift-formed mountains like the Appalachians and The Great Dividing Range in Australia, or the Himalayas (which are the least likely)?
    – Jaycie Beveri
    7 hours ago










  • Welcome! I recommend removing the questions about the names. We won't be able to answer those. In general naming questions are out of scope for WB.SE because language is so deeply tied to your story.
    – Cort Ammon
    5 hours ago















To clarify, your continent is 5 million square kilometers? Is it in the area where there are a lot of volcanic activity?
– Arkhaine
9 hours ago




To clarify, your continent is 5 million square kilometers? Is it in the area where there are a lot of volcanic activity?
– Arkhaine
9 hours ago












Yes, about that size. There is some volcanic activity, but not really worth mentioning.
– Nesari
9 hours ago




Yes, about that size. There is some volcanic activity, but not really worth mentioning.
– Nesari
9 hours ago












Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. When you have a moment, Nesari, please add the reality-check tag to this question. Thanks!
– JBH
7 hours ago




Welcome to Worldbuilding.SE! We're glad you could join us! When you have a moment, please click here to learn more about our culture and take our tour. When you have a moment, Nesari, please add the reality-check tag to this question. Thanks!
– JBH
7 hours ago












Are you basing the Wyvern Mountains on volcanic ones like the Andes, rift-formed mountains like the Appalachians and The Great Dividing Range in Australia, or the Himalayas (which are the least likely)?
– Jaycie Beveri
7 hours ago




Are you basing the Wyvern Mountains on volcanic ones like the Andes, rift-formed mountains like the Appalachians and The Great Dividing Range in Australia, or the Himalayas (which are the least likely)?
– Jaycie Beveri
7 hours ago












Welcome! I recommend removing the questions about the names. We won't be able to answer those. In general naming questions are out of scope for WB.SE because language is so deeply tied to your story.
– Cort Ammon
5 hours ago




Welcome! I recommend removing the questions about the names. We won't be able to answer those. In general naming questions are out of scope for WB.SE because language is so deeply tied to your story.
– Cort Ammon
5 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Some general thoughts & critiques:



  1. I get no sense of scale from the map, so can't really speak as to believability. In other words, it could be a map of a continent, or it could be a map of an island the size of Cyprus.

  2. Aesthetically, I find the land shapes pleasing; but not the inky colour of the sea. The work as a whole is very dark.

  3. It looks like every other computer generated fantasy map out there. If that's the style you're going for, then I'd say you're well on your way! Though you might consider some kind of faux-Greek knotwork border and huge cartouche that says "MAP OF XYZ-LANDIA"! Because that seems to be de rigeur in modern computer generated fantasy maps.


  4. My main critique regards lettering choices:



    • "Wyvern Mountains" should be in a MUCH SMALLER font! If this is a map of a continent, probably all the lettering is too large.

    • Lettering, ideally, should not stick out into the ocean (Caellan Wilderness, I'm looking at you!). Smaller letters, curving around the southern side of the woodlands I think would look better.


  5. Are you trying for a Greek-like sound in the city names? If that was deliberate, kudos! That's the general sense I got from the names. And then there's Uzchizaak. (Bless you!) Kind of looks like you stuck Klingon onto the side of Achaia! Are the people of those cities of a different race / ethnicity than the quasi-Greeks?


  6. Is this whole continent part of the Empire of Myregea? If so, that fact is not apparent from the placement of the country's name. If so, that name should be in nice large letters! Are the folk of those three nearly vowelless cities part of the Empire? If not, some political boundaries might be in order.

  7. Roads, at the very least, would be helpful, as would provincial names.

  8. The more I look at the map, the more I dislike the name "Wyvern Mountains". Doesn't have the same Greeky feel to it. But that's really a matter of personal taste.

  9. West of the Wilderness, there is a little dark square with a dot in the middle. Is that an error, or is that your world's answer to Rockall?

Final Answer:



YES.



I find your map to be a realistic and believable computer generated fantasy map. I'm not a geologist, but I don't see any egregious errors that can't be handwaved away because it's fantasy. In fact, I'd say it is actually very nicely drawn and with a couple minor corrections and some judicious decoration would look very nice folded up in a computer game or rpg box or reproduced in a novel or world compendium.



Chapeau!






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    Based on your answer above, and bear in mind I am no geologist nor cartographer, but considering several factors such as the climate, land size (approx. 2.6m sqm less than Australia in comparison) you may want to put in a bit more variation on it such as more forests, swamps etc. and your central landmass area seems to be dry with just a few rivers going inland. If it is deliberate then its fine, but a lake or two may be more desirable/sensible?






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Is it realistic, maybe. I'm not a Geologist so can only speak from observations of maps and some online research, Elemtilas' breakdown is very good but i'd just wanted to add to it



      If other examples of mountain ranges similar to the Wyvern Mountains are to be believed, such as the the Andes in Chile,, where the mountain range runs the length of the continent parallel with the coastline then they are formed by continental plates crushing into each other and its less likely to have a nicely rounded end to each side of them. its more likely to draw out to a point. perhaps something similar to the below,



      enter image description here



      Artistic License



      Understand that artistic license was heavily used in the past in terms of map making, for example the below picture illustrates The difference between a medieval map of the English coast around the important harbour of Plymouth, and compares next to it is the real life google maps image of Plymouth



      Plymouth Harbour



      The Old Maps are there to offer details of the town as well as possible landing and mooring regions for an enemy invading force, and scale is not as important in the less tactically significant areas.



      Whereas after the invention of newer map making technology, I forget the name of the device but it used telescopes, angles and triangles to more accurately measure distances and make more accurate maps These older maps that showed mostly defensive information became obsolete.



      Why is this important



      Because it depends on in what timeline these maps were made. if it were the older style then as a basic map of the entire continent then its ok. not perfect but ok.



      Your map looks like its come from an online generator, where you plan out the shape, and basic terrain features then add names and notes. the issue with those generators is that the don't do coastline very well. the features of your map appear to be in the classical.fantasy style in terms of mountains and forests however the coastline is not, cliffs etc should be more pronounced on a map of this style, irrespective of scale.



      Please understand I'm not criticizing the use of the online generators, they would well enough in general, and realistic looking maps are very very hard to achieve. I've tried numerous times and they still look worse than the online generated ones.



      After this then the other answers have you covered, so i won't repeat the answers of other users.



      However



      If you are wanting a more modern looking map, then scales are off, but so is style. the same rules apply as stated by Elemtilas



      I haven't personally found any decent and free software to help you create them, but have had moderate success (at least compared to my other attempts) with layering in Photoshop to build up contour lines and but it is a long logn process






      share|improve this answer




















      • I think theodolite is the word you're looking for
        – Separatrix
        20 mins ago










      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Nesari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126992%2fis-this-map-realistic-believeable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      6
      down vote













      Some general thoughts & critiques:



      1. I get no sense of scale from the map, so can't really speak as to believability. In other words, it could be a map of a continent, or it could be a map of an island the size of Cyprus.

      2. Aesthetically, I find the land shapes pleasing; but not the inky colour of the sea. The work as a whole is very dark.

      3. It looks like every other computer generated fantasy map out there. If that's the style you're going for, then I'd say you're well on your way! Though you might consider some kind of faux-Greek knotwork border and huge cartouche that says "MAP OF XYZ-LANDIA"! Because that seems to be de rigeur in modern computer generated fantasy maps.


      4. My main critique regards lettering choices:



        • "Wyvern Mountains" should be in a MUCH SMALLER font! If this is a map of a continent, probably all the lettering is too large.

        • Lettering, ideally, should not stick out into the ocean (Caellan Wilderness, I'm looking at you!). Smaller letters, curving around the southern side of the woodlands I think would look better.


      5. Are you trying for a Greek-like sound in the city names? If that was deliberate, kudos! That's the general sense I got from the names. And then there's Uzchizaak. (Bless you!) Kind of looks like you stuck Klingon onto the side of Achaia! Are the people of those cities of a different race / ethnicity than the quasi-Greeks?


      6. Is this whole continent part of the Empire of Myregea? If so, that fact is not apparent from the placement of the country's name. If so, that name should be in nice large letters! Are the folk of those three nearly vowelless cities part of the Empire? If not, some political boundaries might be in order.

      7. Roads, at the very least, would be helpful, as would provincial names.

      8. The more I look at the map, the more I dislike the name "Wyvern Mountains". Doesn't have the same Greeky feel to it. But that's really a matter of personal taste.

      9. West of the Wilderness, there is a little dark square with a dot in the middle. Is that an error, or is that your world's answer to Rockall?

      Final Answer:



      YES.



      I find your map to be a realistic and believable computer generated fantasy map. I'm not a geologist, but I don't see any egregious errors that can't be handwaved away because it's fantasy. In fact, I'd say it is actually very nicely drawn and with a couple minor corrections and some judicious decoration would look very nice folded up in a computer game or rpg box or reproduced in a novel or world compendium.



      Chapeau!






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        6
        down vote













        Some general thoughts & critiques:



        1. I get no sense of scale from the map, so can't really speak as to believability. In other words, it could be a map of a continent, or it could be a map of an island the size of Cyprus.

        2. Aesthetically, I find the land shapes pleasing; but not the inky colour of the sea. The work as a whole is very dark.

        3. It looks like every other computer generated fantasy map out there. If that's the style you're going for, then I'd say you're well on your way! Though you might consider some kind of faux-Greek knotwork border and huge cartouche that says "MAP OF XYZ-LANDIA"! Because that seems to be de rigeur in modern computer generated fantasy maps.


        4. My main critique regards lettering choices:



          • "Wyvern Mountains" should be in a MUCH SMALLER font! If this is a map of a continent, probably all the lettering is too large.

          • Lettering, ideally, should not stick out into the ocean (Caellan Wilderness, I'm looking at you!). Smaller letters, curving around the southern side of the woodlands I think would look better.


        5. Are you trying for a Greek-like sound in the city names? If that was deliberate, kudos! That's the general sense I got from the names. And then there's Uzchizaak. (Bless you!) Kind of looks like you stuck Klingon onto the side of Achaia! Are the people of those cities of a different race / ethnicity than the quasi-Greeks?


        6. Is this whole continent part of the Empire of Myregea? If so, that fact is not apparent from the placement of the country's name. If so, that name should be in nice large letters! Are the folk of those three nearly vowelless cities part of the Empire? If not, some political boundaries might be in order.

        7. Roads, at the very least, would be helpful, as would provincial names.

        8. The more I look at the map, the more I dislike the name "Wyvern Mountains". Doesn't have the same Greeky feel to it. But that's really a matter of personal taste.

        9. West of the Wilderness, there is a little dark square with a dot in the middle. Is that an error, or is that your world's answer to Rockall?

        Final Answer:



        YES.



        I find your map to be a realistic and believable computer generated fantasy map. I'm not a geologist, but I don't see any egregious errors that can't be handwaved away because it's fantasy. In fact, I'd say it is actually very nicely drawn and with a couple minor corrections and some judicious decoration would look very nice folded up in a computer game or rpg box or reproduced in a novel or world compendium.



        Chapeau!






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          6
          down vote










          up vote
          6
          down vote









          Some general thoughts & critiques:



          1. I get no sense of scale from the map, so can't really speak as to believability. In other words, it could be a map of a continent, or it could be a map of an island the size of Cyprus.

          2. Aesthetically, I find the land shapes pleasing; but not the inky colour of the sea. The work as a whole is very dark.

          3. It looks like every other computer generated fantasy map out there. If that's the style you're going for, then I'd say you're well on your way! Though you might consider some kind of faux-Greek knotwork border and huge cartouche that says "MAP OF XYZ-LANDIA"! Because that seems to be de rigeur in modern computer generated fantasy maps.


          4. My main critique regards lettering choices:



            • "Wyvern Mountains" should be in a MUCH SMALLER font! If this is a map of a continent, probably all the lettering is too large.

            • Lettering, ideally, should not stick out into the ocean (Caellan Wilderness, I'm looking at you!). Smaller letters, curving around the southern side of the woodlands I think would look better.


          5. Are you trying for a Greek-like sound in the city names? If that was deliberate, kudos! That's the general sense I got from the names. And then there's Uzchizaak. (Bless you!) Kind of looks like you stuck Klingon onto the side of Achaia! Are the people of those cities of a different race / ethnicity than the quasi-Greeks?


          6. Is this whole continent part of the Empire of Myregea? If so, that fact is not apparent from the placement of the country's name. If so, that name should be in nice large letters! Are the folk of those three nearly vowelless cities part of the Empire? If not, some political boundaries might be in order.

          7. Roads, at the very least, would be helpful, as would provincial names.

          8. The more I look at the map, the more I dislike the name "Wyvern Mountains". Doesn't have the same Greeky feel to it. But that's really a matter of personal taste.

          9. West of the Wilderness, there is a little dark square with a dot in the middle. Is that an error, or is that your world's answer to Rockall?

          Final Answer:



          YES.



          I find your map to be a realistic and believable computer generated fantasy map. I'm not a geologist, but I don't see any egregious errors that can't be handwaved away because it's fantasy. In fact, I'd say it is actually very nicely drawn and with a couple minor corrections and some judicious decoration would look very nice folded up in a computer game or rpg box or reproduced in a novel or world compendium.



          Chapeau!






          share|improve this answer












          Some general thoughts & critiques:



          1. I get no sense of scale from the map, so can't really speak as to believability. In other words, it could be a map of a continent, or it could be a map of an island the size of Cyprus.

          2. Aesthetically, I find the land shapes pleasing; but not the inky colour of the sea. The work as a whole is very dark.

          3. It looks like every other computer generated fantasy map out there. If that's the style you're going for, then I'd say you're well on your way! Though you might consider some kind of faux-Greek knotwork border and huge cartouche that says "MAP OF XYZ-LANDIA"! Because that seems to be de rigeur in modern computer generated fantasy maps.


          4. My main critique regards lettering choices:



            • "Wyvern Mountains" should be in a MUCH SMALLER font! If this is a map of a continent, probably all the lettering is too large.

            • Lettering, ideally, should not stick out into the ocean (Caellan Wilderness, I'm looking at you!). Smaller letters, curving around the southern side of the woodlands I think would look better.


          5. Are you trying for a Greek-like sound in the city names? If that was deliberate, kudos! That's the general sense I got from the names. And then there's Uzchizaak. (Bless you!) Kind of looks like you stuck Klingon onto the side of Achaia! Are the people of those cities of a different race / ethnicity than the quasi-Greeks?


          6. Is this whole continent part of the Empire of Myregea? If so, that fact is not apparent from the placement of the country's name. If so, that name should be in nice large letters! Are the folk of those three nearly vowelless cities part of the Empire? If not, some political boundaries might be in order.

          7. Roads, at the very least, would be helpful, as would provincial names.

          8. The more I look at the map, the more I dislike the name "Wyvern Mountains". Doesn't have the same Greeky feel to it. But that's really a matter of personal taste.

          9. West of the Wilderness, there is a little dark square with a dot in the middle. Is that an error, or is that your world's answer to Rockall?

          Final Answer:



          YES.



          I find your map to be a realistic and believable computer generated fantasy map. I'm not a geologist, but I don't see any egregious errors that can't be handwaved away because it's fantasy. In fact, I'd say it is actually very nicely drawn and with a couple minor corrections and some judicious decoration would look very nice folded up in a computer game or rpg box or reproduced in a novel or world compendium.



          Chapeau!







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          elemtilas

          7,95121742




          7,95121742




















              up vote
              3
              down vote













              Based on your answer above, and bear in mind I am no geologist nor cartographer, but considering several factors such as the climate, land size (approx. 2.6m sqm less than Australia in comparison) you may want to put in a bit more variation on it such as more forests, swamps etc. and your central landmass area seems to be dry with just a few rivers going inland. If it is deliberate then its fine, but a lake or two may be more desirable/sensible?






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                Based on your answer above, and bear in mind I am no geologist nor cartographer, but considering several factors such as the climate, land size (approx. 2.6m sqm less than Australia in comparison) you may want to put in a bit more variation on it such as more forests, swamps etc. and your central landmass area seems to be dry with just a few rivers going inland. If it is deliberate then its fine, but a lake or two may be more desirable/sensible?






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  Based on your answer above, and bear in mind I am no geologist nor cartographer, but considering several factors such as the climate, land size (approx. 2.6m sqm less than Australia in comparison) you may want to put in a bit more variation on it such as more forests, swamps etc. and your central landmass area seems to be dry with just a few rivers going inland. If it is deliberate then its fine, but a lake or two may be more desirable/sensible?






                  share|improve this answer












                  Based on your answer above, and bear in mind I am no geologist nor cartographer, but considering several factors such as the climate, land size (approx. 2.6m sqm less than Australia in comparison) you may want to put in a bit more variation on it such as more forests, swamps etc. and your central landmass area seems to be dry with just a few rivers going inland. If it is deliberate then its fine, but a lake or two may be more desirable/sensible?







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  Arkhaine

                  777212




                  777212




















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Is it realistic, maybe. I'm not a Geologist so can only speak from observations of maps and some online research, Elemtilas' breakdown is very good but i'd just wanted to add to it



                      If other examples of mountain ranges similar to the Wyvern Mountains are to be believed, such as the the Andes in Chile,, where the mountain range runs the length of the continent parallel with the coastline then they are formed by continental plates crushing into each other and its less likely to have a nicely rounded end to each side of them. its more likely to draw out to a point. perhaps something similar to the below,



                      enter image description here



                      Artistic License



                      Understand that artistic license was heavily used in the past in terms of map making, for example the below picture illustrates The difference between a medieval map of the English coast around the important harbour of Plymouth, and compares next to it is the real life google maps image of Plymouth



                      Plymouth Harbour



                      The Old Maps are there to offer details of the town as well as possible landing and mooring regions for an enemy invading force, and scale is not as important in the less tactically significant areas.



                      Whereas after the invention of newer map making technology, I forget the name of the device but it used telescopes, angles and triangles to more accurately measure distances and make more accurate maps These older maps that showed mostly defensive information became obsolete.



                      Why is this important



                      Because it depends on in what timeline these maps were made. if it were the older style then as a basic map of the entire continent then its ok. not perfect but ok.



                      Your map looks like its come from an online generator, where you plan out the shape, and basic terrain features then add names and notes. the issue with those generators is that the don't do coastline very well. the features of your map appear to be in the classical.fantasy style in terms of mountains and forests however the coastline is not, cliffs etc should be more pronounced on a map of this style, irrespective of scale.



                      Please understand I'm not criticizing the use of the online generators, they would well enough in general, and realistic looking maps are very very hard to achieve. I've tried numerous times and they still look worse than the online generated ones.



                      After this then the other answers have you covered, so i won't repeat the answers of other users.



                      However



                      If you are wanting a more modern looking map, then scales are off, but so is style. the same rules apply as stated by Elemtilas



                      I haven't personally found any decent and free software to help you create them, but have had moderate success (at least compared to my other attempts) with layering in Photoshop to build up contour lines and but it is a long logn process






                      share|improve this answer




















                      • I think theodolite is the word you're looking for
                        – Separatrix
                        20 mins ago














                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Is it realistic, maybe. I'm not a Geologist so can only speak from observations of maps and some online research, Elemtilas' breakdown is very good but i'd just wanted to add to it



                      If other examples of mountain ranges similar to the Wyvern Mountains are to be believed, such as the the Andes in Chile,, where the mountain range runs the length of the continent parallel with the coastline then they are formed by continental plates crushing into each other and its less likely to have a nicely rounded end to each side of them. its more likely to draw out to a point. perhaps something similar to the below,



                      enter image description here



                      Artistic License



                      Understand that artistic license was heavily used in the past in terms of map making, for example the below picture illustrates The difference between a medieval map of the English coast around the important harbour of Plymouth, and compares next to it is the real life google maps image of Plymouth



                      Plymouth Harbour



                      The Old Maps are there to offer details of the town as well as possible landing and mooring regions for an enemy invading force, and scale is not as important in the less tactically significant areas.



                      Whereas after the invention of newer map making technology, I forget the name of the device but it used telescopes, angles and triangles to more accurately measure distances and make more accurate maps These older maps that showed mostly defensive information became obsolete.



                      Why is this important



                      Because it depends on in what timeline these maps were made. if it were the older style then as a basic map of the entire continent then its ok. not perfect but ok.



                      Your map looks like its come from an online generator, where you plan out the shape, and basic terrain features then add names and notes. the issue with those generators is that the don't do coastline very well. the features of your map appear to be in the classical.fantasy style in terms of mountains and forests however the coastline is not, cliffs etc should be more pronounced on a map of this style, irrespective of scale.



                      Please understand I'm not criticizing the use of the online generators, they would well enough in general, and realistic looking maps are very very hard to achieve. I've tried numerous times and they still look worse than the online generated ones.



                      After this then the other answers have you covered, so i won't repeat the answers of other users.



                      However



                      If you are wanting a more modern looking map, then scales are off, but so is style. the same rules apply as stated by Elemtilas



                      I haven't personally found any decent and free software to help you create them, but have had moderate success (at least compared to my other attempts) with layering in Photoshop to build up contour lines and but it is a long logn process






                      share|improve this answer




















                      • I think theodolite is the word you're looking for
                        – Separatrix
                        20 mins ago












                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      Is it realistic, maybe. I'm not a Geologist so can only speak from observations of maps and some online research, Elemtilas' breakdown is very good but i'd just wanted to add to it



                      If other examples of mountain ranges similar to the Wyvern Mountains are to be believed, such as the the Andes in Chile,, where the mountain range runs the length of the continent parallel with the coastline then they are formed by continental plates crushing into each other and its less likely to have a nicely rounded end to each side of them. its more likely to draw out to a point. perhaps something similar to the below,



                      enter image description here



                      Artistic License



                      Understand that artistic license was heavily used in the past in terms of map making, for example the below picture illustrates The difference between a medieval map of the English coast around the important harbour of Plymouth, and compares next to it is the real life google maps image of Plymouth



                      Plymouth Harbour



                      The Old Maps are there to offer details of the town as well as possible landing and mooring regions for an enemy invading force, and scale is not as important in the less tactically significant areas.



                      Whereas after the invention of newer map making technology, I forget the name of the device but it used telescopes, angles and triangles to more accurately measure distances and make more accurate maps These older maps that showed mostly defensive information became obsolete.



                      Why is this important



                      Because it depends on in what timeline these maps were made. if it were the older style then as a basic map of the entire continent then its ok. not perfect but ok.



                      Your map looks like its come from an online generator, where you plan out the shape, and basic terrain features then add names and notes. the issue with those generators is that the don't do coastline very well. the features of your map appear to be in the classical.fantasy style in terms of mountains and forests however the coastline is not, cliffs etc should be more pronounced on a map of this style, irrespective of scale.



                      Please understand I'm not criticizing the use of the online generators, they would well enough in general, and realistic looking maps are very very hard to achieve. I've tried numerous times and they still look worse than the online generated ones.



                      After this then the other answers have you covered, so i won't repeat the answers of other users.



                      However



                      If you are wanting a more modern looking map, then scales are off, but so is style. the same rules apply as stated by Elemtilas



                      I haven't personally found any decent and free software to help you create them, but have had moderate success (at least compared to my other attempts) with layering in Photoshop to build up contour lines and but it is a long logn process






                      share|improve this answer












                      Is it realistic, maybe. I'm not a Geologist so can only speak from observations of maps and some online research, Elemtilas' breakdown is very good but i'd just wanted to add to it



                      If other examples of mountain ranges similar to the Wyvern Mountains are to be believed, such as the the Andes in Chile,, where the mountain range runs the length of the continent parallel with the coastline then they are formed by continental plates crushing into each other and its less likely to have a nicely rounded end to each side of them. its more likely to draw out to a point. perhaps something similar to the below,



                      enter image description here



                      Artistic License



                      Understand that artistic license was heavily used in the past in terms of map making, for example the below picture illustrates The difference between a medieval map of the English coast around the important harbour of Plymouth, and compares next to it is the real life google maps image of Plymouth



                      Plymouth Harbour



                      The Old Maps are there to offer details of the town as well as possible landing and mooring regions for an enemy invading force, and scale is not as important in the less tactically significant areas.



                      Whereas after the invention of newer map making technology, I forget the name of the device but it used telescopes, angles and triangles to more accurately measure distances and make more accurate maps These older maps that showed mostly defensive information became obsolete.



                      Why is this important



                      Because it depends on in what timeline these maps were made. if it were the older style then as a basic map of the entire continent then its ok. not perfect but ok.



                      Your map looks like its come from an online generator, where you plan out the shape, and basic terrain features then add names and notes. the issue with those generators is that the don't do coastline very well. the features of your map appear to be in the classical.fantasy style in terms of mountains and forests however the coastline is not, cliffs etc should be more pronounced on a map of this style, irrespective of scale.



                      Please understand I'm not criticizing the use of the online generators, they would well enough in general, and realistic looking maps are very very hard to achieve. I've tried numerous times and they still look worse than the online generated ones.



                      After this then the other answers have you covered, so i won't repeat the answers of other users.



                      However



                      If you are wanting a more modern looking map, then scales are off, but so is style. the same rules apply as stated by Elemtilas



                      I haven't personally found any decent and free software to help you create them, but have had moderate success (at least compared to my other attempts) with layering in Photoshop to build up contour lines and but it is a long logn process







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 2 hours ago









                      Blade Wraith

                      5,9901036




                      5,9901036











                      • I think theodolite is the word you're looking for
                        – Separatrix
                        20 mins ago
















                      • I think theodolite is the word you're looking for
                        – Separatrix
                        20 mins ago















                      I think theodolite is the word you're looking for
                      – Separatrix
                      20 mins ago




                      I think theodolite is the word you're looking for
                      – Separatrix
                      20 mins ago










                      Nesari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      Nesari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Nesari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Nesari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126992%2fis-this-map-realistic-believeable%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      List of Gilmore Girls characters

                      Confectionery