Big O or Omega?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Good day,



I am going over a problem sheet right now and I can not seem to figure out the last combination of functions and their bounds.



We are given,




$f_1(n) = dfracn^3log(n), f_2(n)=n^9+2.2^n text and g_1(n)=(n+1)^3, g_2(n)=2^n+2^fracn2$



Decide whether the different combinations are $f_i=O(g_j(n)) textand/or f_i=Omega(g_j(n)).$




What I got so far is that $f_1=O(g_1), f_1=O(g_2), f_2=Omega(g_1)$



I am stuck on the combination $f_2, g_2$.



I am not sure what I can do to show that it works because of $2.2^n$










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    I assume you already know that $2^frac n2$ is unimportant here since it equals $sqrt2^n$ and so is asymptotically insignificant compared to the term $2^n$.
    – String
    38 mins ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Good day,



I am going over a problem sheet right now and I can not seem to figure out the last combination of functions and their bounds.



We are given,




$f_1(n) = dfracn^3log(n), f_2(n)=n^9+2.2^n text and g_1(n)=(n+1)^3, g_2(n)=2^n+2^fracn2$



Decide whether the different combinations are $f_i=O(g_j(n)) textand/or f_i=Omega(g_j(n)).$




What I got so far is that $f_1=O(g_1), f_1=O(g_2), f_2=Omega(g_1)$



I am stuck on the combination $f_2, g_2$.



I am not sure what I can do to show that it works because of $2.2^n$










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 1




    I assume you already know that $2^frac n2$ is unimportant here since it equals $sqrt2^n$ and so is asymptotically insignificant compared to the term $2^n$.
    – String
    38 mins ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





Good day,



I am going over a problem sheet right now and I can not seem to figure out the last combination of functions and their bounds.



We are given,




$f_1(n) = dfracn^3log(n), f_2(n)=n^9+2.2^n text and g_1(n)=(n+1)^3, g_2(n)=2^n+2^fracn2$



Decide whether the different combinations are $f_i=O(g_j(n)) textand/or f_i=Omega(g_j(n)).$




What I got so far is that $f_1=O(g_1), f_1=O(g_2), f_2=Omega(g_1)$



I am stuck on the combination $f_2, g_2$.



I am not sure what I can do to show that it works because of $2.2^n$










share|cite|improve this question















Good day,



I am going over a problem sheet right now and I can not seem to figure out the last combination of functions and their bounds.



We are given,




$f_1(n) = dfracn^3log(n), f_2(n)=n^9+2.2^n text and g_1(n)=(n+1)^3, g_2(n)=2^n+2^fracn2$



Decide whether the different combinations are $f_i=O(g_j(n)) textand/or f_i=Omega(g_j(n)).$




What I got so far is that $f_1=O(g_1), f_1=O(g_2), f_2=Omega(g_1)$



I am stuck on the combination $f_2, g_2$.



I am not sure what I can do to show that it works because of $2.2^n$







real-analysis asymptotics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Alex Francisco

17k92149




17k92149










asked 2 hours ago









ʎpoqou

1701110




1701110







  • 1




    I assume you already know that $2^frac n2$ is unimportant here since it equals $sqrt2^n$ and so is asymptotically insignificant compared to the term $2^n$.
    – String
    38 mins ago












  • 1




    I assume you already know that $2^frac n2$ is unimportant here since it equals $sqrt2^n$ and so is asymptotically insignificant compared to the term $2^n$.
    – String
    38 mins ago







1




1




I assume you already know that $2^frac n2$ is unimportant here since it equals $sqrt2^n$ and so is asymptotically insignificant compared to the term $2^n$.
– String
38 mins ago




I assume you already know that $2^frac n2$ is unimportant here since it equals $sqrt2^n$ and so is asymptotically insignificant compared to the term $2^n$.
– String
38 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










You can represent it by $e$ and $log2$, $log(2.2)$:



$dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)= dfracn^9+(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2 geq dfrac(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2geq dfrac(2.2)^n2cdot 2^n =frac12e^n(log2.2-log2)$



And similarly:



$dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)leq 2e^n(log2.2-log2)$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Is it okay that the upper/lower bound depends on $n$? Perhaps I did not fully understand the notion of $O$ and $Omega$
    – ÊŽpoqou
    4 mins ago


















up vote
2
down vote













Suppose we have $a>b>1$. Then
$$
fraca^nb^n=left(fracabright)^n=(1+r)^n
$$

for some $r>0$ and this grows exponentially as $n$ tends to infinity. Thus $a^n$ wins out asymptotically although $b^n$ also tends to infinity.






share|cite|improve this answer




















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2946850%2fbig-o-or-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    You can represent it by $e$ and $log2$, $log(2.2)$:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)= dfracn^9+(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2 geq dfrac(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2geq dfrac(2.2)^n2cdot 2^n =frac12e^n(log2.2-log2)$



    And similarly:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)leq 2e^n(log2.2-log2)$






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • Is it okay that the upper/lower bound depends on $n$? Perhaps I did not fully understand the notion of $O$ and $Omega$
      – ÊŽpoqou
      4 mins ago















    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    You can represent it by $e$ and $log2$, $log(2.2)$:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)= dfracn^9+(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2 geq dfrac(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2geq dfrac(2.2)^n2cdot 2^n =frac12e^n(log2.2-log2)$



    And similarly:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)leq 2e^n(log2.2-log2)$






    share|cite|improve this answer




















    • Is it okay that the upper/lower bound depends on $n$? Perhaps I did not fully understand the notion of $O$ and $Omega$
      – ÊŽpoqou
      4 mins ago













    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    You can represent it by $e$ and $log2$, $log(2.2)$:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)= dfracn^9+(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2 geq dfrac(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2geq dfrac(2.2)^n2cdot 2^n =frac12e^n(log2.2-log2)$



    And similarly:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)leq 2e^n(log2.2-log2)$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    You can represent it by $e$ and $log2$, $log(2.2)$:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)= dfracn^9+(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2 geq dfrac(2.2)^n2^n+2^fracn2geq dfrac(2.2)^n2cdot 2^n =frac12e^n(log2.2-log2)$



    And similarly:



    $dfracf_2(n)g_2(n)leq 2e^n(log2.2-log2)$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 53 mins ago









    Keen-ameteur

    886214




    886214











    • Is it okay that the upper/lower bound depends on $n$? Perhaps I did not fully understand the notion of $O$ and $Omega$
      – ÊŽpoqou
      4 mins ago

















    • Is it okay that the upper/lower bound depends on $n$? Perhaps I did not fully understand the notion of $O$ and $Omega$
      – ÊŽpoqou
      4 mins ago
















    Is it okay that the upper/lower bound depends on $n$? Perhaps I did not fully understand the notion of $O$ and $Omega$
    – ÊŽpoqou
    4 mins ago





    Is it okay that the upper/lower bound depends on $n$? Perhaps I did not fully understand the notion of $O$ and $Omega$
    – ÊŽpoqou
    4 mins ago











    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Suppose we have $a>b>1$. Then
    $$
    fraca^nb^n=left(fracabright)^n=(1+r)^n
    $$

    for some $r>0$ and this grows exponentially as $n$ tends to infinity. Thus $a^n$ wins out asymptotically although $b^n$ also tends to infinity.






    share|cite|improve this answer
























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Suppose we have $a>b>1$. Then
      $$
      fraca^nb^n=left(fracabright)^n=(1+r)^n
      $$

      for some $r>0$ and this grows exponentially as $n$ tends to infinity. Thus $a^n$ wins out asymptotically although $b^n$ also tends to infinity.






      share|cite|improve this answer






















        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        Suppose we have $a>b>1$. Then
        $$
        fraca^nb^n=left(fracabright)^n=(1+r)^n
        $$

        for some $r>0$ and this grows exponentially as $n$ tends to infinity. Thus $a^n$ wins out asymptotically although $b^n$ also tends to infinity.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Suppose we have $a>b>1$. Then
        $$
        fraca^nb^n=left(fracabright)^n=(1+r)^n
        $$

        for some $r>0$ and this grows exponentially as $n$ tends to infinity. Thus $a^n$ wins out asymptotically although $b^n$ also tends to infinity.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 42 mins ago









        String

        13.4k32754




        13.4k32754



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2946850%2fbig-o-or-omega%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            Confectionery