Trying to arrange sums in neat way

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I am trying to write the following summations as compactly as possible using summation and enumeration:




$$fracy_11+y_2+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_41+y_5 leq 1$$
$$fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 leq 1$$
$$fracy_1+y_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$
$$frac y_1+y_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$




I wrote it as following:



$$sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+y_k+1+...+y_5 leq 1$$
$$sum_k=1^3 frac y_k+y_k+11+y_k+2+...+y_5 leq 1$$
$$ sum_k=1^2 frac y_k+y_k+1+y_k+21+y_k+3+...+y_5 leq 1$$
$$ frac sum_k=1^4 y_k1+y_5 leq 1$$




Is there any enumeration to combine the $4$ summations?











share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    I am trying to write the following summations as compactly as possible using summation and enumeration:




    $$fracy_11+y_2+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_41+y_5 leq 1$$
    $$fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 leq 1$$
    $$fracy_1+y_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$
    $$frac y_1+y_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$




    I wrote it as following:



    $$sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+y_k+1+...+y_5 leq 1$$
    $$sum_k=1^3 frac y_k+y_k+11+y_k+2+...+y_5 leq 1$$
    $$ sum_k=1^2 frac y_k+y_k+1+y_k+21+y_k+3+...+y_5 leq 1$$
    $$ frac sum_k=1^4 y_k1+y_5 leq 1$$




    Is there any enumeration to combine the $4$ summations?











    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      I am trying to write the following summations as compactly as possible using summation and enumeration:




      $$fracy_11+y_2+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_41+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$fracy_1+y_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$
      $$frac y_1+y_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$




      I wrote it as following:



      $$sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+y_k+1+...+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$sum_k=1^3 frac y_k+y_k+11+y_k+2+...+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$ sum_k=1^2 frac y_k+y_k+1+y_k+21+y_k+3+...+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$ frac sum_k=1^4 y_k1+y_5 leq 1$$




      Is there any enumeration to combine the $4$ summations?











      share|cite|improve this question















      I am trying to write the following summations as compactly as possible using summation and enumeration:




      $$fracy_11+y_2+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_41+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$fracy_1+y_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$
      $$frac y_1+y_2+y_3+y_41+y_5leq 1$$




      I wrote it as following:



      $$sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+y_k+1+...+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$sum_k=1^3 frac y_k+y_k+11+y_k+2+...+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$ sum_k=1^2 frac y_k+y_k+1+y_k+21+y_k+3+...+y_5 leq 1$$
      $$ frac sum_k=1^4 y_k1+y_5 leq 1$$




      Is there any enumeration to combine the $4$ summations?








      calculus summation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 52 mins ago

























      asked 1 hour ago









      Dontknowanything

      1,334518




      1,334518




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          If I'm not mistaken, the following should be an equivalent expression:



          $$forall i in 1,2,3,4: sum_k=1^5-i fracsum_j=k^k+i-1 y_j1+sum_j=k+i^5 y_j leq 1.$$



          It is obviously way less clear and intuitive than the original, though.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.

















          • +1. Please, do the same at the denominator. :)
            – farruhota
            17 mins ago











          • Missed it. Thanks!
            – Bastián Núñez
            7 mins ago

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          What you gain it compactness you lose (massively) in comprehsion but:



          $frac y_11 + y_2 + ... + y_5 + .... = sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+sum_j=k+1^5 y_jle 1$



          And $fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 = sum_k=1^5-1frac y_k + y_k+11+sum_j=k+2^5 y_jle$



          And then you get



          $[sum_k=1^5-mfrac sum_i=k^k+m-1 y_i1+sum_j=k+m^5 y_j le 1]|_m=1^4$



          But really, if a were a reader and I came across that... I'd hit you.






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2927260%2ftrying-to-arrange-sums-in-neat-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote













            If I'm not mistaken, the following should be an equivalent expression:



            $$forall i in 1,2,3,4: sum_k=1^5-i fracsum_j=k^k+i-1 y_j1+sum_j=k+i^5 y_j leq 1.$$



            It is obviously way less clear and intuitive than the original, though.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

















            • +1. Please, do the same at the denominator. :)
              – farruhota
              17 mins ago











            • Missed it. Thanks!
              – Bastián Núñez
              7 mins ago














            up vote
            3
            down vote













            If I'm not mistaken, the following should be an equivalent expression:



            $$forall i in 1,2,3,4: sum_k=1^5-i fracsum_j=k^k+i-1 y_j1+sum_j=k+i^5 y_j leq 1.$$



            It is obviously way less clear and intuitive than the original, though.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.

















            • +1. Please, do the same at the denominator. :)
              – farruhota
              17 mins ago











            • Missed it. Thanks!
              – Bastián Núñez
              7 mins ago












            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            If I'm not mistaken, the following should be an equivalent expression:



            $$forall i in 1,2,3,4: sum_k=1^5-i fracsum_j=k^k+i-1 y_j1+sum_j=k+i^5 y_j leq 1.$$



            It is obviously way less clear and intuitive than the original, though.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            If I'm not mistaken, the following should be an equivalent expression:



            $$forall i in 1,2,3,4: sum_k=1^5-i fracsum_j=k^k+i-1 y_j1+sum_j=k+i^5 y_j leq 1.$$



            It is obviously way less clear and intuitive than the original, though.







            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 8 mins ago





















            New contributor




            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 34 mins ago









            Bastián Núñez

            314




            314




            New contributor




            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Bastián Núñez is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.











            • +1. Please, do the same at the denominator. :)
              – farruhota
              17 mins ago











            • Missed it. Thanks!
              – Bastián Núñez
              7 mins ago
















            • +1. Please, do the same at the denominator. :)
              – farruhota
              17 mins ago











            • Missed it. Thanks!
              – Bastián Núñez
              7 mins ago















            +1. Please, do the same at the denominator. :)
            – farruhota
            17 mins ago





            +1. Please, do the same at the denominator. :)
            – farruhota
            17 mins ago













            Missed it. Thanks!
            – Bastián Núñez
            7 mins ago




            Missed it. Thanks!
            – Bastián Núñez
            7 mins ago










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            What you gain it compactness you lose (massively) in comprehsion but:



            $frac y_11 + y_2 + ... + y_5 + .... = sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+sum_j=k+1^5 y_jle 1$



            And $fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 = sum_k=1^5-1frac y_k + y_k+11+sum_j=k+2^5 y_jle$



            And then you get



            $[sum_k=1^5-mfrac sum_i=k^k+m-1 y_i1+sum_j=k+m^5 y_j le 1]|_m=1^4$



            But really, if a were a reader and I came across that... I'd hit you.






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              What you gain it compactness you lose (massively) in comprehsion but:



              $frac y_11 + y_2 + ... + y_5 + .... = sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+sum_j=k+1^5 y_jle 1$



              And $fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 = sum_k=1^5-1frac y_k + y_k+11+sum_j=k+2^5 y_jle$



              And then you get



              $[sum_k=1^5-mfrac sum_i=k^k+m-1 y_i1+sum_j=k+m^5 y_j le 1]|_m=1^4$



              But really, if a were a reader and I came across that... I'd hit you.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                What you gain it compactness you lose (massively) in comprehsion but:



                $frac y_11 + y_2 + ... + y_5 + .... = sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+sum_j=k+1^5 y_jle 1$



                And $fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 = sum_k=1^5-1frac y_k + y_k+11+sum_j=k+2^5 y_jle$



                And then you get



                $[sum_k=1^5-mfrac sum_i=k^k+m-1 y_i1+sum_j=k+m^5 y_j le 1]|_m=1^4$



                But really, if a were a reader and I came across that... I'd hit you.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                What you gain it compactness you lose (massively) in comprehsion but:



                $frac y_11 + y_2 + ... + y_5 + .... = sum_k=1^4 frac y_k1+sum_j=k+1^5 y_jle 1$



                And $fracy_1+y_21+y_3+y_4+y_5+fracy_2+y_31+y_4+y_5+fracy_3+y_41+y_5 = sum_k=1^5-1frac y_k + y_k+11+sum_j=k+2^5 y_jle$



                And then you get



                $[sum_k=1^5-mfrac sum_i=k^k+m-1 y_i1+sum_j=k+m^5 y_j le 1]|_m=1^4$



                But really, if a were a reader and I came across that... I'd hit you.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 28 mins ago









                fleablood

                61.7k22678




                61.7k22678



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2927260%2ftrying-to-arrange-sums-in-neat-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                    One-line joke