What is a possible substitution to this ODE?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












I have to solve this ODE:



$$
(y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1
$$



I have to make it in a form of separable variable equation and for that I have tried the following substitutions:
$$
u=y-2x
$$

and
$$
u=3y-6x+1
$$



But none made it "solvable", for example in the first I get to a point where I have this:
$$
frace^y-2x=x+K
$$

where K is any constant. At this point I am unable to solve for y.



Can anyone help me solve this?










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I have to solve this ODE:



    $$
    (y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1
    $$



    I have to make it in a form of separable variable equation and for that I have tried the following substitutions:
    $$
    u=y-2x
    $$

    and
    $$
    u=3y-6x+1
    $$



    But none made it "solvable", for example in the first I get to a point where I have this:
    $$
    frace^y-2x=x+K
    $$

    where K is any constant. At this point I am unable to solve for y.



    Can anyone help me solve this?










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I have to solve this ODE:



      $$
      (y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1
      $$



      I have to make it in a form of separable variable equation and for that I have tried the following substitutions:
      $$
      u=y-2x
      $$

      and
      $$
      u=3y-6x+1
      $$



      But none made it "solvable", for example in the first I get to a point where I have this:
      $$
      frace^y-2x=x+K
      $$

      where K is any constant. At this point I am unable to solve for y.



      Can anyone help me solve this?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I have to solve this ODE:



      $$
      (y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1
      $$



      I have to make it in a form of separable variable equation and for that I have tried the following substitutions:
      $$
      u=y-2x
      $$

      and
      $$
      u=3y-6x+1
      $$



      But none made it "solvable", for example in the first I get to a point where I have this:
      $$
      frace^y-2x=x+K
      $$

      where K is any constant. At this point I am unable to solve for y.



      Can anyone help me solve this?







      differential-equations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 hours ago









      Duartejfs

      234




      234




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          $$(y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1$$
          Substitute $y-2x=z implies y'-2=z'$
          $$z(z'+2)=3z+1$$
          $$zz'=z+1$$
          $$int frac zdzz+1=x+K$$
          $$z-ln (z+1)=x+K$$
          $$y -ln(y-2x+1)=3x+K$$
          Implicit form is correct too. So you can keep it this way



          Or consider x as a function of y
          $$x(y)=frac 13(y-ln(y-2x+1))+c$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















          • That's what I had gotten to, but I didn't know I could leave it in the implicit form. By the way, if I was given the condition $$y(x_0)=y_0$$ how could I find the maximal solution with the implicit form?
            – Duartejfs
            2 hours ago







          • 1




            If this is homework, whether you can "leave it in the implicit form" or not depends upon your teacher! Ask him or her. As for "$y(x_0)= y_0$". since you have $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ K$, replace y with $y_0$ and x with $x_0$: $y_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)= 3x_0+ K$ so that $K= y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$ and $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$.
            – user247327
            24 mins ago

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Starting from Isham's answer.



          Using
          $$3x+c=y-ln(y-2x+1)$$ the explicit solution is given by
          $$y=-Wleft(-e^-(x+c+1)right)+2 x-1$$ where appears Lambert function.



          Using the condition $y(x_0)=y_0$, we get
          $$c=-log left(-(2 x_0-y_0-1), e^(2 x_0-y_0-1)right)-x_0-1$$ and then
          $$y=-Wleft((2 x_0-y_0-1) e^(3 x_0-y_0-x-1)right)+2 x-1$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2926400%2fwhat-is-a-possible-substitution-to-this-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            $$(y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1$$
            Substitute $y-2x=z implies y'-2=z'$
            $$z(z'+2)=3z+1$$
            $$zz'=z+1$$
            $$int frac zdzz+1=x+K$$
            $$z-ln (z+1)=x+K$$
            $$y -ln(y-2x+1)=3x+K$$
            Implicit form is correct too. So you can keep it this way



            Or consider x as a function of y
            $$x(y)=frac 13(y-ln(y-2x+1))+c$$






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • That's what I had gotten to, but I didn't know I could leave it in the implicit form. By the way, if I was given the condition $$y(x_0)=y_0$$ how could I find the maximal solution with the implicit form?
              – Duartejfs
              2 hours ago







            • 1




              If this is homework, whether you can "leave it in the implicit form" or not depends upon your teacher! Ask him or her. As for "$y(x_0)= y_0$". since you have $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ K$, replace y with $y_0$ and x with $x_0$: $y_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)= 3x_0+ K$ so that $K= y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$ and $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$.
              – user247327
              24 mins ago














            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            $$(y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1$$
            Substitute $y-2x=z implies y'-2=z'$
            $$z(z'+2)=3z+1$$
            $$zz'=z+1$$
            $$int frac zdzz+1=x+K$$
            $$z-ln (z+1)=x+K$$
            $$y -ln(y-2x+1)=3x+K$$
            Implicit form is correct too. So you can keep it this way



            Or consider x as a function of y
            $$x(y)=frac 13(y-ln(y-2x+1))+c$$






            share|cite|improve this answer




















            • That's what I had gotten to, but I didn't know I could leave it in the implicit form. By the way, if I was given the condition $$y(x_0)=y_0$$ how could I find the maximal solution with the implicit form?
              – Duartejfs
              2 hours ago







            • 1




              If this is homework, whether you can "leave it in the implicit form" or not depends upon your teacher! Ask him or her. As for "$y(x_0)= y_0$". since you have $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ K$, replace y with $y_0$ and x with $x_0$: $y_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)= 3x_0+ K$ so that $K= y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$ and $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$.
              – user247327
              24 mins ago












            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted






            $$(y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1$$
            Substitute $y-2x=z implies y'-2=z'$
            $$z(z'+2)=3z+1$$
            $$zz'=z+1$$
            $$int frac zdzz+1=x+K$$
            $$z-ln (z+1)=x+K$$
            $$y -ln(y-2x+1)=3x+K$$
            Implicit form is correct too. So you can keep it this way



            Or consider x as a function of y
            $$x(y)=frac 13(y-ln(y-2x+1))+c$$






            share|cite|improve this answer












            $$(y-2x)fracdydx=3y-6x+1$$
            Substitute $y-2x=z implies y'-2=z'$
            $$z(z'+2)=3z+1$$
            $$zz'=z+1$$
            $$int frac zdzz+1=x+K$$
            $$z-ln (z+1)=x+K$$
            $$y -ln(y-2x+1)=3x+K$$
            Implicit form is correct too. So you can keep it this way



            Or consider x as a function of y
            $$x(y)=frac 13(y-ln(y-2x+1))+c$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            Isham

            11.2k3929




            11.2k3929











            • That's what I had gotten to, but I didn't know I could leave it in the implicit form. By the way, if I was given the condition $$y(x_0)=y_0$$ how could I find the maximal solution with the implicit form?
              – Duartejfs
              2 hours ago







            • 1




              If this is homework, whether you can "leave it in the implicit form" or not depends upon your teacher! Ask him or her. As for "$y(x_0)= y_0$". since you have $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ K$, replace y with $y_0$ and x with $x_0$: $y_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)= 3x_0+ K$ so that $K= y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$ and $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$.
              – user247327
              24 mins ago
















            • That's what I had gotten to, but I didn't know I could leave it in the implicit form. By the way, if I was given the condition $$y(x_0)=y_0$$ how could I find the maximal solution with the implicit form?
              – Duartejfs
              2 hours ago







            • 1




              If this is homework, whether you can "leave it in the implicit form" or not depends upon your teacher! Ask him or her. As for "$y(x_0)= y_0$". since you have $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ K$, replace y with $y_0$ and x with $x_0$: $y_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)= 3x_0+ K$ so that $K= y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$ and $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$.
              – user247327
              24 mins ago















            That's what I had gotten to, but I didn't know I could leave it in the implicit form. By the way, if I was given the condition $$y(x_0)=y_0$$ how could I find the maximal solution with the implicit form?
            – Duartejfs
            2 hours ago





            That's what I had gotten to, but I didn't know I could leave it in the implicit form. By the way, if I was given the condition $$y(x_0)=y_0$$ how could I find the maximal solution with the implicit form?
            – Duartejfs
            2 hours ago





            1




            1




            If this is homework, whether you can "leave it in the implicit form" or not depends upon your teacher! Ask him or her. As for "$y(x_0)= y_0$". since you have $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ K$, replace y with $y_0$ and x with $x_0$: $y_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)= 3x_0+ K$ so that $K= y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$ and $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$.
            – user247327
            24 mins ago




            If this is homework, whether you can "leave it in the implicit form" or not depends upon your teacher! Ask him or her. As for "$y(x_0)= y_0$". since you have $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ K$, replace y with $y_0$ and x with $x_0$: $y_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)= 3x_0+ K$ so that $K= y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$ and $y- ln(y- 2x+ 1)= 3x+ y_0- 3x_0- ln(y_0- 2x_0+ 1)$.
            – user247327
            24 mins ago










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Starting from Isham's answer.



            Using
            $$3x+c=y-ln(y-2x+1)$$ the explicit solution is given by
            $$y=-Wleft(-e^-(x+c+1)right)+2 x-1$$ where appears Lambert function.



            Using the condition $y(x_0)=y_0$, we get
            $$c=-log left(-(2 x_0-y_0-1), e^(2 x_0-y_0-1)right)-x_0-1$$ and then
            $$y=-Wleft((2 x_0-y_0-1) e^(3 x_0-y_0-x-1)right)+2 x-1$$






            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Starting from Isham's answer.



              Using
              $$3x+c=y-ln(y-2x+1)$$ the explicit solution is given by
              $$y=-Wleft(-e^-(x+c+1)right)+2 x-1$$ where appears Lambert function.



              Using the condition $y(x_0)=y_0$, we get
              $$c=-log left(-(2 x_0-y_0-1), e^(2 x_0-y_0-1)right)-x_0-1$$ and then
              $$y=-Wleft((2 x_0-y_0-1) e^(3 x_0-y_0-x-1)right)+2 x-1$$






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                Starting from Isham's answer.



                Using
                $$3x+c=y-ln(y-2x+1)$$ the explicit solution is given by
                $$y=-Wleft(-e^-(x+c+1)right)+2 x-1$$ where appears Lambert function.



                Using the condition $y(x_0)=y_0$, we get
                $$c=-log left(-(2 x_0-y_0-1), e^(2 x_0-y_0-1)right)-x_0-1$$ and then
                $$y=-Wleft((2 x_0-y_0-1) e^(3 x_0-y_0-x-1)right)+2 x-1$$






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Starting from Isham's answer.



                Using
                $$3x+c=y-ln(y-2x+1)$$ the explicit solution is given by
                $$y=-Wleft(-e^-(x+c+1)right)+2 x-1$$ where appears Lambert function.



                Using the condition $y(x_0)=y_0$, we get
                $$c=-log left(-(2 x_0-y_0-1), e^(2 x_0-y_0-1)right)-x_0-1$$ and then
                $$y=-Wleft((2 x_0-y_0-1) e^(3 x_0-y_0-x-1)right)+2 x-1$$







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 34 mins ago









                Claude Leibovici

                113k1155128




                113k1155128



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2926400%2fwhat-is-a-possible-substitution-to-this-ode%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                    What does second last employer means? [closed]

                    One-line joke