Shouldn't “decursus” be accusative in Psalm 1:3?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite













(Psalm 1:3, Clementine Vulgate) Et erit tamquam lignum quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo: et folium ejus non defluet; et omnia quæcumque faciet prosperabuntur.




The Douay-Rheims translates this into English as, "And he shall be like a tree which is planted near the running waters . . ."



How should decursus be parsed in this verse?



According to Wiktionary, secus is a preposition taking an accusative, but decursus doesn't look like it is in accusative form to me. What am I missing?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2




    It is accusative, but of 4th declension and plural. Literally,'beside the downward courses of the waters.'
    – Tom Cotton
    7 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite













(Psalm 1:3, Clementine Vulgate) Et erit tamquam lignum quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo: et folium ejus non defluet; et omnia quæcumque faciet prosperabuntur.




The Douay-Rheims translates this into English as, "And he shall be like a tree which is planted near the running waters . . ."



How should decursus be parsed in this verse?



According to Wiktionary, secus is a preposition taking an accusative, but decursus doesn't look like it is in accusative form to me. What am I missing?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 2




    It is accusative, but of 4th declension and plural. Literally,'beside the downward courses of the waters.'
    – Tom Cotton
    7 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite












(Psalm 1:3, Clementine Vulgate) Et erit tamquam lignum quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo: et folium ejus non defluet; et omnia quæcumque faciet prosperabuntur.




The Douay-Rheims translates this into English as, "And he shall be like a tree which is planted near the running waters . . ."



How should decursus be parsed in this verse?



According to Wiktionary, secus is a preposition taking an accusative, but decursus doesn't look like it is in accusative form to me. What am I missing?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












(Psalm 1:3, Clementine Vulgate) Et erit tamquam lignum quod plantatum est secus decursus aquarum, quod fructum suum dabit in tempore suo: et folium ejus non defluet; et omnia quæcumque faciet prosperabuntur.




The Douay-Rheims translates this into English as, "And he shall be like a tree which is planted near the running waters . . ."



How should decursus be parsed in this verse?



According to Wiktionary, secus is a preposition taking an accusative, but decursus doesn't look like it is in accusative form to me. What am I missing?







grammar-choice






share|improve this question







New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 9 hours ago









Pascal's Wager

1161




1161




New contributor




Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Pascal's Wager is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 2




    It is accusative, but of 4th declension and plural. Literally,'beside the downward courses of the waters.'
    – Tom Cotton
    7 hours ago












  • 2




    It is accusative, but of 4th declension and plural. Literally,'beside the downward courses of the waters.'
    – Tom Cotton
    7 hours ago







2




2




It is accusative, but of 4th declension and plural. Literally,'beside the downward courses of the waters.'
– Tom Cotton
7 hours ago




It is accusative, but of 4th declension and plural. Literally,'beside the downward courses of the waters.'
– Tom Cotton
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













The noun decursus belongs to the fourth declension, not the second. You know this because, if you look it up in a dictionary, the two forms that are given (the 'principal parts') will be dēcursus, -ūs, not dēcursus, -ī. Therefore, in your passage, decursus is, in fact, accusative, but plural (= dēcursūs).






share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "644"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7208%2fshouldnt-decursus-be-accusative-in-psalm-13%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote













    The noun decursus belongs to the fourth declension, not the second. You know this because, if you look it up in a dictionary, the two forms that are given (the 'principal parts') will be dēcursus, -ūs, not dēcursus, -ī. Therefore, in your passage, decursus is, in fact, accusative, but plural (= dēcursūs).






    share|improve this answer
























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      The noun decursus belongs to the fourth declension, not the second. You know this because, if you look it up in a dictionary, the two forms that are given (the 'principal parts') will be dēcursus, -ūs, not dēcursus, -ī. Therefore, in your passage, decursus is, in fact, accusative, but plural (= dēcursūs).






      share|improve this answer






















        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        The noun decursus belongs to the fourth declension, not the second. You know this because, if you look it up in a dictionary, the two forms that are given (the 'principal parts') will be dēcursus, -ūs, not dēcursus, -ī. Therefore, in your passage, decursus is, in fact, accusative, but plural (= dēcursūs).






        share|improve this answer












        The noun decursus belongs to the fourth declension, not the second. You know this because, if you look it up in a dictionary, the two forms that are given (the 'principal parts') will be dēcursus, -ūs, not dēcursus, -ī. Therefore, in your passage, decursus is, in fact, accusative, but plural (= dēcursūs).







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 7 hours ago









        cnread

        8,1421923




        8,1421923




















            Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Pascal's Wager is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f7208%2fshouldnt-decursus-be-accusative-in-psalm-13%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What does second last employer means? [closed]

            List of Gilmore Girls characters

            One-line joke