In a single-continent world, what could cause hydrothermal vents?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In the world I'm building, there is a single continent. However, in the deeper parts of the ocean, there are hydrothermal vents. They're pretty necessary to my story, but I can't figure out why they would be there as to my knowledge they usually need to be near cracks in the tectonic plates.



I don't know if it's worth noting, but the core of my world is very small and there is little magma to be found. The hydrothermal vents are also about 16 500 ft down instead of around 16 000 feet.










share|improve this question

















  • 3




    Not all tectonic plates carry continents. For example, on our own Earth, the Pacific plate, the Nazca plate, the Scotia plate and the Filipino plate don't carry continents. Not to mention that a continent can be assembled from continental crust residing on multiple plates; for example, Asia has pieces residing on the Eurasian, Arabian and Indian plates.
    – AlexP
    34 mins ago







  • 1




    "little magma to be found" - do you want your world to be tectonically inactive?
    – Alexander
    23 mins ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In the world I'm building, there is a single continent. However, in the deeper parts of the ocean, there are hydrothermal vents. They're pretty necessary to my story, but I can't figure out why they would be there as to my knowledge they usually need to be near cracks in the tectonic plates.



I don't know if it's worth noting, but the core of my world is very small and there is little magma to be found. The hydrothermal vents are also about 16 500 ft down instead of around 16 000 feet.










share|improve this question

















  • 3




    Not all tectonic plates carry continents. For example, on our own Earth, the Pacific plate, the Nazca plate, the Scotia plate and the Filipino plate don't carry continents. Not to mention that a continent can be assembled from continental crust residing on multiple plates; for example, Asia has pieces residing on the Eurasian, Arabian and Indian plates.
    – AlexP
    34 mins ago







  • 1




    "little magma to be found" - do you want your world to be tectonically inactive?
    – Alexander
    23 mins ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











In the world I'm building, there is a single continent. However, in the deeper parts of the ocean, there are hydrothermal vents. They're pretty necessary to my story, but I can't figure out why they would be there as to my knowledge they usually need to be near cracks in the tectonic plates.



I don't know if it's worth noting, but the core of my world is very small and there is little magma to be found. The hydrothermal vents are also about 16 500 ft down instead of around 16 000 feet.










share|improve this question













In the world I'm building, there is a single continent. However, in the deeper parts of the ocean, there are hydrothermal vents. They're pretty necessary to my story, but I can't figure out why they would be there as to my knowledge they usually need to be near cracks in the tectonic plates.



I don't know if it's worth noting, but the core of my world is very small and there is little magma to be found. The hydrothermal vents are also about 16 500 ft down instead of around 16 000 feet.







geography underwater ocean






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 43 mins ago









AzaleaGarden

36511




36511







  • 3




    Not all tectonic plates carry continents. For example, on our own Earth, the Pacific plate, the Nazca plate, the Scotia plate and the Filipino plate don't carry continents. Not to mention that a continent can be assembled from continental crust residing on multiple plates; for example, Asia has pieces residing on the Eurasian, Arabian and Indian plates.
    – AlexP
    34 mins ago







  • 1




    "little magma to be found" - do you want your world to be tectonically inactive?
    – Alexander
    23 mins ago












  • 3




    Not all tectonic plates carry continents. For example, on our own Earth, the Pacific plate, the Nazca plate, the Scotia plate and the Filipino plate don't carry continents. Not to mention that a continent can be assembled from continental crust residing on multiple plates; for example, Asia has pieces residing on the Eurasian, Arabian and Indian plates.
    – AlexP
    34 mins ago







  • 1




    "little magma to be found" - do you want your world to be tectonically inactive?
    – Alexander
    23 mins ago







3




3




Not all tectonic plates carry continents. For example, on our own Earth, the Pacific plate, the Nazca plate, the Scotia plate and the Filipino plate don't carry continents. Not to mention that a continent can be assembled from continental crust residing on multiple plates; for example, Asia has pieces residing on the Eurasian, Arabian and Indian plates.
– AlexP
34 mins ago





Not all tectonic plates carry continents. For example, on our own Earth, the Pacific plate, the Nazca plate, the Scotia plate and the Filipino plate don't carry continents. Not to mention that a continent can be assembled from continental crust residing on multiple plates; for example, Asia has pieces residing on the Eurasian, Arabian and Indian plates.
– AlexP
34 mins ago





1




1




"little magma to be found" - do you want your world to be tectonically inactive?
– Alexander
23 mins ago




"little magma to be found" - do you want your world to be tectonically inactive?
– Alexander
23 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













You can have tectonic plates on a water world, that is still "land" under there, you just have enough water to cover it all. Look at early Earth and Pangaea for an example.



In your case, any tectonic plates carrying enough land to break through water are all adjacent to each other; just like our continents were once all adjacent.



With multiple plates you can still have mountains, valleys, etc. No problems with it, just as you have it. Any tectonic plate joins under the ocean are just plates that don't carry enough land to be seen above water.





share




















  • An edit and an upvote! (I was going to say the same: you just beat me to it! ;-) )
    – Fabby
    1 min ago

















up vote
2
down vote













No need for the single continent (let's hypothetically call it "Pangea" -- all earth) to have always existed, or for it to always exist in the future.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea




Pangaea or Pangea ( /pænˈdʒiːə/) was a supercontinent that existed during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. It assembled from earlier continental units approximately 335 million years ago, and it began to break apart about 175 million years ago.




Those hydrothermal vents are part of the undersea mid-ocean ridges which pushed the earlier continents together...



By en:User:Kieff - File:Pangaea continents.png, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8161694
enter image description here






share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    That's funny, we both posted the same idea, one second apart.
    – Amadeus
    33 mins ago






  • 1




    I noticed that... :) Some ideas are just too obvious.
    – RonJohn
    30 mins ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125910%2fin-a-single-continent-world-what-could-cause-hydrothermal-vents%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
4
down vote













You can have tectonic plates on a water world, that is still "land" under there, you just have enough water to cover it all. Look at early Earth and Pangaea for an example.



In your case, any tectonic plates carrying enough land to break through water are all adjacent to each other; just like our continents were once all adjacent.



With multiple plates you can still have mountains, valleys, etc. No problems with it, just as you have it. Any tectonic plate joins under the ocean are just plates that don't carry enough land to be seen above water.





share




















  • An edit and an upvote! (I was going to say the same: you just beat me to it! ;-) )
    – Fabby
    1 min ago














up vote
4
down vote













You can have tectonic plates on a water world, that is still "land" under there, you just have enough water to cover it all. Look at early Earth and Pangaea for an example.



In your case, any tectonic plates carrying enough land to break through water are all adjacent to each other; just like our continents were once all adjacent.



With multiple plates you can still have mountains, valleys, etc. No problems with it, just as you have it. Any tectonic plate joins under the ocean are just plates that don't carry enough land to be seen above water.





share




















  • An edit and an upvote! (I was going to say the same: you just beat me to it! ;-) )
    – Fabby
    1 min ago












up vote
4
down vote










up vote
4
down vote









You can have tectonic plates on a water world, that is still "land" under there, you just have enough water to cover it all. Look at early Earth and Pangaea for an example.



In your case, any tectonic plates carrying enough land to break through water are all adjacent to each other; just like our continents were once all adjacent.



With multiple plates you can still have mountains, valleys, etc. No problems with it, just as you have it. Any tectonic plate joins under the ocean are just plates that don't carry enough land to be seen above water.





share












You can have tectonic plates on a water world, that is still "land" under there, you just have enough water to cover it all. Look at early Earth and Pangaea for an example.



In your case, any tectonic plates carrying enough land to break through water are all adjacent to each other; just like our continents were once all adjacent.



With multiple plates you can still have mountains, valleys, etc. No problems with it, just as you have it. Any tectonic plate joins under the ocean are just plates that don't carry enough land to be seen above water.






share











share


share










answered 35 mins ago









Amadeus

19.2k42875




19.2k42875











  • An edit and an upvote! (I was going to say the same: you just beat me to it! ;-) )
    – Fabby
    1 min ago
















  • An edit and an upvote! (I was going to say the same: you just beat me to it! ;-) )
    – Fabby
    1 min ago















An edit and an upvote! (I was going to say the same: you just beat me to it! ;-) )
– Fabby
1 min ago




An edit and an upvote! (I was going to say the same: you just beat me to it! ;-) )
– Fabby
1 min ago










up vote
2
down vote













No need for the single continent (let's hypothetically call it "Pangea" -- all earth) to have always existed, or for it to always exist in the future.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea




Pangaea or Pangea ( /pænˈdʒiːə/) was a supercontinent that existed during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. It assembled from earlier continental units approximately 335 million years ago, and it began to break apart about 175 million years ago.




Those hydrothermal vents are part of the undersea mid-ocean ridges which pushed the earlier continents together...



By en:User:Kieff - File:Pangaea continents.png, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8161694
enter image description here






share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    That's funny, we both posted the same idea, one second apart.
    – Amadeus
    33 mins ago






  • 1




    I noticed that... :) Some ideas are just too obvious.
    – RonJohn
    30 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote













No need for the single continent (let's hypothetically call it "Pangea" -- all earth) to have always existed, or for it to always exist in the future.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea




Pangaea or Pangea ( /pænˈdʒiːə/) was a supercontinent that existed during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. It assembled from earlier continental units approximately 335 million years ago, and it began to break apart about 175 million years ago.




Those hydrothermal vents are part of the undersea mid-ocean ridges which pushed the earlier continents together...



By en:User:Kieff - File:Pangaea continents.png, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8161694
enter image description here






share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    That's funny, we both posted the same idea, one second apart.
    – Amadeus
    33 mins ago






  • 1




    I noticed that... :) Some ideas are just too obvious.
    – RonJohn
    30 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









No need for the single continent (let's hypothetically call it "Pangea" -- all earth) to have always existed, or for it to always exist in the future.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea




Pangaea or Pangea ( /pænˈdʒiːə/) was a supercontinent that existed during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. It assembled from earlier continental units approximately 335 million years ago, and it began to break apart about 175 million years ago.




Those hydrothermal vents are part of the undersea mid-ocean ridges which pushed the earlier continents together...



By en:User:Kieff - File:Pangaea continents.png, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8161694
enter image description here






share|improve this answer












No need for the single continent (let's hypothetically call it "Pangea" -- all earth) to have always existed, or for it to always exist in the future.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pangaea




Pangaea or Pangea ( /pænˈdʒiːə/) was a supercontinent that existed during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras. It assembled from earlier continental units approximately 335 million years ago, and it began to break apart about 175 million years ago.




Those hydrothermal vents are part of the undersea mid-ocean ridges which pushed the earlier continents together...



By en:User:Kieff - File:Pangaea continents.png, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=8161694
enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 35 mins ago









RonJohn

12.3k12659




12.3k12659







  • 1




    That's funny, we both posted the same idea, one second apart.
    – Amadeus
    33 mins ago






  • 1




    I noticed that... :) Some ideas are just too obvious.
    – RonJohn
    30 mins ago












  • 1




    That's funny, we both posted the same idea, one second apart.
    – Amadeus
    33 mins ago






  • 1




    I noticed that... :) Some ideas are just too obvious.
    – RonJohn
    30 mins ago







1




1




That's funny, we both posted the same idea, one second apart.
– Amadeus
33 mins ago




That's funny, we both posted the same idea, one second apart.
– Amadeus
33 mins ago




1




1




I noticed that... :) Some ideas are just too obvious.
– RonJohn
30 mins ago




I noticed that... :) Some ideas are just too obvious.
– RonJohn
30 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f125910%2fin-a-single-continent-world-what-could-cause-hydrothermal-vents%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery