Real Analysis - provinig a sequence converges to some value
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $a_n$ where $n in mathbb N$ be a sequence of rational numbers converging to $a$. Suppose $a neq 0$, for $k = 1, 2, ...$ let
$$b_k=begincases 0 & textif;a_k=0\\frac1a_k &textif;a_k neq 0endcases$$
Prove that $b_n$ converges to $frac1a$.
I was studying real analysis and got stuck on this problem.
Can you help me solve this problem or give me some hints?
Thanks
edit: is it possible to solve this in terms of Cauchy Sequence?
real-analysis
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $a_n$ where $n in mathbb N$ be a sequence of rational numbers converging to $a$. Suppose $a neq 0$, for $k = 1, 2, ...$ let
$$b_k=begincases 0 & textif;a_k=0\\frac1a_k &textif;a_k neq 0endcases$$
Prove that $b_n$ converges to $frac1a$.
I was studying real analysis and got stuck on this problem.
Can you help me solve this problem or give me some hints?
Thanks
edit: is it possible to solve this in terms of Cauchy Sequence?
real-analysis
New contributor
Tips: to make MathJax works, use the dollar symbols to wrap up your math expressions. E.g. $mathbb N$ vs mathbb N.
â xbh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $a_n$ where $n in mathbb N$ be a sequence of rational numbers converging to $a$. Suppose $a neq 0$, for $k = 1, 2, ...$ let
$$b_k=begincases 0 & textif;a_k=0\\frac1a_k &textif;a_k neq 0endcases$$
Prove that $b_n$ converges to $frac1a$.
I was studying real analysis and got stuck on this problem.
Can you help me solve this problem or give me some hints?
Thanks
edit: is it possible to solve this in terms of Cauchy Sequence?
real-analysis
New contributor
Let $a_n$ where $n in mathbb N$ be a sequence of rational numbers converging to $a$. Suppose $a neq 0$, for $k = 1, 2, ...$ let
$$b_k=begincases 0 & textif;a_k=0\\frac1a_k &textif;a_k neq 0endcases$$
Prove that $b_n$ converges to $frac1a$.
I was studying real analysis and got stuck on this problem.
Can you help me solve this problem or give me some hints?
Thanks
edit: is it possible to solve this in terms of Cauchy Sequence?
real-analysis
real-analysis
New contributor
New contributor
edited 1 hour ago
Chinnapparaj R
2,275520
2,275520
New contributor
asked 1 hour ago
TUC
133
133
New contributor
New contributor
Tips: to make MathJax works, use the dollar symbols to wrap up your math expressions. E.g. $mathbb N$ vs mathbb N.
â xbh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
Tips: to make MathJax works, use the dollar symbols to wrap up your math expressions. E.g. $mathbb N$ vs mathbb N.
â xbh
1 hour ago
Tips: to make MathJax works, use the dollar symbols to wrap up your math expressions. E.g. $mathbb N$ vs mathbb N.
â xbh
1 hour ago
Tips: to make MathJax works, use the dollar symbols to wrap up your math expressions. E.g. $mathbb N$ vs mathbb N.
â xbh
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It is not necessary to use Cauchy sequences.
Let $varepsilon = fraca2 > 0$ (because $a neq 0)$. The sequence $(a_k)$ converges to $a$, so there exists $N in mathbbN$, such that for all $k geq N$, $a-varepsilon < a_k < a +varepsilon$. By definition of $varepsilon$, you get $a_k neq 0$ for all $k geq N$.
So, for all $k geq N$, $b_k = frac1a_k$. Taking the limit, you get immediately that $(b_k)$ converges to $frac1a$.
So $lim_nto infty$ $(b_n)$ $_n in mathbb N$ = $frac1lim_nto infty (a_n)$ = $frac1a$ ?
â TUC
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Hint
Because $anot=0$ (let's say $a>0$), show that $exists n_0inmathbbN: forall ngeq n_0quad a_n>0$
I already know that $a_n$ is a Cauchy sequence. Do I also have to show that $b_n$ is a Cauchy sequence as well?
â TUC
55 mins ago
I think that the definition of convergence is enough
â giannispapav
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It is not necessary to use Cauchy sequences.
Let $varepsilon = fraca2 > 0$ (because $a neq 0)$. The sequence $(a_k)$ converges to $a$, so there exists $N in mathbbN$, such that for all $k geq N$, $a-varepsilon < a_k < a +varepsilon$. By definition of $varepsilon$, you get $a_k neq 0$ for all $k geq N$.
So, for all $k geq N$, $b_k = frac1a_k$. Taking the limit, you get immediately that $(b_k)$ converges to $frac1a$.
So $lim_nto infty$ $(b_n)$ $_n in mathbb N$ = $frac1lim_nto infty (a_n)$ = $frac1a$ ?
â TUC
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It is not necessary to use Cauchy sequences.
Let $varepsilon = fraca2 > 0$ (because $a neq 0)$. The sequence $(a_k)$ converges to $a$, so there exists $N in mathbbN$, such that for all $k geq N$, $a-varepsilon < a_k < a +varepsilon$. By definition of $varepsilon$, you get $a_k neq 0$ for all $k geq N$.
So, for all $k geq N$, $b_k = frac1a_k$. Taking the limit, you get immediately that $(b_k)$ converges to $frac1a$.
So $lim_nto infty$ $(b_n)$ $_n in mathbb N$ = $frac1lim_nto infty (a_n)$ = $frac1a$ ?
â TUC
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
It is not necessary to use Cauchy sequences.
Let $varepsilon = fraca2 > 0$ (because $a neq 0)$. The sequence $(a_k)$ converges to $a$, so there exists $N in mathbbN$, such that for all $k geq N$, $a-varepsilon < a_k < a +varepsilon$. By definition of $varepsilon$, you get $a_k neq 0$ for all $k geq N$.
So, for all $k geq N$, $b_k = frac1a_k$. Taking the limit, you get immediately that $(b_k)$ converges to $frac1a$.
It is not necessary to use Cauchy sequences.
Let $varepsilon = fraca2 > 0$ (because $a neq 0)$. The sequence $(a_k)$ converges to $a$, so there exists $N in mathbbN$, such that for all $k geq N$, $a-varepsilon < a_k < a +varepsilon$. By definition of $varepsilon$, you get $a_k neq 0$ for all $k geq N$.
So, for all $k geq N$, $b_k = frac1a_k$. Taking the limit, you get immediately that $(b_k)$ converges to $frac1a$.
answered 52 mins ago
TheSilverDoe
87011
87011
So $lim_nto infty$ $(b_n)$ $_n in mathbb N$ = $frac1lim_nto infty (a_n)$ = $frac1a$ ?
â TUC
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
So $lim_nto infty$ $(b_n)$ $_n in mathbb N$ = $frac1lim_nto infty (a_n)$ = $frac1a$ ?
â TUC
13 mins ago
So $lim_nto infty$ $(b_n)$ $_n in mathbb N$ = $frac1lim_nto infty (a_n)$ = $frac1a$ ?
â TUC
13 mins ago
So $lim_nto infty$ $(b_n)$ $_n in mathbb N$ = $frac1lim_nto infty (a_n)$ = $frac1a$ ?
â TUC
13 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Hint
Because $anot=0$ (let's say $a>0$), show that $exists n_0inmathbbN: forall ngeq n_0quad a_n>0$
I already know that $a_n$ is a Cauchy sequence. Do I also have to show that $b_n$ is a Cauchy sequence as well?
â TUC
55 mins ago
I think that the definition of convergence is enough
â giannispapav
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
Hint
Because $anot=0$ (let's say $a>0$), show that $exists n_0inmathbbN: forall ngeq n_0quad a_n>0$
I already know that $a_n$ is a Cauchy sequence. Do I also have to show that $b_n$ is a Cauchy sequence as well?
â TUC
55 mins ago
I think that the definition of convergence is enough
â giannispapav
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Hint
Because $anot=0$ (let's say $a>0$), show that $exists n_0inmathbbN: forall ngeq n_0quad a_n>0$
Hint
Because $anot=0$ (let's say $a>0$), show that $exists n_0inmathbbN: forall ngeq n_0quad a_n>0$
answered 1 hour ago
giannispapav
1,414323
1,414323
I already know that $a_n$ is a Cauchy sequence. Do I also have to show that $b_n$ is a Cauchy sequence as well?
â TUC
55 mins ago
I think that the definition of convergence is enough
â giannispapav
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
I already know that $a_n$ is a Cauchy sequence. Do I also have to show that $b_n$ is a Cauchy sequence as well?
â TUC
55 mins ago
I think that the definition of convergence is enough
â giannispapav
51 mins ago
I already know that $a_n$ is a Cauchy sequence. Do I also have to show that $b_n$ is a Cauchy sequence as well?
â TUC
55 mins ago
I already know that $a_n$ is a Cauchy sequence. Do I also have to show that $b_n$ is a Cauchy sequence as well?
â TUC
55 mins ago
I think that the definition of convergence is enough
â giannispapav
51 mins ago
I think that the definition of convergence is enough
â giannispapav
51 mins ago
add a comment |Â
TUC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TUC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TUC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
TUC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2936608%2freal-analysis-provinig-a-sequence-converges-to-some-value%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Tips: to make MathJax works, use the dollar symbols to wrap up your math expressions. E.g. $mathbb N$ vs mathbb N.
â xbh
1 hour ago