Proof of an inequality using analytic geometry

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












If $p,q,r$ are real numbers and $0<p<q<r$, then $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



Is this a well-known inequality?



My proof of it is based on analytic geometry:



If you plot the points $P=(p,1/p)$, $Q=(q,1/q)$, $R=(r,1/r)$ in this order, you get the vertices of a triangle circumscribed by an equilateral hyperbola $xy=1$ entirely on the first quadrant (as all numbers $p,q,r$ are positive and because a line cannot intercept a conic in three points). The area of this triangle PQR can be given by the following formula: $$frac 12 begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix$$



And as these coordinates are written anticlockwise in this determinant, it has to be positive:
$$begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix>0$$



From that we get



$$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



Is this proof correct?



Is there another, simpler proof for this inequality?










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    If $p,q,r$ are real numbers and $0<p<q<r$, then $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



    Is this a well-known inequality?



    My proof of it is based on analytic geometry:



    If you plot the points $P=(p,1/p)$, $Q=(q,1/q)$, $R=(r,1/r)$ in this order, you get the vertices of a triangle circumscribed by an equilateral hyperbola $xy=1$ entirely on the first quadrant (as all numbers $p,q,r$ are positive and because a line cannot intercept a conic in three points). The area of this triangle PQR can be given by the following formula: $$frac 12 begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix$$



    And as these coordinates are written anticlockwise in this determinant, it has to be positive:
    $$begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix>0$$



    From that we get



    $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



    Is this proof correct?



    Is there another, simpler proof for this inequality?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      If $p,q,r$ are real numbers and $0<p<q<r$, then $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



      Is this a well-known inequality?



      My proof of it is based on analytic geometry:



      If you plot the points $P=(p,1/p)$, $Q=(q,1/q)$, $R=(r,1/r)$ in this order, you get the vertices of a triangle circumscribed by an equilateral hyperbola $xy=1$ entirely on the first quadrant (as all numbers $p,q,r$ are positive and because a line cannot intercept a conic in three points). The area of this triangle PQR can be given by the following formula: $$frac 12 begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix$$



      And as these coordinates are written anticlockwise in this determinant, it has to be positive:
      $$begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix>0$$



      From that we get



      $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



      Is this proof correct?



      Is there another, simpler proof for this inequality?










      share|cite|improve this question















      If $p,q,r$ are real numbers and $0<p<q<r$, then $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



      Is this a well-known inequality?



      My proof of it is based on analytic geometry:



      If you plot the points $P=(p,1/p)$, $Q=(q,1/q)$, $R=(r,1/r)$ in this order, you get the vertices of a triangle circumscribed by an equilateral hyperbola $xy=1$ entirely on the first quadrant (as all numbers $p,q,r$ are positive and because a line cannot intercept a conic in three points). The area of this triangle PQR can be given by the following formula: $$frac 12 begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix$$



      And as these coordinates are written anticlockwise in this determinant, it has to be positive:
      $$begin vmatrix p & frac 1p & 1 \ q & frac 1q & 1 \ r & frac 1r & 1 \ end vmatrix>0$$



      From that we get



      $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr$$



      Is this proof correct?



      Is there another, simpler proof for this inequality?







      algebra-precalculus proof-verification inequality analytic-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 49 mins ago









      greedoid

      28.7k93878




      28.7k93878










      asked 1 hour ago









      MrDudulex

      907




      907




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Just a slightly different view at your proof: If the function $f: I to Bbb R$ is
          strictly convex on the interval $I subset Bbb R$ then for $p < q < r$ in $I$
          $$
          f(q) < fracr-qr-p , f(p) + fracq-pr-p , f(r) \
          iff (r-q) , f(p) + (p-r) , f(q) + (q-p) , f(r) > 0 quad (*)
          $$
          Choosing $f(x) = frac 1x$ gives the desired inequality.



          The connection to your solution is that $(*)$ can be written as
          $$
          begin vmatrix p & f(p) & 1 \ q & f(q) & 1 \ r & f(r) & 1 \ end vmatrix>0
          , ,
          $$
          i.e. the (oriented) area of the triangle is positive because
          $f(x) = frac 1x$ is strictly convex.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Nice fact. Using this fact we can create many homologous inequalities with such convex functions
            – MrDudulex
            5 mins ago


















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Put $x=rover q>1$ and $y= qover p>1$ so we have to prove $$1over x+1over y +xy >x+y+1over xy$$ or $$x+y+x^2y^2>x^2y+y^2x+1$$
          or $$x^2y^2-xy(x+y)+(x+y)-1>0$$



          or $$(xy-1)(xy+1)-(x+y)(xy-1)>0$$ or $$(xy-1)(xy-x-y+1)>0$$



          or $$(xy-1)(x-1)(y-1)>0$$
          which is true.






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Your inequalitiy is equavalent to $$- left( q-r right) left( p-r right) left( p-q right) >0$$
            and this is true since we have $$0<p<q<r$$






            share|cite|improve this answer





























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              As an alternative let



              $$x=frac pq quad y=frac qr quad frac rp=frac1xy quad x,yin(0,1) $$



              therefore we obtain



              $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr iff x+y+frac1xyge frac1x+frac1y+xy$$



              $$x+y+frac1xy-frac1x-frac1y-xyge 0iff fracx^2y+xy^2+1-y-x-1xyge 0$$



              $$x^2y+xy^2-y-xge 0 iff xy(x+y)-(x+y)ge 0iff (xy-1)(x+y)ge 0$$



              which is true.






              share|cite




















                Your Answer




                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: false,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2923057%2fproof-of-an-inequality-using-analytic-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest






























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted










                Just a slightly different view at your proof: If the function $f: I to Bbb R$ is
                strictly convex on the interval $I subset Bbb R$ then for $p < q < r$ in $I$
                $$
                f(q) < fracr-qr-p , f(p) + fracq-pr-p , f(r) \
                iff (r-q) , f(p) + (p-r) , f(q) + (q-p) , f(r) > 0 quad (*)
                $$
                Choosing $f(x) = frac 1x$ gives the desired inequality.



                The connection to your solution is that $(*)$ can be written as
                $$
                begin vmatrix p & f(p) & 1 \ q & f(q) & 1 \ r & f(r) & 1 \ end vmatrix>0
                , ,
                $$
                i.e. the (oriented) area of the triangle is positive because
                $f(x) = frac 1x$ is strictly convex.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                • Nice fact. Using this fact we can create many homologous inequalities with such convex functions
                  – MrDudulex
                  5 mins ago















                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted










                Just a slightly different view at your proof: If the function $f: I to Bbb R$ is
                strictly convex on the interval $I subset Bbb R$ then for $p < q < r$ in $I$
                $$
                f(q) < fracr-qr-p , f(p) + fracq-pr-p , f(r) \
                iff (r-q) , f(p) + (p-r) , f(q) + (q-p) , f(r) > 0 quad (*)
                $$
                Choosing $f(x) = frac 1x$ gives the desired inequality.



                The connection to your solution is that $(*)$ can be written as
                $$
                begin vmatrix p & f(p) & 1 \ q & f(q) & 1 \ r & f(r) & 1 \ end vmatrix>0
                , ,
                $$
                i.e. the (oriented) area of the triangle is positive because
                $f(x) = frac 1x$ is strictly convex.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                • Nice fact. Using this fact we can create many homologous inequalities with such convex functions
                  – MrDudulex
                  5 mins ago













                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                Just a slightly different view at your proof: If the function $f: I to Bbb R$ is
                strictly convex on the interval $I subset Bbb R$ then for $p < q < r$ in $I$
                $$
                f(q) < fracr-qr-p , f(p) + fracq-pr-p , f(r) \
                iff (r-q) , f(p) + (p-r) , f(q) + (q-p) , f(r) > 0 quad (*)
                $$
                Choosing $f(x) = frac 1x$ gives the desired inequality.



                The connection to your solution is that $(*)$ can be written as
                $$
                begin vmatrix p & f(p) & 1 \ q & f(q) & 1 \ r & f(r) & 1 \ end vmatrix>0
                , ,
                $$
                i.e. the (oriented) area of the triangle is positive because
                $f(x) = frac 1x$ is strictly convex.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Just a slightly different view at your proof: If the function $f: I to Bbb R$ is
                strictly convex on the interval $I subset Bbb R$ then for $p < q < r$ in $I$
                $$
                f(q) < fracr-qr-p , f(p) + fracq-pr-p , f(r) \
                iff (r-q) , f(p) + (p-r) , f(q) + (q-p) , f(r) > 0 quad (*)
                $$
                Choosing $f(x) = frac 1x$ gives the desired inequality.



                The connection to your solution is that $(*)$ can be written as
                $$
                begin vmatrix p & f(p) & 1 \ q & f(q) & 1 \ r & f(r) & 1 \ end vmatrix>0
                , ,
                $$
                i.e. the (oriented) area of the triangle is positive because
                $f(x) = frac 1x$ is strictly convex.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 16 mins ago

























                answered 21 mins ago









                Martin R

                24.1k32744




                24.1k32744











                • Nice fact. Using this fact we can create many homologous inequalities with such convex functions
                  – MrDudulex
                  5 mins ago

















                • Nice fact. Using this fact we can create many homologous inequalities with such convex functions
                  – MrDudulex
                  5 mins ago
















                Nice fact. Using this fact we can create many homologous inequalities with such convex functions
                – MrDudulex
                5 mins ago





                Nice fact. Using this fact we can create many homologous inequalities with such convex functions
                – MrDudulex
                5 mins ago











                up vote
                3
                down vote













                Put $x=rover q>1$ and $y= qover p>1$ so we have to prove $$1over x+1over y +xy >x+y+1over xy$$ or $$x+y+x^2y^2>x^2y+y^2x+1$$
                or $$x^2y^2-xy(x+y)+(x+y)-1>0$$



                or $$(xy-1)(xy+1)-(x+y)(xy-1)>0$$ or $$(xy-1)(xy-x-y+1)>0$$



                or $$(xy-1)(x-1)(y-1)>0$$
                which is true.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote













                  Put $x=rover q>1$ and $y= qover p>1$ so we have to prove $$1over x+1over y +xy >x+y+1over xy$$ or $$x+y+x^2y^2>x^2y+y^2x+1$$
                  or $$x^2y^2-xy(x+y)+(x+y)-1>0$$



                  or $$(xy-1)(xy+1)-(x+y)(xy-1)>0$$ or $$(xy-1)(xy-x-y+1)>0$$



                  or $$(xy-1)(x-1)(y-1)>0$$
                  which is true.






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    3
                    down vote









                    Put $x=rover q>1$ and $y= qover p>1$ so we have to prove $$1over x+1over y +xy >x+y+1over xy$$ or $$x+y+x^2y^2>x^2y+y^2x+1$$
                    or $$x^2y^2-xy(x+y)+(x+y)-1>0$$



                    or $$(xy-1)(xy+1)-(x+y)(xy-1)>0$$ or $$(xy-1)(xy-x-y+1)>0$$



                    or $$(xy-1)(x-1)(y-1)>0$$
                    which is true.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    Put $x=rover q>1$ and $y= qover p>1$ so we have to prove $$1over x+1over y +xy >x+y+1over xy$$ or $$x+y+x^2y^2>x^2y+y^2x+1$$
                    or $$x^2y^2-xy(x+y)+(x+y)-1>0$$



                    or $$(xy-1)(xy+1)-(x+y)(xy-1)>0$$ or $$(xy-1)(xy-x-y+1)>0$$



                    or $$(xy-1)(x-1)(y-1)>0$$
                    which is true.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 1 hour ago

























                    answered 1 hour ago









                    greedoid

                    28.7k93878




                    28.7k93878




















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Your inequalitiy is equavalent to $$- left( q-r right) left( p-r right) left( p-q right) >0$$
                        and this is true since we have $$0<p<q<r$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Your inequalitiy is equavalent to $$- left( q-r right) left( p-r right) left( p-q right) >0$$
                          and this is true since we have $$0<p<q<r$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Your inequalitiy is equavalent to $$- left( q-r right) left( p-r right) left( p-q right) >0$$
                            and this is true since we have $$0<p<q<r$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            Your inequalitiy is equavalent to $$- left( q-r right) left( p-r right) left( p-q right) >0$$
                            and this is true since we have $$0<p<q<r$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer














                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited 1 hour ago

























                            answered 1 hour ago









                            Dr. Sonnhard Graubner

                            68.9k32760




                            68.9k32760




















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                As an alternative let



                                $$x=frac pq quad y=frac qr quad frac rp=frac1xy quad x,yin(0,1) $$



                                therefore we obtain



                                $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr iff x+y+frac1xyge frac1x+frac1y+xy$$



                                $$x+y+frac1xy-frac1x-frac1y-xyge 0iff fracx^2y+xy^2+1-y-x-1xyge 0$$



                                $$x^2y+xy^2-y-xge 0 iff xy(x+y)-(x+y)ge 0iff (xy-1)(x+y)ge 0$$



                                which is true.






                                share|cite
























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  As an alternative let



                                  $$x=frac pq quad y=frac qr quad frac rp=frac1xy quad x,yin(0,1) $$



                                  therefore we obtain



                                  $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr iff x+y+frac1xyge frac1x+frac1y+xy$$



                                  $$x+y+frac1xy-frac1x-frac1y-xyge 0iff fracx^2y+xy^2+1-y-x-1xyge 0$$



                                  $$x^2y+xy^2-y-xge 0 iff xy(x+y)-(x+y)ge 0iff (xy-1)(x+y)ge 0$$



                                  which is true.






                                  share|cite






















                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    As an alternative let



                                    $$x=frac pq quad y=frac qr quad frac rp=frac1xy quad x,yin(0,1) $$



                                    therefore we obtain



                                    $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr iff x+y+frac1xyge frac1x+frac1y+xy$$



                                    $$x+y+frac1xy-frac1x-frac1y-xyge 0iff fracx^2y+xy^2+1-y-x-1xyge 0$$



                                    $$x^2y+xy^2-y-xge 0 iff xy(x+y)-(x+y)ge 0iff (xy-1)(x+y)ge 0$$



                                    which is true.






                                    share|cite












                                    As an alternative let



                                    $$x=frac pq quad y=frac qr quad frac rp=frac1xy quad x,yin(0,1) $$



                                    therefore we obtain



                                    $$frac pq +frac qr +frac rp >frac qp +frac rq +frac pr iff x+y+frac1xyge frac1x+frac1y+xy$$



                                    $$x+y+frac1xy-frac1x-frac1y-xyge 0iff fracx^2y+xy^2+1-y-x-1xyge 0$$



                                    $$x^2y+xy^2-y-xge 0 iff xy(x+y)-(x+y)ge 0iff (xy-1)(x+y)ge 0$$



                                    which is true.







                                    share|cite












                                    share|cite



                                    share|cite










                                    answered 2 mins ago









                                    gimusi

                                    73.6k73889




                                    73.6k73889



























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2923057%2fproof-of-an-inequality-using-analytic-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest













































































                                        Comments

                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        What does second last employer means? [closed]

                                        Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                                        One-line joke