One-off exorbitant long commute time makeup - Do I owe it 100% to my employer to sacrifice my personal time?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












Living in a region that experience winter, there are sometimes (infrequently) massive delays in the morning due to snowstorms (or even just a random crash). In particular, my commute time was tripled today (due to a crash) and so I showed up markedly late.



We are expected to be at work until a set time, so I have no reason to show up early since I can't leave early, so mitigating chances of being late by arriving early every day is not reasonable because it would be 100% my burden. We are also expected to be at work for a minimum time every day, so I would have to stay just as late as I arrived to not raise any (automated) red flags.



Therefore, when there is a very outlier commute time in the morning, is it ethically my responsibility to stay equally late as I arrived (when it doesn't significantly affect anything such as deadlines)?



Note also that we are (pseudo) salaried, and "getting my work done early" is not an acceptable excuse to leave early (and they automatically monitor time at work and enforce it). We are also disallowed from working remotely just because of weather.



So it appears that this issue reduces down to how much personal time is worth versus company time, and the economic elasticity of having that respected.




We know from market economics that tax burdens are distributed to both parties (e.g. if you levy a 10% sales tax on the merchant, they'll just charge 5% higher to customers so the tax burden is equally distributedI am failing to find a reference using Google, help please?). I see these two situations as very similar, therefore I should only be obligated to stay late to make up for half of the time I show up late (remember, arriving late today was abnormal).



So, when I approach my manager about this issue, is it reasonable to expect such a compromise?



Also, is there any difference if it were the case of having a scheduled commitment after work that would be prevented by staying late at work to make up time?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    I am failing to find a reference using Google, help please? - This is because the way it works is the Business collects all 10% sales tax from the consumer.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    46 mins ago










  • What kind of job is it? Is it the sort where you have tasks to do, or the sort where you are some sort of contact from X AM to Y PM?
    – David Thornley
    43 mins ago










  • @IDrinkandIKnowThings It's because I'm not using the proper keywords. You're also assuming 100% price elasticity, which is almost never true.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @DavidThornley It's (pseudo) salary, so having time requirements enforced is already weird.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @Elaskanator - The keywords would be imaginary business policies.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    31 mins ago
















up vote
-2
down vote

favorite












Living in a region that experience winter, there are sometimes (infrequently) massive delays in the morning due to snowstorms (or even just a random crash). In particular, my commute time was tripled today (due to a crash) and so I showed up markedly late.



We are expected to be at work until a set time, so I have no reason to show up early since I can't leave early, so mitigating chances of being late by arriving early every day is not reasonable because it would be 100% my burden. We are also expected to be at work for a minimum time every day, so I would have to stay just as late as I arrived to not raise any (automated) red flags.



Therefore, when there is a very outlier commute time in the morning, is it ethically my responsibility to stay equally late as I arrived (when it doesn't significantly affect anything such as deadlines)?



Note also that we are (pseudo) salaried, and "getting my work done early" is not an acceptable excuse to leave early (and they automatically monitor time at work and enforce it). We are also disallowed from working remotely just because of weather.



So it appears that this issue reduces down to how much personal time is worth versus company time, and the economic elasticity of having that respected.




We know from market economics that tax burdens are distributed to both parties (e.g. if you levy a 10% sales tax on the merchant, they'll just charge 5% higher to customers so the tax burden is equally distributedI am failing to find a reference using Google, help please?). I see these two situations as very similar, therefore I should only be obligated to stay late to make up for half of the time I show up late (remember, arriving late today was abnormal).



So, when I approach my manager about this issue, is it reasonable to expect such a compromise?



Also, is there any difference if it were the case of having a scheduled commitment after work that would be prevented by staying late at work to make up time?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    I am failing to find a reference using Google, help please? - This is because the way it works is the Business collects all 10% sales tax from the consumer.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    46 mins ago










  • What kind of job is it? Is it the sort where you have tasks to do, or the sort where you are some sort of contact from X AM to Y PM?
    – David Thornley
    43 mins ago










  • @IDrinkandIKnowThings It's because I'm not using the proper keywords. You're also assuming 100% price elasticity, which is almost never true.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @DavidThornley It's (pseudo) salary, so having time requirements enforced is already weird.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @Elaskanator - The keywords would be imaginary business policies.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    31 mins ago












up vote
-2
down vote

favorite









up vote
-2
down vote

favorite











Living in a region that experience winter, there are sometimes (infrequently) massive delays in the morning due to snowstorms (or even just a random crash). In particular, my commute time was tripled today (due to a crash) and so I showed up markedly late.



We are expected to be at work until a set time, so I have no reason to show up early since I can't leave early, so mitigating chances of being late by arriving early every day is not reasonable because it would be 100% my burden. We are also expected to be at work for a minimum time every day, so I would have to stay just as late as I arrived to not raise any (automated) red flags.



Therefore, when there is a very outlier commute time in the morning, is it ethically my responsibility to stay equally late as I arrived (when it doesn't significantly affect anything such as deadlines)?



Note also that we are (pseudo) salaried, and "getting my work done early" is not an acceptable excuse to leave early (and they automatically monitor time at work and enforce it). We are also disallowed from working remotely just because of weather.



So it appears that this issue reduces down to how much personal time is worth versus company time, and the economic elasticity of having that respected.




We know from market economics that tax burdens are distributed to both parties (e.g. if you levy a 10% sales tax on the merchant, they'll just charge 5% higher to customers so the tax burden is equally distributedI am failing to find a reference using Google, help please?). I see these two situations as very similar, therefore I should only be obligated to stay late to make up for half of the time I show up late (remember, arriving late today was abnormal).



So, when I approach my manager about this issue, is it reasonable to expect such a compromise?



Also, is there any difference if it were the case of having a scheduled commitment after work that would be prevented by staying late at work to make up time?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Living in a region that experience winter, there are sometimes (infrequently) massive delays in the morning due to snowstorms (or even just a random crash). In particular, my commute time was tripled today (due to a crash) and so I showed up markedly late.



We are expected to be at work until a set time, so I have no reason to show up early since I can't leave early, so mitigating chances of being late by arriving early every day is not reasonable because it would be 100% my burden. We are also expected to be at work for a minimum time every day, so I would have to stay just as late as I arrived to not raise any (automated) red flags.



Therefore, when there is a very outlier commute time in the morning, is it ethically my responsibility to stay equally late as I arrived (when it doesn't significantly affect anything such as deadlines)?



Note also that we are (pseudo) salaried, and "getting my work done early" is not an acceptable excuse to leave early (and they automatically monitor time at work and enforce it). We are also disallowed from working remotely just because of weather.



So it appears that this issue reduces down to how much personal time is worth versus company time, and the economic elasticity of having that respected.




We know from market economics that tax burdens are distributed to both parties (e.g. if you levy a 10% sales tax on the merchant, they'll just charge 5% higher to customers so the tax burden is equally distributedI am failing to find a reference using Google, help please?). I see these two situations as very similar, therefore I should only be obligated to stay late to make up for half of the time I show up late (remember, arriving late today was abnormal).



So, when I approach my manager about this issue, is it reasonable to expect such a compromise?



Also, is there any difference if it were the case of having a scheduled commitment after work that would be prevented by staying late at work to make up time?







professionalism ethics negotiation






share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 min ago





















New contributor




Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 51 mins ago









Elaskanator

12




12




New contributor




Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Elaskanator is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    I am failing to find a reference using Google, help please? - This is because the way it works is the Business collects all 10% sales tax from the consumer.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    46 mins ago










  • What kind of job is it? Is it the sort where you have tasks to do, or the sort where you are some sort of contact from X AM to Y PM?
    – David Thornley
    43 mins ago










  • @IDrinkandIKnowThings It's because I'm not using the proper keywords. You're also assuming 100% price elasticity, which is almost never true.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @DavidThornley It's (pseudo) salary, so having time requirements enforced is already weird.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @Elaskanator - The keywords would be imaginary business policies.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    31 mins ago












  • 1




    I am failing to find a reference using Google, help please? - This is because the way it works is the Business collects all 10% sales tax from the consumer.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    46 mins ago










  • What kind of job is it? Is it the sort where you have tasks to do, or the sort where you are some sort of contact from X AM to Y PM?
    – David Thornley
    43 mins ago










  • @IDrinkandIKnowThings It's because I'm not using the proper keywords. You're also assuming 100% price elasticity, which is almost never true.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @DavidThornley It's (pseudo) salary, so having time requirements enforced is already weird.
    – Elaskanator
    33 mins ago











  • @Elaskanator - The keywords would be imaginary business policies.
    – IDrinkandIKnowThings
    31 mins ago







1




1




I am failing to find a reference using Google, help please? - This is because the way it works is the Business collects all 10% sales tax from the consumer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
46 mins ago




I am failing to find a reference using Google, help please? - This is because the way it works is the Business collects all 10% sales tax from the consumer.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
46 mins ago












What kind of job is it? Is it the sort where you have tasks to do, or the sort where you are some sort of contact from X AM to Y PM?
– David Thornley
43 mins ago




What kind of job is it? Is it the sort where you have tasks to do, or the sort where you are some sort of contact from X AM to Y PM?
– David Thornley
43 mins ago












@IDrinkandIKnowThings It's because I'm not using the proper keywords. You're also assuming 100% price elasticity, which is almost never true.
– Elaskanator
33 mins ago





@IDrinkandIKnowThings It's because I'm not using the proper keywords. You're also assuming 100% price elasticity, which is almost never true.
– Elaskanator
33 mins ago













@DavidThornley It's (pseudo) salary, so having time requirements enforced is already weird.
– Elaskanator
33 mins ago





@DavidThornley It's (pseudo) salary, so having time requirements enforced is already weird.
– Elaskanator
33 mins ago













@Elaskanator - The keywords would be imaginary business policies.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
31 mins ago




@Elaskanator - The keywords would be imaginary business policies.
– IDrinkandIKnowThings
31 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













It's not the employer's responsibility to make sure your commute isn't seriously delayed on any given day, or that you live somewhere with a predictable commute. Where you live, and the mechanics of getting to work, are your responsibility. If your employer expects a certain number of hours of work each day or each week, it's up to you to make sure that happens.



Therefore, if you're expected to make up the time, or account for it in some other way, you need to do something for the whole time, not just half of it. Your employer may be willing to accept rare lateness as one of those thing, but you don't say that's the case.



It would be reasonable to ask your manager whether you have to stay late that day or whether you could make up part or all of the time on another day. Sometimes the rules are more flexible than they're presented.






share|improve this answer




















  • I did say it was a rare lateness ("sometimes").
    – Elaskanator
    31 mins ago

















up vote
0
down vote













Generally, yes, you're expected to make up the time, even though it may not seem "fair" because it wasn't your fault that you were late. As the saying goes, "It's not fair, but no one said life is fair." OTOH, it's also not fair to your employer to pay employees for work not done.



If you are paid hourly, do you expect to be paid for 8 hours of work when you only work 7? If (like me) you're one of those quasi-hourly employees (supposedly paid an hourly rate, but expected to "work until the job is done", even though you only receive overtime pay in very rare circumstances), you'll still need to make up the time. Of course, there may be "comp time" (compensatory time) where you work extra on other days. Usually "comp time" is worked in advance; however, many employers allow you to make up missed time like this later - especially as long as it is in the same pay period).



If you're salaried (i.e. you receive the same pay regardless of the number of hours worked), then you may be able to leave early without making it up.



As for approaching your manager: I'd recommend against it, unless you are:



  • Asking about making up the time on a different schedule. For example, "Hey boss, I know I was 2 hours late today due to the snow. Unfortunately, I really need to get home soon, even though I've worked only 7 hours today. Is it okay if I make up 30 minutes each day over the next couple days?"

or



  • (If you're salaried) Asking if they mind if you leave early (most especially if you have some sort of other engagement).

Otherwise, you are likely to look to the manager like you are trying to slack off and get paid for it.



In this era of working from home, you might ask if that's another possibility for making up the time or even if you could do so on days when the weather makes your commute problematic.






share|improve this answer




















  • They explicitly say in the employee handbook that we cannot use adverse weather as a reason to work remotely, and we are pseudo-salaried and prohibited from leaving early just because we got our work ahead of schedule. Therefore I feel my issue really boils down to arguing for the market elasticity between the employee's time and the employer's expectation of their time.
    – Elaskanator
    16 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "423"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Elaskanator is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122260%2fone-off-exorbitant-long-commute-time-makeup-do-i-owe-it-100-to-my-employer-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













It's not the employer's responsibility to make sure your commute isn't seriously delayed on any given day, or that you live somewhere with a predictable commute. Where you live, and the mechanics of getting to work, are your responsibility. If your employer expects a certain number of hours of work each day or each week, it's up to you to make sure that happens.



Therefore, if you're expected to make up the time, or account for it in some other way, you need to do something for the whole time, not just half of it. Your employer may be willing to accept rare lateness as one of those thing, but you don't say that's the case.



It would be reasonable to ask your manager whether you have to stay late that day or whether you could make up part or all of the time on another day. Sometimes the rules are more flexible than they're presented.






share|improve this answer




















  • I did say it was a rare lateness ("sometimes").
    – Elaskanator
    31 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote













It's not the employer's responsibility to make sure your commute isn't seriously delayed on any given day, or that you live somewhere with a predictable commute. Where you live, and the mechanics of getting to work, are your responsibility. If your employer expects a certain number of hours of work each day or each week, it's up to you to make sure that happens.



Therefore, if you're expected to make up the time, or account for it in some other way, you need to do something for the whole time, not just half of it. Your employer may be willing to accept rare lateness as one of those thing, but you don't say that's the case.



It would be reasonable to ask your manager whether you have to stay late that day or whether you could make up part or all of the time on another day. Sometimes the rules are more flexible than they're presented.






share|improve this answer




















  • I did say it was a rare lateness ("sometimes").
    – Elaskanator
    31 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









It's not the employer's responsibility to make sure your commute isn't seriously delayed on any given day, or that you live somewhere with a predictable commute. Where you live, and the mechanics of getting to work, are your responsibility. If your employer expects a certain number of hours of work each day or each week, it's up to you to make sure that happens.



Therefore, if you're expected to make up the time, or account for it in some other way, you need to do something for the whole time, not just half of it. Your employer may be willing to accept rare lateness as one of those thing, but you don't say that's the case.



It would be reasonable to ask your manager whether you have to stay late that day or whether you could make up part or all of the time on another day. Sometimes the rules are more flexible than they're presented.






share|improve this answer












It's not the employer's responsibility to make sure your commute isn't seriously delayed on any given day, or that you live somewhere with a predictable commute. Where you live, and the mechanics of getting to work, are your responsibility. If your employer expects a certain number of hours of work each day or each week, it's up to you to make sure that happens.



Therefore, if you're expected to make up the time, or account for it in some other way, you need to do something for the whole time, not just half of it. Your employer may be willing to accept rare lateness as one of those thing, but you don't say that's the case.



It would be reasonable to ask your manager whether you have to stay late that day or whether you could make up part or all of the time on another day. Sometimes the rules are more flexible than they're presented.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 35 mins ago









David Thornley

1,09015




1,09015











  • I did say it was a rare lateness ("sometimes").
    – Elaskanator
    31 mins ago
















  • I did say it was a rare lateness ("sometimes").
    – Elaskanator
    31 mins ago















I did say it was a rare lateness ("sometimes").
– Elaskanator
31 mins ago




I did say it was a rare lateness ("sometimes").
– Elaskanator
31 mins ago












up vote
0
down vote













Generally, yes, you're expected to make up the time, even though it may not seem "fair" because it wasn't your fault that you were late. As the saying goes, "It's not fair, but no one said life is fair." OTOH, it's also not fair to your employer to pay employees for work not done.



If you are paid hourly, do you expect to be paid for 8 hours of work when you only work 7? If (like me) you're one of those quasi-hourly employees (supposedly paid an hourly rate, but expected to "work until the job is done", even though you only receive overtime pay in very rare circumstances), you'll still need to make up the time. Of course, there may be "comp time" (compensatory time) where you work extra on other days. Usually "comp time" is worked in advance; however, many employers allow you to make up missed time like this later - especially as long as it is in the same pay period).



If you're salaried (i.e. you receive the same pay regardless of the number of hours worked), then you may be able to leave early without making it up.



As for approaching your manager: I'd recommend against it, unless you are:



  • Asking about making up the time on a different schedule. For example, "Hey boss, I know I was 2 hours late today due to the snow. Unfortunately, I really need to get home soon, even though I've worked only 7 hours today. Is it okay if I make up 30 minutes each day over the next couple days?"

or



  • (If you're salaried) Asking if they mind if you leave early (most especially if you have some sort of other engagement).

Otherwise, you are likely to look to the manager like you are trying to slack off and get paid for it.



In this era of working from home, you might ask if that's another possibility for making up the time or even if you could do so on days when the weather makes your commute problematic.






share|improve this answer




















  • They explicitly say in the employee handbook that we cannot use adverse weather as a reason to work remotely, and we are pseudo-salaried and prohibited from leaving early just because we got our work ahead of schedule. Therefore I feel my issue really boils down to arguing for the market elasticity between the employee's time and the employer's expectation of their time.
    – Elaskanator
    16 mins ago















up vote
0
down vote













Generally, yes, you're expected to make up the time, even though it may not seem "fair" because it wasn't your fault that you were late. As the saying goes, "It's not fair, but no one said life is fair." OTOH, it's also not fair to your employer to pay employees for work not done.



If you are paid hourly, do you expect to be paid for 8 hours of work when you only work 7? If (like me) you're one of those quasi-hourly employees (supposedly paid an hourly rate, but expected to "work until the job is done", even though you only receive overtime pay in very rare circumstances), you'll still need to make up the time. Of course, there may be "comp time" (compensatory time) where you work extra on other days. Usually "comp time" is worked in advance; however, many employers allow you to make up missed time like this later - especially as long as it is in the same pay period).



If you're salaried (i.e. you receive the same pay regardless of the number of hours worked), then you may be able to leave early without making it up.



As for approaching your manager: I'd recommend against it, unless you are:



  • Asking about making up the time on a different schedule. For example, "Hey boss, I know I was 2 hours late today due to the snow. Unfortunately, I really need to get home soon, even though I've worked only 7 hours today. Is it okay if I make up 30 minutes each day over the next couple days?"

or



  • (If you're salaried) Asking if they mind if you leave early (most especially if you have some sort of other engagement).

Otherwise, you are likely to look to the manager like you are trying to slack off and get paid for it.



In this era of working from home, you might ask if that's another possibility for making up the time or even if you could do so on days when the weather makes your commute problematic.






share|improve this answer




















  • They explicitly say in the employee handbook that we cannot use adverse weather as a reason to work remotely, and we are pseudo-salaried and prohibited from leaving early just because we got our work ahead of schedule. Therefore I feel my issue really boils down to arguing for the market elasticity between the employee's time and the employer's expectation of their time.
    – Elaskanator
    16 mins ago













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Generally, yes, you're expected to make up the time, even though it may not seem "fair" because it wasn't your fault that you were late. As the saying goes, "It's not fair, but no one said life is fair." OTOH, it's also not fair to your employer to pay employees for work not done.



If you are paid hourly, do you expect to be paid for 8 hours of work when you only work 7? If (like me) you're one of those quasi-hourly employees (supposedly paid an hourly rate, but expected to "work until the job is done", even though you only receive overtime pay in very rare circumstances), you'll still need to make up the time. Of course, there may be "comp time" (compensatory time) where you work extra on other days. Usually "comp time" is worked in advance; however, many employers allow you to make up missed time like this later - especially as long as it is in the same pay period).



If you're salaried (i.e. you receive the same pay regardless of the number of hours worked), then you may be able to leave early without making it up.



As for approaching your manager: I'd recommend against it, unless you are:



  • Asking about making up the time on a different schedule. For example, "Hey boss, I know I was 2 hours late today due to the snow. Unfortunately, I really need to get home soon, even though I've worked only 7 hours today. Is it okay if I make up 30 minutes each day over the next couple days?"

or



  • (If you're salaried) Asking if they mind if you leave early (most especially if you have some sort of other engagement).

Otherwise, you are likely to look to the manager like you are trying to slack off and get paid for it.



In this era of working from home, you might ask if that's another possibility for making up the time or even if you could do so on days when the weather makes your commute problematic.






share|improve this answer












Generally, yes, you're expected to make up the time, even though it may not seem "fair" because it wasn't your fault that you were late. As the saying goes, "It's not fair, but no one said life is fair." OTOH, it's also not fair to your employer to pay employees for work not done.



If you are paid hourly, do you expect to be paid for 8 hours of work when you only work 7? If (like me) you're one of those quasi-hourly employees (supposedly paid an hourly rate, but expected to "work until the job is done", even though you only receive overtime pay in very rare circumstances), you'll still need to make up the time. Of course, there may be "comp time" (compensatory time) where you work extra on other days. Usually "comp time" is worked in advance; however, many employers allow you to make up missed time like this later - especially as long as it is in the same pay period).



If you're salaried (i.e. you receive the same pay regardless of the number of hours worked), then you may be able to leave early without making it up.



As for approaching your manager: I'd recommend against it, unless you are:



  • Asking about making up the time on a different schedule. For example, "Hey boss, I know I was 2 hours late today due to the snow. Unfortunately, I really need to get home soon, even though I've worked only 7 hours today. Is it okay if I make up 30 minutes each day over the next couple days?"

or



  • (If you're salaried) Asking if they mind if you leave early (most especially if you have some sort of other engagement).

Otherwise, you are likely to look to the manager like you are trying to slack off and get paid for it.



In this era of working from home, you might ask if that's another possibility for making up the time or even if you could do so on days when the weather makes your commute problematic.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 23 mins ago









GreenMatt

15.6k1465110




15.6k1465110











  • They explicitly say in the employee handbook that we cannot use adverse weather as a reason to work remotely, and we are pseudo-salaried and prohibited from leaving early just because we got our work ahead of schedule. Therefore I feel my issue really boils down to arguing for the market elasticity between the employee's time and the employer's expectation of their time.
    – Elaskanator
    16 mins ago

















  • They explicitly say in the employee handbook that we cannot use adverse weather as a reason to work remotely, and we are pseudo-salaried and prohibited from leaving early just because we got our work ahead of schedule. Therefore I feel my issue really boils down to arguing for the market elasticity between the employee's time and the employer's expectation of their time.
    – Elaskanator
    16 mins ago
















They explicitly say in the employee handbook that we cannot use adverse weather as a reason to work remotely, and we are pseudo-salaried and prohibited from leaving early just because we got our work ahead of schedule. Therefore I feel my issue really boils down to arguing for the market elasticity between the employee's time and the employer's expectation of their time.
– Elaskanator
16 mins ago





They explicitly say in the employee handbook that we cannot use adverse weather as a reason to work remotely, and we are pseudo-salaried and prohibited from leaving early just because we got our work ahead of schedule. Therefore I feel my issue really boils down to arguing for the market elasticity between the employee's time and the employer's expectation of their time.
– Elaskanator
16 mins ago











Elaskanator is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Elaskanator is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Elaskanator is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Elaskanator is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122260%2fone-off-exorbitant-long-commute-time-makeup-do-i-owe-it-100-to-my-employer-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery