Can a creature with Truesight ignore the tactile elements of Mirage Arcane?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












Mirage Arcane is a powerful illusion spell that:




includes audible, visual, tactile, and olfactory elements.




However:




Creatures with truesight can see through the illusion to the terrain’s true form however, all other elements of the illusion remain, so while the creature is aware of the illusion’s presence, the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




A creature without truesight cannot move through a wall created by Mirage Arcane without destroying the wall. Can a creature with truesight do so?



It seems like the answer hinges on exactly what work the last "can" in the above quote is doing.










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Mirage Arcane is a powerful illusion spell that:




    includes audible, visual, tactile, and olfactory elements.




    However:




    Creatures with truesight can see through the illusion to the terrain’s true form however, all other elements of the illusion remain, so while the creature is aware of the illusion’s presence, the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




    A creature without truesight cannot move through a wall created by Mirage Arcane without destroying the wall. Can a creature with truesight do so?



    It seems like the answer hinges on exactly what work the last "can" in the above quote is doing.










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Mirage Arcane is a powerful illusion spell that:




      includes audible, visual, tactile, and olfactory elements.




      However:




      Creatures with truesight can see through the illusion to the terrain’s true form however, all other elements of the illusion remain, so while the creature is aware of the illusion’s presence, the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




      A creature without truesight cannot move through a wall created by Mirage Arcane without destroying the wall. Can a creature with truesight do so?



      It seems like the answer hinges on exactly what work the last "can" in the above quote is doing.










      share|improve this question













      Mirage Arcane is a powerful illusion spell that:




      includes audible, visual, tactile, and olfactory elements.




      However:




      Creatures with truesight can see through the illusion to the terrain’s true form however, all other elements of the illusion remain, so while the creature is aware of the illusion’s presence, the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




      A creature without truesight cannot move through a wall created by Mirage Arcane without destroying the wall. Can a creature with truesight do so?



      It seems like the answer hinges on exactly what work the last "can" in the above quote is doing.







      dnd-5e spells illusion






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 3 hours ago









      Vigil

      5,5252264




      5,5252264




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          The creature can ignore or interact with the physical parts of the illusion at their choice.



          As you say, this really comes down to the meaning of the word "can" here:




          the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




          "Can" is not a defined rules word, so it defaults to the idiomatic English meaning of the word: "be able to". Nothing about the word states that they must or must not, just that they are able to. And of course if they are able to do it, they are able to not do it.



          Thus, the creature with truesight is able to interact with the illusion, but can choose not to.



          Supporting this, Jeremy Crawford has helpfully clarified the meaning of this word in rules context however in this tweet:




          In D&D rules, "can" means what it means in English. If you can do something, you're capable of it. You decide whether you do it.




          So, can here implies an ability to do something but also a choice.



          So, the creature could move through the wall or they could, for example, choose to climb up it (using the appropriate climbing rules of course).






          share|improve this answer





























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            The creature can walk through the wall



            I think you've almost answered your own question there. The part of the quote is:




            the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




            which implies that it can also not interact with it and walk right through it. This would make sense given that the creature knows that the illusion isn't there.



            If the spell was supposed to force creatures with truesight to be restricted by the illusion, it would probably say "must" or something similar rather than "can".






            share|improve this answer




















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "122"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135119%2fcan-a-creature-with-truesight-ignore-the-tactile-elements-of-mirage-arcane%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote













              The creature can ignore or interact with the physical parts of the illusion at their choice.



              As you say, this really comes down to the meaning of the word "can" here:




              the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




              "Can" is not a defined rules word, so it defaults to the idiomatic English meaning of the word: "be able to". Nothing about the word states that they must or must not, just that they are able to. And of course if they are able to do it, they are able to not do it.



              Thus, the creature with truesight is able to interact with the illusion, but can choose not to.



              Supporting this, Jeremy Crawford has helpfully clarified the meaning of this word in rules context however in this tweet:




              In D&D rules, "can" means what it means in English. If you can do something, you're capable of it. You decide whether you do it.




              So, can here implies an ability to do something but also a choice.



              So, the creature could move through the wall or they could, for example, choose to climb up it (using the appropriate climbing rules of course).






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                The creature can ignore or interact with the physical parts of the illusion at their choice.



                As you say, this really comes down to the meaning of the word "can" here:




                the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




                "Can" is not a defined rules word, so it defaults to the idiomatic English meaning of the word: "be able to". Nothing about the word states that they must or must not, just that they are able to. And of course if they are able to do it, they are able to not do it.



                Thus, the creature with truesight is able to interact with the illusion, but can choose not to.



                Supporting this, Jeremy Crawford has helpfully clarified the meaning of this word in rules context however in this tweet:




                In D&D rules, "can" means what it means in English. If you can do something, you're capable of it. You decide whether you do it.




                So, can here implies an ability to do something but also a choice.



                So, the creature could move through the wall or they could, for example, choose to climb up it (using the appropriate climbing rules of course).






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote









                  The creature can ignore or interact with the physical parts of the illusion at their choice.



                  As you say, this really comes down to the meaning of the word "can" here:




                  the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




                  "Can" is not a defined rules word, so it defaults to the idiomatic English meaning of the word: "be able to". Nothing about the word states that they must or must not, just that they are able to. And of course if they are able to do it, they are able to not do it.



                  Thus, the creature with truesight is able to interact with the illusion, but can choose not to.



                  Supporting this, Jeremy Crawford has helpfully clarified the meaning of this word in rules context however in this tweet:




                  In D&D rules, "can" means what it means in English. If you can do something, you're capable of it. You decide whether you do it.




                  So, can here implies an ability to do something but also a choice.



                  So, the creature could move through the wall or they could, for example, choose to climb up it (using the appropriate climbing rules of course).






                  share|improve this answer














                  The creature can ignore or interact with the physical parts of the illusion at their choice.



                  As you say, this really comes down to the meaning of the word "can" here:




                  the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




                  "Can" is not a defined rules word, so it defaults to the idiomatic English meaning of the word: "be able to". Nothing about the word states that they must or must not, just that they are able to. And of course if they are able to do it, they are able to not do it.



                  Thus, the creature with truesight is able to interact with the illusion, but can choose not to.



                  Supporting this, Jeremy Crawford has helpfully clarified the meaning of this word in rules context however in this tweet:




                  In D&D rules, "can" means what it means in English. If you can do something, you're capable of it. You decide whether you do it.




                  So, can here implies an ability to do something but also a choice.



                  So, the creature could move through the wall or they could, for example, choose to climb up it (using the appropriate climbing rules of course).







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 hours ago

























                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Rubiksmoose

                  41.5k5205315




                  41.5k5205315






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      The creature can walk through the wall



                      I think you've almost answered your own question there. The part of the quote is:




                      the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




                      which implies that it can also not interact with it and walk right through it. This would make sense given that the creature knows that the illusion isn't there.



                      If the spell was supposed to force creatures with truesight to be restricted by the illusion, it would probably say "must" or something similar rather than "can".






                      share|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        The creature can walk through the wall



                        I think you've almost answered your own question there. The part of the quote is:




                        the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




                        which implies that it can also not interact with it and walk right through it. This would make sense given that the creature knows that the illusion isn't there.



                        If the spell was supposed to force creatures with truesight to be restricted by the illusion, it would probably say "must" or something similar rather than "can".






                        share|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          The creature can walk through the wall



                          I think you've almost answered your own question there. The part of the quote is:




                          the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




                          which implies that it can also not interact with it and walk right through it. This would make sense given that the creature knows that the illusion isn't there.



                          If the spell was supposed to force creatures with truesight to be restricted by the illusion, it would probably say "must" or something similar rather than "can".






                          share|improve this answer












                          The creature can walk through the wall



                          I think you've almost answered your own question there. The part of the quote is:




                          the creature can still physically interact with the illusion.




                          which implies that it can also not interact with it and walk right through it. This would make sense given that the creature knows that the illusion isn't there.



                          If the spell was supposed to force creatures with truesight to be restricted by the illusion, it would probably say "must" or something similar rather than "can".







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 2 hours ago









                          NathanS

                          18.7k679198




                          18.7k679198



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135119%2fcan-a-creature-with-truesight-ignore-the-tactile-elements-of-mirage-arcane%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Comments

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What does second last employer means? [closed]

                              Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                              One-line joke