Objectivity and subjectivity
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.
epistemology subjectivity objectivity
New contributor
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.
epistemology subjectivity objectivity
New contributor
Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
â Matt Turner
1 hour ago
Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
â Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.
epistemology subjectivity objectivity
New contributor
What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.
epistemology subjectivity objectivity
epistemology subjectivity objectivity
New contributor
New contributor
edited 4 hours ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
26.2k21757
26.2k21757
New contributor
asked 4 hours ago
Alexander Quinn
384
384
New contributor
New contributor
Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
â Matt Turner
1 hour ago
Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
â Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
â Matt Turner
1 hour ago
Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
â Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago
Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
â Matt Turner
1 hour ago
It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
â Matt Turner
1 hour ago
Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
â Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago
Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
â Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago
 |Â
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.
Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.
In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.
First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.
Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.
Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.
Hope this helps, interesting question.
New contributor
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.
Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.
In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.
First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.
Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.
Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.
Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.
In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.
First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.
Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.
Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.
Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.
In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.
First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.
Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.
Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.
Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.
Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.
In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.
First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.
Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.
Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.
answered 55 mins ago
Matt Turner
253110
253110
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.
Hope this helps, interesting question.
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.
Hope this helps, interesting question.
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.
Hope this helps, interesting question.
New contributor
My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.
Hope this helps, interesting question.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 1 hour ago
ActionEconomy
213
213
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56896%2fobjectivity-and-subjectivity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
â Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago
It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
â Matt Turner
1 hour ago
Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
â Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago