Objectivity and subjectivity

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
    – Matt Turner
    1 hour ago










  • Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
    – Alexander Quinn
    1 hour ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
    – Matt Turner
    1 hour ago










  • Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
    – Alexander Quinn
    1 hour ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











What are all the different ways that we can define these two ideas. Do there actually exist things that we can say with certainty are Objective and things which exist that are absolutely subjective or are these both in the middle.







epistemology subjectivity objectivity






share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago









Mauro ALLEGRANZA

26.2k21757




26.2k21757






New contributor




Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









Alexander Quinn

384




384




New contributor




Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Alexander Quinn is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
    – Matt Turner
    1 hour ago










  • Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
    – Alexander Quinn
    1 hour ago
















  • Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    4 hours ago










  • It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
    – Matt Turner
    1 hour ago










  • Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
    – Alexander Quinn
    1 hour ago















Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago




Everyday experience is full of "things" that are subjective i.e. depending on subject's personal perspective, feelings, beliefs, desires or discovery.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago












Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago




Regarding objectivity is science, see yesterday's post.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago












And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago




And everyday life if full of "things" taht are objective, i.e. true independently from individual subjectivity caused by perception, emotions, or imagination.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
4 hours ago












It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
– Matt Turner
1 hour ago




It's pretty difficult to say anything with certainty in philosophy. It could help to expand on what you mean by things. For instance the number 7 certainly has an air of objectivity about it, but is also abstract and questions about its existence tend to generate pretty complex answers..
– Matt Turner
1 hour ago












Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
– Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago




Well exactly that one would feel that a integer should be objective but it is still abstract and perhaps has a subjective sense so wouldn't it be fair to say that there isn't anything that exists that is say objective that doesn't somehow have a subjective lens to it. For example a car crash bystanders can say that the crash happened but there view of it is different from one another.
– Alexander Quinn
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.



Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.



In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.



First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.



Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.



Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
    It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
    Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
    As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.



    Hope this helps, interesting question.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "265"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56896%2fobjectivity-and-subjectivity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.



      Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.



      In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.



      First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.



      Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.



      Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted










        Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.



        Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.



        In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.



        First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.



        Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.



        Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted






          Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.



          Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.



          In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.



          First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.



          Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.



          Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.






          share|improve this answer












          Here is one concept of objectivity, taken from SEP.



          Let's take objective properties to be qualities of an object that exist independently of a perception of that object; for example, the primality of the number 7, or the atomic mass of hydrogen. The intuition being that these facts would remain even if there was no one around to perceive them.



          In The View from Nowhere Thomas Nagel identifies three steps to identifying such objective properties.



          First we must recognise that our perceptions are caused by causal processes and the effects those processes have on our sense organs and brains.



          Second we must consider that these causal processes also act on other things (than ourselves) and sometimes never act on anything at all. Think of a tree falling in the woods with no one around to hear, it intuitively seems that something must happen in that situation and that something must be detachable from a human perspective.



          Finally we must form a conception of an entity's nature that is detached from our perspective, hence the title of the book, The View From Nowhere. Only by abstracting out our perspectival experience of the object are we able to gain a sense of objectivity.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 55 mins ago









          Matt Turner

          253110




          253110




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
              It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
              Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
              As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.



              Hope this helps, interesting question.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
                It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
                Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
                As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.



                Hope this helps, interesting question.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
                  It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
                  Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
                  As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.



                  Hope this helps, interesting question.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  My childhood tutor in philosophy suggested that objectivity and subjectivity are a single spectrum. An attribute of the attributes that we assign objects.
                  It's value on this spectrum might be estimated by how much we expect the attribute to vary from perspective to perspective.
                  Unfortunately, the assignment of objectivity/subjectivity of an attribute is subjective itself.
                  As a side note, the acknowledgment of any form of objectivity is always in question, as we have yet to define truly objective proofs even for things as seemingly concrete as mathematics.



                  Hope this helps, interesting question.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 1 hour ago









                  ActionEconomy

                  213




                  213




                  New contributor




                  ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  ActionEconomy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                      Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Alexander Quinn is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56896%2fobjectivity-and-subjectivity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                      Confectionery