Mixing
Can a cancerous cell from outside cause cancer in a healthy person?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If a cancerous cell enters the body of a healthy person from someone else's blood or something, will that healthy person get cancer?
cancer hematology
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If a cancerous cell enters the body of a healthy person from someone else's blood or something, will that healthy person get cancer?
cancer hematology
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
Are you only interested in humans? Can you please clarify that in your post (e.g. by addingin humansorin animals)?
– Remi.b
11 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
If a cancerous cell enters the body of a healthy person from someone else's blood or something, will that healthy person get cancer?
cancer hematology
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
If a cancerous cell enters the body of a healthy person from someone else's blood or something, will that healthy person get cancer?
cancer hematology
cancer hematology
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
asked 6 hours ago
Dhruva
435
435
Are you only interested in humans? Can you please clarify that in your post (e.g. by addingin humansorin animals)?
– Remi.b
11 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Are you only interested in humans? Can you please clarify that in your post (e.g. by addingin humansorin animals)?
– Remi.b
11 mins ago
Are you only interested in humans? Can you please clarify that in your post (e.g. by adding
in humans or in animals)?– Remi.b
11 mins ago
Are you only interested in humans? Can you please clarify that in your post (e.g. by adding
in humans or in animals)?– Remi.b
11 mins ago
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Can a cancer cells from someone else's body cause cancer in a healthy person?
No. Cancer cells from another person cannot cause cancer in a healthy person. The rare cases of transmissible tumors all involve unhealthy or not yet developed persons.
Transmission of tumor cells from one individual to another happens, but is quite rare, and in all cases involves some compromise or reduced development of the immune system. Though tumor cells do metastasize in an individual, when this occurs, tumor seeds must be able to evade the immune system and find an environment suitable for adhesion and replication. Tumor associated cells (non cancerous cells that regulate the microenvironment to make it favorable for growth and replication) are discussed in this seminal paper on cancer biology by Hannahan and Weinberg. There are similarities to infectious processes, but cancer is not measles. Tumor cells don't shed in comparable numbers, aren't adapted for immune escape in a separate host, and don't express appropriate adhesion proteins for portals of entry on a new host or readily induce tumor associated niches in a new host. The cases where person-to-person transmission of cancer via tumor cell inoculation does occur seem to demonstrate more how cancer cells are not infectious agents.
Donor-related tumors in transplant patients occur in immunosuppressed patients, but are still rare. The low frequency of transmission seems to be due, in part, to screening. The fact that we see this at all demonstrates the significance of transmission route and immune escape.
Maternal-fetal, and in utero twin-twin seem to be exceedingly rare, but have occurred, again, demonstrating the existence, but poor efficiency of transmission. Here, the fetus has an undeveloped immune system. I would not consider this case to be cancer cells causing cancer in a healthy person.
Inoculation of volunteers with tumor cells in a problematic series of experiments at Sloan Kettering in the 50s, transplantation of tumor cells into patients with other cancers, resulted in growth, recurrence after excision, and death in some cases. Transplantation into healthy volunteers (yes, they did this) resulted in nodules that spontaneously regressed. This experiment has since been interpreted as evidence for immune system control of transplanted tumor system in healthy individuals, as compared to growth and progression in a receptive niche in a cancer patient.
So person-to-person transmission of cancer cells is rare and requires an immunosuppressed or undeveloped host, or a host who already has cancer. There are no documented cases of person-to-person transmission to a healthy individual, and documented cases of failed transmission despite a surgical attempt. This is because, unlike an infectious microbe, in a healthy individual, there is not a suitable receptor for adhesion at an exposed or accessible site, a suitable environment for replication, and adaptations for immune escape by tumor cells in the original host are not effective in a new host.
As a side note, there are contagious cancers in other species, but this doesn't seem to be particularly relevant to a question about whether cancer can be transmitted between two humans. Many cancers have transmissible risk factors (e.g., human herpesvirus-8, hepatitis B and C viruses, human papilloma virus 16 and 18, and others)
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
Your explanations of the possible cases were something like this CAN happen are good (and you do make clear that is very rare), but I still think your answer shouldn't start with a plain 'No' - since that is not really the truth. Maybe something like 'Not unless special cirsumstances are met (see below)' would be a better TLDR
– Nicolai
46 mins ago
@Nicolai the question asks if it can happen in a healthy person. The answer there is a clear no. I will clarify.
– De Novo
45 mins ago
1
Ah true, I didn't catch the healthy part.
– Nicolai
42 mins ago
@nicolai it was important to bring that to my attention, though, since it needed clarifying. I can see how a quick read of an answer that goes into some detail about cases where it does happen would seem not to fit with an answer that starts with "No".
– De Novo
40 mins ago
1
@DeNovo Yes, I consider this question on-topic! Never meant the opposite.
– Remi.b
13 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
The answer is no.
From molecular/mechanistic point of view cancer cell itself is not a self-maintaining and independent creature. Even assuming its infinite potential to renew and grow, it still needs constant nutrients supply and tailored microenvironment to survive. Therefore, there is a growing number of attempts to therapeutically target tumour cells niche, see: Joyce JA, Cancer Cell, 7(6), P513-520, 2005 and Belli C. et al., Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Apr;65:22-32. To overcome this limitations, Cells can undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which allows for migration outside the primary location and is crucial to initiate metastases.
Another important issue is the major histocompatibility complex, which allows to identify and eliminate cells, that contains foreign antigenes. Also, constant immune surveillance in immunocompetent individuals leads to elimination of potential cancerogenous cells. Therefore, patients with immunodeficiencies (eg. with AIDS or on prolonged pharmacological immunosuppression) have significantly higher risk of developing infection-related cancers, such as cervical cancer (HPV) or Kaposi Sarcoma (HHV-8).
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Most cancers cannot be transmitted. But some can. We call them (clonally) transmissible cancers.
Transmissible cancers
The most famous case of transmissible cancers exist is the Devil facial tumour disease in Tazmanian devils. Other cases exist in Syrian hamsters, dogs (CTVT), and some bivalves. No such transmissible cancer exist in humans.
Transmission of viruses inducing cancers
There are cases of cancer caused by viruses. Those viruses are transmissible and hence it looks like the cancer itself is transmissible. In humans, this is for example the case of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus.
Transmission via transplant
Finally, there are cases of cancer that can be transmitted to a new person via a tissue transplant. In humans, Kaposi's sarcoma is (again) an example.
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
Kaposi's sarcoma is not a transmissible cancer. It has a transmissible risk factor, HHV-8, but this is definitely not an example of cancer cells from one person causing cancer in another person. The cancer cells are not the transmissible agent (unlike the transmissible cancers in nonhuman animals). The special cases of Kaposi sarcoma transmission after transplant definitely don't involve healthy recipients. These patients are immunosuppressed, and the cells are, well, transplanted.
– De Novo
53 mins ago
@DeNovo You're right. I actually made reference to transmission of Kaposi's sarcoma indirectly via the transmission of a herpesvirus. I clarified that. Thanks. I added the idea of transmission via transplant. If I am not mistaken Kaposi's sarcoma is known to be "transmissible" via both transplant and virus transmission. Please correct me if I am wrong.
– Remi.b
30 mins ago
Thanks for editing. I'm removing the downvote. I'm not going to upvote because I don't think this directly addresses the question about what happens when cancerous cells enter the body of a healthy person.
– De Novo
24 mins ago
add a comment |Â
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Can a cancer cells from someone else's body cause cancer in a healthy person?
No. Cancer cells from another person cannot cause cancer in a healthy person. The rare cases of transmissible tumors all involve unhealthy or not yet developed persons.
Transmission of tumor cells from one individual to another happens, but is quite rare, and in all cases involves some compromise or reduced development of the immune system. Though tumor cells do metastasize in an individual, when this occurs, tumor seeds must be able to evade the immune system and find an environment suitable for adhesion and replication. Tumor associated cells (non cancerous cells that regulate the microenvironment to make it favorable for growth and replication) are discussed in this seminal paper on cancer biology by Hannahan and Weinberg. There are similarities to infectious processes, but cancer is not measles. Tumor cells don't shed in comparable numbers, aren't adapted for immune escape in a separate host, and don't express appropriate adhesion proteins for portals of entry on a new host or readily induce tumor associated niches in a new host. The cases where person-to-person transmission of cancer via tumor cell inoculation does occur seem to demonstrate more how cancer cells are not infectious agents.
Donor-related tumors in transplant patients occur in immunosuppressed patients, but are still rare. The low frequency of transmission seems to be due, in part, to screening. The fact that we see this at all demonstrates the significance of transmission route and immune escape.
Maternal-fetal, and in utero twin-twin seem to be exceedingly rare, but have occurred, again, demonstrating the existence, but poor efficiency of transmission. Here, the fetus has an undeveloped immune system. I would not consider this case to be cancer cells causing cancer in a healthy person.
Inoculation of volunteers with tumor cells in a problematic series of experiments at Sloan Kettering in the 50s, transplantation of tumor cells into patients with other cancers, resulted in growth, recurrence after excision, and death in some cases. Transplantation into healthy volunteers (yes, they did this) resulted in nodules that spontaneously regressed. This experiment has since been interpreted as evidence for immune system control of transplanted tumor system in healthy individuals, as compared to growth and progression in a receptive niche in a cancer patient.
So person-to-person transmission of cancer cells is rare and requires an immunosuppressed or undeveloped host, or a host who already has cancer. There are no documented cases of person-to-person transmission to a healthy individual, and documented cases of failed transmission despite a surgical attempt. This is because, unlike an infectious microbe, in a healthy individual, there is not a suitable receptor for adhesion at an exposed or accessible site, a suitable environment for replication, and adaptations for immune escape by tumor cells in the original host are not effective in a new host.
As a side note, there are contagious cancers in other species, but this doesn't seem to be particularly relevant to a question about whether cancer can be transmitted between two humans. Many cancers have transmissible risk factors (e.g., human herpesvirus-8, hepatitis B and C viruses, human papilloma virus 16 and 18, and others)
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
Your explanations of the possible cases were something like this CAN happen are good (and you do make clear that is very rare), but I still think your answer shouldn't start with a plain 'No' - since that is not really the truth. Maybe something like 'Not unless special cirsumstances are met (see below)' would be a better TLDR
– Nicolai
46 mins ago
@Nicolai the question asks if it can happen in a healthy person. The answer there is a clear no. I will clarify.
– De Novo
45 mins ago
1
Ah true, I didn't catch the healthy part.
– Nicolai
42 mins ago
@nicolai it was important to bring that to my attention, though, since it needed clarifying. I can see how a quick read of an answer that goes into some detail about cases where it does happen would seem not to fit with an answer that starts with "No".
– De Novo
40 mins ago
1
@DeNovo Yes, I consider this question on-topic! Never meant the opposite.
– Remi.b
13 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
Can a cancer cells from someone else's body cause cancer in a healthy person?
No. Cancer cells from another person cannot cause cancer in a healthy person. The rare cases of transmissible tumors all involve unhealthy or not yet developed persons.
Transmission of tumor cells from one individual to another happens, but is quite rare, and in all cases involves some compromise or reduced development of the immune system. Though tumor cells do metastasize in an individual, when this occurs, tumor seeds must be able to evade the immune system and find an environment suitable for adhesion and replication. Tumor associated cells (non cancerous cells that regulate the microenvironment to make it favorable for growth and replication) are discussed in this seminal paper on cancer biology by Hannahan and Weinberg. There are similarities to infectious processes, but cancer is not measles. Tumor cells don't shed in comparable numbers, aren't adapted for immune escape in a separate host, and don't express appropriate adhesion proteins for portals of entry on a new host or readily induce tumor associated niches in a new host. The cases where person-to-person transmission of cancer via tumor cell inoculation does occur seem to demonstrate more how cancer cells are not infectious agents.
Donor-related tumors in transplant patients occur in immunosuppressed patients, but are still rare. The low frequency of transmission seems to be due, in part, to screening. The fact that we see this at all demonstrates the significance of transmission route and immune escape.
Maternal-fetal, and in utero twin-twin seem to be exceedingly rare, but have occurred, again, demonstrating the existence, but poor efficiency of transmission. Here, the fetus has an undeveloped immune system. I would not consider this case to be cancer cells causing cancer in a healthy person.
Inoculation of volunteers with tumor cells in a problematic series of experiments at Sloan Kettering in the 50s, transplantation of tumor cells into patients with other cancers, resulted in growth, recurrence after excision, and death in some cases. Transplantation into healthy volunteers (yes, they did this) resulted in nodules that spontaneously regressed. This experiment has since been interpreted as evidence for immune system control of transplanted tumor system in healthy individuals, as compared to growth and progression in a receptive niche in a cancer patient.
So person-to-person transmission of cancer cells is rare and requires an immunosuppressed or undeveloped host, or a host who already has cancer. There are no documented cases of person-to-person transmission to a healthy individual, and documented cases of failed transmission despite a surgical attempt. This is because, unlike an infectious microbe, in a healthy individual, there is not a suitable receptor for adhesion at an exposed or accessible site, a suitable environment for replication, and adaptations for immune escape by tumor cells in the original host are not effective in a new host.
As a side note, there are contagious cancers in other species, but this doesn't seem to be particularly relevant to a question about whether cancer can be transmitted between two humans. Many cancers have transmissible risk factors (e.g., human herpesvirus-8, hepatitis B and C viruses, human papilloma virus 16 and 18, and others)
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
Your explanations of the possible cases were something like this CAN happen are good (and you do make clear that is very rare), but I still think your answer shouldn't start with a plain 'No' - since that is not really the truth. Maybe something like 'Not unless special cirsumstances are met (see below)' would be a better TLDR
– Nicolai
46 mins ago
@Nicolai the question asks if it can happen in a healthy person. The answer there is a clear no. I will clarify.
– De Novo
45 mins ago
1
Ah true, I didn't catch the healthy part.
– Nicolai
42 mins ago
@nicolai it was important to bring that to my attention, though, since it needed clarifying. I can see how a quick read of an answer that goes into some detail about cases where it does happen would seem not to fit with an answer that starts with "No".
– De Novo
40 mins ago
1
@DeNovo Yes, I consider this question on-topic! Never meant the opposite.
– Remi.b
13 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Can a cancer cells from someone else's body cause cancer in a healthy person?
No. Cancer cells from another person cannot cause cancer in a healthy person. The rare cases of transmissible tumors all involve unhealthy or not yet developed persons.
Transmission of tumor cells from one individual to another happens, but is quite rare, and in all cases involves some compromise or reduced development of the immune system. Though tumor cells do metastasize in an individual, when this occurs, tumor seeds must be able to evade the immune system and find an environment suitable for adhesion and replication. Tumor associated cells (non cancerous cells that regulate the microenvironment to make it favorable for growth and replication) are discussed in this seminal paper on cancer biology by Hannahan and Weinberg. There are similarities to infectious processes, but cancer is not measles. Tumor cells don't shed in comparable numbers, aren't adapted for immune escape in a separate host, and don't express appropriate adhesion proteins for portals of entry on a new host or readily induce tumor associated niches in a new host. The cases where person-to-person transmission of cancer via tumor cell inoculation does occur seem to demonstrate more how cancer cells are not infectious agents.
Donor-related tumors in transplant patients occur in immunosuppressed patients, but are still rare. The low frequency of transmission seems to be due, in part, to screening. The fact that we see this at all demonstrates the significance of transmission route and immune escape.
Maternal-fetal, and in utero twin-twin seem to be exceedingly rare, but have occurred, again, demonstrating the existence, but poor efficiency of transmission. Here, the fetus has an undeveloped immune system. I would not consider this case to be cancer cells causing cancer in a healthy person.
Inoculation of volunteers with tumor cells in a problematic series of experiments at Sloan Kettering in the 50s, transplantation of tumor cells into patients with other cancers, resulted in growth, recurrence after excision, and death in some cases. Transplantation into healthy volunteers (yes, they did this) resulted in nodules that spontaneously regressed. This experiment has since been interpreted as evidence for immune system control of transplanted tumor system in healthy individuals, as compared to growth and progression in a receptive niche in a cancer patient.
So person-to-person transmission of cancer cells is rare and requires an immunosuppressed or undeveloped host, or a host who already has cancer. There are no documented cases of person-to-person transmission to a healthy individual, and documented cases of failed transmission despite a surgical attempt. This is because, unlike an infectious microbe, in a healthy individual, there is not a suitable receptor for adhesion at an exposed or accessible site, a suitable environment for replication, and adaptations for immune escape by tumor cells in the original host are not effective in a new host.
As a side note, there are contagious cancers in other species, but this doesn't seem to be particularly relevant to a question about whether cancer can be transmitted between two humans. Many cancers have transmissible risk factors (e.g., human herpesvirus-8, hepatitis B and C viruses, human papilloma virus 16 and 18, and others)
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
Can a cancer cells from someone else's body cause cancer in a healthy person?
No. Cancer cells from another person cannot cause cancer in a healthy person. The rare cases of transmissible tumors all involve unhealthy or not yet developed persons.
Transmission of tumor cells from one individual to another happens, but is quite rare, and in all cases involves some compromise or reduced development of the immune system. Though tumor cells do metastasize in an individual, when this occurs, tumor seeds must be able to evade the immune system and find an environment suitable for adhesion and replication. Tumor associated cells (non cancerous cells that regulate the microenvironment to make it favorable for growth and replication) are discussed in this seminal paper on cancer biology by Hannahan and Weinberg. There are similarities to infectious processes, but cancer is not measles. Tumor cells don't shed in comparable numbers, aren't adapted for immune escape in a separate host, and don't express appropriate adhesion proteins for portals of entry on a new host or readily induce tumor associated niches in a new host. The cases where person-to-person transmission of cancer via tumor cell inoculation does occur seem to demonstrate more how cancer cells are not infectious agents.
Donor-related tumors in transplant patients occur in immunosuppressed patients, but are still rare. The low frequency of transmission seems to be due, in part, to screening. The fact that we see this at all demonstrates the significance of transmission route and immune escape.
Maternal-fetal, and in utero twin-twin seem to be exceedingly rare, but have occurred, again, demonstrating the existence, but poor efficiency of transmission. Here, the fetus has an undeveloped immune system. I would not consider this case to be cancer cells causing cancer in a healthy person.
Inoculation of volunteers with tumor cells in a problematic series of experiments at Sloan Kettering in the 50s, transplantation of tumor cells into patients with other cancers, resulted in growth, recurrence after excision, and death in some cases. Transplantation into healthy volunteers (yes, they did this) resulted in nodules that spontaneously regressed. This experiment has since been interpreted as evidence for immune system control of transplanted tumor system in healthy individuals, as compared to growth and progression in a receptive niche in a cancer patient.
So person-to-person transmission of cancer cells is rare and requires an immunosuppressed or undeveloped host, or a host who already has cancer. There are no documented cases of person-to-person transmission to a healthy individual, and documented cases of failed transmission despite a surgical attempt. This is because, unlike an infectious microbe, in a healthy individual, there is not a suitable receptor for adhesion at an exposed or accessible site, a suitable environment for replication, and adaptations for immune escape by tumor cells in the original host are not effective in a new host.
As a side note, there are contagious cancers in other species, but this doesn't seem to be particularly relevant to a question about whether cancer can be transmitted between two humans. Many cancers have transmissible risk factors (e.g., human herpesvirus-8, hepatitis B and C viruses, human papilloma virus 16 and 18, and others)
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
edited 35 mins ago
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
answered 56 mins ago
De Novo
5,848832
5,848832
Your explanations of the possible cases were something like this CAN happen are good (and you do make clear that is very rare), but I still think your answer shouldn't start with a plain 'No' - since that is not really the truth. Maybe something like 'Not unless special cirsumstances are met (see below)' would be a better TLDR
– Nicolai
46 mins ago
@Nicolai the question asks if it can happen in a healthy person. The answer there is a clear no. I will clarify.
– De Novo
45 mins ago
1
Ah true, I didn't catch the healthy part.
– Nicolai
42 mins ago
@nicolai it was important to bring that to my attention, though, since it needed clarifying. I can see how a quick read of an answer that goes into some detail about cases where it does happen would seem not to fit with an answer that starts with "No".
– De Novo
40 mins ago
1
@DeNovo Yes, I consider this question on-topic! Never meant the opposite.
– Remi.b
13 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
Your explanations of the possible cases were something like this CAN happen are good (and you do make clear that is very rare), but I still think your answer shouldn't start with a plain 'No' - since that is not really the truth. Maybe something like 'Not unless special cirsumstances are met (see below)' would be a better TLDR
– Nicolai
46 mins ago
@Nicolai the question asks if it can happen in a healthy person. The answer there is a clear no. I will clarify.
– De Novo
45 mins ago
1
Ah true, I didn't catch the healthy part.
– Nicolai
42 mins ago
@nicolai it was important to bring that to my attention, though, since it needed clarifying. I can see how a quick read of an answer that goes into some detail about cases where it does happen would seem not to fit with an answer that starts with "No".
– De Novo
40 mins ago
1
@DeNovo Yes, I consider this question on-topic! Never meant the opposite.
– Remi.b
13 mins ago
Your explanations of the possible cases were something like this CAN happen are good (and you do make clear that is very rare), but I still think your answer shouldn't start with a plain 'No' - since that is not really the truth. Maybe something like 'Not unless special cirsumstances are met (see below)' would be a better TLDR
– Nicolai
46 mins ago
Your explanations of the possible cases were something like this CAN happen are good (and you do make clear that is very rare), but I still think your answer shouldn't start with a plain 'No' - since that is not really the truth. Maybe something like 'Not unless special cirsumstances are met (see below)' would be a better TLDR
– Nicolai
46 mins ago
@Nicolai the question asks if it can happen in a healthy person. The answer there is a clear no. I will clarify.
– De Novo
45 mins ago
@Nicolai the question asks if it can happen in a healthy person. The answer there is a clear no. I will clarify.
– De Novo
45 mins ago
1
1
Ah true, I didn't catch the healthy part.
– Nicolai
42 mins ago
Ah true, I didn't catch the healthy part.
– Nicolai
42 mins ago
@nicolai it was important to bring that to my attention, though, since it needed clarifying. I can see how a quick read of an answer that goes into some detail about cases where it does happen would seem not to fit with an answer that starts with "No".
– De Novo
40 mins ago
@nicolai it was important to bring that to my attention, though, since it needed clarifying. I can see how a quick read of an answer that goes into some detail about cases where it does happen would seem not to fit with an answer that starts with "No".
– De Novo
40 mins ago
1
1
@DeNovo Yes, I consider this question on-topic! Never meant the opposite.
– Remi.b
13 mins ago
@DeNovo Yes, I consider this question on-topic! Never meant the opposite.
– Remi.b
13 mins ago
 |Â
show 4 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
The answer is no.
From molecular/mechanistic point of view cancer cell itself is not a self-maintaining and independent creature. Even assuming its infinite potential to renew and grow, it still needs constant nutrients supply and tailored microenvironment to survive. Therefore, there is a growing number of attempts to therapeutically target tumour cells niche, see: Joyce JA, Cancer Cell, 7(6), P513-520, 2005 and Belli C. et al., Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Apr;65:22-32. To overcome this limitations, Cells can undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which allows for migration outside the primary location and is crucial to initiate metastases.
Another important issue is the major histocompatibility complex, which allows to identify and eliminate cells, that contains foreign antigenes. Also, constant immune surveillance in immunocompetent individuals leads to elimination of potential cancerogenous cells. Therefore, patients with immunodeficiencies (eg. with AIDS or on prolonged pharmacological immunosuppression) have significantly higher risk of developing infection-related cancers, such as cervical cancer (HPV) or Kaposi Sarcoma (HHV-8).
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
The answer is no.
From molecular/mechanistic point of view cancer cell itself is not a self-maintaining and independent creature. Even assuming its infinite potential to renew and grow, it still needs constant nutrients supply and tailored microenvironment to survive. Therefore, there is a growing number of attempts to therapeutically target tumour cells niche, see: Joyce JA, Cancer Cell, 7(6), P513-520, 2005 and Belli C. et al., Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Apr;65:22-32. To overcome this limitations, Cells can undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which allows for migration outside the primary location and is crucial to initiate metastases.
Another important issue is the major histocompatibility complex, which allows to identify and eliminate cells, that contains foreign antigenes. Also, constant immune surveillance in immunocompetent individuals leads to elimination of potential cancerogenous cells. Therefore, patients with immunodeficiencies (eg. with AIDS or on prolonged pharmacological immunosuppression) have significantly higher risk of developing infection-related cancers, such as cervical cancer (HPV) or Kaposi Sarcoma (HHV-8).
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The answer is no.
From molecular/mechanistic point of view cancer cell itself is not a self-maintaining and independent creature. Even assuming its infinite potential to renew and grow, it still needs constant nutrients supply and tailored microenvironment to survive. Therefore, there is a growing number of attempts to therapeutically target tumour cells niche, see: Joyce JA, Cancer Cell, 7(6), P513-520, 2005 and Belli C. et al., Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Apr;65:22-32. To overcome this limitations, Cells can undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which allows for migration outside the primary location and is crucial to initiate metastases.
Another important issue is the major histocompatibility complex, which allows to identify and eliminate cells, that contains foreign antigenes. Also, constant immune surveillance in immunocompetent individuals leads to elimination of potential cancerogenous cells. Therefore, patients with immunodeficiencies (eg. with AIDS or on prolonged pharmacological immunosuppression) have significantly higher risk of developing infection-related cancers, such as cervical cancer (HPV) or Kaposi Sarcoma (HHV-8).
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
The answer is no.
From molecular/mechanistic point of view cancer cell itself is not a self-maintaining and independent creature. Even assuming its infinite potential to renew and grow, it still needs constant nutrients supply and tailored microenvironment to survive. Therefore, there is a growing number of attempts to therapeutically target tumour cells niche, see: Joyce JA, Cancer Cell, 7(6), P513-520, 2005 and Belli C. et al., Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Apr;65:22-32. To overcome this limitations, Cells can undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition, which allows for migration outside the primary location and is crucial to initiate metastases.
Another important issue is the major histocompatibility complex, which allows to identify and eliminate cells, that contains foreign antigenes. Also, constant immune surveillance in immunocompetent individuals leads to elimination of potential cancerogenous cells. Therefore, patients with immunodeficiencies (eg. with AIDS or on prolonged pharmacological immunosuppression) have significantly higher risk of developing infection-related cancers, such as cervical cancer (HPV) or Kaposi Sarcoma (HHV-8).
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
edited 11 mins ago
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
answered 16 mins ago
hibernicah
3136
3136
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Most cancers cannot be transmitted. But some can. We call them (clonally) transmissible cancers.
Transmissible cancers
The most famous case of transmissible cancers exist is the Devil facial tumour disease in Tazmanian devils. Other cases exist in Syrian hamsters, dogs (CTVT), and some bivalves. No such transmissible cancer exist in humans.
Transmission of viruses inducing cancers
There are cases of cancer caused by viruses. Those viruses are transmissible and hence it looks like the cancer itself is transmissible. In humans, this is for example the case of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus.
Transmission via transplant
Finally, there are cases of cancer that can be transmitted to a new person via a tissue transplant. In humans, Kaposi's sarcoma is (again) an example.
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
Kaposi's sarcoma is not a transmissible cancer. It has a transmissible risk factor, HHV-8, but this is definitely not an example of cancer cells from one person causing cancer in another person. The cancer cells are not the transmissible agent (unlike the transmissible cancers in nonhuman animals). The special cases of Kaposi sarcoma transmission after transplant definitely don't involve healthy recipients. These patients are immunosuppressed, and the cells are, well, transplanted.
– De Novo
53 mins ago
@DeNovo You're right. I actually made reference to transmission of Kaposi's sarcoma indirectly via the transmission of a herpesvirus. I clarified that. Thanks. I added the idea of transmission via transplant. If I am not mistaken Kaposi's sarcoma is known to be "transmissible" via both transplant and virus transmission. Please correct me if I am wrong.
– Remi.b
30 mins ago
Thanks for editing. I'm removing the downvote. I'm not going to upvote because I don't think this directly addresses the question about what happens when cancerous cells enter the body of a healthy person.
– De Novo
24 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Most cancers cannot be transmitted. But some can. We call them (clonally) transmissible cancers.
Transmissible cancers
The most famous case of transmissible cancers exist is the Devil facial tumour disease in Tazmanian devils. Other cases exist in Syrian hamsters, dogs (CTVT), and some bivalves. No such transmissible cancer exist in humans.
Transmission of viruses inducing cancers
There are cases of cancer caused by viruses. Those viruses are transmissible and hence it looks like the cancer itself is transmissible. In humans, this is for example the case of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus.
Transmission via transplant
Finally, there are cases of cancer that can be transmitted to a new person via a tissue transplant. In humans, Kaposi's sarcoma is (again) an example.
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
Kaposi's sarcoma is not a transmissible cancer. It has a transmissible risk factor, HHV-8, but this is definitely not an example of cancer cells from one person causing cancer in another person. The cancer cells are not the transmissible agent (unlike the transmissible cancers in nonhuman animals). The special cases of Kaposi sarcoma transmission after transplant definitely don't involve healthy recipients. These patients are immunosuppressed, and the cells are, well, transplanted.
– De Novo
53 mins ago
@DeNovo You're right. I actually made reference to transmission of Kaposi's sarcoma indirectly via the transmission of a herpesvirus. I clarified that. Thanks. I added the idea of transmission via transplant. If I am not mistaken Kaposi's sarcoma is known to be "transmissible" via both transplant and virus transmission. Please correct me if I am wrong.
– Remi.b
30 mins ago
Thanks for editing. I'm removing the downvote. I'm not going to upvote because I don't think this directly addresses the question about what happens when cancerous cells enter the body of a healthy person.
– De Novo
24 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Most cancers cannot be transmitted. But some can. We call them (clonally) transmissible cancers.
Transmissible cancers
The most famous case of transmissible cancers exist is the Devil facial tumour disease in Tazmanian devils. Other cases exist in Syrian hamsters, dogs (CTVT), and some bivalves. No such transmissible cancer exist in humans.
Transmission of viruses inducing cancers
There are cases of cancer caused by viruses. Those viruses are transmissible and hence it looks like the cancer itself is transmissible. In humans, this is for example the case of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus.
Transmission via transplant
Finally, there are cases of cancer that can be transmitted to a new person via a tissue transplant. In humans, Kaposi's sarcoma is (again) an example.
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
Most cancers cannot be transmitted. But some can. We call them (clonally) transmissible cancers.
Transmissible cancers
The most famous case of transmissible cancers exist is the Devil facial tumour disease in Tazmanian devils. Other cases exist in Syrian hamsters, dogs (CTVT), and some bivalves. No such transmissible cancer exist in humans.
Transmission of viruses inducing cancers
There are cases of cancer caused by viruses. Those viruses are transmissible and hence it looks like the cancer itself is transmissible. In humans, this is for example the case of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus.
Transmission via transplant
Finally, there are cases of cancer that can be transmitted to a new person via a tissue transplant. In humans, Kaposi's sarcoma is (again) an example.
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
edited 20 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
answered 1 hour ago
Remi.b
56k6102184
56k6102184
Kaposi's sarcoma is not a transmissible cancer. It has a transmissible risk factor, HHV-8, but this is definitely not an example of cancer cells from one person causing cancer in another person. The cancer cells are not the transmissible agent (unlike the transmissible cancers in nonhuman animals). The special cases of Kaposi sarcoma transmission after transplant definitely don't involve healthy recipients. These patients are immunosuppressed, and the cells are, well, transplanted.
– De Novo
53 mins ago
@DeNovo You're right. I actually made reference to transmission of Kaposi's sarcoma indirectly via the transmission of a herpesvirus. I clarified that. Thanks. I added the idea of transmission via transplant. If I am not mistaken Kaposi's sarcoma is known to be "transmissible" via both transplant and virus transmission. Please correct me if I am wrong.
– Remi.b
30 mins ago
Thanks for editing. I'm removing the downvote. I'm not going to upvote because I don't think this directly addresses the question about what happens when cancerous cells enter the body of a healthy person.
– De Novo
24 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Kaposi's sarcoma is not a transmissible cancer. It has a transmissible risk factor, HHV-8, but this is definitely not an example of cancer cells from one person causing cancer in another person. The cancer cells are not the transmissible agent (unlike the transmissible cancers in nonhuman animals). The special cases of Kaposi sarcoma transmission after transplant definitely don't involve healthy recipients. These patients are immunosuppressed, and the cells are, well, transplanted.
– De Novo
53 mins ago
@DeNovo You're right. I actually made reference to transmission of Kaposi's sarcoma indirectly via the transmission of a herpesvirus. I clarified that. Thanks. I added the idea of transmission via transplant. If I am not mistaken Kaposi's sarcoma is known to be "transmissible" via both transplant and virus transmission. Please correct me if I am wrong.
– Remi.b
30 mins ago
Thanks for editing. I'm removing the downvote. I'm not going to upvote because I don't think this directly addresses the question about what happens when cancerous cells enter the body of a healthy person.
– De Novo
24 mins ago
Kaposi's sarcoma is not a transmissible cancer. It has a transmissible risk factor, HHV-8, but this is definitely not an example of cancer cells from one person causing cancer in another person. The cancer cells are not the transmissible agent (unlike the transmissible cancers in nonhuman animals). The special cases of Kaposi sarcoma transmission after transplant definitely don't involve healthy recipients. These patients are immunosuppressed, and the cells are, well, transplanted.
– De Novo
53 mins ago
Kaposi's sarcoma is not a transmissible cancer. It has a transmissible risk factor, HHV-8, but this is definitely not an example of cancer cells from one person causing cancer in another person. The cancer cells are not the transmissible agent (unlike the transmissible cancers in nonhuman animals). The special cases of Kaposi sarcoma transmission after transplant definitely don't involve healthy recipients. These patients are immunosuppressed, and the cells are, well, transplanted.
– De Novo
53 mins ago
@DeNovo You're right. I actually made reference to transmission of Kaposi's sarcoma indirectly via the transmission of a herpesvirus. I clarified that. Thanks. I added the idea of transmission via transplant. If I am not mistaken Kaposi's sarcoma is known to be "transmissible" via both transplant and virus transmission. Please correct me if I am wrong.
– Remi.b
30 mins ago
@DeNovo You're right. I actually made reference to transmission of Kaposi's sarcoma indirectly via the transmission of a herpesvirus. I clarified that. Thanks. I added the idea of transmission via transplant. If I am not mistaken Kaposi's sarcoma is known to be "transmissible" via both transplant and virus transmission. Please correct me if I am wrong.
– Remi.b
30 mins ago
Thanks for editing. I'm removing the downvote. I'm not going to upvote because I don't think this directly addresses the question about what happens when cancerous cells enter the body of a healthy person.
– De Novo
24 mins ago
Thanks for editing. I'm removing the downvote. I'm not going to upvote because I don't think this directly addresses the question about what happens when cancerous cells enter the body of a healthy person.
– De Novo
24 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbiology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78792%2fcan-a-cancerous-cell-from-outside-cause-cancer-in-a-healthy-person%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Are you only interested in humans? Can you please clarify that in your post (e.g. by adding
in humansorin animals)?– Remi.b
11 mins ago