When is it better to move - before or after a housing bubble bursts?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
19
down vote

favorite
1












My husband and I currently own our home and are looking at upgrading to a bigger house in the next year or two. The housing market right now in our area (US East Coast city) is doing really well, and our home is valued much higher than it was when we purchased it. However, with all of the new expensive developments popping up, I strongly suspect that the housing bubble here is going to burst soon.



On the one hand, if we wait until after the market turns, then buying our new place will be much cheaper than if we moved earlier. On the other hand, waiting would also mean losing value in our current home we would be selling. One of the other reasons we're thinking about this now is that we are on year 5 of our 7-year ARM, so our interest rates will be going up if we don't sell or refinance.



Considering that we would be looking to both sell and buy property around the same time, is it better to do it when the market is up or after it makes a downturn?



I have seen both this question and this question, but they are both specifically about going from renting to owning, while we already own.










share|improve this question



















  • 4




    Is selling now and buying later an option (rent until the market goes down)?
    – yoozer8
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    What's your current mortgage? How much of a down payment will you be able to put on the new house in each scenario? How much more will the new house cost compared to the old? I think there are too many variables involved to provide a blanket "sell now"-vs-"wait" answer.
    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK I don't think yoozer8 means that you're going to rent permenantly. It's more of a "If you can rent for a few years and watch the bubble burst, you can get a house you otherwise might not be able to afford". Especially with many new developments, the worst case would be the market doesn't burst, and you're in the same position you were previously; looking for a bigger house, and a bunch of money to put towards it.
    – Anoplexian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    @BruceWayne We do still have plenty of mortgage. It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.
    – David K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK All "recourse" means is that the bank can come after you for the difference between what you owe (the remaining principal balance of the mortgage) and what they sell the house for in foreclosure. I can't see why just walking away and letting them foreclose is a good strategy in any situation, especially in a "good" market.
    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago

















up vote
19
down vote

favorite
1












My husband and I currently own our home and are looking at upgrading to a bigger house in the next year or two. The housing market right now in our area (US East Coast city) is doing really well, and our home is valued much higher than it was when we purchased it. However, with all of the new expensive developments popping up, I strongly suspect that the housing bubble here is going to burst soon.



On the one hand, if we wait until after the market turns, then buying our new place will be much cheaper than if we moved earlier. On the other hand, waiting would also mean losing value in our current home we would be selling. One of the other reasons we're thinking about this now is that we are on year 5 of our 7-year ARM, so our interest rates will be going up if we don't sell or refinance.



Considering that we would be looking to both sell and buy property around the same time, is it better to do it when the market is up or after it makes a downturn?



I have seen both this question and this question, but they are both specifically about going from renting to owning, while we already own.










share|improve this question



















  • 4




    Is selling now and buying later an option (rent until the market goes down)?
    – yoozer8
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    What's your current mortgage? How much of a down payment will you be able to put on the new house in each scenario? How much more will the new house cost compared to the old? I think there are too many variables involved to provide a blanket "sell now"-vs-"wait" answer.
    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK I don't think yoozer8 means that you're going to rent permenantly. It's more of a "If you can rent for a few years and watch the bubble burst, you can get a house you otherwise might not be able to afford". Especially with many new developments, the worst case would be the market doesn't burst, and you're in the same position you were previously; looking for a bigger house, and a bunch of money to put towards it.
    – Anoplexian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    @BruceWayne We do still have plenty of mortgage. It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.
    – David K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK All "recourse" means is that the bank can come after you for the difference between what you owe (the remaining principal balance of the mortgage) and what they sell the house for in foreclosure. I can't see why just walking away and letting them foreclose is a good strategy in any situation, especially in a "good" market.
    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago













up vote
19
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
19
down vote

favorite
1






1





My husband and I currently own our home and are looking at upgrading to a bigger house in the next year or two. The housing market right now in our area (US East Coast city) is doing really well, and our home is valued much higher than it was when we purchased it. However, with all of the new expensive developments popping up, I strongly suspect that the housing bubble here is going to burst soon.



On the one hand, if we wait until after the market turns, then buying our new place will be much cheaper than if we moved earlier. On the other hand, waiting would also mean losing value in our current home we would be selling. One of the other reasons we're thinking about this now is that we are on year 5 of our 7-year ARM, so our interest rates will be going up if we don't sell or refinance.



Considering that we would be looking to both sell and buy property around the same time, is it better to do it when the market is up or after it makes a downturn?



I have seen both this question and this question, but they are both specifically about going from renting to owning, while we already own.










share|improve this question















My husband and I currently own our home and are looking at upgrading to a bigger house in the next year or two. The housing market right now in our area (US East Coast city) is doing really well, and our home is valued much higher than it was when we purchased it. However, with all of the new expensive developments popping up, I strongly suspect that the housing bubble here is going to burst soon.



On the one hand, if we wait until after the market turns, then buying our new place will be much cheaper than if we moved earlier. On the other hand, waiting would also mean losing value in our current home we would be selling. One of the other reasons we're thinking about this now is that we are on year 5 of our 7-year ARM, so our interest rates will be going up if we don't sell or refinance.



Considering that we would be looking to both sell and buy property around the same time, is it better to do it when the market is up or after it makes a downturn?



I have seen both this question and this question, but they are both specifically about going from renting to owning, while we already own.







real-estate housing bubble






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 20 mins ago









Mark Rogers

1093




1093










asked 7 hours ago









David K

21827




21827







  • 4




    Is selling now and buying later an option (rent until the market goes down)?
    – yoozer8
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    What's your current mortgage? How much of a down payment will you be able to put on the new house in each scenario? How much more will the new house cost compared to the old? I think there are too many variables involved to provide a blanket "sell now"-vs-"wait" answer.
    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK I don't think yoozer8 means that you're going to rent permenantly. It's more of a "If you can rent for a few years and watch the bubble burst, you can get a house you otherwise might not be able to afford". Especially with many new developments, the worst case would be the market doesn't burst, and you're in the same position you were previously; looking for a bigger house, and a bunch of money to put towards it.
    – Anoplexian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    @BruceWayne We do still have plenty of mortgage. It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.
    – David K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK All "recourse" means is that the bank can come after you for the difference between what you owe (the remaining principal balance of the mortgage) and what they sell the house for in foreclosure. I can't see why just walking away and letting them foreclose is a good strategy in any situation, especially in a "good" market.
    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago













  • 4




    Is selling now and buying later an option (rent until the market goes down)?
    – yoozer8
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    What's your current mortgage? How much of a down payment will you be able to put on the new house in each scenario? How much more will the new house cost compared to the old? I think there are too many variables involved to provide a blanket "sell now"-vs-"wait" answer.
    – chepner
    6 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK I don't think yoozer8 means that you're going to rent permenantly. It's more of a "If you can rent for a few years and watch the bubble burst, you can get a house you otherwise might not be able to afford". Especially with many new developments, the worst case would be the market doesn't burst, and you're in the same position you were previously; looking for a bigger house, and a bunch of money to put towards it.
    – Anoplexian
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    @BruceWayne We do still have plenty of mortgage. It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.
    – David K
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @DavidK All "recourse" means is that the bank can come after you for the difference between what you owe (the remaining principal balance of the mortgage) and what they sell the house for in foreclosure. I can't see why just walking away and letting them foreclose is a good strategy in any situation, especially in a "good" market.
    – D Stanley
    1 hour ago








4




4




Is selling now and buying later an option (rent until the market goes down)?
– yoozer8
6 hours ago




Is selling now and buying later an option (rent until the market goes down)?
– yoozer8
6 hours ago




1




1




What's your current mortgage? How much of a down payment will you be able to put on the new house in each scenario? How much more will the new house cost compared to the old? I think there are too many variables involved to provide a blanket "sell now"-vs-"wait" answer.
– chepner
6 hours ago




What's your current mortgage? How much of a down payment will you be able to put on the new house in each scenario? How much more will the new house cost compared to the old? I think there are too many variables involved to provide a blanket "sell now"-vs-"wait" answer.
– chepner
6 hours ago




1




1




@DavidK I don't think yoozer8 means that you're going to rent permenantly. It's more of a "If you can rent for a few years and watch the bubble burst, you can get a house you otherwise might not be able to afford". Especially with many new developments, the worst case would be the market doesn't burst, and you're in the same position you were previously; looking for a bigger house, and a bunch of money to put towards it.
– Anoplexian
3 hours ago




@DavidK I don't think yoozer8 means that you're going to rent permenantly. It's more of a "If you can rent for a few years and watch the bubble burst, you can get a house you otherwise might not be able to afford". Especially with many new developments, the worst case would be the market doesn't burst, and you're in the same position you were previously; looking for a bigger house, and a bunch of money to put towards it.
– Anoplexian
3 hours ago




1




1




@BruceWayne We do still have plenty of mortgage. It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.
– David K
2 hours ago




@BruceWayne We do still have plenty of mortgage. It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.
– David K
2 hours ago




1




1




@DavidK All "recourse" means is that the bank can come after you for the difference between what you owe (the remaining principal balance of the mortgage) and what they sell the house for in foreclosure. I can't see why just walking away and letting them foreclose is a good strategy in any situation, especially in a "good" market.
– D Stanley
1 hour ago





@DavidK All "recourse" means is that the bank can come after you for the difference between what you owe (the remaining principal balance of the mortgage) and what they sell the house for in foreclosure. I can't see why just walking away and letting them foreclose is a good strategy in any situation, especially in a "good" market.
– D Stanley
1 hour ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
35
down vote













If you're moving up in house in the same area, it's better to wait until the alleged bubble bursts, since bubbles affect higher-prices homes more than lower-priced homes. You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out. There is no shame in renting, especially if you don't plan to stay in the house for more than a few years.



If you're downsizing, then it's better to move now for the same reasons.



If you're changing areas, then it all depends on the markets in those areas.



All that said, timing any market (including housing) is very tricky and can often work against you. Unless you think there's an enormous bubble (like a 50% premium) then in the long run it won't make much difference.




It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.




This should be your consideration, not a supposed "bubble". Interest rates are poised to go up over the next few years, so the sooner you can get out of that ARM the better. If you can afford to get a 15-yeard fixed mortgage on a new house in the next few years, that's your best bet. If not, then refinance what you have into a fixed rate mortgage.






share|improve this answer


















  • 11




    Why would it be shameful to rent if you do plan to stay?
    – Taacoo
    5 hours ago






  • 11




    @Taacoo I didn't say it would be. I was responding to the comment "we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own"
    – D Stanley
    5 hours ago







  • 3




    "You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out." and if you do that and property prices and rents shoot up you are screwed. Just because you think there is a bubble doesn't mean that the alleged bubble will burst before you go insolvent.
    – Peter Green
    2 hours ago










  • @PeterGreen I just posed it as an option because of a comment that the OP seemed reluctant to rent.
    – D Stanley
    2 hours ago

















up vote
14
down vote













Tricky choice, but there's a couple of things to consider. You said you plan on upgrading to a more expensive house, so you might save more on the new house post-bubble than you'd lose on your current house. Suppose you want to move from a $1M house to a $1.5M house - you'll need $0.5M. The bubble bursts, and housing prices fall 20% across the board. Now you have an $0.8M house and want to buy a $1.2M house, so you only need $0.4M to make up the difference. That's a big assumption that housing prices fall equally in all areas, but you get the idea.



The other things to consider is how easy it will be to sell your current house. Housing prices fall because the demand isn't there. Even with a lower price, you may have more trouble finding a buyer post-bubble, so consider how important timing is for the sale of your current home.






share|improve this answer
















  • 9




    Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage).
    – CactusCake
    6 hours ago


















up vote
13
down vote













If you sell and buy around the same time, the market situation (hot, cold, before, after, or no crash) is of little relevance - it just affects the size of the numbers on both contracts, and about the same, so it's mostly a wash.



If you want to take advantage of your prediction, you have to split the selling and the buying in time - several months at least - and sell high, wait until after the predicted crash, and then buy low. Obviously, that implies that you rent in between (or live in your car, or with your parents, or whatever). And if the crash doesn't come - because your prediction was wrong - you don't make money on it, but lose the value gain from the period you waited. No risk, no gain.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    +1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains
    – yoozer8
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes.
    – yitzih
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost.
    – Acccumulation
    4 hours ago










  • Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost).
    – xyious
    1 hour ago

















up vote
-1
down vote













For most people, most of the time, the issue is qualifying for the mortgage, not the price differential between the old house and the new house.



The problems is that periods when prices go down are often times when interest rates go up, like now. It tends to be a wash, since you wind up with the same monthly payment.



You have a particular situation which may bias your decision towards "buy now", which is that you have an ARM. Since your mortgage rate is going to adjust in two years, the fact that we are in a period of rising interest rates means that you are going to either have move up or refinance.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • @downvoter, please consider explaining to our new contributor what they did wrong.
    – Rupert Morrish
    30 mins ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101594%2fwhen-is-it-better-to-move-before-or-after-a-housing-bubble-bursts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
35
down vote













If you're moving up in house in the same area, it's better to wait until the alleged bubble bursts, since bubbles affect higher-prices homes more than lower-priced homes. You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out. There is no shame in renting, especially if you don't plan to stay in the house for more than a few years.



If you're downsizing, then it's better to move now for the same reasons.



If you're changing areas, then it all depends on the markets in those areas.



All that said, timing any market (including housing) is very tricky and can often work against you. Unless you think there's an enormous bubble (like a 50% premium) then in the long run it won't make much difference.




It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.




This should be your consideration, not a supposed "bubble". Interest rates are poised to go up over the next few years, so the sooner you can get out of that ARM the better. If you can afford to get a 15-yeard fixed mortgage on a new house in the next few years, that's your best bet. If not, then refinance what you have into a fixed rate mortgage.






share|improve this answer


















  • 11




    Why would it be shameful to rent if you do plan to stay?
    – Taacoo
    5 hours ago






  • 11




    @Taacoo I didn't say it would be. I was responding to the comment "we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own"
    – D Stanley
    5 hours ago







  • 3




    "You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out." and if you do that and property prices and rents shoot up you are screwed. Just because you think there is a bubble doesn't mean that the alleged bubble will burst before you go insolvent.
    – Peter Green
    2 hours ago










  • @PeterGreen I just posed it as an option because of a comment that the OP seemed reluctant to rent.
    – D Stanley
    2 hours ago














up vote
35
down vote













If you're moving up in house in the same area, it's better to wait until the alleged bubble bursts, since bubbles affect higher-prices homes more than lower-priced homes. You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out. There is no shame in renting, especially if you don't plan to stay in the house for more than a few years.



If you're downsizing, then it's better to move now for the same reasons.



If you're changing areas, then it all depends on the markets in those areas.



All that said, timing any market (including housing) is very tricky and can often work against you. Unless you think there's an enormous bubble (like a 50% premium) then in the long run it won't make much difference.




It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.




This should be your consideration, not a supposed "bubble". Interest rates are poised to go up over the next few years, so the sooner you can get out of that ARM the better. If you can afford to get a 15-yeard fixed mortgage on a new house in the next few years, that's your best bet. If not, then refinance what you have into a fixed rate mortgage.






share|improve this answer


















  • 11




    Why would it be shameful to rent if you do plan to stay?
    – Taacoo
    5 hours ago






  • 11




    @Taacoo I didn't say it would be. I was responding to the comment "we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own"
    – D Stanley
    5 hours ago







  • 3




    "You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out." and if you do that and property prices and rents shoot up you are screwed. Just because you think there is a bubble doesn't mean that the alleged bubble will burst before you go insolvent.
    – Peter Green
    2 hours ago










  • @PeterGreen I just posed it as an option because of a comment that the OP seemed reluctant to rent.
    – D Stanley
    2 hours ago












up vote
35
down vote










up vote
35
down vote









If you're moving up in house in the same area, it's better to wait until the alleged bubble bursts, since bubbles affect higher-prices homes more than lower-priced homes. You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out. There is no shame in renting, especially if you don't plan to stay in the house for more than a few years.



If you're downsizing, then it's better to move now for the same reasons.



If you're changing areas, then it all depends on the markets in those areas.



All that said, timing any market (including housing) is very tricky and can often work against you. Unless you think there's an enormous bubble (like a 50% premium) then in the long run it won't make much difference.




It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.




This should be your consideration, not a supposed "bubble". Interest rates are poised to go up over the next few years, so the sooner you can get out of that ARM the better. If you can afford to get a 15-yeard fixed mortgage on a new house in the next few years, that's your best bet. If not, then refinance what you have into a fixed rate mortgage.






share|improve this answer














If you're moving up in house in the same area, it's better to wait until the alleged bubble bursts, since bubbles affect higher-prices homes more than lower-priced homes. You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out. There is no shame in renting, especially if you don't plan to stay in the house for more than a few years.



If you're downsizing, then it's better to move now for the same reasons.



If you're changing areas, then it all depends on the markets in those areas.



All that said, timing any market (including housing) is very tricky and can often work against you. Unless you think there's an enormous bubble (like a 50% premium) then in the long run it won't make much difference.




It's worth noting that we have a 7 year ARM, and we are currently on year 5, which is one of the reasons we're looking at the move now.




This should be your consideration, not a supposed "bubble". Interest rates are poised to go up over the next few years, so the sooner you can get out of that ARM the better. If you can afford to get a 15-yeard fixed mortgage on a new house in the next few years, that's your best bet. If not, then refinance what you have into a fixed rate mortgage.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 6 hours ago









D Stanley

48.6k7147157




48.6k7147157







  • 11




    Why would it be shameful to rent if you do plan to stay?
    – Taacoo
    5 hours ago






  • 11




    @Taacoo I didn't say it would be. I was responding to the comment "we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own"
    – D Stanley
    5 hours ago







  • 3




    "You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out." and if you do that and property prices and rents shoot up you are screwed. Just because you think there is a bubble doesn't mean that the alleged bubble will burst before you go insolvent.
    – Peter Green
    2 hours ago










  • @PeterGreen I just posed it as an option because of a comment that the OP seemed reluctant to rent.
    – D Stanley
    2 hours ago












  • 11




    Why would it be shameful to rent if you do plan to stay?
    – Taacoo
    5 hours ago






  • 11




    @Taacoo I didn't say it would be. I was responding to the comment "we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own"
    – D Stanley
    5 hours ago







  • 3




    "You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out." and if you do that and property prices and rents shoot up you are screwed. Just because you think there is a bubble doesn't mean that the alleged bubble will burst before you go insolvent.
    – Peter Green
    2 hours ago










  • @PeterGreen I just posed it as an option because of a comment that the OP seemed reluctant to rent.
    – D Stanley
    2 hours ago







11




11




Why would it be shameful to rent if you do plan to stay?
– Taacoo
5 hours ago




Why would it be shameful to rent if you do plan to stay?
– Taacoo
5 hours ago




11




11




@Taacoo I didn't say it would be. I was responding to the comment "we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own"
– D Stanley
5 hours ago





@Taacoo I didn't say it would be. I was responding to the comment "we don't plan to go back to renting now that we own"
– D Stanley
5 hours ago





3




3




"You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out." and if you do that and property prices and rents shoot up you are screwed. Just because you think there is a bubble doesn't mean that the alleged bubble will burst before you go insolvent.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago




"You could also sell now and rent until the market bottoms out." and if you do that and property prices and rents shoot up you are screwed. Just because you think there is a bubble doesn't mean that the alleged bubble will burst before you go insolvent.
– Peter Green
2 hours ago












@PeterGreen I just posed it as an option because of a comment that the OP seemed reluctant to rent.
– D Stanley
2 hours ago




@PeterGreen I just posed it as an option because of a comment that the OP seemed reluctant to rent.
– D Stanley
2 hours ago












up vote
14
down vote













Tricky choice, but there's a couple of things to consider. You said you plan on upgrading to a more expensive house, so you might save more on the new house post-bubble than you'd lose on your current house. Suppose you want to move from a $1M house to a $1.5M house - you'll need $0.5M. The bubble bursts, and housing prices fall 20% across the board. Now you have an $0.8M house and want to buy a $1.2M house, so you only need $0.4M to make up the difference. That's a big assumption that housing prices fall equally in all areas, but you get the idea.



The other things to consider is how easy it will be to sell your current house. Housing prices fall because the demand isn't there. Even with a lower price, you may have more trouble finding a buyer post-bubble, so consider how important timing is for the sale of your current home.






share|improve this answer
















  • 9




    Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage).
    – CactusCake
    6 hours ago















up vote
14
down vote













Tricky choice, but there's a couple of things to consider. You said you plan on upgrading to a more expensive house, so you might save more on the new house post-bubble than you'd lose on your current house. Suppose you want to move from a $1M house to a $1.5M house - you'll need $0.5M. The bubble bursts, and housing prices fall 20% across the board. Now you have an $0.8M house and want to buy a $1.2M house, so you only need $0.4M to make up the difference. That's a big assumption that housing prices fall equally in all areas, but you get the idea.



The other things to consider is how easy it will be to sell your current house. Housing prices fall because the demand isn't there. Even with a lower price, you may have more trouble finding a buyer post-bubble, so consider how important timing is for the sale of your current home.






share|improve this answer
















  • 9




    Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage).
    – CactusCake
    6 hours ago













up vote
14
down vote










up vote
14
down vote









Tricky choice, but there's a couple of things to consider. You said you plan on upgrading to a more expensive house, so you might save more on the new house post-bubble than you'd lose on your current house. Suppose you want to move from a $1M house to a $1.5M house - you'll need $0.5M. The bubble bursts, and housing prices fall 20% across the board. Now you have an $0.8M house and want to buy a $1.2M house, so you only need $0.4M to make up the difference. That's a big assumption that housing prices fall equally in all areas, but you get the idea.



The other things to consider is how easy it will be to sell your current house. Housing prices fall because the demand isn't there. Even with a lower price, you may have more trouble finding a buyer post-bubble, so consider how important timing is for the sale of your current home.






share|improve this answer












Tricky choice, but there's a couple of things to consider. You said you plan on upgrading to a more expensive house, so you might save more on the new house post-bubble than you'd lose on your current house. Suppose you want to move from a $1M house to a $1.5M house - you'll need $0.5M. The bubble bursts, and housing prices fall 20% across the board. Now you have an $0.8M house and want to buy a $1.2M house, so you only need $0.4M to make up the difference. That's a big assumption that housing prices fall equally in all areas, but you get the idea.



The other things to consider is how easy it will be to sell your current house. Housing prices fall because the demand isn't there. Even with a lower price, you may have more trouble finding a buyer post-bubble, so consider how important timing is for the sale of your current home.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Nuclear Wang

1,010613




1,010613







  • 9




    Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage).
    – CactusCake
    6 hours ago













  • 9




    Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage).
    – CactusCake
    6 hours ago








9




9




Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage).
– CactusCake
6 hours ago





Another thing to be cautious of are moving interest rates. Borrowing 500k @ 4% APR has roughly the same total repayment amount (over 30 thirty years) as borrowing 400k @ 6% APR. If waiting for the market to drop by 20% also allows enough time for interest rates to climb by 2% then your 100k equity savings would be entirely wiped out by additional interest payments (assuming you need a mortgage).
– CactusCake
6 hours ago











up vote
13
down vote













If you sell and buy around the same time, the market situation (hot, cold, before, after, or no crash) is of little relevance - it just affects the size of the numbers on both contracts, and about the same, so it's mostly a wash.



If you want to take advantage of your prediction, you have to split the selling and the buying in time - several months at least - and sell high, wait until after the predicted crash, and then buy low. Obviously, that implies that you rent in between (or live in your car, or with your parents, or whatever). And if the crash doesn't come - because your prediction was wrong - you don't make money on it, but lose the value gain from the period you waited. No risk, no gain.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    +1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains
    – yoozer8
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes.
    – yitzih
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost.
    – Acccumulation
    4 hours ago










  • Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost).
    – xyious
    1 hour ago














up vote
13
down vote













If you sell and buy around the same time, the market situation (hot, cold, before, after, or no crash) is of little relevance - it just affects the size of the numbers on both contracts, and about the same, so it's mostly a wash.



If you want to take advantage of your prediction, you have to split the selling and the buying in time - several months at least - and sell high, wait until after the predicted crash, and then buy low. Obviously, that implies that you rent in between (or live in your car, or with your parents, or whatever). And if the crash doesn't come - because your prediction was wrong - you don't make money on it, but lose the value gain from the period you waited. No risk, no gain.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    +1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains
    – yoozer8
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes.
    – yitzih
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost.
    – Acccumulation
    4 hours ago










  • Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost).
    – xyious
    1 hour ago












up vote
13
down vote










up vote
13
down vote









If you sell and buy around the same time, the market situation (hot, cold, before, after, or no crash) is of little relevance - it just affects the size of the numbers on both contracts, and about the same, so it's mostly a wash.



If you want to take advantage of your prediction, you have to split the selling and the buying in time - several months at least - and sell high, wait until after the predicted crash, and then buy low. Obviously, that implies that you rent in between (or live in your car, or with your parents, or whatever). And if the crash doesn't come - because your prediction was wrong - you don't make money on it, but lose the value gain from the period you waited. No risk, no gain.






share|improve this answer














If you sell and buy around the same time, the market situation (hot, cold, before, after, or no crash) is of little relevance - it just affects the size of the numbers on both contracts, and about the same, so it's mostly a wash.



If you want to take advantage of your prediction, you have to split the selling and the buying in time - several months at least - and sell high, wait until after the predicted crash, and then buy low. Obviously, that implies that you rent in between (or live in your car, or with your parents, or whatever). And if the crash doesn't come - because your prediction was wrong - you don't make money on it, but lose the value gain from the period you waited. No risk, no gain.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago









yoozer8

1,7663921




1,7663921










answered 6 hours ago









Aganju

19.1k23076




19.1k23076







  • 1




    +1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains
    – yoozer8
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes.
    – yitzih
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost.
    – Acccumulation
    4 hours ago










  • Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost).
    – xyious
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    +1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains
    – yoozer8
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes.
    – yitzih
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost.
    – Acccumulation
    4 hours ago










  • Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost).
    – xyious
    1 hour ago







1




1




+1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains
– yoozer8
4 hours ago




+1 Additionally, even if you're prediction is accurate, the cost of renting in between could wipe out any gains
– yoozer8
4 hours ago




1




1




@yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes.
– yitzih
4 hours ago




@yoozer8 Not necessarily if they're still paying a mortgage and taking into account the cost of upkeep and property taxes.
– yitzih
4 hours ago




1




1




@yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost.
– Acccumulation
4 hours ago




@yoozer8 Rent isn't an additionaly cost.
– Acccumulation
4 hours ago












Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost).
– xyious
1 hour ago




Rent clearly is an additional cost, just of far lesser extent than most people think. If Rent is > (interest + homeowner's insurance + taxes & fees) it's an additional cost. Sometimes it's a wash, most of the time Rent has 10%-20% premium vs the non principal mortgage payment (When I decided to buy in my area rent was actually more expensive than the whole mortgage payment, in which case it's a pretty significant additional cost).
– xyious
1 hour ago










up vote
-1
down vote













For most people, most of the time, the issue is qualifying for the mortgage, not the price differential between the old house and the new house.



The problems is that periods when prices go down are often times when interest rates go up, like now. It tends to be a wash, since you wind up with the same monthly payment.



You have a particular situation which may bias your decision towards "buy now", which is that you have an ARM. Since your mortgage rate is going to adjust in two years, the fact that we are in a period of rising interest rates means that you are going to either have move up or refinance.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • @downvoter, please consider explaining to our new contributor what they did wrong.
    – Rupert Morrish
    30 mins ago














up vote
-1
down vote













For most people, most of the time, the issue is qualifying for the mortgage, not the price differential between the old house and the new house.



The problems is that periods when prices go down are often times when interest rates go up, like now. It tends to be a wash, since you wind up with the same monthly payment.



You have a particular situation which may bias your decision towards "buy now", which is that you have an ARM. Since your mortgage rate is going to adjust in two years, the fact that we are in a period of rising interest rates means that you are going to either have move up or refinance.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • @downvoter, please consider explaining to our new contributor what they did wrong.
    – Rupert Morrish
    30 mins ago












up vote
-1
down vote










up vote
-1
down vote









For most people, most of the time, the issue is qualifying for the mortgage, not the price differential between the old house and the new house.



The problems is that periods when prices go down are often times when interest rates go up, like now. It tends to be a wash, since you wind up with the same monthly payment.



You have a particular situation which may bias your decision towards "buy now", which is that you have an ARM. Since your mortgage rate is going to adjust in two years, the fact that we are in a period of rising interest rates means that you are going to either have move up or refinance.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









For most people, most of the time, the issue is qualifying for the mortgage, not the price differential between the old house and the new house.



The problems is that periods when prices go down are often times when interest rates go up, like now. It tends to be a wash, since you wind up with the same monthly payment.



You have a particular situation which may bias your decision towards "buy now", which is that you have an ARM. Since your mortgage rate is going to adjust in two years, the fact that we are in a period of rising interest rates means that you are going to either have move up or refinance.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 29 mins ago









Rupert Morrish

3,3852728




3,3852728






New contributor




Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 46 mins ago









Seattle Part-Time Broker

1




1




New contributor




Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Seattle Part-Time Broker is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • @downvoter, please consider explaining to our new contributor what they did wrong.
    – Rupert Morrish
    30 mins ago
















  • @downvoter, please consider explaining to our new contributor what they did wrong.
    – Rupert Morrish
    30 mins ago















@downvoter, please consider explaining to our new contributor what they did wrong.
– Rupert Morrish
30 mins ago




@downvoter, please consider explaining to our new contributor what they did wrong.
– Rupert Morrish
30 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f101594%2fwhen-is-it-better-to-move-before-or-after-a-housing-bubble-bursts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery