How was this interior room photo lit? Window…Strobes…Both?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I would like to understand how this scene is lit:



enter image description here



I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?



It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
    – scottbb
    2 hours ago











  • @scottbb Will do when I get home :)
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    1 hour ago














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I would like to understand how this scene is lit:



enter image description here



I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?



It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
    – scottbb
    2 hours ago











  • @scottbb Will do when I get home :)
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    1 hour ago












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











I would like to understand how this scene is lit:



enter image description here



I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?



It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I would like to understand how this scene is lit:



enter image description here



I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?



It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!







lighting interior






share|improve this question









New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 16 mins ago









Hueco

9,34032344




9,34032344






New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Martin

211




211




New contributor




Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Martin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
    – scottbb
    2 hours ago











  • @scottbb Will do when I get home :)
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    1 hour ago
















  • Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    @Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
    – scottbb
    2 hours ago











  • @scottbb Will do when I get home :)
    – Alexander von Wernherr
    1 hour ago















Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
– Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago




Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
– Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago




1




1




@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
– scottbb
2 hours ago





@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
– scottbb
2 hours ago













@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
– Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago




@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
– Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













1. Some theory



The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.



This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.



enter image description here



If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.



enter image description here



On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.



You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)



A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones



enter image description here



B. Compose



enter image description here




2. It seems



In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.



enter image description here



It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.



enter image description here




3. In some other cases



On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.



This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.



enter image description here






share|improve this answer






















  • Quadratically. Done.
    – Rafael
    1 hour ago

















up vote
2
down vote













I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.



Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "61"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102473%2fhow-was-this-interior-room-photo-lit-window-strobes-both%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote













    1. Some theory



    The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.



    This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.



    enter image description here



    If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.



    enter image description here



    On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.



    You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)



    A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones



    enter image description here



    B. Compose



    enter image description here




    2. It seems



    In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.



    enter image description here



    It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.



    enter image description here




    3. In some other cases



    On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.



    This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer






















    • Quadratically. Done.
      – Rafael
      1 hour ago














    up vote
    4
    down vote













    1. Some theory



    The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.



    This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.



    enter image description here



    If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.



    enter image description here



    On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.



    You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)



    A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones



    enter image description here



    B. Compose



    enter image description here




    2. It seems



    In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.



    enter image description here



    It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.



    enter image description here




    3. In some other cases



    On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.



    This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer






















    • Quadratically. Done.
      – Rafael
      1 hour ago












    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    1. Some theory



    The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.



    This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.



    enter image description here



    If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.



    enter image description here



    On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.



    You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)



    A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones



    enter image description here



    B. Compose



    enter image description here




    2. It seems



    In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.



    enter image description here



    It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.



    enter image description here




    3. In some other cases



    On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.



    This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer














    1. Some theory



    The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.



    This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.



    enter image description here



    If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.



    enter image description here



    On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.



    You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)



    A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones



    enter image description here



    B. Compose



    enter image description here




    2. It seems



    In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.



    enter image description here



    It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.



    enter image description here




    3. In some other cases



    On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.



    This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.



    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 39 mins ago

























    answered 2 hours ago









    Rafael

    12.6k11838




    12.6k11838











    • Quadratically. Done.
      – Rafael
      1 hour ago
















    • Quadratically. Done.
      – Rafael
      1 hour ago















    Quadratically. Done.
    – Rafael
    1 hour ago




    Quadratically. Done.
    – Rafael
    1 hour ago












    up vote
    2
    down vote













    I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.



    Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.



      Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.



        Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.






        share|improve this answer














        I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.



        Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 2 hours ago









        Stan

        3,528820




        3,528820




















            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102473%2fhow-was-this-interior-room-photo-lit-window-strobes-both%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Confectionery