How was this interior room photo lit? Windowâ¦Strobesâ¦Both?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I would like to understand how this scene is lit:
I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?
It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!
lighting interior
New contributor
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I would like to understand how this scene is lit:
I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?
It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!
lighting interior
New contributor
Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
â Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago
1
@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
â scottbb
2 hours ago
@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
â Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I would like to understand how this scene is lit:
I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?
It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!
lighting interior
New contributor
I would like to understand how this scene is lit:
I can see that sunlight is coming from two big windows on the right. But is there some kind of studio equipment, like a soft box or something similar on the left side?
It is a nice light on the couch and dark corners of the room. I would really like to be able to get the same studio-like feel within my interior shots!
lighting interior
lighting interior
New contributor
New contributor
edited 16 mins ago
Hueco
9,34032344
9,34032344
New contributor
asked 2 hours ago
Martin
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
â Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago
1
@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
â scottbb
2 hours ago
@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
â Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
â Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago
1
@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
â scottbb
2 hours ago
@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
â Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago
Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
â Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago
Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
â Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago
1
1
@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
â scottbb
2 hours ago
@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
â scottbb
2 hours ago
@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
â Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago
@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
â Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
1. Some theory
The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.
This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.
If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.
On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.
You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)
A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones
B. Compose
2. It seems
In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.
It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.
3. In some other cases
On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.
This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.
Quadratically. Done.
â Rafael
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.
Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
1. Some theory
The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.
This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.
If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.
On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.
You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)
A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones
B. Compose
2. It seems
In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.
It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.
3. In some other cases
On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.
This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.
Quadratically. Done.
â Rafael
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
1. Some theory
The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.
This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.
If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.
On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.
You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)
A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones
B. Compose
2. It seems
In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.
It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.
3. In some other cases
On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.
This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.
Quadratically. Done.
â Rafael
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
1. Some theory
The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.
This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.
If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.
On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.
You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)
A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones
B. Compose
2. It seems
In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.
It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.
3. In some other cases
On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.
This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.
1. Some theory
The first thing you need to understand is the inverse square law.
This is that the light intensity decreases quadratically when you are further apart from the light source.
If you put a softbox to the right side of the coach the light will decrease and the far side of the room will be darker.
On a big diffuse light, this is a bit more complex to calculate that on a spotlight, but it is also true.
You then, need to work on a large studio and put some lights further away, or you can put a softbox, take multiple shots, and compose them in post, (doing the opposite did to simulate the darkening)
A. Shoot with a correct exposure of the different zones
B. Compose
2. It seems
In the case of this image, I think it is actually natural light, see the reflection on the glass.
It has probably a good space in front of the window. If you have a building or a wall, this is actually the source light and the square law starts from that point.
3. In some other cases
On a normal studio shoot of an interior, you set up multiple light sources building the interior, you normally do not rely on just one source.
This is not the case on this image. But if you can not take several shots, for example, if you have a moving subject, some people, for example, you can put additional lights. In this case, the lights are bounced into the walls and ceiling.
edited 39 mins ago
answered 2 hours ago
Rafael
12.6k11838
12.6k11838
Quadratically. Done.
â Rafael
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
Quadratically. Done.
â Rafael
1 hour ago
Quadratically. Done.
â Rafael
1 hour ago
Quadratically. Done.
â Rafael
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.
Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.
Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.
Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.
I see no evidence of the use of a soft box in this shot. It is a bright room with a white reflecting painted wall/doorway opposite the large translucent light source/window and the photo is properly exposed. Welcome to photo.stack exchange. Tip: The reflections on the glass domes are a good indicator of the light source.
Edit: There is one window (source). It might appear as if there are two sources due to a sheer curtain half-covering the tall window. This creates a two-tone source where one half of the window has a half-to-three-quarter stop less light than the uncovered half of the window.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Stan
3,528820
3,528820
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Martin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102473%2fhow-was-this-interior-room-photo-lit-window-strobes-both%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Plantleafs on the right side are in the shade. Seems to me, there was no secondary light.
â Alexander von Wernherr
2 hours ago
1
@Stan, Alexander, Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short. Opinions on how this scene was lit directly answer the question, so why not make those actual answers? Thanks. =)
â scottbb
2 hours ago
@scottbb Will do when I get home :)
â Alexander von Wernherr
1 hour ago