Make commas not italicized inside a macro using textit

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to set up a shortcut for writing semantic types. These are usually written inside $langle$ and $rangle$ delimiters, with italicized letters standing for each type and commas separating these. They should look something like this:



enter image description here



I've come up with a macro like the following:



newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%



However, this of course results in the commas being italicized, too, which is not usually done in this context:



enter image description here



Is there a way to exclude commas from being italicized when using this command?



MWE:



documentclassarticle

newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%


usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackagetimes

begindocument
 typee, t % Don't want comma italicized
 $langle e, trangle$ % Don't want math typeface for letters
 $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$ % Desired result, but cumbersome
enddocument


Edit:



To clarify, the reason I don't want to just do $langle#1#rangle$ is because I want the semantic types to be set in the same typeface as the main text, not the math mode typeface. I've updated the MWE to reflect this, and here's the comparison:



enter image description here






italic







share|improve this question



















  • 1




    it seems logically wrong to use the text face here, for textit will pick up tje current text style eg bold, you seem to be just useing the deprecated times package so using times roman text with computer modern math, if you used compatible math and text types it may look better to use the math font here.
    – David Carlisle
    36 mins ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to set up a shortcut for writing semantic types. These are usually written inside $langle$ and $rangle$ delimiters, with italicized letters standing for each type and commas separating these. They should look something like this:



enter image description here



I've come up with a macro like the following:



newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%



However, this of course results in the commas being italicized, too, which is not usually done in this context:



enter image description here



Is there a way to exclude commas from being italicized when using this command?



MWE:



documentclassarticle

newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%


usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackagetimes

begindocument
 typee, t % Don't want comma italicized
 $langle e, trangle$ % Don't want math typeface for letters
 $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$ % Desired result, but cumbersome
enddocument


Edit:



To clarify, the reason I don't want to just do $langle#1#rangle$ is because I want the semantic types to be set in the same typeface as the main text, not the math mode typeface. I've updated the MWE to reflect this, and here's the comparison:



enter image description here






italic







share|improve this question



















  • 1




    it seems logically wrong to use the text face here, for textit will pick up tje current text style eg bold, you seem to be just useing the deprecated times package so using times roman text with computer modern math, if you used compatible math and text types it may look better to use the math font here.
    – David Carlisle
    36 mins ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to set up a shortcut for writing semantic types. These are usually written inside $langle$ and $rangle$ delimiters, with italicized letters standing for each type and commas separating these. They should look something like this:



enter image description here



I've come up with a macro like the following:



newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%



However, this of course results in the commas being italicized, too, which is not usually done in this context:



enter image description here



Is there a way to exclude commas from being italicized when using this command?



MWE:



documentclassarticle

newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%


usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackagetimes

begindocument
 typee, t % Don't want comma italicized
 $langle e, trangle$ % Don't want math typeface for letters
 $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$ % Desired result, but cumbersome
enddocument


Edit:



To clarify, the reason I don't want to just do $langle#1#rangle$ is because I want the semantic types to be set in the same typeface as the main text, not the math mode typeface. I've updated the MWE to reflect this, and here's the comparison:



enter image description here






italic







share|improve this question















I'm trying to set up a shortcut for writing semantic types. These are usually written inside $langle$ and $rangle$ delimiters, with italicized letters standing for each type and commas separating these. They should look something like this:



enter image description here



I've come up with a macro like the following:



newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%



However, this of course results in the commas being italicized, too, which is not usually done in this context:



enter image description here



Is there a way to exclude commas from being italicized when using this command?



MWE:



documentclassarticle

newcommandtype[1]%
 $langle$textit#1$rangle$%


usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackagetimes

begindocument
 typee, t % Don't want comma italicized
 $langle e, trangle$ % Don't want math typeface for letters
 $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$ % Desired result, but cumbersome
enddocument


Edit:



To clarify, the reason I don't want to just do $langle#1#rangle$ is because I want the semantic types to be set in the same typeface as the main text, not the math mode typeface. I've updated the MWE to reflect this, and here's the comparison:



enter image description here






italic




italic






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 45 mins ago

























asked 1 hour ago









Jigsaw

1136




1136







  • 1




    it seems logically wrong to use the text face here, for textit will pick up tje current text style eg bold, you seem to be just useing the deprecated times package so using times roman text with computer modern math, if you used compatible math and text types it may look better to use the math font here.
    – David Carlisle
    36 mins ago












  • 1




    it seems logically wrong to use the text face here, for textit will pick up tje current text style eg bold, you seem to be just useing the deprecated times package so using times roman text with computer modern math, if you used compatible math and text types it may look better to use the math font here.
    – David Carlisle
    36 mins ago







1




1




it seems logically wrong to use the text face here, for textit will pick up tje current text style eg bold, you seem to be just useing the deprecated times package so using times roman text with computer modern math, if you used compatible math and text types it may look better to use the math font here.
– David Carlisle
36 mins ago




it seems logically wrong to use the text face here, for textit will pick up tje current text style eg bold, you seem to be just useing the deprecated times package so using times roman text with computer modern math, if you used compatible math and text types it may look better to use the math font here.
– David Carlisle
36 mins ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










You want the semantic types to be math variables. Note mathptmx below, not the long deprecated times package.



documentclassarticle
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackagemathptmx

newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

begindocument

typee, t

$langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

enddocument


enter image description here



As you see, the only difference is in the (excessive) spacing in the complicated version.



An even better version, because newtx provides for much richer Times-like fonts for math:



documentclassarticle
usepackage[T1]fontenc
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

begindocument

typee, t

$langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

enddocument


enter image description here



For XeLaTeX and text font set to TeX Gyre Pagella, use newpxmath; a small fix is needed, though.



documentclassarticle
usepackage[no-math]fontspec
usepackagenewpxmath
usepackageamsmath

setmainfontTeX Gyre Pagella

DeclareSymbolFontoperatorsOT1zpltlfmn
SetSymbolFontoperatorsboldOT1zpltlfbn

newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

begindocument

typee, t

enddocument





share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    How about using:



    documentclassarticle

    deftype<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$

    begindocument
     type<e, t>
    enddocument


    to produce:



    enter image description here



    You could also drop the type and just use



    def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$


    and then have <e,t> in your document.



    EDIT



    To allow for nesting you should explicitly typeset the comma in textrm:



    documentclassarticle

    def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1textrm, textit#2$rangle$

    begindocument
     <e, t>

     <<e,t>,<e,t>>
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456047%2fmake-commas-not-italicized-inside-a-macro-using-textit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest

















      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      You want the semantic types to be math variables. Note mathptmx below, not the long deprecated times package.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[T1]fontenc
      usepackagemathptmx

      newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

      begindocument

      typee, t

      $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

      enddocument


      enter image description here



      As you see, the only difference is in the (excessive) spacing in the complicated version.



      An even better version, because newtx provides for much richer Times-like fonts for math:



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[T1]fontenc
      usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

      newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

      begindocument

      typee, t

      $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

      enddocument


      enter image description here



      For XeLaTeX and text font set to TeX Gyre Pagella, use newpxmath; a small fix is needed, though.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[no-math]fontspec
      usepackagenewpxmath
      usepackageamsmath

      setmainfontTeX Gyre Pagella

      DeclareSymbolFontoperatorsOT1zpltlfmn
      SetSymbolFontoperatorsboldOT1zpltlfbn

      newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

      begindocument

      typee, t

      enddocument





      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        You want the semantic types to be math variables. Note mathptmx below, not the long deprecated times package.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[T1]fontenc
        usepackagemathptmx

        newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

        begindocument

        typee, t

        $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        As you see, the only difference is in the (excessive) spacing in the complicated version.



        An even better version, because newtx provides for much richer Times-like fonts for math:



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[T1]fontenc
        usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

        newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

        begindocument

        typee, t

        $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        For XeLaTeX and text font set to TeX Gyre Pagella, use newpxmath; a small fix is needed, though.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackage[no-math]fontspec
        usepackagenewpxmath
        usepackageamsmath

        setmainfontTeX Gyre Pagella

        DeclareSymbolFontoperatorsOT1zpltlfmn
        SetSymbolFontoperatorsboldOT1zpltlfbn

        newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

        begindocument

        typee, t

        enddocument





        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          You want the semantic types to be math variables. Note mathptmx below, not the long deprecated times package.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[T1]fontenc
          usepackagemathptmx

          newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

          begindocument

          typee, t

          $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          As you see, the only difference is in the (excessive) spacing in the complicated version.



          An even better version, because newtx provides for much richer Times-like fonts for math:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[T1]fontenc
          usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

          newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

          begindocument

          typee, t

          $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          For XeLaTeX and text font set to TeX Gyre Pagella, use newpxmath; a small fix is needed, though.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[no-math]fontspec
          usepackagenewpxmath
          usepackageamsmath

          setmainfontTeX Gyre Pagella

          DeclareSymbolFontoperatorsOT1zpltlfmn
          SetSymbolFontoperatorsboldOT1zpltlfbn

          newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

          begindocument

          typee, t

          enddocument





          share|improve this answer














          You want the semantic types to be math variables. Note mathptmx below, not the long deprecated times package.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[T1]fontenc
          usepackagemathptmx

          newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

          begindocument

          typee, t

          $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          As you see, the only difference is in the (excessive) spacing in the complicated version.



          An even better version, because newtx provides for much richer Times-like fonts for math:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[T1]fontenc
          usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath

          newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

          begindocument

          typee, t

          $langle$textite, textitt$rangle$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          For XeLaTeX and text font set to TeX Gyre Pagella, use newpxmath; a small fix is needed, though.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[no-math]fontspec
          usepackagenewpxmath
          usepackageamsmath

          setmainfontTeX Gyre Pagella

          DeclareSymbolFontoperatorsOT1zpltlfmn
          SetSymbolFontoperatorsboldOT1zpltlfbn

          newcommandtype[1]ensuremathlangle#1rangle

          begindocument

          typee, t

          enddocument






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 15 mins ago

























          answered 29 mins ago









          egreg

          690k8518383086




          690k8518383086




















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              How about using:



              documentclassarticle

              deftype<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$

              begindocument
               type<e, t>
              enddocument


              to produce:



              enter image description here



              You could also drop the type and just use



              def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$


              and then have <e,t> in your document.



              EDIT



              To allow for nesting you should explicitly typeset the comma in textrm:



              documentclassarticle

              def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1textrm, textit#2$rangle$

              begindocument
               <e, t>

               <<e,t>,<e,t>>
              enddocument





              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                How about using:



                documentclassarticle

                deftype<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$

                begindocument
                 type<e, t>
                enddocument


                to produce:



                enter image description here



                You could also drop the type and just use



                def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$


                and then have <e,t> in your document.



                EDIT



                To allow for nesting you should explicitly typeset the comma in textrm:



                documentclassarticle

                def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1textrm, textit#2$rangle$

                begindocument
                 <e, t>

                 <<e,t>,<e,t>>
                enddocument





                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  How about using:



                  documentclassarticle

                  deftype<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$

                  begindocument
                   type<e, t>
                  enddocument


                  to produce:



                  enter image description here



                  You could also drop the type and just use



                  def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$


                  and then have <e,t> in your document.



                  EDIT



                  To allow for nesting you should explicitly typeset the comma in textrm:



                  documentclassarticle

                  def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1textrm, textit#2$rangle$

                  begindocument
                   <e, t>

                   <<e,t>,<e,t>>
                  enddocument





                  share|improve this answer














                  How about using:



                  documentclassarticle

                  deftype<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$

                  begindocument
                   type<e, t>
                  enddocument


                  to produce:



                  enter image description here



                  You could also drop the type and just use



                  def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1, textit#2$rangle$


                  and then have <e,t> in your document.



                  EDIT



                  To allow for nesting you should explicitly typeset the comma in textrm:



                  documentclassarticle

                  def<#1,#2>$langle$textit#1textrm, textit#2$rangle$

                  begindocument
                   <e, t>

                   <<e,t>,<e,t>>
                  enddocument






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 29 mins ago

























                  answered 46 mins ago









                  Andrew

                  28.1k34075




                  28.1k34075



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456047%2fmake-commas-not-italicized-inside-a-macro-using-textit%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest
































































                      Comments

                      Post a Comment

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Image
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
                      Read more

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      Image
                      Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address only
                      Read more

                      One-line joke

                      A one-liner is a joke that is delivered in a single line. A good one-liner is said to be pithy - concise and meaningful. [1] Comedians and actors use this comedic method as part of their act, e.g. Jimmy Carr, Tommy Cooper, Rodney Dangerfield, Norm Macdonald, Ken Dodd, Stewart Francis, Zach Galifianakis, Mitch Hedberg, Anthony Jeselnik, Milton Jones, Shappi Khorsandi, Jay London, Mark Linn-Baker, Demetri Martin, Groucho Marx, Dan Mintz, Emo Philips, Tim Vine, Steven Wright and Henny Youngman and Arnold Schwarzenegger. [ citation needed ] Many fictional characters are also known to deliver one-liners, including James Bond, who usually includes pithy and laconic quips after disposing of a villain. [ citation needed ] Examples "A baby seal walks into a club." "A dyslexic man walks into a bra." (Anonymous) "There are three types of people, those who can count and those who can't." "Venison's dear, isn't it?" (Jimmy Carr) "An escala
                      Read more