Why do some Califate money feature crosses?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Why do some Muslim money feature crosses?
Like the following ones:
Was cross an early Muslim symbol?
christianity islam money numismatics national-symbols
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Why do some Muslim money feature crosses?
Like the following ones:
Was cross an early Muslim symbol?
christianity islam money numismatics national-symbols
What makes you think that's "muslim money"? Do you know where and when it's from, specifically?
â Spencer
1 hour ago
@Spencer. The inscriptions are in Arabic.
â fdb
1 hour ago
1
@fdb Then, the inscriptions and their translations should be edited into the question.
â Spencer
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Why do some Muslim money feature crosses?
Like the following ones:
Was cross an early Muslim symbol?
christianity islam money numismatics national-symbols
Why do some Muslim money feature crosses?
Like the following ones:
Was cross an early Muslim symbol?
christianity islam money numismatics national-symbols
christianity islam money numismatics national-symbols
asked 2 hours ago
Anixx
22.6k762151
22.6k762151
What makes you think that's "muslim money"? Do you know where and when it's from, specifically?
â Spencer
1 hour ago
@Spencer. The inscriptions are in Arabic.
â fdb
1 hour ago
1
@fdb Then, the inscriptions and their translations should be edited into the question.
â Spencer
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
What makes you think that's "muslim money"? Do you know where and when it's from, specifically?
â Spencer
1 hour ago
@Spencer. The inscriptions are in Arabic.
â fdb
1 hour ago
1
@fdb Then, the inscriptions and their translations should be edited into the question.
â Spencer
1 hour ago
What makes you think that's "muslim money"? Do you know where and when it's from, specifically?
â Spencer
1 hour ago
What makes you think that's "muslim money"? Do you know where and when it's from, specifically?
â Spencer
1 hour ago
@Spencer. The inscriptions are in Arabic.
â fdb
1 hour ago
@Spencer. The inscriptions are in Arabic.
â fdb
1 hour ago
1
1
@fdb Then, the inscriptions and their translations should be edited into the question.
â Spencer
1 hour ago
@fdb Then, the inscriptions and their translations should be edited into the question.
â Spencer
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
It is because the Umayyads either copied Byzantine coins, or reused Byzantine dies, changing the text.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
The top picture is quite obviously a coin with a crude depiction of a seventh century "byzantine" emperor holding a globe with a cross on top. The early Muslim coins issued in former Roman territories were obviously based on Roman coins which the subject people were more familiar with, or else made with reused and modified Roman coin dies.
In 636 the Arabs defeated the Byzantine army at the Battle of the Yarmuk. Jerusalem surrendered to the Caliph Umar the next year. As the circulating coinage in Arab-ruled Syria and Palestine wore out, there was an urgent need for fresh supplies of money.
Local authorities began striking copies of the Byzantine copper follis. The prosperous Jordan valley town of Scythopolis (Beit SheâÂÂan, Israel) issued a heavy follis copying the coins of long-dead Justin II (reigned 565-574). Most other towns issued light coppers of four to six grams, closely following the types of the current emperor in Constantinople (Heraclius until 641, then Constans II until 668). As the weight standard of Byzantine coppers declined, Arab imitations kept pace, but the workmanship and quality of the imitations is often better.
https://coinweek.com/ancient-coins/coinage-first-caliphate/1
In fact, I dimly remember an account of some dispute about coins between Emperor Justinian II (first reign 685-695) and the Caliph that was used to explain why the Caliph started issuing coins with a new, more Muslim design, but I don't know if that story is true.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
It is because the Umayyads either copied Byzantine coins, or reused Byzantine dies, changing the text.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
It is because the Umayyads either copied Byzantine coins, or reused Byzantine dies, changing the text.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
It is because the Umayyads either copied Byzantine coins, or reused Byzantine dies, changing the text.
It is because the Umayyads either copied Byzantine coins, or reused Byzantine dies, changing the text.
answered 1 hour ago
fdb
6,55211329
6,55211329
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
The top picture is quite obviously a coin with a crude depiction of a seventh century "byzantine" emperor holding a globe with a cross on top. The early Muslim coins issued in former Roman territories were obviously based on Roman coins which the subject people were more familiar with, or else made with reused and modified Roman coin dies.
In 636 the Arabs defeated the Byzantine army at the Battle of the Yarmuk. Jerusalem surrendered to the Caliph Umar the next year. As the circulating coinage in Arab-ruled Syria and Palestine wore out, there was an urgent need for fresh supplies of money.
Local authorities began striking copies of the Byzantine copper follis. The prosperous Jordan valley town of Scythopolis (Beit SheâÂÂan, Israel) issued a heavy follis copying the coins of long-dead Justin II (reigned 565-574). Most other towns issued light coppers of four to six grams, closely following the types of the current emperor in Constantinople (Heraclius until 641, then Constans II until 668). As the weight standard of Byzantine coppers declined, Arab imitations kept pace, but the workmanship and quality of the imitations is often better.
https://coinweek.com/ancient-coins/coinage-first-caliphate/1
In fact, I dimly remember an account of some dispute about coins between Emperor Justinian II (first reign 685-695) and the Caliph that was used to explain why the Caliph started issuing coins with a new, more Muslim design, but I don't know if that story is true.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
The top picture is quite obviously a coin with a crude depiction of a seventh century "byzantine" emperor holding a globe with a cross on top. The early Muslim coins issued in former Roman territories were obviously based on Roman coins which the subject people were more familiar with, or else made with reused and modified Roman coin dies.
In 636 the Arabs defeated the Byzantine army at the Battle of the Yarmuk. Jerusalem surrendered to the Caliph Umar the next year. As the circulating coinage in Arab-ruled Syria and Palestine wore out, there was an urgent need for fresh supplies of money.
Local authorities began striking copies of the Byzantine copper follis. The prosperous Jordan valley town of Scythopolis (Beit SheâÂÂan, Israel) issued a heavy follis copying the coins of long-dead Justin II (reigned 565-574). Most other towns issued light coppers of four to six grams, closely following the types of the current emperor in Constantinople (Heraclius until 641, then Constans II until 668). As the weight standard of Byzantine coppers declined, Arab imitations kept pace, but the workmanship and quality of the imitations is often better.
https://coinweek.com/ancient-coins/coinage-first-caliphate/1
In fact, I dimly remember an account of some dispute about coins between Emperor Justinian II (first reign 685-695) and the Caliph that was used to explain why the Caliph started issuing coins with a new, more Muslim design, but I don't know if that story is true.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The top picture is quite obviously a coin with a crude depiction of a seventh century "byzantine" emperor holding a globe with a cross on top. The early Muslim coins issued in former Roman territories were obviously based on Roman coins which the subject people were more familiar with, or else made with reused and modified Roman coin dies.
In 636 the Arabs defeated the Byzantine army at the Battle of the Yarmuk. Jerusalem surrendered to the Caliph Umar the next year. As the circulating coinage in Arab-ruled Syria and Palestine wore out, there was an urgent need for fresh supplies of money.
Local authorities began striking copies of the Byzantine copper follis. The prosperous Jordan valley town of Scythopolis (Beit SheâÂÂan, Israel) issued a heavy follis copying the coins of long-dead Justin II (reigned 565-574). Most other towns issued light coppers of four to six grams, closely following the types of the current emperor in Constantinople (Heraclius until 641, then Constans II until 668). As the weight standard of Byzantine coppers declined, Arab imitations kept pace, but the workmanship and quality of the imitations is often better.
https://coinweek.com/ancient-coins/coinage-first-caliphate/1
In fact, I dimly remember an account of some dispute about coins between Emperor Justinian II (first reign 685-695) and the Caliph that was used to explain why the Caliph started issuing coins with a new, more Muslim design, but I don't know if that story is true.
The top picture is quite obviously a coin with a crude depiction of a seventh century "byzantine" emperor holding a globe with a cross on top. The early Muslim coins issued in former Roman territories were obviously based on Roman coins which the subject people were more familiar with, or else made with reused and modified Roman coin dies.
In 636 the Arabs defeated the Byzantine army at the Battle of the Yarmuk. Jerusalem surrendered to the Caliph Umar the next year. As the circulating coinage in Arab-ruled Syria and Palestine wore out, there was an urgent need for fresh supplies of money.
Local authorities began striking copies of the Byzantine copper follis. The prosperous Jordan valley town of Scythopolis (Beit SheâÂÂan, Israel) issued a heavy follis copying the coins of long-dead Justin II (reigned 565-574). Most other towns issued light coppers of four to six grams, closely following the types of the current emperor in Constantinople (Heraclius until 641, then Constans II until 668). As the weight standard of Byzantine coppers declined, Arab imitations kept pace, but the workmanship and quality of the imitations is often better.
https://coinweek.com/ancient-coins/coinage-first-caliphate/1
In fact, I dimly remember an account of some dispute about coins between Emperor Justinian II (first reign 685-695) and the Caliph that was used to explain why the Caliph started issuing coins with a new, more Muslim design, but I don't know if that story is true.
answered 45 mins ago
MAGolding
5,587423
5,587423
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48839%2fwhy-do-some-califate-money-feature-crosses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
What makes you think that's "muslim money"? Do you know where and when it's from, specifically?
â Spencer
1 hour ago
@Spencer. The inscriptions are in Arabic.
â fdb
1 hour ago
1
@fdb Then, the inscriptions and their translations should be edited into the question.
â Spencer
1 hour ago