Why is the bottom of image over exposed?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am getting a lighter edge on the bottom of my images.... I have googled and can't seem to find anything that points me in the right direction to the cause. Any ideas?
Info:
Canon 6d
OrLit Speedlite RT-600
Gary Fong Speedlite diffuser



The whiter edge is there regardless of landscape or portrait shot (portrait shot is is on the right side which would be the bottom of the image.) However it is not on every shot!



Landscape Shots - shot one after the other:

ISO 100
85mm 1.2
1/640
speedlite set to high speed sync



image without light edgeImage with light edge



Portrait shot:
ISO 200
85MM 1.2
1/400
speedlite set to high speed sync



Light edge in portrait mode



Is it my speedlite malfunctioning? What would cause this?
I do have on an accordian style hood on the lens. The hood was not extended but was at the edge of the lens...could it be reflecting the light back into the bottom of the image? I'm mystified. I shoot raw and will be able to fix in post....










share|improve this question







New contributor




Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Oh, quick question — do you have the flash pointed forward or straight up?
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am getting a lighter edge on the bottom of my images.... I have googled and can't seem to find anything that points me in the right direction to the cause. Any ideas?
Info:
Canon 6d
OrLit Speedlite RT-600
Gary Fong Speedlite diffuser



The whiter edge is there regardless of landscape or portrait shot (portrait shot is is on the right side which would be the bottom of the image.) However it is not on every shot!



Landscape Shots - shot one after the other:

ISO 100
85mm 1.2
1/640
speedlite set to high speed sync



image without light edgeImage with light edge



Portrait shot:
ISO 200
85MM 1.2
1/400
speedlite set to high speed sync



Light edge in portrait mode



Is it my speedlite malfunctioning? What would cause this?
I do have on an accordian style hood on the lens. The hood was not extended but was at the edge of the lens...could it be reflecting the light back into the bottom of the image? I'm mystified. I shoot raw and will be able to fix in post....










share|improve this question







New contributor




Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Oh, quick question — do you have the flash pointed forward or straight up?
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I am getting a lighter edge on the bottom of my images.... I have googled and can't seem to find anything that points me in the right direction to the cause. Any ideas?
Info:
Canon 6d
OrLit Speedlite RT-600
Gary Fong Speedlite diffuser



The whiter edge is there regardless of landscape or portrait shot (portrait shot is is on the right side which would be the bottom of the image.) However it is not on every shot!



Landscape Shots - shot one after the other:

ISO 100
85mm 1.2
1/640
speedlite set to high speed sync



image without light edgeImage with light edge



Portrait shot:
ISO 200
85MM 1.2
1/400
speedlite set to high speed sync



Light edge in portrait mode



Is it my speedlite malfunctioning? What would cause this?
I do have on an accordian style hood on the lens. The hood was not extended but was at the edge of the lens...could it be reflecting the light back into the bottom of the image? I'm mystified. I shoot raw and will be able to fix in post....










share|improve this question







New contributor




Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am getting a lighter edge on the bottom of my images.... I have googled and can't seem to find anything that points me in the right direction to the cause. Any ideas?
Info:
Canon 6d
OrLit Speedlite RT-600
Gary Fong Speedlite diffuser



The whiter edge is there regardless of landscape or portrait shot (portrait shot is is on the right side which would be the bottom of the image.) However it is not on every shot!



Landscape Shots - shot one after the other:

ISO 100
85mm 1.2
1/640
speedlite set to high speed sync



image without light edgeImage with light edge



Portrait shot:
ISO 200
85MM 1.2
1/400
speedlite set to high speed sync



Light edge in portrait mode



Is it my speedlite malfunctioning? What would cause this?
I do have on an accordian style hood on the lens. The hood was not extended but was at the edge of the lens...could it be reflecting the light back into the bottom of the image? I'm mystified. I shoot raw and will be able to fix in post....







canon hotshoe-flash light 85mm






share|improve this question







New contributor




Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Just4Clicks

112




112




New contributor




Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Just4Clicks is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Oh, quick question — do you have the flash pointed forward or straight up?
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago
















  • Oh, quick question — do you have the flash pointed forward or straight up?
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago















Oh, quick question — do you have the flash pointed forward or straight up?
– mattdm
1 hour ago




Oh, quick question — do you have the flash pointed forward or straight up?
– mattdm
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













My bet is on the same thing you guess — light reflected from the diffuser bouncing around badly.



This is easily tested by making some images with and without the flash on. I'd suggest a neutral target (the infamous brick wall shot), and run through a range of apertures and flash power.



Assuming that's it — or actually, even if it's not — I'd suggest replacing the dome diffuser with an off-camera flash and possibly a a larger-yet-portable softbox. That sounds like it might be inconvenient outdoors, but the thing is, it's exactly because you're shooting outdoors. This style of diffuser does increase the effective flash area a little bit, softening light some, but its main effect is to scatter light in every direction. Indoors, that light then bounces from ceilings and walls, but outdoors (or in a large room), the primary effect is simply to waste light.



You can get that same effect for free and without risk of weird stray light simply by cutting the flash power. So maybe you don't even need to go the off-camera route ... but it's an option that will give you a lot more flexibility.






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks! Yes I will run through some test today. Always something! LOL ;) Thanks again!
    – Just4Clicks
    1 hour ago










  • Added some other unasked advice too :)
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Just4Clicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102246%2fwhy-is-the-bottom-of-image-over-exposed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













My bet is on the same thing you guess — light reflected from the diffuser bouncing around badly.



This is easily tested by making some images with and without the flash on. I'd suggest a neutral target (the infamous brick wall shot), and run through a range of apertures and flash power.



Assuming that's it — or actually, even if it's not — I'd suggest replacing the dome diffuser with an off-camera flash and possibly a a larger-yet-portable softbox. That sounds like it might be inconvenient outdoors, but the thing is, it's exactly because you're shooting outdoors. This style of diffuser does increase the effective flash area a little bit, softening light some, but its main effect is to scatter light in every direction. Indoors, that light then bounces from ceilings and walls, but outdoors (or in a large room), the primary effect is simply to waste light.



You can get that same effect for free and without risk of weird stray light simply by cutting the flash power. So maybe you don't even need to go the off-camera route ... but it's an option that will give you a lot more flexibility.






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks! Yes I will run through some test today. Always something! LOL ;) Thanks again!
    – Just4Clicks
    1 hour ago










  • Added some other unasked advice too :)
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago














up vote
2
down vote













My bet is on the same thing you guess — light reflected from the diffuser bouncing around badly.



This is easily tested by making some images with and without the flash on. I'd suggest a neutral target (the infamous brick wall shot), and run through a range of apertures and flash power.



Assuming that's it — or actually, even if it's not — I'd suggest replacing the dome diffuser with an off-camera flash and possibly a a larger-yet-portable softbox. That sounds like it might be inconvenient outdoors, but the thing is, it's exactly because you're shooting outdoors. This style of diffuser does increase the effective flash area a little bit, softening light some, but its main effect is to scatter light in every direction. Indoors, that light then bounces from ceilings and walls, but outdoors (or in a large room), the primary effect is simply to waste light.



You can get that same effect for free and without risk of weird stray light simply by cutting the flash power. So maybe you don't even need to go the off-camera route ... but it's an option that will give you a lot more flexibility.






share|improve this answer






















  • Thanks! Yes I will run through some test today. Always something! LOL ;) Thanks again!
    – Just4Clicks
    1 hour ago










  • Added some other unasked advice too :)
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









My bet is on the same thing you guess — light reflected from the diffuser bouncing around badly.



This is easily tested by making some images with and without the flash on. I'd suggest a neutral target (the infamous brick wall shot), and run through a range of apertures and flash power.



Assuming that's it — or actually, even if it's not — I'd suggest replacing the dome diffuser with an off-camera flash and possibly a a larger-yet-portable softbox. That sounds like it might be inconvenient outdoors, but the thing is, it's exactly because you're shooting outdoors. This style of diffuser does increase the effective flash area a little bit, softening light some, but its main effect is to scatter light in every direction. Indoors, that light then bounces from ceilings and walls, but outdoors (or in a large room), the primary effect is simply to waste light.



You can get that same effect for free and without risk of weird stray light simply by cutting the flash power. So maybe you don't even need to go the off-camera route ... but it's an option that will give you a lot more flexibility.






share|improve this answer














My bet is on the same thing you guess — light reflected from the diffuser bouncing around badly.



This is easily tested by making some images with and without the flash on. I'd suggest a neutral target (the infamous brick wall shot), and run through a range of apertures and flash power.



Assuming that's it — or actually, even if it's not — I'd suggest replacing the dome diffuser with an off-camera flash and possibly a a larger-yet-portable softbox. That sounds like it might be inconvenient outdoors, but the thing is, it's exactly because you're shooting outdoors. This style of diffuser does increase the effective flash area a little bit, softening light some, but its main effect is to scatter light in every direction. Indoors, that light then bounces from ceilings and walls, but outdoors (or in a large room), the primary effect is simply to waste light.



You can get that same effect for free and without risk of weird stray light simply by cutting the flash power. So maybe you don't even need to go the off-camera route ... but it's an option that will give you a lot more flexibility.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 1 hour ago









mattdm

117k37341633




117k37341633











  • Thanks! Yes I will run through some test today. Always something! LOL ;) Thanks again!
    – Just4Clicks
    1 hour ago










  • Added some other unasked advice too :)
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago
















  • Thanks! Yes I will run through some test today. Always something! LOL ;) Thanks again!
    – Just4Clicks
    1 hour ago










  • Added some other unasked advice too :)
    – mattdm
    1 hour ago















Thanks! Yes I will run through some test today. Always something! LOL ;) Thanks again!
– Just4Clicks
1 hour ago




Thanks! Yes I will run through some test today. Always something! LOL ;) Thanks again!
– Just4Clicks
1 hour ago












Added some other unasked advice too :)
– mattdm
1 hour ago




Added some other unasked advice too :)
– mattdm
1 hour ago










Just4Clicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Just4Clicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Just4Clicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Just4Clicks is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f102246%2fwhy-is-the-bottom-of-image-over-exposed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery