Mixing
Is the complement of an affine open in an abelian variety ample?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $U$ be an affine open subscheme of an abelian variety $A$ over $mathbbC$. Is $A-U$ an ample divisor?
If $dim A =1$ this is true.
If $dim A = 2$, the complement is a divisor $D_1+ldots + D_n$. If all of these are elliptic curves, then the complement is not affine (as it will contain the translate of one of these elliptic curves). So, wlog $D_1$ is not an elliptic curve. But then $D_1$ is ample (by Nakai-Moishezon). And this implies that $D_1 +ldots +D_n$ is also ample.
I couldn't figure it out for abelian threefolds.
ag.algebraic-geometry complex-geometry abelian-varieties
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $U$ be an affine open subscheme of an abelian variety $A$ over $mathbbC$. Is $A-U$ an ample divisor?
If $dim A =1$ this is true.
If $dim A = 2$, the complement is a divisor $D_1+ldots + D_n$. If all of these are elliptic curves, then the complement is not affine (as it will contain the translate of one of these elliptic curves). So, wlog $D_1$ is not an elliptic curve. But then $D_1$ is ample (by Nakai-Moishezon). And this implies that $D_1 +ldots +D_n$ is also ample.
I couldn't figure it out for abelian threefolds.
ag.algebraic-geometry complex-geometry abelian-varieties
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is actually the way projectivity of abelian varieties is typically proven, cf. Mumford's Abelian varieties, p. 59 (p. 62 in the first edition). See also Theorem 10.9 of Bhatt's notes.
– R. van Dobben de Bruyn
33 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $U$ be an affine open subscheme of an abelian variety $A$ over $mathbbC$. Is $A-U$ an ample divisor?
If $dim A =1$ this is true.
If $dim A = 2$, the complement is a divisor $D_1+ldots + D_n$. If all of these are elliptic curves, then the complement is not affine (as it will contain the translate of one of these elliptic curves). So, wlog $D_1$ is not an elliptic curve. But then $D_1$ is ample (by Nakai-Moishezon). And this implies that $D_1 +ldots +D_n$ is also ample.
I couldn't figure it out for abelian threefolds.
ag.algebraic-geometry complex-geometry abelian-varieties
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Let $U$ be an affine open subscheme of an abelian variety $A$ over $mathbbC$. Is $A-U$ an ample divisor?
If $dim A =1$ this is true.
If $dim A = 2$, the complement is a divisor $D_1+ldots + D_n$. If all of these are elliptic curves, then the complement is not affine (as it will contain the translate of one of these elliptic curves). So, wlog $D_1$ is not an elliptic curve. But then $D_1$ is ample (by Nakai-Moishezon). And this implies that $D_1 +ldots +D_n$ is also ample.
I couldn't figure it out for abelian threefolds.
ag.algebraic-geometry complex-geometry abelian-varieties
ag.algebraic-geometry complex-geometry abelian-varieties
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
asked 1 hour ago
Sjoerd
582
582
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Sjoerd is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is actually the way projectivity of abelian varieties is typically proven, cf. Mumford's Abelian varieties, p. 59 (p. 62 in the first edition). See also Theorem 10.9 of Bhatt's notes.
– R. van Dobben de Bruyn
33 mins ago
add a comment |Â
This is actually the way projectivity of abelian varieties is typically proven, cf. Mumford's Abelian varieties, p. 59 (p. 62 in the first edition). See also Theorem 10.9 of Bhatt's notes.
– R. van Dobben de Bruyn
33 mins ago
This is actually the way projectivity of abelian varieties is typically proven, cf. Mumford's Abelian varieties, p. 59 (p. 62 in the first edition). See also Theorem 10.9 of Bhatt's notes.
– R. van Dobben de Bruyn
33 mins ago
This is actually the way projectivity of abelian varieties is typically proven, cf. Mumford's Abelian varieties, p. 59 (p. 62 in the first edition). See also Theorem 10.9 of Bhatt's notes.
– R. van Dobben de Bruyn
33 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Welcome new contributor. Yes, that is true. Let $k$ be any field, let $A$ be an Abelian variety over $k$, and let $Usubset A$ be a dense open affine. Denote by $Dsubset A$ the complementary divisor with its induced reduced structure. Denote the invertible sheaf of this divisor by $mathcalL:=mathcalO_A(D).$ Denote by $s$ the global section of $mathcalL$ whose zero locus equals $D.$
Ampleness can be proved after faithfully flat base change over $textSpec k$, thus assume that $k$ is algebraically closed. By Lemma II.5.14 of Hartshorne, for every $gin mathcalO_A(U)$, there exists an integer $n_0$ and a section $widetildegin mathcalL^otimes n_0(A)$ such that $widetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0|_U$. Notice that for every integer $rgeq 0$, also $s^rwidetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0+r|_U$. Since the $k$-algebra $mathcalO_A(U)$ is finitely generated, there exists an integer $n_0>0$ such that the image of $(s|_U)^-ncdot mathcalL^otimes n(A) to mathcalO_A(U)$ generates $mathcalO_A(U)$ as a $k$-algebra for every $ngeq n_0$. In particular, the base locus $B_n$ of the complete linear system of $mathcalL^otimes n$ is disjoint from $U$, and the induced morphism to projective space, $$phi_n:Asetminus B_n to mathbbP^d_n_k,$$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on $U$.
The set $A(k)_texttor$ of torsion $k$-points $a$ of $A$ is dense. Thus, denoting by $$tau_a:Ato A$$ the morphism of translation by $a$, for every $k$-point $p$ of $A$, the set $tau_a(p)$ is dense in $A$. In particular, not all of these points can lie in the proper, Zariski closed subset $D$. Thus, there exists an integer $m>0$ and an $m$-torsion point $a$ such that $tau_a^*D$ does not contain $p$. In other words, the point $p$ is contained in the open affine subset $tau_a^-1(U)$.
Since $a$ is $m$-torsion, $tau_a^*mathcalL^otimes n$ is isomorphic to $mathcalL^otimes n$ for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$. For such $n$, also the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from $tau_a^-1(U)$, and $phi_n$ restricts to a locally closed immersion on $tau_a^-1(U)$.
The set of translates $tau_a^-1(U)$ for $ain A(k)_texttor$ is an open affine covering of $A$. Since $A$ is quasi-compact, there exist finitely many torsion translates of $U$ that cover $A$. For $m>1$ equal to the least common multiple of the orders of those finitely many torsion points, for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$, the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from each of these open translates in this open covering. Thus, the base locus $B_n$ is empty. Moreover, the $k$-morphism $phi_n$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on each of these open translates.
If $phi_n$ had a positive dimensional fiber, that fiber would intersect one of these open translates in a positive dimensional subvariety, and that would contradict that $phi_n$ is an immersion on that open translate. Thus, every fiber of $phi_n$ is finite. Since $phi_n$ is a morphism between proper $k$-schemes that has finite fibers, the morphism $phi_n$ is a finite morphism. Since the pullback of an ample invertible sheaf by a finite morphism is ample, the invertible sheaf $mathcalL^otimes n cong phi_n^*mathcalO(1)$ is ample on $A$. Finally, since $mathcalL^otimes n$ is ample, also $mathcalL$ is ample.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Welcome new contributor. Yes, that is true. Let $k$ be any field, let $A$ be an Abelian variety over $k$, and let $Usubset A$ be a dense open affine. Denote by $Dsubset A$ the complementary divisor with its induced reduced structure. Denote the invertible sheaf of this divisor by $mathcalL:=mathcalO_A(D).$ Denote by $s$ the global section of $mathcalL$ whose zero locus equals $D.$
Ampleness can be proved after faithfully flat base change over $textSpec k$, thus assume that $k$ is algebraically closed. By Lemma II.5.14 of Hartshorne, for every $gin mathcalO_A(U)$, there exists an integer $n_0$ and a section $widetildegin mathcalL^otimes n_0(A)$ such that $widetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0|_U$. Notice that for every integer $rgeq 0$, also $s^rwidetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0+r|_U$. Since the $k$-algebra $mathcalO_A(U)$ is finitely generated, there exists an integer $n_0>0$ such that the image of $(s|_U)^-ncdot mathcalL^otimes n(A) to mathcalO_A(U)$ generates $mathcalO_A(U)$ as a $k$-algebra for every $ngeq n_0$. In particular, the base locus $B_n$ of the complete linear system of $mathcalL^otimes n$ is disjoint from $U$, and the induced morphism to projective space, $$phi_n:Asetminus B_n to mathbbP^d_n_k,$$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on $U$.
The set $A(k)_texttor$ of torsion $k$-points $a$ of $A$ is dense. Thus, denoting by $$tau_a:Ato A$$ the morphism of translation by $a$, for every $k$-point $p$ of $A$, the set $tau_a(p)$ is dense in $A$. In particular, not all of these points can lie in the proper, Zariski closed subset $D$. Thus, there exists an integer $m>0$ and an $m$-torsion point $a$ such that $tau_a^*D$ does not contain $p$. In other words, the point $p$ is contained in the open affine subset $tau_a^-1(U)$.
Since $a$ is $m$-torsion, $tau_a^*mathcalL^otimes n$ is isomorphic to $mathcalL^otimes n$ for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$. For such $n$, also the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from $tau_a^-1(U)$, and $phi_n$ restricts to a locally closed immersion on $tau_a^-1(U)$.
The set of translates $tau_a^-1(U)$ for $ain A(k)_texttor$ is an open affine covering of $A$. Since $A$ is quasi-compact, there exist finitely many torsion translates of $U$ that cover $A$. For $m>1$ equal to the least common multiple of the orders of those finitely many torsion points, for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$, the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from each of these open translates in this open covering. Thus, the base locus $B_n$ is empty. Moreover, the $k$-morphism $phi_n$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on each of these open translates.
If $phi_n$ had a positive dimensional fiber, that fiber would intersect one of these open translates in a positive dimensional subvariety, and that would contradict that $phi_n$ is an immersion on that open translate. Thus, every fiber of $phi_n$ is finite. Since $phi_n$ is a morphism between proper $k$-schemes that has finite fibers, the morphism $phi_n$ is a finite morphism. Since the pullback of an ample invertible sheaf by a finite morphism is ample, the invertible sheaf $mathcalL^otimes n cong phi_n^*mathcalO(1)$ is ample on $A$. Finally, since $mathcalL^otimes n$ is ample, also $mathcalL$ is ample.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
Welcome new contributor. Yes, that is true. Let $k$ be any field, let $A$ be an Abelian variety over $k$, and let $Usubset A$ be a dense open affine. Denote by $Dsubset A$ the complementary divisor with its induced reduced structure. Denote the invertible sheaf of this divisor by $mathcalL:=mathcalO_A(D).$ Denote by $s$ the global section of $mathcalL$ whose zero locus equals $D.$
Ampleness can be proved after faithfully flat base change over $textSpec k$, thus assume that $k$ is algebraically closed. By Lemma II.5.14 of Hartshorne, for every $gin mathcalO_A(U)$, there exists an integer $n_0$ and a section $widetildegin mathcalL^otimes n_0(A)$ such that $widetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0|_U$. Notice that for every integer $rgeq 0$, also $s^rwidetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0+r|_U$. Since the $k$-algebra $mathcalO_A(U)$ is finitely generated, there exists an integer $n_0>0$ such that the image of $(s|_U)^-ncdot mathcalL^otimes n(A) to mathcalO_A(U)$ generates $mathcalO_A(U)$ as a $k$-algebra for every $ngeq n_0$. In particular, the base locus $B_n$ of the complete linear system of $mathcalL^otimes n$ is disjoint from $U$, and the induced morphism to projective space, $$phi_n:Asetminus B_n to mathbbP^d_n_k,$$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on $U$.
The set $A(k)_texttor$ of torsion $k$-points $a$ of $A$ is dense. Thus, denoting by $$tau_a:Ato A$$ the morphism of translation by $a$, for every $k$-point $p$ of $A$, the set $tau_a(p)$ is dense in $A$. In particular, not all of these points can lie in the proper, Zariski closed subset $D$. Thus, there exists an integer $m>0$ and an $m$-torsion point $a$ such that $tau_a^*D$ does not contain $p$. In other words, the point $p$ is contained in the open affine subset $tau_a^-1(U)$.
Since $a$ is $m$-torsion, $tau_a^*mathcalL^otimes n$ is isomorphic to $mathcalL^otimes n$ for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$. For such $n$, also the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from $tau_a^-1(U)$, and $phi_n$ restricts to a locally closed immersion on $tau_a^-1(U)$.
The set of translates $tau_a^-1(U)$ for $ain A(k)_texttor$ is an open affine covering of $A$. Since $A$ is quasi-compact, there exist finitely many torsion translates of $U$ that cover $A$. For $m>1$ equal to the least common multiple of the orders of those finitely many torsion points, for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$, the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from each of these open translates in this open covering. Thus, the base locus $B_n$ is empty. Moreover, the $k$-morphism $phi_n$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on each of these open translates.
If $phi_n$ had a positive dimensional fiber, that fiber would intersect one of these open translates in a positive dimensional subvariety, and that would contradict that $phi_n$ is an immersion on that open translate. Thus, every fiber of $phi_n$ is finite. Since $phi_n$ is a morphism between proper $k$-schemes that has finite fibers, the morphism $phi_n$ is a finite morphism. Since the pullback of an ample invertible sheaf by a finite morphism is ample, the invertible sheaf $mathcalL^otimes n cong phi_n^*mathcalO(1)$ is ample on $A$. Finally, since $mathcalL^otimes n$ is ample, also $mathcalL$ is ample.
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Welcome new contributor. Yes, that is true. Let $k$ be any field, let $A$ be an Abelian variety over $k$, and let $Usubset A$ be a dense open affine. Denote by $Dsubset A$ the complementary divisor with its induced reduced structure. Denote the invertible sheaf of this divisor by $mathcalL:=mathcalO_A(D).$ Denote by $s$ the global section of $mathcalL$ whose zero locus equals $D.$
Ampleness can be proved after faithfully flat base change over $textSpec k$, thus assume that $k$ is algebraically closed. By Lemma II.5.14 of Hartshorne, for every $gin mathcalO_A(U)$, there exists an integer $n_0$ and a section $widetildegin mathcalL^otimes n_0(A)$ such that $widetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0|_U$. Notice that for every integer $rgeq 0$, also $s^rwidetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0+r|_U$. Since the $k$-algebra $mathcalO_A(U)$ is finitely generated, there exists an integer $n_0>0$ such that the image of $(s|_U)^-ncdot mathcalL^otimes n(A) to mathcalO_A(U)$ generates $mathcalO_A(U)$ as a $k$-algebra for every $ngeq n_0$. In particular, the base locus $B_n$ of the complete linear system of $mathcalL^otimes n$ is disjoint from $U$, and the induced morphism to projective space, $$phi_n:Asetminus B_n to mathbbP^d_n_k,$$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on $U$.
The set $A(k)_texttor$ of torsion $k$-points $a$ of $A$ is dense. Thus, denoting by $$tau_a:Ato A$$ the morphism of translation by $a$, for every $k$-point $p$ of $A$, the set $tau_a(p)$ is dense in $A$. In particular, not all of these points can lie in the proper, Zariski closed subset $D$. Thus, there exists an integer $m>0$ and an $m$-torsion point $a$ such that $tau_a^*D$ does not contain $p$. In other words, the point $p$ is contained in the open affine subset $tau_a^-1(U)$.
Since $a$ is $m$-torsion, $tau_a^*mathcalL^otimes n$ is isomorphic to $mathcalL^otimes n$ for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$. For such $n$, also the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from $tau_a^-1(U)$, and $phi_n$ restricts to a locally closed immersion on $tau_a^-1(U)$.
The set of translates $tau_a^-1(U)$ for $ain A(k)_texttor$ is an open affine covering of $A$. Since $A$ is quasi-compact, there exist finitely many torsion translates of $U$ that cover $A$. For $m>1$ equal to the least common multiple of the orders of those finitely many torsion points, for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$, the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from each of these open translates in this open covering. Thus, the base locus $B_n$ is empty. Moreover, the $k$-morphism $phi_n$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on each of these open translates.
If $phi_n$ had a positive dimensional fiber, that fiber would intersect one of these open translates in a positive dimensional subvariety, and that would contradict that $phi_n$ is an immersion on that open translate. Thus, every fiber of $phi_n$ is finite. Since $phi_n$ is a morphism between proper $k$-schemes that has finite fibers, the morphism $phi_n$ is a finite morphism. Since the pullback of an ample invertible sheaf by a finite morphism is ample, the invertible sheaf $mathcalL^otimes n cong phi_n^*mathcalO(1)$ is ample on $A$. Finally, since $mathcalL^otimes n$ is ample, also $mathcalL$ is ample.
Welcome new contributor. Yes, that is true. Let $k$ be any field, let $A$ be an Abelian variety over $k$, and let $Usubset A$ be a dense open affine. Denote by $Dsubset A$ the complementary divisor with its induced reduced structure. Denote the invertible sheaf of this divisor by $mathcalL:=mathcalO_A(D).$ Denote by $s$ the global section of $mathcalL$ whose zero locus equals $D.$
Ampleness can be proved after faithfully flat base change over $textSpec k$, thus assume that $k$ is algebraically closed. By Lemma II.5.14 of Hartshorne, for every $gin mathcalO_A(U)$, there exists an integer $n_0$ and a section $widetildegin mathcalL^otimes n_0(A)$ such that $widetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0|_U$. Notice that for every integer $rgeq 0$, also $s^rwidetildeg|_U$ equals $gcdot s^n_0+r|_U$. Since the $k$-algebra $mathcalO_A(U)$ is finitely generated, there exists an integer $n_0>0$ such that the image of $(s|_U)^-ncdot mathcalL^otimes n(A) to mathcalO_A(U)$ generates $mathcalO_A(U)$ as a $k$-algebra for every $ngeq n_0$. In particular, the base locus $B_n$ of the complete linear system of $mathcalL^otimes n$ is disjoint from $U$, and the induced morphism to projective space, $$phi_n:Asetminus B_n to mathbbP^d_n_k,$$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on $U$.
The set $A(k)_texttor$ of torsion $k$-points $a$ of $A$ is dense. Thus, denoting by $$tau_a:Ato A$$ the morphism of translation by $a$, for every $k$-point $p$ of $A$, the set $tau_a(p)$ is dense in $A$. In particular, not all of these points can lie in the proper, Zariski closed subset $D$. Thus, there exists an integer $m>0$ and an $m$-torsion point $a$ such that $tau_a^*D$ does not contain $p$. In other words, the point $p$ is contained in the open affine subset $tau_a^-1(U)$.
Since $a$ is $m$-torsion, $tau_a^*mathcalL^otimes n$ is isomorphic to $mathcalL^otimes n$ for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$. For such $n$, also the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from $tau_a^-1(U)$, and $phi_n$ restricts to a locally closed immersion on $tau_a^-1(U)$.
The set of translates $tau_a^-1(U)$ for $ain A(k)_texttor$ is an open affine covering of $A$. Since $A$ is quasi-compact, there exist finitely many torsion translates of $U$ that cover $A$. For $m>1$ equal to the least common multiple of the orders of those finitely many torsion points, for every positive integer $n$ that is divisible by $m$, the base locus $B_n$ is disjoint from each of these open translates in this open covering. Thus, the base locus $B_n$ is empty. Moreover, the $k$-morphism $phi_n$ restricts as a locally closed immersion on each of these open translates.
If $phi_n$ had a positive dimensional fiber, that fiber would intersect one of these open translates in a positive dimensional subvariety, and that would contradict that $phi_n$ is an immersion on that open translate. Thus, every fiber of $phi_n$ is finite. Since $phi_n$ is a morphism between proper $k$-schemes that has finite fibers, the morphism $phi_n$ is a finite morphism. Since the pullback of an ample invertible sheaf by a finite morphism is ample, the invertible sheaf $mathcalL^otimes n cong phi_n^*mathcalO(1)$ is ample on $A$. Finally, since $mathcalL^otimes n$ is ample, also $mathcalL$ is ample.
edited 49 mins ago
community wiki
3 revs
Jason Starr
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sjoerd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sjoerd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sjoerd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sjoerd is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f314288%2fis-the-complement-of-an-affine-open-in-an-abelian-variety-ample%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
This is actually the way projectivity of abelian varieties is typically proven, cf. Mumford's Abelian varieties, p. 59 (p. 62 in the first edition). See also Theorem 10.9 of Bhatt's notes.
– R. van Dobben de Bruyn
33 mins ago