Beginner radian/degree converter program

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm a bit of a beginner when it comes to Java, and I created this small code to help me grasp a few small subjects. It allows its user to convert a radical to a degree measure and a degree measure to a radical. This is my final code:



import java.io.BufferedReader; 
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.util.ArrayList;

public class MainClass

public static void dtr (BufferedReader dRead) throws IOException

ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>();
ArrayList<Integer> gcd = new ArrayList<Integer>();


int d = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
for (int pd = 1; pd <= d; pd++)
if (d % pd == 0)
divisors.add(pd);



for (int index = 0; index < divisors.size(); ++index)
if (180.0 % divisors.get(index) == 0)
gcd.add(divisors.get(index));




int dem = (180 / gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1));
if ((d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) == 1)
System.out.print("Radical: pi / " + dem);
else
System.out.print("Radical: " + (d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) + "pi / " + dem);




public static void rtd (BufferedReader rnRead, BufferedReader rdRead) throws IOException

int rn = Integer.parseInt(rnRead.readLine());
int rd = Integer.parseInt(rdRead.readLine());

int dividend = rn * 180;

System.out.print("Degrees: " + (dividend / rd));



public static void main(String args) throws IOException userChoice.contains("d"))

System.out.print("Degrees: ");
BufferedReader dRead = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
dtr(dRead);

else if (userChoice.contains("R")




I know how bad some of this code is, but I just want to know if there is any way I could have optimized what this does, because I'd like to apply those concepts to everything that I'll make in the future.










share|improve this question









New contributor




avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Regarding ` BufferedReader userInput ...` while in this example it is harmless no to close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out try with resources statement: docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions. /tryResourceClose.html. It is also common to reuse the same Reader and not creating a new one every time you need to perform a read operat
    – David Soroko
    1 hour ago











  • @DavidSoroko Sounds like the start of a review. Feel free to make it an answer.
    – Mast
    1 hour ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I'm a bit of a beginner when it comes to Java, and I created this small code to help me grasp a few small subjects. It allows its user to convert a radical to a degree measure and a degree measure to a radical. This is my final code:



import java.io.BufferedReader; 
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.util.ArrayList;

public class MainClass

public static void dtr (BufferedReader dRead) throws IOException

ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>();
ArrayList<Integer> gcd = new ArrayList<Integer>();


int d = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
for (int pd = 1; pd <= d; pd++)
if (d % pd == 0)
divisors.add(pd);



for (int index = 0; index < divisors.size(); ++index)
if (180.0 % divisors.get(index) == 0)
gcd.add(divisors.get(index));




int dem = (180 / gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1));
if ((d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) == 1)
System.out.print("Radical: pi / " + dem);
else
System.out.print("Radical: " + (d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) + "pi / " + dem);




public static void rtd (BufferedReader rnRead, BufferedReader rdRead) throws IOException

int rn = Integer.parseInt(rnRead.readLine());
int rd = Integer.parseInt(rdRead.readLine());

int dividend = rn * 180;

System.out.print("Degrees: " + (dividend / rd));



public static void main(String args) throws IOException userChoice.contains("d"))

System.out.print("Degrees: ");
BufferedReader dRead = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
dtr(dRead);

else if (userChoice.contains("R")




I know how bad some of this code is, but I just want to know if there is any way I could have optimized what this does, because I'd like to apply those concepts to everything that I'll make in the future.










share|improve this question









New contributor




avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Regarding ` BufferedReader userInput ...` while in this example it is harmless no to close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out try with resources statement: docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions. /tryResourceClose.html. It is also common to reuse the same Reader and not creating a new one every time you need to perform a read operat
    – David Soroko
    1 hour ago











  • @DavidSoroko Sounds like the start of a review. Feel free to make it an answer.
    – Mast
    1 hour ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I'm a bit of a beginner when it comes to Java, and I created this small code to help me grasp a few small subjects. It allows its user to convert a radical to a degree measure and a degree measure to a radical. This is my final code:



import java.io.BufferedReader; 
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.util.ArrayList;

public class MainClass

public static void dtr (BufferedReader dRead) throws IOException

ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>();
ArrayList<Integer> gcd = new ArrayList<Integer>();


int d = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
for (int pd = 1; pd <= d; pd++)
if (d % pd == 0)
divisors.add(pd);



for (int index = 0; index < divisors.size(); ++index)
if (180.0 % divisors.get(index) == 0)
gcd.add(divisors.get(index));




int dem = (180 / gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1));
if ((d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) == 1)
System.out.print("Radical: pi / " + dem);
else
System.out.print("Radical: " + (d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) + "pi / " + dem);




public static void rtd (BufferedReader rnRead, BufferedReader rdRead) throws IOException

int rn = Integer.parseInt(rnRead.readLine());
int rd = Integer.parseInt(rdRead.readLine());

int dividend = rn * 180;

System.out.print("Degrees: " + (dividend / rd));



public static void main(String args) throws IOException userChoice.contains("d"))

System.out.print("Degrees: ");
BufferedReader dRead = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
dtr(dRead);

else if (userChoice.contains("R")




I know how bad some of this code is, but I just want to know if there is any way I could have optimized what this does, because I'd like to apply those concepts to everything that I'll make in the future.










share|improve this question









New contributor




avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm a bit of a beginner when it comes to Java, and I created this small code to help me grasp a few small subjects. It allows its user to convert a radical to a degree measure and a degree measure to a radical. This is my final code:



import java.io.BufferedReader; 
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStreamReader;
import java.util.ArrayList;

public class MainClass

public static void dtr (BufferedReader dRead) throws IOException

ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>();
ArrayList<Integer> gcd = new ArrayList<Integer>();


int d = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
for (int pd = 1; pd <= d; pd++)
if (d % pd == 0)
divisors.add(pd);



for (int index = 0; index < divisors.size(); ++index)
if (180.0 % divisors.get(index) == 0)
gcd.add(divisors.get(index));




int dem = (180 / gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1));
if ((d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) == 1)
System.out.print("Radical: pi / " + dem);
else
System.out.print("Radical: " + (d / (gcd.get(gcd.size() - 1))) + "pi / " + dem);




public static void rtd (BufferedReader rnRead, BufferedReader rdRead) throws IOException

int rn = Integer.parseInt(rnRead.readLine());
int rd = Integer.parseInt(rdRead.readLine());

int dividend = rn * 180;

System.out.print("Degrees: " + (dividend / rd));



public static void main(String args) throws IOException userChoice.contains("d"))

System.out.print("Degrees: ");
BufferedReader dRead = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in));
dtr(dRead);

else if (userChoice.contains("R")




I know how bad some of this code is, but I just want to know if there is any way I could have optimized what this does, because I'd like to apply those concepts to everything that I'll make in the future.







java beginner rational-numbers unit-conversion






share|improve this question









New contributor




avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









200_success

126k14146407




126k14146407






New contributor




avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 4 hours ago









avavstack

113




113




New contributor




avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






avavstack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Regarding ` BufferedReader userInput ...` while in this example it is harmless no to close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out try with resources statement: docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions. /tryResourceClose.html. It is also common to reuse the same Reader and not creating a new one every time you need to perform a read operat
    – David Soroko
    1 hour ago











  • @DavidSoroko Sounds like the start of a review. Feel free to make it an answer.
    – Mast
    1 hour ago
















  • Regarding ` BufferedReader userInput ...` while in this example it is harmless no to close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out try with resources statement: docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions. /tryResourceClose.html. It is also common to reuse the same Reader and not creating a new one every time you need to perform a read operat
    – David Soroko
    1 hour ago











  • @DavidSoroko Sounds like the start of a review. Feel free to make it an answer.
    – Mast
    1 hour ago















Regarding ` BufferedReader userInput ...` while in this example it is harmless no to close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out try with resources statement: docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions. /tryResourceClose.html. It is also common to reuse the same Reader and not creating a new one every time you need to perform a read operat
– David Soroko
1 hour ago





Regarding ` BufferedReader userInput ...` while in this example it is harmless no to close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out try with resources statement: docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions. /tryResourceClose.html. It is also common to reuse the same Reader and not creating a new one every time you need to perform a read operat
– David Soroko
1 hour ago













@DavidSoroko Sounds like the start of a review. Feel free to make it an answer.
– Mast
1 hour ago




@DavidSoroko Sounds like the start of a review. Feel free to make it an answer.
– Mast
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Nowadays is common to omit the generic type on the right hand side of an assignment so instead of



 ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>(); 


you can write



 ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>(); 


Since you are not using any ArrayList specific functionality it is cleaner to declare divisors as List (same goes for gcd)



 List<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>();


The call gcd.get(gcd.size() deserves a separate method with a reasonable name.



Regarding BufferedReader userInput ... while in this example it is harmless to not close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out "try with resources statement": https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html.



It is also common to reuse the Reader and not create a new one every time you need to perform a read operation. With this in mind you will have something like this:



public static void main(String args) throws IOException 
System.out.println("Do you want to convert from radicals to degrees, or degrees to radicals?");
System.out.print("Use "R" for radials to degrees, and "D" for degrees to radicals: ");
try (BufferedReader userInput = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)))



Note that now rtd requires only one parameter. Because you print before reading user input, the user gets to see



 Radical numerator (omit pi): 
Radical denominator:


before she has an opportunity to provide any input. Those statements should move into rtd interleaved with reading user input.



 if (userChoice.contains("D") || userChoice.contains("d"))


can be simplified like so:



if (userChoice.toLowerCase().contains("d")) { 





share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    The Euclidean algorithm is a well-known
    and efficient method to compute the greatest common divisor of two integers.



    Compared to your approach, the Euclidean algorithm is faster, less code, and
    does not require additional storage.



    Using for example



    // https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor#Iterative_Euclid.27s_Algorithm
    public static int gcd(int a, int b)
    while (b > 0)
    int c = a % b;
    a = b;
    b = c;

    return a;



    reducing the fraction simplifies to



    int degrees = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
    int commonDivisor = gcd(degrees, 180);
    int numerator = degrees / commonDivisor;
    int denominator = 180 / commonDivisor;





    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "196"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      avavstack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206436%2fbeginner-radian-degree-converter-program%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Nowadays is common to omit the generic type on the right hand side of an assignment so instead of



       ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>(); 


      you can write



       ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>(); 


      Since you are not using any ArrayList specific functionality it is cleaner to declare divisors as List (same goes for gcd)



       List<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>();


      The call gcd.get(gcd.size() deserves a separate method with a reasonable name.



      Regarding BufferedReader userInput ... while in this example it is harmless to not close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out "try with resources statement": https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html.



      It is also common to reuse the Reader and not create a new one every time you need to perform a read operation. With this in mind you will have something like this:



      public static void main(String args) throws IOException 
      System.out.println("Do you want to convert from radicals to degrees, or degrees to radicals?");
      System.out.print("Use "R" for radials to degrees, and "D" for degrees to radicals: ");
      try (BufferedReader userInput = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)))



      Note that now rtd requires only one parameter. Because you print before reading user input, the user gets to see



       Radical numerator (omit pi): 
      Radical denominator:


      before she has an opportunity to provide any input. Those statements should move into rtd interleaved with reading user input.



       if (userChoice.contains("D") || userChoice.contains("d"))


      can be simplified like so:



      if (userChoice.toLowerCase().contains("d")) { 





      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Nowadays is common to omit the generic type on the right hand side of an assignment so instead of



         ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>(); 


        you can write



         ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>(); 


        Since you are not using any ArrayList specific functionality it is cleaner to declare divisors as List (same goes for gcd)



         List<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>();


        The call gcd.get(gcd.size() deserves a separate method with a reasonable name.



        Regarding BufferedReader userInput ... while in this example it is harmless to not close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out "try with resources statement": https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html.



        It is also common to reuse the Reader and not create a new one every time you need to perform a read operation. With this in mind you will have something like this:



        public static void main(String args) throws IOException 
        System.out.println("Do you want to convert from radicals to degrees, or degrees to radicals?");
        System.out.print("Use "R" for radials to degrees, and "D" for degrees to radicals: ");
        try (BufferedReader userInput = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)))



        Note that now rtd requires only one parameter. Because you print before reading user input, the user gets to see



         Radical numerator (omit pi): 
        Radical denominator:


        before she has an opportunity to provide any input. Those statements should move into rtd interleaved with reading user input.



         if (userChoice.contains("D") || userChoice.contains("d"))


        can be simplified like so:



        if (userChoice.toLowerCase().contains("d")) { 





        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          Nowadays is common to omit the generic type on the right hand side of an assignment so instead of



           ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>(); 


          you can write



           ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>(); 


          Since you are not using any ArrayList specific functionality it is cleaner to declare divisors as List (same goes for gcd)



           List<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>();


          The call gcd.get(gcd.size() deserves a separate method with a reasonable name.



          Regarding BufferedReader userInput ... while in this example it is harmless to not close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out "try with resources statement": https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html.



          It is also common to reuse the Reader and not create a new one every time you need to perform a read operation. With this in mind you will have something like this:



          public static void main(String args) throws IOException 
          System.out.println("Do you want to convert from radicals to degrees, or degrees to radicals?");
          System.out.print("Use "R" for radials to degrees, and "D" for degrees to radicals: ");
          try (BufferedReader userInput = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)))



          Note that now rtd requires only one parameter. Because you print before reading user input, the user gets to see



           Radical numerator (omit pi): 
          Radical denominator:


          before she has an opportunity to provide any input. Those statements should move into rtd interleaved with reading user input.



           if (userChoice.contains("D") || userChoice.contains("d"))


          can be simplified like so:



          if (userChoice.toLowerCase().contains("d")) { 





          share|improve this answer














          Nowadays is common to omit the generic type on the right hand side of an assignment so instead of



           ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<Integer>(); 


          you can write



           ArrayList<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>(); 


          Since you are not using any ArrayList specific functionality it is cleaner to declare divisors as List (same goes for gcd)



           List<Integer> divisors = new ArrayList<>();


          The call gcd.get(gcd.size() deserves a separate method with a reasonable name.



          Regarding BufferedReader userInput ... while in this example it is harmless to not close IO resources, it is good practice to do so in general. Check out "try with resources statement": https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html.



          It is also common to reuse the Reader and not create a new one every time you need to perform a read operation. With this in mind you will have something like this:



          public static void main(String args) throws IOException 
          System.out.println("Do you want to convert from radicals to degrees, or degrees to radicals?");
          System.out.print("Use "R" for radials to degrees, and "D" for degrees to radicals: ");
          try (BufferedReader userInput = new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(System.in)))



          Note that now rtd requires only one parameter. Because you print before reading user input, the user gets to see



           Radical numerator (omit pi): 
          Radical denominator:


          before she has an opportunity to provide any input. Those statements should move into rtd interleaved with reading user input.



           if (userChoice.contains("D") || userChoice.contains("d"))


          can be simplified like so:



          if (userChoice.toLowerCase().contains("d")) { 






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 50 mins ago

























          answered 1 hour ago









          David Soroko

          1713




          1713






















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              The Euclidean algorithm is a well-known
              and efficient method to compute the greatest common divisor of two integers.



              Compared to your approach, the Euclidean algorithm is faster, less code, and
              does not require additional storage.



              Using for example



              // https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor#Iterative_Euclid.27s_Algorithm
              public static int gcd(int a, int b)
              while (b > 0)
              int c = a % b;
              a = b;
              b = c;

              return a;



              reducing the fraction simplifies to



              int degrees = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
              int commonDivisor = gcd(degrees, 180);
              int numerator = degrees / commonDivisor;
              int denominator = 180 / commonDivisor;





              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                The Euclidean algorithm is a well-known
                and efficient method to compute the greatest common divisor of two integers.



                Compared to your approach, the Euclidean algorithm is faster, less code, and
                does not require additional storage.



                Using for example



                // https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor#Iterative_Euclid.27s_Algorithm
                public static int gcd(int a, int b)
                while (b > 0)
                int c = a % b;
                a = b;
                b = c;

                return a;



                reducing the fraction simplifies to



                int degrees = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
                int commonDivisor = gcd(degrees, 180);
                int numerator = degrees / commonDivisor;
                int denominator = 180 / commonDivisor;





                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  The Euclidean algorithm is a well-known
                  and efficient method to compute the greatest common divisor of two integers.



                  Compared to your approach, the Euclidean algorithm is faster, less code, and
                  does not require additional storage.



                  Using for example



                  // https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor#Iterative_Euclid.27s_Algorithm
                  public static int gcd(int a, int b)
                  while (b > 0)
                  int c = a % b;
                  a = b;
                  b = c;

                  return a;



                  reducing the fraction simplifies to



                  int degrees = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
                  int commonDivisor = gcd(degrees, 180);
                  int numerator = degrees / commonDivisor;
                  int denominator = 180 / commonDivisor;





                  share|improve this answer












                  The Euclidean algorithm is a well-known
                  and efficient method to compute the greatest common divisor of two integers.



                  Compared to your approach, the Euclidean algorithm is faster, less code, and
                  does not require additional storage.



                  Using for example



                  // https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Greatest_common_divisor#Iterative_Euclid.27s_Algorithm
                  public static int gcd(int a, int b)
                  while (b > 0)
                  int c = a % b;
                  a = b;
                  b = c;

                  return a;



                  reducing the fraction simplifies to



                  int degrees = Integer.parseInt(dRead.readLine());
                  int commonDivisor = gcd(degrees, 180);
                  int numerator = degrees / commonDivisor;
                  int denominator = 180 / commonDivisor;






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 20 mins ago









                  Martin R

                  15k12261




                  15k12261




















                      avavstack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


















                      avavstack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      avavstack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      avavstack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f206436%2fbeginner-radian-degree-converter-program%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

                      Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

                      Confectionery