The plausibility of a water canopy
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.
I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?
reality-check planets
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.
I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?
reality-check planets
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago
Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
1
Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago
Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.
I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?
reality-check planets
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.
I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?
reality-check planets
reality-check planets
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 13 mins ago
Tim B♦
56.6k22160276
56.6k22160276
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago


Austin Trigloff
168110
168110
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago
Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
1
Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago
Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago
Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
1
Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago
Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago
Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago
Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago
Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
1
1
Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago
Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago
Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago
Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.
A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.
If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".
1
I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
2
The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.
A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.
If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".
1
I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
2
The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.
A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.
If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".
1
I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
2
The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.
A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.
If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".
Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.
A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.
If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".
answered 3 hours ago


L.Dutch♦
66.2k20159311
66.2k20159311
1
I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
2
The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
1
I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
2
The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago
1
1
I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
2
2
The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago
The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago
add a comment |Â
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128830%2fthe-plausibility-of-a-water-canopy%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago
Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago
1
Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago
Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago