The plausibility of a water canopy

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.



I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
    – Real Subtle
    3 hours ago










  • Oh, thank you!!
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
    – Renan
    45 mins ago










  • Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
    – AlexP
    40 mins ago















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.



I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
    – Real Subtle
    3 hours ago










  • Oh, thank you!!
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
    – Renan
    45 mins ago










  • Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
    – AlexP
    40 mins ago













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.



I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Once I heard a creationist say that the earth once may have had a hydrosphere layer up above our natural atmosphere, which implied that a substantial layer of ice covered the earth and created a greenhouse effect.



I am not attempting to argue this assumption, but can this phenomenon occur in a world similar to our own? If it can, then what would be the consequences?







reality-check planets






share|improve this question









New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 13 mins ago









Tim B♦

56.6k22160276




56.6k22160276






New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









Austin Trigloff

168110




168110




New contributor




Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Austin Trigloff is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
    – Real Subtle
    3 hours ago










  • Oh, thank you!!
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
    – Renan
    45 mins ago










  • Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
    – AlexP
    40 mins ago

















  • Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
    – Real Subtle
    3 hours ago










  • Oh, thank you!!
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
    – Renan
    45 mins ago










  • Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
    – AlexP
    40 mins ago
















Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago




Might be related: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/questions/25571/…
– Real Subtle
3 hours ago












Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago




Oh, thank you!!
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago




1




1




Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago




Possible duplicate of Is life possible on a world where the water floats in the air?
– Renan
45 mins ago












Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago





Did the creationist also gave a hint about what was keeping the water and ice up there and prevented them from falling down? And the creationistic technical term is "water canopy"; a hydrosphere is something else entirely, and Earth already has a hydrosphere.
– AlexP
40 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote













Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.



A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.



If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".






share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    The key word in the question is "creationist".
    – nzaman
    1 hour ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128830%2fthe-plausibility-of-a-water-canopy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
8
down vote













Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.



A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.



If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".






share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    The key word in the question is "creationist".
    – nzaman
    1 hour ago














up vote
8
down vote













Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.



A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.



If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".






share|improve this answer
















  • 1




    I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    The key word in the question is "creationist".
    – nzaman
    1 hour ago












up vote
8
down vote










up vote
8
down vote









Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.



A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.



If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".






share|improve this answer












Liquid or solid water is denser than air at STP, therefore there is no way that still air can sustain water by buoyancy.



A flow of air can lift water, but that would not happen all around the globe: somewhere the upgoing air has to come down.



If instead there is a layer of ice covering the surface and the liquid water is above this layer of ice, I have a hard time understanding how a bulk layer of ice can be qualified as "atmosphere".







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









L.Dutch♦

66.2k20159311




66.2k20159311







  • 1




    I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    The key word in the question is "creationist".
    – nzaman
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
    – Austin Trigloff
    3 hours ago






  • 2




    The key word in the question is "creationist".
    – nzaman
    1 hour ago







1




1




I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago




I agree, it's not the name I would use. Maybe outer ice shell
– Austin Trigloff
3 hours ago




2




2




The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago




The key word in the question is "creationist".
– nzaman
1 hour ago










Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Austin Trigloff is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128830%2fthe-plausibility-of-a-water-canopy%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Confectionery