siunitx: some options must be in preamble, not with S[?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

up vote
3
down vote

favorite

This is my question for siunitx users: Is it necessary to specify the input-symbols parameter in the preamble, rather than within S?

Why do I ask?

Here's a table produced by my R function outreg in the package rockchalk.

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle 
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 input-symbols = ( )


begindocument
begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[input-symbols = ( ), 
 group-digits = false, 
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center, 
 table-space-text-pre = (, 
 table-space-text-post = ***, 
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false]@
hline
 & multicolumn1cWhichever& multicolumn1cWhatevertabularnewline
 & multicolumn1cEstimate& multicolumn1cEstimatetabularnewline
 & multicolumn1c(S.E.)& multicolumn1c(S.E.)tabularnewline
 hline
 hline
 (Intercept) &403.245*** &29.774*** tabularnewline
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 x1 &1.546*& multicolumn1cphantom000. tabularnewline
 & (0.692) & tabularnewline
 x2 & multicolumn1cphantom000. &3.413** tabularnewline
 & & (0.512)tabularnewline
 hline
 N& multicolumn1c100& multicolumn1c100 tabularnewline
 RMSE &6.121 &5.205 tabularnewline
 $R^2$ &0.048 &0.312 tabularnewline
 adj $R^2$ &0.039 &0.305 tabularnewline
 AIC &617.694 &617.694tabularnewline
 hline
hline

 multicolumn3l$* ple 0.05$$*!!* ple 0.01$$*!!*!!* ple 0.001$tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

Thanks to the help of members in this group, the output is mostly adequate, IMHO. I cannot know ahead of time how many digits might be used, so I don't rely on table-format to tighten down the alignment. That's why I've got the nagging problems about centering of different sections of table. But this is, honestly, much better than I had before.

I'm asking now about the preamble and sisetup. I want the table markup to be as close to portable as possible, not depending on any preamble details.

I wanted to eliminate entirely the use of sisetup, but if I remove that from this example, it does not compile because the parentheses are not understandable to the compiler:

! siunitx error: "invalid-number"
!
! Invalid numerical input '(0.618)'.
!
! See the siunitx documentation for further information.

Is the preamble sisetup the only correction?

siunitx

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

add a comment | 

up vote
3
down vote

favorite

This is my question for siunitx users: Is it necessary to specify the input-symbols parameter in the preamble, rather than within S?

Why do I ask?

Here's a table produced by my R function outreg in the package rockchalk.

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle 
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 input-symbols = ( )


begindocument
begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[input-symbols = ( ), 
 group-digits = false, 
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center, 
 table-space-text-pre = (, 
 table-space-text-post = ***, 
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false]@
hline
 & multicolumn1cWhichever& multicolumn1cWhatevertabularnewline
 & multicolumn1cEstimate& multicolumn1cEstimatetabularnewline
 & multicolumn1c(S.E.)& multicolumn1c(S.E.)tabularnewline
 hline
 hline
 (Intercept) &403.245*** &29.774*** tabularnewline
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 x1 &1.546*& multicolumn1cphantom000. tabularnewline
 & (0.692) & tabularnewline
 x2 & multicolumn1cphantom000. &3.413** tabularnewline
 & & (0.512)tabularnewline
 hline
 N& multicolumn1c100& multicolumn1c100 tabularnewline
 RMSE &6.121 &5.205 tabularnewline
 $R^2$ &0.048 &0.312 tabularnewline
 adj $R^2$ &0.039 &0.305 tabularnewline
 AIC &617.694 &617.694tabularnewline
 hline
hline

 multicolumn3l$* ple 0.05$$*!!* ple 0.01$$*!!*!!* ple 0.001$tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

Thanks to the help of members in this group, the output is mostly adequate, IMHO. I cannot know ahead of time how many digits might be used, so I don't rely on table-format to tighten down the alignment. That's why I've got the nagging problems about centering of different sections of table. But this is, honestly, much better than I had before.

I'm asking now about the preamble and sisetup. I want the table markup to be as close to portable as possible, not depending on any preamble details.

I wanted to eliminate entirely the use of sisetup, but if I remove that from this example, it does not compile because the parentheses are not understandable to the compiler:

! siunitx error: "invalid-number"
!
! Invalid numerical input '(0.618)'.
!
! See the siunitx documentation for further information.

Is the preamble sisetup the only correction?

siunitx

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

add a comment | 

up vote
3
down vote

favorite

up vote
3
down vote

favorite

This is my question for siunitx users: Is it necessary to specify the input-symbols parameter in the preamble, rather than within S?

Why do I ask?

Here's a table produced by my R function outreg in the package rockchalk.

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle 
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 input-symbols = ( )


begindocument
begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[input-symbols = ( ), 
 group-digits = false, 
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center, 
 table-space-text-pre = (, 
 table-space-text-post = ***, 
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false]@
hline
 & multicolumn1cWhichever& multicolumn1cWhatevertabularnewline
 & multicolumn1cEstimate& multicolumn1cEstimatetabularnewline
 & multicolumn1c(S.E.)& multicolumn1c(S.E.)tabularnewline
 hline
 hline
 (Intercept) &403.245*** &29.774*** tabularnewline
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 x1 &1.546*& multicolumn1cphantom000. tabularnewline
 & (0.692) & tabularnewline
 x2 & multicolumn1cphantom000. &3.413** tabularnewline
 & & (0.512)tabularnewline
 hline
 N& multicolumn1c100& multicolumn1c100 tabularnewline
 RMSE &6.121 &5.205 tabularnewline
 $R^2$ &0.048 &0.312 tabularnewline
 adj $R^2$ &0.039 &0.305 tabularnewline
 AIC &617.694 &617.694tabularnewline
 hline
hline

 multicolumn3l$* ple 0.05$$*!!* ple 0.01$$*!!*!!* ple 0.001$tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

Thanks to the help of members in this group, the output is mostly adequate, IMHO. I cannot know ahead of time how many digits might be used, so I don't rely on table-format to tighten down the alignment. That's why I've got the nagging problems about centering of different sections of table. But this is, honestly, much better than I had before.

I'm asking now about the preamble and sisetup. I want the table markup to be as close to portable as possible, not depending on any preamble details.

I wanted to eliminate entirely the use of sisetup, but if I remove that from this example, it does not compile because the parentheses are not understandable to the compiler:

! siunitx error: "invalid-number"
!
! Invalid numerical input '(0.618)'.
!
! See the siunitx documentation for further information.

Is the preamble sisetup the only correction?

siunitx

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

This is my question for siunitx users: Is it necessary to specify the input-symbols parameter in the preamble, rather than within S?

Why do I ask?

Here's a table produced by my R function outreg in the package rockchalk.

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle 
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 input-symbols = ( )


begindocument
begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[input-symbols = ( ), 
 group-digits = false, 
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center, 
 table-space-text-pre = (, 
 table-space-text-post = ***, 
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false]@
hline
 & multicolumn1cWhichever& multicolumn1cWhatevertabularnewline
 & multicolumn1cEstimate& multicolumn1cEstimatetabularnewline
 & multicolumn1c(S.E.)& multicolumn1c(S.E.)tabularnewline
 hline
 hline
 (Intercept) &403.245*** &29.774*** tabularnewline
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 x1 &1.546*& multicolumn1cphantom000. tabularnewline
 & (0.692) & tabularnewline
 x2 & multicolumn1cphantom000. &3.413** tabularnewline
 & & (0.512)tabularnewline
 hline
 N& multicolumn1c100& multicolumn1c100 tabularnewline
 RMSE &6.121 &5.205 tabularnewline
 $R^2$ &0.048 &0.312 tabularnewline
 adj $R^2$ &0.039 &0.305 tabularnewline
 AIC &617.694 &617.694tabularnewline
 hline
hline

 multicolumn3l$* ple 0.05$$*!!* ple 0.01$$*!!*!!* ple 0.001$tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

Thanks to the help of members in this group, the output is mostly adequate, IMHO. I cannot know ahead of time how many digits might be used, so I don't rely on table-format to tighten down the alignment. That's why I've got the nagging problems about centering of different sections of table. But this is, honestly, much better than I had before.

I'm asking now about the preamble and sisetup. I want the table markup to be as close to portable as possible, not depending on any preamble details.

I wanted to eliminate entirely the use of sisetup, but if I remove that from this example, it does not compile because the parentheses are not understandable to the compiler:

! siunitx error: "invalid-number"
!
! Invalid numerical input '(0.618)'.
!
! See the siunitx documentation for further information.

Is the preamble sisetup the only correction?

siunitx

siunitx

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

share|improve this question

share|improve this question

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

asked 2 hours ago

pauljohn32

334110

334110

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
6
down vote



accepted

Your syntax of the tabular preamble is faulty. You are using *2S[...] But you should put braces around the second argument so that the optional argument of S is processed too:

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 % input-symbols = ( )


begindocument

begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[
 input-symbols = ( ),
 group-digits = false,
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center,
 table-space-text-pre = (,
 table-space-text-post = ***,
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false
 ]@
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454785%2fsiunitx-some-options-must-be-in-preamble-not-with-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

active

oldest

votes

up vote
6
down vote



accepted

Your syntax of the tabular preamble is faulty. You are using *2S[...] But you should put braces around the second argument so that the optional argument of S is processed too:

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 % input-symbols = ( )


begindocument

begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[
 input-symbols = ( ),
 group-digits = false,
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center,
 table-space-text-pre = (,
 table-space-text-post = ***,
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false
 ]@
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

add a comment | 

up vote
6
down vote



accepted

Your syntax of the tabular preamble is faulty. You are using *2S[...] But you should put braces around the second argument so that the optional argument of S is processed too:

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 % input-symbols = ( )


begindocument

begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[
 input-symbols = ( ),
 group-digits = false,
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center,
 table-space-text-pre = (,
 table-space-text-post = ***,
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false
 ]@
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

add a comment | 

up vote
6
down vote



accepted

up vote
6
down vote



accepted

Your syntax of the tabular preamble is faulty. You are using *2S[...] But you should put braces around the second argument so that the optional argument of S is processed too:

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 % input-symbols = ( )


begindocument

begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[
 input-symbols = ( ),
 group-digits = false,
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center,
 table-space-text-pre = (,
 table-space-text-post = ***,
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false
 ]@
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

Your syntax of the tabular preamble is faulty. You are using *2S[...] But you should put braces around the second argument so that the optional argument of S is processed too:

documentclass[11pt,letterpaper,english]extarticle
usepackagebooktabs
usepackagedcolumn
usepackagearray

usepackagesiunitx
%following now in each table
sisetup
 % input-symbols = ( )


begindocument

begintable
captionStill have showAIC argument, as in previous versionslabeltab:ex5ds
centeringbegintabular@l*2S[
 input-symbols = ( ),
 group-digits = false,
 table-format = 3.3,
 table-number-alignment = center,
 table-space-text-pre = (,
 table-space-text-post = ***,
 table-align-text-pre = false,
 table-align-text-post = false,
 parse-units = false
 ]@
 & (0.618) & (0.522)tabularnewline
 endtabular
 endtable
enddocument

share|improve this answer

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

share|improve this answer

share|improve this answer

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

answered 44 mins ago

Ulrike Fischer

180k7285655

180k7285655

add a comment | 

add a comment | 

 

draft saved

draft discarded

 

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f454785%2fsiunitx-some-options-must-be-in-preamble-not-with-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name Email

Name Email

Name

Email

Name Email

Name

Email