What role did the RAT (Ram Air Turbine) play on US Airways flight 1549?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
An article in June 2018 Flying Magazine regarding the RAT by a Rob Mark explains that Capt. Sullunberger deployed the RAT for additional power to guide the plane down to the safe ditching on the Hudson River.
My understanding is, according to all the narratives, the book, and the movie, what saved the day (with the exception of the amazing skills of the flight crew) was the immediate starting of the APU by Capt. Sullenberger that was not even on the QRM check list,...and not the RAT.
I am wondering if both (APU and RAT) were used on that flight or the APU only? And if so, has Flying Magazine author made a mistake?
aircraft-performance apu rat
add a comment |Â
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
An article in June 2018 Flying Magazine regarding the RAT by a Rob Mark explains that Capt. Sullunberger deployed the RAT for additional power to guide the plane down to the safe ditching on the Hudson River.
My understanding is, according to all the narratives, the book, and the movie, what saved the day (with the exception of the amazing skills of the flight crew) was the immediate starting of the APU by Capt. Sullenberger that was not even on the QRM check list,...and not the RAT.
I am wondering if both (APU and RAT) were used on that flight or the APU only? And if so, has Flying Magazine author made a mistake?
aircraft-performance apu rat
add a comment |Â
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
An article in June 2018 Flying Magazine regarding the RAT by a Rob Mark explains that Capt. Sullunberger deployed the RAT for additional power to guide the plane down to the safe ditching on the Hudson River.
My understanding is, according to all the narratives, the book, and the movie, what saved the day (with the exception of the amazing skills of the flight crew) was the immediate starting of the APU by Capt. Sullenberger that was not even on the QRM check list,...and not the RAT.
I am wondering if both (APU and RAT) were used on that flight or the APU only? And if so, has Flying Magazine author made a mistake?
aircraft-performance apu rat
An article in June 2018 Flying Magazine regarding the RAT by a Rob Mark explains that Capt. Sullunberger deployed the RAT for additional power to guide the plane down to the safe ditching on the Hudson River.
My understanding is, according to all the narratives, the book, and the movie, what saved the day (with the exception of the amazing skills of the flight crew) was the immediate starting of the APU by Capt. Sullenberger that was not even on the QRM check list,...and not the RAT.
I am wondering if both (APU and RAT) were used on that flight or the APU only? And if so, has Flying Magazine author made a mistake?
aircraft-performance apu rat
edited Sep 6 at 20:09
chicks
11515
11515
asked Sep 4 at 18:10


Hercules-63
20118
20118
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The full NTSB report can be found here and is the official source of information on the incident. According to that report Sullunberger did immediately start the APU which did deliver power and they determined they did not need to manually deploy the RAT. However the onboard systems deployed it automatically likely as a result of the initial power loss and sufficient airspeed (over 100Kts).
Regarding step e, the pilots stated that they determined that
electrical power was established and, therefore, that the RAT did not
need to be manually deployed. Further, immediately after the loss of
engine thrust, the captain started the APU.
This can be heard in the official transcript
At 1527:14, the first officer stated, “uh oh,†followed by the captain
stating, “we got one rol- both of ‘em rolling back.†At 1527:18, the
cockpit area microphone (CAM) recorded the beginning of a rumbling
sound.
At 1527:19, the captain stated, “[engine] ignition, start,â€Â
and, about 2 seconds later, “I’m starting the APU [auxiliary power
unit].â€Â5
At 1527:23, the captain took over control of the airplane,
stating, “my aircraft.â€Â
However the RAT was found to be deployed (due to the automatic systems on the aircraft) when the airframe was recovered
When all of the airplane’s electrical power is lost and the airplane
has an airspeed greater than 100 knots (kts), the RAT will
automatically deploy and begin providing electrical power. The RAT was
found in the extended position when the airplane was recovered from
the water.
4
How can a pilot extend rat when there is no power? Which is the problem rat tries to solve. (afaik) Is there a handle directly attached to it?
– Ali Erdem
Sep 4 at 19:09
8
@AliErdem: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/…
– BowlOfRed
Sep 4 at 19:22
1
If I recall correctly, you do not need power to deploy a RAT, you need power to retract it. Like brakes on a truck or a train, the default state is actually deployed, not stowed.
– MichaelK
Sep 5 at 7:37
2
RATs are normally spring-deployed (to get them out fast), and are held in by a latch. You need battery power to a solenoid to release the latch - twang! (They are retracted by hand to ensure the latch is hlding correctly, to avoid a twang at the wrong time.)
– RAC
Sep 5 at 7:54
1
Thank you for linking the report. It was an interresting read.
– Daan van Hoek
Sep 5 at 14:06
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The full NTSB report can be found here and is the official source of information on the incident. According to that report Sullunberger did immediately start the APU which did deliver power and they determined they did not need to manually deploy the RAT. However the onboard systems deployed it automatically likely as a result of the initial power loss and sufficient airspeed (over 100Kts).
Regarding step e, the pilots stated that they determined that
electrical power was established and, therefore, that the RAT did not
need to be manually deployed. Further, immediately after the loss of
engine thrust, the captain started the APU.
This can be heard in the official transcript
At 1527:14, the first officer stated, “uh oh,†followed by the captain
stating, “we got one rol- both of ‘em rolling back.†At 1527:18, the
cockpit area microphone (CAM) recorded the beginning of a rumbling
sound.
At 1527:19, the captain stated, “[engine] ignition, start,â€Â
and, about 2 seconds later, “I’m starting the APU [auxiliary power
unit].â€Â5
At 1527:23, the captain took over control of the airplane,
stating, “my aircraft.â€Â
However the RAT was found to be deployed (due to the automatic systems on the aircraft) when the airframe was recovered
When all of the airplane’s electrical power is lost and the airplane
has an airspeed greater than 100 knots (kts), the RAT will
automatically deploy and begin providing electrical power. The RAT was
found in the extended position when the airplane was recovered from
the water.
4
How can a pilot extend rat when there is no power? Which is the problem rat tries to solve. (afaik) Is there a handle directly attached to it?
– Ali Erdem
Sep 4 at 19:09
8
@AliErdem: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/…
– BowlOfRed
Sep 4 at 19:22
1
If I recall correctly, you do not need power to deploy a RAT, you need power to retract it. Like brakes on a truck or a train, the default state is actually deployed, not stowed.
– MichaelK
Sep 5 at 7:37
2
RATs are normally spring-deployed (to get them out fast), and are held in by a latch. You need battery power to a solenoid to release the latch - twang! (They are retracted by hand to ensure the latch is hlding correctly, to avoid a twang at the wrong time.)
– RAC
Sep 5 at 7:54
1
Thank you for linking the report. It was an interresting read.
– Daan van Hoek
Sep 5 at 14:06
add a comment |Â
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The full NTSB report can be found here and is the official source of information on the incident. According to that report Sullunberger did immediately start the APU which did deliver power and they determined they did not need to manually deploy the RAT. However the onboard systems deployed it automatically likely as a result of the initial power loss and sufficient airspeed (over 100Kts).
Regarding step e, the pilots stated that they determined that
electrical power was established and, therefore, that the RAT did not
need to be manually deployed. Further, immediately after the loss of
engine thrust, the captain started the APU.
This can be heard in the official transcript
At 1527:14, the first officer stated, “uh oh,†followed by the captain
stating, “we got one rol- both of ‘em rolling back.†At 1527:18, the
cockpit area microphone (CAM) recorded the beginning of a rumbling
sound.
At 1527:19, the captain stated, “[engine] ignition, start,â€Â
and, about 2 seconds later, “I’m starting the APU [auxiliary power
unit].â€Â5
At 1527:23, the captain took over control of the airplane,
stating, “my aircraft.â€Â
However the RAT was found to be deployed (due to the automatic systems on the aircraft) when the airframe was recovered
When all of the airplane’s electrical power is lost and the airplane
has an airspeed greater than 100 knots (kts), the RAT will
automatically deploy and begin providing electrical power. The RAT was
found in the extended position when the airplane was recovered from
the water.
4
How can a pilot extend rat when there is no power? Which is the problem rat tries to solve. (afaik) Is there a handle directly attached to it?
– Ali Erdem
Sep 4 at 19:09
8
@AliErdem: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/…
– BowlOfRed
Sep 4 at 19:22
1
If I recall correctly, you do not need power to deploy a RAT, you need power to retract it. Like brakes on a truck or a train, the default state is actually deployed, not stowed.
– MichaelK
Sep 5 at 7:37
2
RATs are normally spring-deployed (to get them out fast), and are held in by a latch. You need battery power to a solenoid to release the latch - twang! (They are retracted by hand to ensure the latch is hlding correctly, to avoid a twang at the wrong time.)
– RAC
Sep 5 at 7:54
1
Thank you for linking the report. It was an interresting read.
– Daan van Hoek
Sep 5 at 14:06
add a comment |Â
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
up vote
26
down vote
accepted
The full NTSB report can be found here and is the official source of information on the incident. According to that report Sullunberger did immediately start the APU which did deliver power and they determined they did not need to manually deploy the RAT. However the onboard systems deployed it automatically likely as a result of the initial power loss and sufficient airspeed (over 100Kts).
Regarding step e, the pilots stated that they determined that
electrical power was established and, therefore, that the RAT did not
need to be manually deployed. Further, immediately after the loss of
engine thrust, the captain started the APU.
This can be heard in the official transcript
At 1527:14, the first officer stated, “uh oh,†followed by the captain
stating, “we got one rol- both of ‘em rolling back.†At 1527:18, the
cockpit area microphone (CAM) recorded the beginning of a rumbling
sound.
At 1527:19, the captain stated, “[engine] ignition, start,â€Â
and, about 2 seconds later, “I’m starting the APU [auxiliary power
unit].â€Â5
At 1527:23, the captain took over control of the airplane,
stating, “my aircraft.â€Â
However the RAT was found to be deployed (due to the automatic systems on the aircraft) when the airframe was recovered
When all of the airplane’s electrical power is lost and the airplane
has an airspeed greater than 100 knots (kts), the RAT will
automatically deploy and begin providing electrical power. The RAT was
found in the extended position when the airplane was recovered from
the water.
The full NTSB report can be found here and is the official source of information on the incident. According to that report Sullunberger did immediately start the APU which did deliver power and they determined they did not need to manually deploy the RAT. However the onboard systems deployed it automatically likely as a result of the initial power loss and sufficient airspeed (over 100Kts).
Regarding step e, the pilots stated that they determined that
electrical power was established and, therefore, that the RAT did not
need to be manually deployed. Further, immediately after the loss of
engine thrust, the captain started the APU.
This can be heard in the official transcript
At 1527:14, the first officer stated, “uh oh,†followed by the captain
stating, “we got one rol- both of ‘em rolling back.†At 1527:18, the
cockpit area microphone (CAM) recorded the beginning of a rumbling
sound.
At 1527:19, the captain stated, “[engine] ignition, start,â€Â
and, about 2 seconds later, “I’m starting the APU [auxiliary power
unit].â€Â5
At 1527:23, the captain took over control of the airplane,
stating, “my aircraft.â€Â
However the RAT was found to be deployed (due to the automatic systems on the aircraft) when the airframe was recovered
When all of the airplane’s electrical power is lost and the airplane
has an airspeed greater than 100 knots (kts), the RAT will
automatically deploy and begin providing electrical power. The RAT was
found in the extended position when the airplane was recovered from
the water.
edited Sep 4 at 21:42
answered Sep 4 at 18:27
Dave
56.5k3101207
56.5k3101207
4
How can a pilot extend rat when there is no power? Which is the problem rat tries to solve. (afaik) Is there a handle directly attached to it?
– Ali Erdem
Sep 4 at 19:09
8
@AliErdem: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/…
– BowlOfRed
Sep 4 at 19:22
1
If I recall correctly, you do not need power to deploy a RAT, you need power to retract it. Like brakes on a truck or a train, the default state is actually deployed, not stowed.
– MichaelK
Sep 5 at 7:37
2
RATs are normally spring-deployed (to get them out fast), and are held in by a latch. You need battery power to a solenoid to release the latch - twang! (They are retracted by hand to ensure the latch is hlding correctly, to avoid a twang at the wrong time.)
– RAC
Sep 5 at 7:54
1
Thank you for linking the report. It was an interresting read.
– Daan van Hoek
Sep 5 at 14:06
add a comment |Â
4
How can a pilot extend rat when there is no power? Which is the problem rat tries to solve. (afaik) Is there a handle directly attached to it?
– Ali Erdem
Sep 4 at 19:09
8
@AliErdem: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/…
– BowlOfRed
Sep 4 at 19:22
1
If I recall correctly, you do not need power to deploy a RAT, you need power to retract it. Like brakes on a truck or a train, the default state is actually deployed, not stowed.
– MichaelK
Sep 5 at 7:37
2
RATs are normally spring-deployed (to get them out fast), and are held in by a latch. You need battery power to a solenoid to release the latch - twang! (They are retracted by hand to ensure the latch is hlding correctly, to avoid a twang at the wrong time.)
– RAC
Sep 5 at 7:54
1
Thank you for linking the report. It was an interresting read.
– Daan van Hoek
Sep 5 at 14:06
4
4
How can a pilot extend rat when there is no power? Which is the problem rat tries to solve. (afaik) Is there a handle directly attached to it?
– Ali Erdem
Sep 4 at 19:09
How can a pilot extend rat when there is no power? Which is the problem rat tries to solve. (afaik) Is there a handle directly attached to it?
– Ali Erdem
Sep 4 at 19:09
8
8
@AliErdem: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/…
– BowlOfRed
Sep 4 at 19:22
@AliErdem: aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/1583/…
– BowlOfRed
Sep 4 at 19:22
1
1
If I recall correctly, you do not need power to deploy a RAT, you need power to retract it. Like brakes on a truck or a train, the default state is actually deployed, not stowed.
– MichaelK
Sep 5 at 7:37
If I recall correctly, you do not need power to deploy a RAT, you need power to retract it. Like brakes on a truck or a train, the default state is actually deployed, not stowed.
– MichaelK
Sep 5 at 7:37
2
2
RATs are normally spring-deployed (to get them out fast), and are held in by a latch. You need battery power to a solenoid to release the latch - twang! (They are retracted by hand to ensure the latch is hlding correctly, to avoid a twang at the wrong time.)
– RAC
Sep 5 at 7:54
RATs are normally spring-deployed (to get them out fast), and are held in by a latch. You need battery power to a solenoid to release the latch - twang! (They are retracted by hand to ensure the latch is hlding correctly, to avoid a twang at the wrong time.)
– RAC
Sep 5 at 7:54
1
1
Thank you for linking the report. It was an interresting read.
– Daan van Hoek
Sep 5 at 14:06
Thank you for linking the report. It was an interresting read.
– Daan van Hoek
Sep 5 at 14:06
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54820%2fwhat-role-did-the-rat-ram-air-turbine-play-on-us-airways-flight-1549%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password