How does the Disengage action interact with opportunity attacks when invisible?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
9
down vote

favorite












I've got an encounter planned involving several creatures who were modified by magic to be able to camouflage themselves to such an extent that the only time they are visible is that instant when they attack a player (think active camo from the Halo series). I've read up on rules for attacking from stealth and attacking a 'hidden' enemy, but I was unable to find anything about how disengaging would go into it.



Currently I plan on having those creatures that leave without using a disengage action provide an opportunity attack from the nearby players albeit with disadvantage due to the camouflage. Would this be an accurate ruling, or would it be more correct to say that, since they are exceptionally hidden, the players would be unable to do an attack of opportunity?







share|improve this question









New contributor




Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Related: When you cast invisibility on your turn, and walk away from 2 enemies, do they get an attack of opportunity?
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 18:59






  • 2




    Your last sentence includes the phrase "exceptionally hidden" to describe the camouflage's effect. This leads me to believe that you might be conflating merely invisible/unseen with hidden, which are two different things in 5E. You may wish to review other answers on this site to familiarize yourself with the difference.
    – cpcodes
    Sep 6 at 20:54
















up vote
9
down vote

favorite












I've got an encounter planned involving several creatures who were modified by magic to be able to camouflage themselves to such an extent that the only time they are visible is that instant when they attack a player (think active camo from the Halo series). I've read up on rules for attacking from stealth and attacking a 'hidden' enemy, but I was unable to find anything about how disengaging would go into it.



Currently I plan on having those creatures that leave without using a disengage action provide an opportunity attack from the nearby players albeit with disadvantage due to the camouflage. Would this be an accurate ruling, or would it be more correct to say that, since they are exceptionally hidden, the players would be unable to do an attack of opportunity?







share|improve this question









New contributor




Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















  • Related: When you cast invisibility on your turn, and walk away from 2 enemies, do they get an attack of opportunity?
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 18:59






  • 2




    Your last sentence includes the phrase "exceptionally hidden" to describe the camouflage's effect. This leads me to believe that you might be conflating merely invisible/unseen with hidden, which are two different things in 5E. You may wish to review other answers on this site to familiarize yourself with the difference.
    – cpcodes
    Sep 6 at 20:54












up vote
9
down vote

favorite









up vote
9
down vote

favorite











I've got an encounter planned involving several creatures who were modified by magic to be able to camouflage themselves to such an extent that the only time they are visible is that instant when they attack a player (think active camo from the Halo series). I've read up on rules for attacking from stealth and attacking a 'hidden' enemy, but I was unable to find anything about how disengaging would go into it.



Currently I plan on having those creatures that leave without using a disengage action provide an opportunity attack from the nearby players albeit with disadvantage due to the camouflage. Would this be an accurate ruling, or would it be more correct to say that, since they are exceptionally hidden, the players would be unable to do an attack of opportunity?







share|improve this question









New contributor




Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










I've got an encounter planned involving several creatures who were modified by magic to be able to camouflage themselves to such an extent that the only time they are visible is that instant when they attack a player (think active camo from the Halo series). I've read up on rules for attacking from stealth and attacking a 'hidden' enemy, but I was unable to find anything about how disengaging would go into it.



Currently I plan on having those creatures that leave without using a disengage action provide an opportunity attack from the nearby players albeit with disadvantage due to the camouflage. Would this be an accurate ruling, or would it be more correct to say that, since they are exceptionally hidden, the players would be unable to do an attack of opportunity?









share|improve this question









New contributor




Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 6 at 20:46









V2Blast

14k23493




14k23493






New contributor




Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Sep 6 at 18:08









Skulgren

483




483




New contributor




Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Skulgren is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Related: When you cast invisibility on your turn, and walk away from 2 enemies, do they get an attack of opportunity?
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 18:59






  • 2




    Your last sentence includes the phrase "exceptionally hidden" to describe the camouflage's effect. This leads me to believe that you might be conflating merely invisible/unseen with hidden, which are two different things in 5E. You may wish to review other answers on this site to familiarize yourself with the difference.
    – cpcodes
    Sep 6 at 20:54
















  • Related: When you cast invisibility on your turn, and walk away from 2 enemies, do they get an attack of opportunity?
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 18:59






  • 2




    Your last sentence includes the phrase "exceptionally hidden" to describe the camouflage's effect. This leads me to believe that you might be conflating merely invisible/unseen with hidden, which are two different things in 5E. You may wish to review other answers on this site to familiarize yourself with the difference.
    – cpcodes
    Sep 6 at 20:54















Related: When you cast invisibility on your turn, and walk away from 2 enemies, do they get an attack of opportunity?
– Rubiksmoose
Sep 6 at 18:59




Related: When you cast invisibility on your turn, and walk away from 2 enemies, do they get an attack of opportunity?
– Rubiksmoose
Sep 6 at 18:59




2




2




Your last sentence includes the phrase "exceptionally hidden" to describe the camouflage's effect. This leads me to believe that you might be conflating merely invisible/unseen with hidden, which are two different things in 5E. You may wish to review other answers on this site to familiarize yourself with the difference.
– cpcodes
Sep 6 at 20:54




Your last sentence includes the phrase "exceptionally hidden" to describe the camouflage's effect. This leads me to believe that you might be conflating merely invisible/unseen with hidden, which are two different things in 5E. You may wish to review other answers on this site to familiarize yourself with the difference.
– cpcodes
Sep 6 at 20:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
18
down vote



accepted










Opportunity Attacks Depend on Sight



As per the basic rules:




You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.




If the character can see the enemy, they can use their reaction to make an opportunity attack.



If they cannot see the enemy, they cannot take an opportunity attack.



Use Ready Action to Attack Briefly Visible Enemy



This assumes that attacking renders the enemy visible, and it then gets some sort of free action to become invisible again. In this case, a character could use the ready action to strike as soon as the enemy become visible. However, that means characters with extra attack won't get to use that feature.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3




    I think the answer might be worth expanding slightly to note that though the players won't get to make opportunity attacks, they could use the Ready action on their turns to prepare an attack the instant such a creature appears next to them, so there is a way they can use their reactions to get attacks against these creatures.
    – Carcer
    Sep 6 at 18:27










  • Extra attack also won't work.
    – NautArch
    Sep 6 at 18:48










  • Since in this case the players are the ones making the OAs you may want to say Extra Attack. Multi-attack is a monster ability. It also might be good to explicitly say that because OAs can depend on sight, there is no reason for the monsters in the question to disengage. Just to fully close the loop on the question.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 19:26







  • 1




    Also worth noting that simply being invisible won't stop players from attacking - the creature would have to take the hide action and beat the PCs perception for that.
    – Isaac Reefman
    Sep 7 at 1:33










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Skulgren is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131242%2fhow-does-the-disengage-action-interact-with-opportunity-attacks-when-invisible%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
18
down vote



accepted










Opportunity Attacks Depend on Sight



As per the basic rules:




You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.




If the character can see the enemy, they can use their reaction to make an opportunity attack.



If they cannot see the enemy, they cannot take an opportunity attack.



Use Ready Action to Attack Briefly Visible Enemy



This assumes that attacking renders the enemy visible, and it then gets some sort of free action to become invisible again. In this case, a character could use the ready action to strike as soon as the enemy become visible. However, that means characters with extra attack won't get to use that feature.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3




    I think the answer might be worth expanding slightly to note that though the players won't get to make opportunity attacks, they could use the Ready action on their turns to prepare an attack the instant such a creature appears next to them, so there is a way they can use their reactions to get attacks against these creatures.
    – Carcer
    Sep 6 at 18:27










  • Extra attack also won't work.
    – NautArch
    Sep 6 at 18:48










  • Since in this case the players are the ones making the OAs you may want to say Extra Attack. Multi-attack is a monster ability. It also might be good to explicitly say that because OAs can depend on sight, there is no reason for the monsters in the question to disengage. Just to fully close the loop on the question.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 19:26







  • 1




    Also worth noting that simply being invisible won't stop players from attacking - the creature would have to take the hide action and beat the PCs perception for that.
    – Isaac Reefman
    Sep 7 at 1:33














up vote
18
down vote



accepted










Opportunity Attacks Depend on Sight



As per the basic rules:




You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.




If the character can see the enemy, they can use their reaction to make an opportunity attack.



If they cannot see the enemy, they cannot take an opportunity attack.



Use Ready Action to Attack Briefly Visible Enemy



This assumes that attacking renders the enemy visible, and it then gets some sort of free action to become invisible again. In this case, a character could use the ready action to strike as soon as the enemy become visible. However, that means characters with extra attack won't get to use that feature.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3




    I think the answer might be worth expanding slightly to note that though the players won't get to make opportunity attacks, they could use the Ready action on their turns to prepare an attack the instant such a creature appears next to them, so there is a way they can use their reactions to get attacks against these creatures.
    – Carcer
    Sep 6 at 18:27










  • Extra attack also won't work.
    – NautArch
    Sep 6 at 18:48










  • Since in this case the players are the ones making the OAs you may want to say Extra Attack. Multi-attack is a monster ability. It also might be good to explicitly say that because OAs can depend on sight, there is no reason for the monsters in the question to disengage. Just to fully close the loop on the question.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 19:26







  • 1




    Also worth noting that simply being invisible won't stop players from attacking - the creature would have to take the hide action and beat the PCs perception for that.
    – Isaac Reefman
    Sep 7 at 1:33












up vote
18
down vote



accepted







up vote
18
down vote



accepted






Opportunity Attacks Depend on Sight



As per the basic rules:




You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.




If the character can see the enemy, they can use their reaction to make an opportunity attack.



If they cannot see the enemy, they cannot take an opportunity attack.



Use Ready Action to Attack Briefly Visible Enemy



This assumes that attacking renders the enemy visible, and it then gets some sort of free action to become invisible again. In this case, a character could use the ready action to strike as soon as the enemy become visible. However, that means characters with extra attack won't get to use that feature.






share|improve this answer














Opportunity Attacks Depend on Sight



As per the basic rules:




You can make an opportunity attack when a hostile creature that you can see moves out of your reach.




If the character can see the enemy, they can use their reaction to make an opportunity attack.



If they cannot see the enemy, they cannot take an opportunity attack.



Use Ready Action to Attack Briefly Visible Enemy



This assumes that attacking renders the enemy visible, and it then gets some sort of free action to become invisible again. In this case, a character could use the ready action to strike as soon as the enemy become visible. However, that means characters with extra attack won't get to use that feature.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Sep 8 at 16:01









Christopher

9,63713672




9,63713672










answered Sep 6 at 18:17









Grosscol

4,091734




4,091734







  • 3




    I think the answer might be worth expanding slightly to note that though the players won't get to make opportunity attacks, they could use the Ready action on their turns to prepare an attack the instant such a creature appears next to them, so there is a way they can use their reactions to get attacks against these creatures.
    – Carcer
    Sep 6 at 18:27










  • Extra attack also won't work.
    – NautArch
    Sep 6 at 18:48










  • Since in this case the players are the ones making the OAs you may want to say Extra Attack. Multi-attack is a monster ability. It also might be good to explicitly say that because OAs can depend on sight, there is no reason for the monsters in the question to disengage. Just to fully close the loop on the question.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 19:26







  • 1




    Also worth noting that simply being invisible won't stop players from attacking - the creature would have to take the hide action and beat the PCs perception for that.
    – Isaac Reefman
    Sep 7 at 1:33












  • 3




    I think the answer might be worth expanding slightly to note that though the players won't get to make opportunity attacks, they could use the Ready action on their turns to prepare an attack the instant such a creature appears next to them, so there is a way they can use their reactions to get attacks against these creatures.
    – Carcer
    Sep 6 at 18:27










  • Extra attack also won't work.
    – NautArch
    Sep 6 at 18:48










  • Since in this case the players are the ones making the OAs you may want to say Extra Attack. Multi-attack is a monster ability. It also might be good to explicitly say that because OAs can depend on sight, there is no reason for the monsters in the question to disengage. Just to fully close the loop on the question.
    – Rubiksmoose
    Sep 6 at 19:26







  • 1




    Also worth noting that simply being invisible won't stop players from attacking - the creature would have to take the hide action and beat the PCs perception for that.
    – Isaac Reefman
    Sep 7 at 1:33







3




3




I think the answer might be worth expanding slightly to note that though the players won't get to make opportunity attacks, they could use the Ready action on their turns to prepare an attack the instant such a creature appears next to them, so there is a way they can use their reactions to get attacks against these creatures.
– Carcer
Sep 6 at 18:27




I think the answer might be worth expanding slightly to note that though the players won't get to make opportunity attacks, they could use the Ready action on their turns to prepare an attack the instant such a creature appears next to them, so there is a way they can use their reactions to get attacks against these creatures.
– Carcer
Sep 6 at 18:27












Extra attack also won't work.
– NautArch
Sep 6 at 18:48




Extra attack also won't work.
– NautArch
Sep 6 at 18:48












Since in this case the players are the ones making the OAs you may want to say Extra Attack. Multi-attack is a monster ability. It also might be good to explicitly say that because OAs can depend on sight, there is no reason for the monsters in the question to disengage. Just to fully close the loop on the question.
– Rubiksmoose
Sep 6 at 19:26





Since in this case the players are the ones making the OAs you may want to say Extra Attack. Multi-attack is a monster ability. It also might be good to explicitly say that because OAs can depend on sight, there is no reason for the monsters in the question to disengage. Just to fully close the loop on the question.
– Rubiksmoose
Sep 6 at 19:26





1




1




Also worth noting that simply being invisible won't stop players from attacking - the creature would have to take the hide action and beat the PCs perception for that.
– Isaac Reefman
Sep 7 at 1:33




Also worth noting that simply being invisible won't stop players from attacking - the creature would have to take the hide action and beat the PCs perception for that.
– Isaac Reefman
Sep 7 at 1:33










Skulgren is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Skulgren is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Skulgren is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Skulgren is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f131242%2fhow-does-the-disengage-action-interact-with-opportunity-attacks-when-invisible%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery