Large bib entry (>20000 characters)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3












My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?







share|improve this question
















  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13














up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3












My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?







share|improve this question
















  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13












up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3






3





My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?







share|improve this question












My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 10 at 14:57









hdev

614




614







  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13












  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13







2




2




D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 14:59




D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 14:59




2




2




I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:01





I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:01





3




3




Two words: et al. :)
– Alan Munn
Aug 10 at 15:04




Two words: et al. :)
– Alan Munn
Aug 10 at 15:04




3




3




it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:05




it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:05




2




2




@hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:13




@hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
13
down vote













The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer




















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445514%2flarge-bib-entry-20000-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
13
down vote













The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer




















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40














up vote
13
down vote













The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer




















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40












up vote
13
down vote










up vote
13
down vote









The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer












The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Aug 10 at 15:25









egreg

679k8318063049




679k8318063049











  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40
















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40















You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:38




You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:38












@hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
– egreg
Aug 10 at 15:40




@hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
– egreg
Aug 10 at 15:40

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445514%2flarge-bib-entry-20000-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

One-line joke