Large bib entry (>20000 characters)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3












My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?




bibtex




share|improve this question
















  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13














up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3












My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?




bibtex




share|improve this question
















  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13












up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3









up vote
12
down vote

favorite
3






3





My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?




bibtex




share|improve this question












My bibliography contains a very big paper (3000+ authors).



When trying to cite that paper, I get this error:



Your field is more than 20000 characters---line 495 of file research.bib


And the citation doesn't appear in the final document.



Question:
How do I fix this or bypass that limit?





bibtex





share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Aug 10 at 14:57









hdev

614




614







  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13












  • 2




    D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 14:59






  • 2




    I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:01







  • 3




    Two words: et al. :)
    – Alan Munn
    Aug 10 at 15:04






  • 3




    it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:05






  • 2




    @hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
    – Phelype Oleinik
    Aug 10 at 15:13







2




2




D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 14:59




D= What paper is this? I'm curious now!
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 14:59




2




2




I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:01





I think that you would need to recompile BibTeX with a larger memory size or cut some author. Or maybe use biber and BibLaTeX instead...
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:01





3




3




Two words: et al. :)
– Alan Munn
Aug 10 at 15:04




Two words: et al. :)
– Alan Munn
Aug 10 at 15:04




3




3




it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:05




it's the one about gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars (iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9) :)
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:05




2




2




@hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:13




@hdev My field is ocean wave energy, but I'm definitely citing this paper in my master's thesis =D
– Phelype Oleinik
Aug 10 at 15:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
13
down vote













The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer




















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445514%2flarge-bib-entry-20000-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
13
down vote













The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer




















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40














up vote
13
down vote













The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer




















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40












up vote
13
down vote










up vote
13
down vote









The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.






share|improve this answer












The BibTeX file exported by IOP is malformed as institutional authors are intermingled with persons and even Biber chokes on it. With some editing it will run, but at the end it will output “B. P. Abbot et al.”.



Change author= into fullauthor= and add the field



author=B. P. Abbot and others,


BibTeX will ignore the humongous fullauthor field.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Aug 10 at 15:25









egreg

679k8318063049




679k8318063049











  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40
















  • You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
    – hdev
    Aug 10 at 15:38










  • @hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
    – egreg
    Aug 10 at 15:40















You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:38




You're right, think I might have to resort to chopping it manually
– hdev
Aug 10 at 15:38












@hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
– egreg
Aug 10 at 15:40




@hdev No need to remove the full list, just change the field name to something BibTeX ignores and add a reduced list like I showed.
– egreg
Aug 10 at 15:40

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445514%2flarge-bib-entry-20000-characters%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote 31 down vote favorite 4 I hold a PhD in mechanical engineering with a 7 year background in self-guided, self-paced research including 2 years as a graduate level course instructor and a subject matter expert for various engineering projects in a university setting in the United States. For the last 10-11 months, I am working in a research industry in France where my task is to debug C++ spaghetti code written over a period of several years by my current supervisor. It is a team of 2: just I and my supervisor. Diurnally, I am posed with a "bug of the day" to get out of this C++ code. My supervisor generally gives me about 15-30 minutes to solve it and then accosts me about whether or not the task is completed and then rinses and repeats this until the end of the day. Off-late, my supervisor has been holding 6-7 hour long "meetin
Read more

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite Many fantasy worlds have multiple humanoid species (elves, orcs, humans, etc) living in the same world, in addition to that, they often have the ability to interbreed. And I can't help but question their believability... fantasy-races reproduction interspecies-relations share | improve this question edited Aug 9 at 14:46 Michael Kjörling ♦ 21.1k 10 85 161 asked Aug 9 at 13:13 Chlodio 118 6 closed as unclear what you're asking by MichaelK, Gryphon, John, Vincent, Frostfyre Aug 9 at 15:25 Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question. 3 Stack Exchange exist to
Read more

Confectionery

Image
Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of
Read more