Mixing
At what point was nose wheel steering “added†to the Space Shuttle design?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
A comment below this answer to my question "Runway landing with a front skid instead of wheel - how does steering happen? (Dreamchaser)" says:
In fact, the Space Shuttle didn't originally have nosewheel steering. It was added after brake damage incidents.
If this is so, at what point in the Shuttle's development, testing, and extensive flight history did this happen? It seems like adding a complete, reliable nose wheel steering system to a mature design would be quite an undertaking.
space-shuttle
asked Aug 10 at 10:36
uhoh
27.4k1287340
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
A comment below this answer to my question "Runway landing with a front skid instead of wheel - how does steering happen? (Dreamchaser)" says:
In fact, the Space Shuttle didn't originally have nosewheel steering. It was added after brake damage incidents.
If this is so, at what point in the Shuttle's development, testing, and extensive flight history did this happen? It seems like adding a complete, reliable nose wheel steering system to a mature design would be quite an undertaking.
space-shuttle
asked Aug 10 at 10:36
uhoh
27.4k1287340
add a comment |Â
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
A comment below this answer to my question "Runway landing with a front skid instead of wheel - how does steering happen? (Dreamchaser)" says:
In fact, the Space Shuttle didn't originally have nosewheel steering. It was added after brake damage incidents.
If this is so, at what point in the Shuttle's development, testing, and extensive flight history did this happen? It seems like adding a complete, reliable nose wheel steering system to a mature design would be quite an undertaking.
space-shuttle
asked Aug 10 at 10:36
uhoh
27.4k1287340
A comment below this answer to my question "Runway landing with a front skid instead of wheel - how does steering happen? (Dreamchaser)" says:
In fact, the Space Shuttle didn't originally have nosewheel steering. It was added after brake damage incidents.
If this is so, at what point in the Shuttle's development, testing, and extensive flight history did this happen? It seems like adding a complete, reliable nose wheel steering system to a mature design would be quite an undertaking.
space-shuttle
asked Aug 10 at 10:36
uhoh
27.4k1287340
asked Aug 10 at 10:36
uhoh
27.4k1287340
asked Aug 10 at 10:36
uhoh
27.4k1287340
asked Aug 10 at 10:36
uhoh
27.4k1287340
27.4k1287340
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
That comment is incorrect, the Orbiters always had a nosewheel steering system (NWS).
Perhaps the author is remembering that the original system was inadequate: it was zero-fault tolerant for loss of hydraulic pressure, for one thing. It was redesigned after the Challenger failure (as were many of the Orbiter systems, including the brakes) to remove inadequacies in its design.
A diagram of the original system can be found in the 1982 press manual.
The text-only version of the 1988 update to the press manual has a terse description of the modifications:
The nose wheel steering system was modified on Columbia (OV-102) for
the 61-C mission, and Discovery (OV-103) and Atlantis (OV-104) are
being similarly modified before their return to flight. The
modification allows a safe high-speed engagement of the nose wheel
steering system and provides positive lateral directional control of
the orbiter during rollout in the presence of high crosswinds and
blown tires.
The Shuttle Crew Operations Manual gives a schematic of the upgraded system showing the addition of Hydraulic System 2 for redundancy. You can see from the diagram that this had the added bonus of providing hydraulic redundancy for nose gear deploy. (The main gear was only deployed by hydraulic system 1, and had a pyrotechnic backup release system).
The "Direct" mode of the system - which put the system in a non-fly-by-wire mode and controlled the steering directly from the rudder pedals - was removed and replaced by a redundant avionics system. You can see in the yellow picture above that the original NWS switch gave the commander a choice of GPC/Direct/Off (where GPC is the computer-supported mode). The picture below shows the switch to control the upgraded system, where the choices are System 1/System 2/Off.
The linked manuals have extensive descriptions of the original and upgraded system should you wish further reading.
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
1
Great! I had a hard time believing that differential braking of the Space Shuttle's wheels would ever have been the only way to steer the thing after touchdown.
– uhoh
Aug 10 at 13:33
1
Good intuition! The original system was really bad though and since the brakes were bad too, it wasn't a good situation.
– Organic Marble
Aug 10 at 13:49
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
That comment is incorrect, the Orbiters always had a nosewheel steering system (NWS).
Perhaps the author is remembering that the original system was inadequate: it was zero-fault tolerant for loss of hydraulic pressure, for one thing. It was redesigned after the Challenger failure (as were many of the Orbiter systems, including the brakes) to remove inadequacies in its design.
A diagram of the original system can be found in the 1982 press manual.
The text-only version of the 1988 update to the press manual has a terse description of the modifications:
The nose wheel steering system was modified on Columbia (OV-102) for
the 61-C mission, and Discovery (OV-103) and Atlantis (OV-104) are
being similarly modified before their return to flight. The
modification allows a safe high-speed engagement of the nose wheel
steering system and provides positive lateral directional control of
the orbiter during rollout in the presence of high crosswinds and
blown tires.
The Shuttle Crew Operations Manual gives a schematic of the upgraded system showing the addition of Hydraulic System 2 for redundancy. You can see from the diagram that this had the added bonus of providing hydraulic redundancy for nose gear deploy. (The main gear was only deployed by hydraulic system 1, and had a pyrotechnic backup release system).
The "Direct" mode of the system - which put the system in a non-fly-by-wire mode and controlled the steering directly from the rudder pedals - was removed and replaced by a redundant avionics system. You can see in the yellow picture above that the original NWS switch gave the commander a choice of GPC/Direct/Off (where GPC is the computer-supported mode). The picture below shows the switch to control the upgraded system, where the choices are System 1/System 2/Off.
The linked manuals have extensive descriptions of the original and upgraded system should you wish further reading.
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
1
Great! I had a hard time believing that differential braking of the Space Shuttle's wheels would ever have been the only way to steer the thing after touchdown.
– uhoh
Aug 10 at 13:33
1
Good intuition! The original system was really bad though and since the brakes were bad too, it wasn't a good situation.
– Organic Marble
Aug 10 at 13:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
That comment is incorrect, the Orbiters always had a nosewheel steering system (NWS).
Perhaps the author is remembering that the original system was inadequate: it was zero-fault tolerant for loss of hydraulic pressure, for one thing. It was redesigned after the Challenger failure (as were many of the Orbiter systems, including the brakes) to remove inadequacies in its design.
A diagram of the original system can be found in the 1982 press manual.
The text-only version of the 1988 update to the press manual has a terse description of the modifications:
The nose wheel steering system was modified on Columbia (OV-102) for
the 61-C mission, and Discovery (OV-103) and Atlantis (OV-104) are
being similarly modified before their return to flight. The
modification allows a safe high-speed engagement of the nose wheel
steering system and provides positive lateral directional control of
the orbiter during rollout in the presence of high crosswinds and
blown tires.
The Shuttle Crew Operations Manual gives a schematic of the upgraded system showing the addition of Hydraulic System 2 for redundancy. You can see from the diagram that this had the added bonus of providing hydraulic redundancy for nose gear deploy. (The main gear was only deployed by hydraulic system 1, and had a pyrotechnic backup release system).
The "Direct" mode of the system - which put the system in a non-fly-by-wire mode and controlled the steering directly from the rudder pedals - was removed and replaced by a redundant avionics system. You can see in the yellow picture above that the original NWS switch gave the commander a choice of GPC/Direct/Off (where GPC is the computer-supported mode). The picture below shows the switch to control the upgraded system, where the choices are System 1/System 2/Off.
The linked manuals have extensive descriptions of the original and upgraded system should you wish further reading.
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
1
Great! I had a hard time believing that differential braking of the Space Shuttle's wheels would ever have been the only way to steer the thing after touchdown.
– uhoh
Aug 10 at 13:33
1
Good intuition! The original system was really bad though and since the brakes were bad too, it wasn't a good situation.
– Organic Marble
Aug 10 at 13:49
add a comment |Â
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
up vote
12
down vote
accepted
That comment is incorrect, the Orbiters always had a nosewheel steering system (NWS).
Perhaps the author is remembering that the original system was inadequate: it was zero-fault tolerant for loss of hydraulic pressure, for one thing. It was redesigned after the Challenger failure (as were many of the Orbiter systems, including the brakes) to remove inadequacies in its design.
A diagram of the original system can be found in the 1982 press manual.
The text-only version of the 1988 update to the press manual has a terse description of the modifications:
The nose wheel steering system was modified on Columbia (OV-102) for
the 61-C mission, and Discovery (OV-103) and Atlantis (OV-104) are
being similarly modified before their return to flight. The
modification allows a safe high-speed engagement of the nose wheel
steering system and provides positive lateral directional control of
the orbiter during rollout in the presence of high crosswinds and
blown tires.
The Shuttle Crew Operations Manual gives a schematic of the upgraded system showing the addition of Hydraulic System 2 for redundancy. You can see from the diagram that this had the added bonus of providing hydraulic redundancy for nose gear deploy. (The main gear was only deployed by hydraulic system 1, and had a pyrotechnic backup release system).
The "Direct" mode of the system - which put the system in a non-fly-by-wire mode and controlled the steering directly from the rudder pedals - was removed and replaced by a redundant avionics system. You can see in the yellow picture above that the original NWS switch gave the commander a choice of GPC/Direct/Off (where GPC is the computer-supported mode). The picture below shows the switch to control the upgraded system, where the choices are System 1/System 2/Off.
The linked manuals have extensive descriptions of the original and upgraded system should you wish further reading.
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
That comment is incorrect, the Orbiters always had a nosewheel steering system (NWS).
Perhaps the author is remembering that the original system was inadequate: it was zero-fault tolerant for loss of hydraulic pressure, for one thing. It was redesigned after the Challenger failure (as were many of the Orbiter systems, including the brakes) to remove inadequacies in its design.
A diagram of the original system can be found in the 1982 press manual.
The text-only version of the 1988 update to the press manual has a terse description of the modifications:
The nose wheel steering system was modified on Columbia (OV-102) for
the 61-C mission, and Discovery (OV-103) and Atlantis (OV-104) are
being similarly modified before their return to flight. The
modification allows a safe high-speed engagement of the nose wheel
steering system and provides positive lateral directional control of
the orbiter during rollout in the presence of high crosswinds and
blown tires.
The Shuttle Crew Operations Manual gives a schematic of the upgraded system showing the addition of Hydraulic System 2 for redundancy. You can see from the diagram that this had the added bonus of providing hydraulic redundancy for nose gear deploy. (The main gear was only deployed by hydraulic system 1, and had a pyrotechnic backup release system).
The "Direct" mode of the system - which put the system in a non-fly-by-wire mode and controlled the steering directly from the rudder pedals - was removed and replaced by a redundant avionics system. You can see in the yellow picture above that the original NWS switch gave the commander a choice of GPC/Direct/Off (where GPC is the computer-supported mode). The picture below shows the switch to control the upgraded system, where the choices are System 1/System 2/Off.
The linked manuals have extensive descriptions of the original and upgraded system should you wish further reading.
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
edited Aug 10 at 12:52
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
answered Aug 10 at 12:46
Organic Marble
46.6k2119199
46.6k2119199
1
Great! I had a hard time believing that differential braking of the Space Shuttle's wheels would ever have been the only way to steer the thing after touchdown.
– uhoh
Aug 10 at 13:33
1
Good intuition! The original system was really bad though and since the brakes were bad too, it wasn't a good situation.
– Organic Marble
Aug 10 at 13:49
add a comment |Â
1
Great! I had a hard time believing that differential braking of the Space Shuttle's wheels would ever have been the only way to steer the thing after touchdown.
– uhoh
Aug 10 at 13:33
1
Good intuition! The original system was really bad though and since the brakes were bad too, it wasn't a good situation.
– Organic Marble
Aug 10 at 13:49
1
1
Great! I had a hard time believing that differential braking of the Space Shuttle's wheels would ever have been the only way to steer the thing after touchdown.
– uhoh
Aug 10 at 13:33
Great! I had a hard time believing that differential braking of the Space Shuttle's wheels would ever have been the only way to steer the thing after touchdown.
– uhoh
Aug 10 at 13:33
1
1
Good intuition! The original system was really bad though and since the brakes were bad too, it wasn't a good situation.
– Organic Marble
Aug 10 at 13:49
Good intuition! The original system was really bad though and since the brakes were bad too, it wasn't a good situation.
– Organic Marble
Aug 10 at 13:49
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30023%2fat-what-point-was-nose-wheel-steering-added-to-the-space-shuttle-design%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password