What is called for those who have not realized their Saguna or Nirguna bodies?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Whoever has awakened to the true nature of their being is called Brahman in Hindu.

What is the called for those, who have not awakened to the true Nature ?







share|improve this question






















  • one who is in bondage is said to be a baddhAtma
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:31










  • one in bondage who is devout in their search for truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:40











  • Samsari is the word you're looking for. But as @SudarshanaSuri mentioned, Mumukshu is someone who is not yet enlightened but is on the path.
    – Arkaprabha Majumdar
    Aug 10 at 11:35










  • It should be Saguna. I have edited it.
    – Rickross
    Aug 10 at 12:14






  • 1




    @JamieClinton Brahmin is social class, Brahman is the ultimate reality in Hinduism.
    – Chinmay Sarupria
    Aug 10 at 18:27














up vote
4
down vote

favorite












Whoever has awakened to the true nature of their being is called Brahman in Hindu.

What is the called for those, who have not awakened to the true Nature ?







share|improve this question






















  • one who is in bondage is said to be a baddhAtma
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:31










  • one in bondage who is devout in their search for truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:40











  • Samsari is the word you're looking for. But as @SudarshanaSuri mentioned, Mumukshu is someone who is not yet enlightened but is on the path.
    – Arkaprabha Majumdar
    Aug 10 at 11:35










  • It should be Saguna. I have edited it.
    – Rickross
    Aug 10 at 12:14






  • 1




    @JamieClinton Brahmin is social class, Brahman is the ultimate reality in Hinduism.
    – Chinmay Sarupria
    Aug 10 at 18:27












up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











Whoever has awakened to the true nature of their being is called Brahman in Hindu.

What is the called for those, who have not awakened to the true Nature ?







share|improve this question














Whoever has awakened to the true nature of their being is called Brahman in Hindu.

What is the called for those, who have not awakened to the true Nature ?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 11 at 3:09









iammilind

13k32790




13k32790










asked Aug 10 at 9:21









Frank Hestermann

501112




501112











  • one who is in bondage is said to be a baddhAtma
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:31










  • one in bondage who is devout in their search for truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:40











  • Samsari is the word you're looking for. But as @SudarshanaSuri mentioned, Mumukshu is someone who is not yet enlightened but is on the path.
    – Arkaprabha Majumdar
    Aug 10 at 11:35










  • It should be Saguna. I have edited it.
    – Rickross
    Aug 10 at 12:14






  • 1




    @JamieClinton Brahmin is social class, Brahman is the ultimate reality in Hinduism.
    – Chinmay Sarupria
    Aug 10 at 18:27
















  • one who is in bondage is said to be a baddhAtma
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:31










  • one in bondage who is devout in their search for truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu
    – SudarshanaSuri
    Aug 10 at 10:40











  • Samsari is the word you're looking for. But as @SudarshanaSuri mentioned, Mumukshu is someone who is not yet enlightened but is on the path.
    – Arkaprabha Majumdar
    Aug 10 at 11:35










  • It should be Saguna. I have edited it.
    – Rickross
    Aug 10 at 12:14






  • 1




    @JamieClinton Brahmin is social class, Brahman is the ultimate reality in Hinduism.
    – Chinmay Sarupria
    Aug 10 at 18:27















one who is in bondage is said to be a baddhAtma
– SudarshanaSuri
Aug 10 at 10:31




one who is in bondage is said to be a baddhAtma
– SudarshanaSuri
Aug 10 at 10:31












one in bondage who is devout in their search for truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu
– SudarshanaSuri
Aug 10 at 10:40





one in bondage who is devout in their search for truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu
– SudarshanaSuri
Aug 10 at 10:40













Samsari is the word you're looking for. But as @SudarshanaSuri mentioned, Mumukshu is someone who is not yet enlightened but is on the path.
– Arkaprabha Majumdar
Aug 10 at 11:35




Samsari is the word you're looking for. But as @SudarshanaSuri mentioned, Mumukshu is someone who is not yet enlightened but is on the path.
– Arkaprabha Majumdar
Aug 10 at 11:35












It should be Saguna. I have edited it.
– Rickross
Aug 10 at 12:14




It should be Saguna. I have edited it.
– Rickross
Aug 10 at 12:14




1




1




@JamieClinton Brahmin is social class, Brahman is the ultimate reality in Hinduism.
– Chinmay Sarupria
Aug 10 at 18:27




@JamieClinton Brahmin is social class, Brahman is the ultimate reality in Hinduism.
– Chinmay Sarupria
Aug 10 at 18:27










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













There can be many obvious terms for non-realized beings, as "deluded" or "covered by ignorance" or "bound".




BG 5.15 - The Omnipresent neither accepts anybody's sin nor even virtue. Knowledge remains covered by ignorance. Thus the creatures become deluded.

BG 3.27 — All actions are enacted in Prakruti by [3] modes (guna-s). Bound by ego(false identity), the self(Atma) believes "'I' am the doer".




But there is no official term as such. :-)

BTW, Nirguna viz. quality-less cannot have a body which is a quality. So it cannot be realized as such






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Many words are used. In general a realized person is known in the scriptures as Atma GyAni, Tattvavid, TattvagyAni, Mukto etc.



    Opposites will be Baddha (bound), agyAni (ooposite of GyAni) etc.



    Have a look at the following verse (from KulArnava Tantram 9.42):




    Jivah shivah shivo jivah sa jivah kevalah shivah |

    PAshabaddhah smrito jivah pAshamuktah sadAshivah ||






    The Jiva is Shiva; Shiva is Jiva; The Jiva is the Advitya (one without a
    second) Shiva only. When the Jiva is bound by the PAshas (bondage)
    it's Jiva and released of the PAshas it's SadAshiva.




    So, Baddhah is used in this verse as the opposite of Mukto (liberated).



    The purport is we are Jiva only as long as we are bound by the PAshas and we are none other than the Brahman himself once we are released of the bondages.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      One who is in bondage is referred to as baddhAtma. One in bondage who is devout in their search of truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu.



      Reference: Artha Panchakam (Verse 3 and 5, you can read from here)




      (3). The Baddhas, or the bound, are those souls who are turned away from the Bhagavan (God): (1) by reason
      of their illusorily identifying their selves (souls) with the bodies which they wear; constituted as these
      bodies are of the five material elements - impermanent cause of joy and grief - corrupt, so that in the
      absense of the indwindling spirit (soul), they are unfit for the sight or touch - and which breed the mental
      aberrations, such as ignorence (ajnAna), misapprehension (anyathA-jnAna) and reversed apprehension
      (viparitha-jnAna) and (2) by reason of their notion that pandering to the pleasures of the body (catered to
      by the five fold thralls of objects, sound, touch sight, taste and smell) is the be-all and end-all of their
      existence. To secure such pleasures of senses, they infringe all the salutary dictates comprised in the
      system known as varna and Asrama, become slaves to worldlings, inflict cruelty on creatures, seize
      others's wifes and wealth, and thus swell the ranks of the mundane.



      (5). The Mumuksus, or the Would-be Free, are those souls in whom the longing desire for salvation (i.e.
      reaching Bhagavan) has arisen. These are the two classes, viz. the UpAsakas, or the Strivers, and the
      Prapannas, or the Resigned. The former seek salvation by self-effort, and the latter leave the same to
      Bhagavan's (God's) care. The former thinks of salvation as his concern, whereas the latter thinks of it as
      His concern.







      share|improve this answer






















      • Can you add exact reference to verse from Artha Panchakam?
        – Pandya♦
        Aug 17 at 10:39










      • @Pandya The verses and their translation are given in the document I've linked above. Feel free to edit them into the answer (I'm getting font issues when I tried).
        – SudarshanaSuri
        Aug 17 at 11:24










      • I think 3rd not 2nd for Baddhas, just added.
        – Pandya♦
        Aug 17 at 11:31










      • So you are also unable to copy the tamizh verses? @Pandya
        – SudarshanaSuri
        Aug 17 at 11:34











      • will add later, somewhat busy.
        – Pandya♦
        Aug 17 at 11:35


















      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      5
      down vote













      There can be many obvious terms for non-realized beings, as "deluded" or "covered by ignorance" or "bound".




      BG 5.15 - The Omnipresent neither accepts anybody's sin nor even virtue. Knowledge remains covered by ignorance. Thus the creatures become deluded.

      BG 3.27 — All actions are enacted in Prakruti by [3] modes (guna-s). Bound by ego(false identity), the self(Atma) believes "'I' am the doer".




      But there is no official term as such. :-)

      BTW, Nirguna viz. quality-less cannot have a body which is a quality. So it cannot be realized as such






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        5
        down vote













        There can be many obvious terms for non-realized beings, as "deluded" or "covered by ignorance" or "bound".




        BG 5.15 - The Omnipresent neither accepts anybody's sin nor even virtue. Knowledge remains covered by ignorance. Thus the creatures become deluded.

        BG 3.27 — All actions are enacted in Prakruti by [3] modes (guna-s). Bound by ego(false identity), the self(Atma) believes "'I' am the doer".




        But there is no official term as such. :-)

        BTW, Nirguna viz. quality-less cannot have a body which is a quality. So it cannot be realized as such






        share|improve this answer






















          up vote
          5
          down vote










          up vote
          5
          down vote









          There can be many obvious terms for non-realized beings, as "deluded" or "covered by ignorance" or "bound".




          BG 5.15 - The Omnipresent neither accepts anybody's sin nor even virtue. Knowledge remains covered by ignorance. Thus the creatures become deluded.

          BG 3.27 — All actions are enacted in Prakruti by [3] modes (guna-s). Bound by ego(false identity), the self(Atma) believes "'I' am the doer".




          But there is no official term as such. :-)

          BTW, Nirguna viz. quality-less cannot have a body which is a quality. So it cannot be realized as such






          share|improve this answer












          There can be many obvious terms for non-realized beings, as "deluded" or "covered by ignorance" or "bound".




          BG 5.15 - The Omnipresent neither accepts anybody's sin nor even virtue. Knowledge remains covered by ignorance. Thus the creatures become deluded.

          BG 3.27 — All actions are enacted in Prakruti by [3] modes (guna-s). Bound by ego(false identity), the self(Atma) believes "'I' am the doer".




          But there is no official term as such. :-)

          BTW, Nirguna viz. quality-less cannot have a body which is a quality. So it cannot be realized as such







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 10 at 12:32









          iammilind

          13k32790




          13k32790




















              up vote
              5
              down vote













              Many words are used. In general a realized person is known in the scriptures as Atma GyAni, Tattvavid, TattvagyAni, Mukto etc.



              Opposites will be Baddha (bound), agyAni (ooposite of GyAni) etc.



              Have a look at the following verse (from KulArnava Tantram 9.42):




              Jivah shivah shivo jivah sa jivah kevalah shivah |

              PAshabaddhah smrito jivah pAshamuktah sadAshivah ||






              The Jiva is Shiva; Shiva is Jiva; The Jiva is the Advitya (one without a
              second) Shiva only. When the Jiva is bound by the PAshas (bondage)
              it's Jiva and released of the PAshas it's SadAshiva.




              So, Baddhah is used in this verse as the opposite of Mukto (liberated).



              The purport is we are Jiva only as long as we are bound by the PAshas and we are none other than the Brahman himself once we are released of the bondages.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                5
                down vote













                Many words are used. In general a realized person is known in the scriptures as Atma GyAni, Tattvavid, TattvagyAni, Mukto etc.



                Opposites will be Baddha (bound), agyAni (ooposite of GyAni) etc.



                Have a look at the following verse (from KulArnava Tantram 9.42):




                Jivah shivah shivo jivah sa jivah kevalah shivah |

                PAshabaddhah smrito jivah pAshamuktah sadAshivah ||






                The Jiva is Shiva; Shiva is Jiva; The Jiva is the Advitya (one without a
                second) Shiva only. When the Jiva is bound by the PAshas (bondage)
                it's Jiva and released of the PAshas it's SadAshiva.




                So, Baddhah is used in this verse as the opposite of Mukto (liberated).



                The purport is we are Jiva only as long as we are bound by the PAshas and we are none other than the Brahman himself once we are released of the bondages.






                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote









                  Many words are used. In general a realized person is known in the scriptures as Atma GyAni, Tattvavid, TattvagyAni, Mukto etc.



                  Opposites will be Baddha (bound), agyAni (ooposite of GyAni) etc.



                  Have a look at the following verse (from KulArnava Tantram 9.42):




                  Jivah shivah shivo jivah sa jivah kevalah shivah |

                  PAshabaddhah smrito jivah pAshamuktah sadAshivah ||






                  The Jiva is Shiva; Shiva is Jiva; The Jiva is the Advitya (one without a
                  second) Shiva only. When the Jiva is bound by the PAshas (bondage)
                  it's Jiva and released of the PAshas it's SadAshiva.




                  So, Baddhah is used in this verse as the opposite of Mukto (liberated).



                  The purport is we are Jiva only as long as we are bound by the PAshas and we are none other than the Brahman himself once we are released of the bondages.






                  share|improve this answer












                  Many words are used. In general a realized person is known in the scriptures as Atma GyAni, Tattvavid, TattvagyAni, Mukto etc.



                  Opposites will be Baddha (bound), agyAni (ooposite of GyAni) etc.



                  Have a look at the following verse (from KulArnava Tantram 9.42):




                  Jivah shivah shivo jivah sa jivah kevalah shivah |

                  PAshabaddhah smrito jivah pAshamuktah sadAshivah ||






                  The Jiva is Shiva; Shiva is Jiva; The Jiva is the Advitya (one without a
                  second) Shiva only. When the Jiva is bound by the PAshas (bondage)
                  it's Jiva and released of the PAshas it's SadAshiva.




                  So, Baddhah is used in this verse as the opposite of Mukto (liberated).



                  The purport is we are Jiva only as long as we are bound by the PAshas and we are none other than the Brahman himself once we are released of the bondages.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Aug 10 at 13:19









                  Rickross

                  40.6k355155




                  40.6k355155




















                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote













                      One who is in bondage is referred to as baddhAtma. One in bondage who is devout in their search of truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu.



                      Reference: Artha Panchakam (Verse 3 and 5, you can read from here)




                      (3). The Baddhas, or the bound, are those souls who are turned away from the Bhagavan (God): (1) by reason
                      of their illusorily identifying their selves (souls) with the bodies which they wear; constituted as these
                      bodies are of the five material elements - impermanent cause of joy and grief - corrupt, so that in the
                      absense of the indwindling spirit (soul), they are unfit for the sight or touch - and which breed the mental
                      aberrations, such as ignorence (ajnAna), misapprehension (anyathA-jnAna) and reversed apprehension
                      (viparitha-jnAna) and (2) by reason of their notion that pandering to the pleasures of the body (catered to
                      by the five fold thralls of objects, sound, touch sight, taste and smell) is the be-all and end-all of their
                      existence. To secure such pleasures of senses, they infringe all the salutary dictates comprised in the
                      system known as varna and Asrama, become slaves to worldlings, inflict cruelty on creatures, seize
                      others's wifes and wealth, and thus swell the ranks of the mundane.



                      (5). The Mumuksus, or the Would-be Free, are those souls in whom the longing desire for salvation (i.e.
                      reaching Bhagavan) has arisen. These are the two classes, viz. the UpAsakas, or the Strivers, and the
                      Prapannas, or the Resigned. The former seek salvation by self-effort, and the latter leave the same to
                      Bhagavan's (God's) care. The former thinks of salvation as his concern, whereas the latter thinks of it as
                      His concern.







                      share|improve this answer






















                      • Can you add exact reference to verse from Artha Panchakam?
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 10:39










                      • @Pandya The verses and their translation are given in the document I've linked above. Feel free to edit them into the answer (I'm getting font issues when I tried).
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:24










                      • I think 3rd not 2nd for Baddhas, just added.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:31










                      • So you are also unable to copy the tamizh verses? @Pandya
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:34











                      • will add later, somewhat busy.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:35














                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote













                      One who is in bondage is referred to as baddhAtma. One in bondage who is devout in their search of truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu.



                      Reference: Artha Panchakam (Verse 3 and 5, you can read from here)




                      (3). The Baddhas, or the bound, are those souls who are turned away from the Bhagavan (God): (1) by reason
                      of their illusorily identifying their selves (souls) with the bodies which they wear; constituted as these
                      bodies are of the five material elements - impermanent cause of joy and grief - corrupt, so that in the
                      absense of the indwindling spirit (soul), they are unfit for the sight or touch - and which breed the mental
                      aberrations, such as ignorence (ajnAna), misapprehension (anyathA-jnAna) and reversed apprehension
                      (viparitha-jnAna) and (2) by reason of their notion that pandering to the pleasures of the body (catered to
                      by the five fold thralls of objects, sound, touch sight, taste and smell) is the be-all and end-all of their
                      existence. To secure such pleasures of senses, they infringe all the salutary dictates comprised in the
                      system known as varna and Asrama, become slaves to worldlings, inflict cruelty on creatures, seize
                      others's wifes and wealth, and thus swell the ranks of the mundane.



                      (5). The Mumuksus, or the Would-be Free, are those souls in whom the longing desire for salvation (i.e.
                      reaching Bhagavan) has arisen. These are the two classes, viz. the UpAsakas, or the Strivers, and the
                      Prapannas, or the Resigned. The former seek salvation by self-effort, and the latter leave the same to
                      Bhagavan's (God's) care. The former thinks of salvation as his concern, whereas the latter thinks of it as
                      His concern.







                      share|improve this answer






















                      • Can you add exact reference to verse from Artha Panchakam?
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 10:39










                      • @Pandya The verses and their translation are given in the document I've linked above. Feel free to edit them into the answer (I'm getting font issues when I tried).
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:24










                      • I think 3rd not 2nd for Baddhas, just added.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:31










                      • So you are also unable to copy the tamizh verses? @Pandya
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:34











                      • will add later, somewhat busy.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:35












                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      4
                      down vote









                      One who is in bondage is referred to as baddhAtma. One in bondage who is devout in their search of truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu.



                      Reference: Artha Panchakam (Verse 3 and 5, you can read from here)




                      (3). The Baddhas, or the bound, are those souls who are turned away from the Bhagavan (God): (1) by reason
                      of their illusorily identifying their selves (souls) with the bodies which they wear; constituted as these
                      bodies are of the five material elements - impermanent cause of joy and grief - corrupt, so that in the
                      absense of the indwindling spirit (soul), they are unfit for the sight or touch - and which breed the mental
                      aberrations, such as ignorence (ajnAna), misapprehension (anyathA-jnAna) and reversed apprehension
                      (viparitha-jnAna) and (2) by reason of their notion that pandering to the pleasures of the body (catered to
                      by the five fold thralls of objects, sound, touch sight, taste and smell) is the be-all and end-all of their
                      existence. To secure such pleasures of senses, they infringe all the salutary dictates comprised in the
                      system known as varna and Asrama, become slaves to worldlings, inflict cruelty on creatures, seize
                      others's wifes and wealth, and thus swell the ranks of the mundane.



                      (5). The Mumuksus, or the Would-be Free, are those souls in whom the longing desire for salvation (i.e.
                      reaching Bhagavan) has arisen. These are the two classes, viz. the UpAsakas, or the Strivers, and the
                      Prapannas, or the Resigned. The former seek salvation by self-effort, and the latter leave the same to
                      Bhagavan's (God's) care. The former thinks of salvation as his concern, whereas the latter thinks of it as
                      His concern.







                      share|improve this answer














                      One who is in bondage is referred to as baddhAtma. One in bondage who is devout in their search of truth and knowledge for the sake of liberation is said to be a Mumukshu.



                      Reference: Artha Panchakam (Verse 3 and 5, you can read from here)




                      (3). The Baddhas, or the bound, are those souls who are turned away from the Bhagavan (God): (1) by reason
                      of their illusorily identifying their selves (souls) with the bodies which they wear; constituted as these
                      bodies are of the five material elements - impermanent cause of joy and grief - corrupt, so that in the
                      absense of the indwindling spirit (soul), they are unfit for the sight or touch - and which breed the mental
                      aberrations, such as ignorence (ajnAna), misapprehension (anyathA-jnAna) and reversed apprehension
                      (viparitha-jnAna) and (2) by reason of their notion that pandering to the pleasures of the body (catered to
                      by the five fold thralls of objects, sound, touch sight, taste and smell) is the be-all and end-all of their
                      existence. To secure such pleasures of senses, they infringe all the salutary dictates comprised in the
                      system known as varna and Asrama, become slaves to worldlings, inflict cruelty on creatures, seize
                      others's wifes and wealth, and thus swell the ranks of the mundane.



                      (5). The Mumuksus, or the Would-be Free, are those souls in whom the longing desire for salvation (i.e.
                      reaching Bhagavan) has arisen. These are the two classes, viz. the UpAsakas, or the Strivers, and the
                      Prapannas, or the Resigned. The former seek salvation by self-effort, and the latter leave the same to
                      Bhagavan's (God's) care. The former thinks of salvation as his concern, whereas the latter thinks of it as
                      His concern.








                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Aug 17 at 11:37

























                      answered Aug 10 at 14:39









                      SudarshanaSuri

                      1,626529




                      1,626529











                      • Can you add exact reference to verse from Artha Panchakam?
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 10:39










                      • @Pandya The verses and their translation are given in the document I've linked above. Feel free to edit them into the answer (I'm getting font issues when I tried).
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:24










                      • I think 3rd not 2nd for Baddhas, just added.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:31










                      • So you are also unable to copy the tamizh verses? @Pandya
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:34











                      • will add later, somewhat busy.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:35
















                      • Can you add exact reference to verse from Artha Panchakam?
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 10:39










                      • @Pandya The verses and their translation are given in the document I've linked above. Feel free to edit them into the answer (I'm getting font issues when I tried).
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:24










                      • I think 3rd not 2nd for Baddhas, just added.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:31










                      • So you are also unable to copy the tamizh verses? @Pandya
                        – SudarshanaSuri
                        Aug 17 at 11:34











                      • will add later, somewhat busy.
                        – Pandya♦
                        Aug 17 at 11:35















                      Can you add exact reference to verse from Artha Panchakam?
                      – Pandya♦
                      Aug 17 at 10:39




                      Can you add exact reference to verse from Artha Panchakam?
                      – Pandya♦
                      Aug 17 at 10:39












                      @Pandya The verses and their translation are given in the document I've linked above. Feel free to edit them into the answer (I'm getting font issues when I tried).
                      – SudarshanaSuri
                      Aug 17 at 11:24




                      @Pandya The verses and their translation are given in the document I've linked above. Feel free to edit them into the answer (I'm getting font issues when I tried).
                      – SudarshanaSuri
                      Aug 17 at 11:24












                      I think 3rd not 2nd for Baddhas, just added.
                      – Pandya♦
                      Aug 17 at 11:31




                      I think 3rd not 2nd for Baddhas, just added.
                      – Pandya♦
                      Aug 17 at 11:31












                      So you are also unable to copy the tamizh verses? @Pandya
                      – SudarshanaSuri
                      Aug 17 at 11:34





                      So you are also unable to copy the tamizh verses? @Pandya
                      – SudarshanaSuri
                      Aug 17 at 11:34













                      will add later, somewhat busy.
                      – Pandya♦
                      Aug 17 at 11:35




                      will add later, somewhat busy.
                      – Pandya♦
                      Aug 17 at 11:35


                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What does second last employer means? [closed]

                      Installing NextGIS Connect into QGIS 3?

                      One-line joke