Mixing
Should I tell my company about an accusation against a candidate?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
I have this buddy of mine who is looking for employment in my company. His hiring manager knows about his attitude problems after speaking to his former colleague (taking medical leave almost every single week, showing up late for work on days he decided to come and generally irresponsible and does not take ownership of his work at all).
However, that's not all. This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies from his previous workplace but there was never a formal case. He was just discharged when his contract ended.
Should I share such information with his hiring manager?
His hiring manager is a good friend of mine from university.
professionalism
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
I have this buddy of mine who is looking for employment in my company. His hiring manager knows about his attitude problems after speaking to his former colleague (taking medical leave almost every single week, showing up late for work on days he decided to come and generally irresponsible and does not take ownership of his work at all).
However, that's not all. This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies from his previous workplace but there was never a formal case. He was just discharged when his contract ended.
Should I share such information with his hiring manager?
His hiring manager is a good friend of mine from university.
professionalism
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
1
You're contemplating going out of your way to make trouble for your buddy?
– Kilisi
3 hours ago
Just an email or phone call away, not really that difficult
– Amanda
2 hours ago
I think 'snitch' is a terrible word that only serves to perpetuate a perverse culture of silence. That said, there really is nothing to report here but an unsubstantiated accusation.
– jcm
2 hours ago
yep, easy enough to make accusations without proof, but I'm just surprised you're trying to sabotage a 'buddy'. I must have a different interpretation of the word.
– Kilisi
58 mins ago
This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies... Who made the accusation and who told you?
– BSMP
37 mins ago
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
I have this buddy of mine who is looking for employment in my company. His hiring manager knows about his attitude problems after speaking to his former colleague (taking medical leave almost every single week, showing up late for work on days he decided to come and generally irresponsible and does not take ownership of his work at all).
However, that's not all. This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies from his previous workplace but there was never a formal case. He was just discharged when his contract ended.
Should I share such information with his hiring manager?
His hiring manager is a good friend of mine from university.
professionalism
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
I have this buddy of mine who is looking for employment in my company. His hiring manager knows about his attitude problems after speaking to his former colleague (taking medical leave almost every single week, showing up late for work on days he decided to come and generally irresponsible and does not take ownership of his work at all).
However, that's not all. This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies from his previous workplace but there was never a formal case. He was just discharged when his contract ended.
Should I share such information with his hiring manager?
His hiring manager is a good friend of mine from university.
professionalism
professionalism
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
edited 3 mins ago
Dukeling
9,09232447
9,09232447
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
asked 3 hours ago
Amanda
12
12
1
You're contemplating going out of your way to make trouble for your buddy?
– Kilisi
3 hours ago
Just an email or phone call away, not really that difficult
– Amanda
2 hours ago
I think 'snitch' is a terrible word that only serves to perpetuate a perverse culture of silence. That said, there really is nothing to report here but an unsubstantiated accusation.
– jcm
2 hours ago
yep, easy enough to make accusations without proof, but I'm just surprised you're trying to sabotage a 'buddy'. I must have a different interpretation of the word.
– Kilisi
58 mins ago
This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies... Who made the accusation and who told you?
– BSMP
37 mins ago
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1
You're contemplating going out of your way to make trouble for your buddy?
– Kilisi
3 hours ago
Just an email or phone call away, not really that difficult
– Amanda
2 hours ago
I think 'snitch' is a terrible word that only serves to perpetuate a perverse culture of silence. That said, there really is nothing to report here but an unsubstantiated accusation.
– jcm
2 hours ago
yep, easy enough to make accusations without proof, but I'm just surprised you're trying to sabotage a 'buddy'. I must have a different interpretation of the word.
– Kilisi
58 mins ago
This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies... Who made the accusation and who told you?
– BSMP
37 mins ago
1
1
You're contemplating going out of your way to make trouble for your buddy?
– Kilisi
3 hours ago
You're contemplating going out of your way to make trouble for your buddy?
– Kilisi
3 hours ago
Just an email or phone call away, not really that difficult
– Amanda
2 hours ago
Just an email or phone call away, not really that difficult
– Amanda
2 hours ago
I think 'snitch' is a terrible word that only serves to perpetuate a perverse culture of silence. That said, there really is nothing to report here but an unsubstantiated accusation.
– jcm
2 hours ago
I think 'snitch' is a terrible word that only serves to perpetuate a perverse culture of silence. That said, there really is nothing to report here but an unsubstantiated accusation.
– jcm
2 hours ago
yep, easy enough to make accusations without proof, but I'm just surprised you're trying to sabotage a 'buddy'. I must have a different interpretation of the word.
– Kilisi
58 mins ago
yep, easy enough to make accusations without proof, but I'm just surprised you're trying to sabotage a 'buddy'. I must have a different interpretation of the word.
– Kilisi
58 mins ago
This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies... Who made the accusation and who told you?
– BSMP
37 mins ago
This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies... Who made the accusation and who told you?
– BSMP
37 mins ago
 |Â
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
How much have you seen personally?
In general, I've found that it's hard to know the whole story. There are situations where you have first-hand knowledge of co-workers violating policies or otherwise being obtrusive. However, you've said that you were told by a former co-worker that the potential employee was on medical leave weekly: Does the potential employee have any legitimate medical issues? Or, perhaps, does the former co-worker have any reason to exaggerate the claims that you've laid out?
Benefit of the doubt.
In general, I've found it's best to give the benefit of the doubt to individuals when you don't have first hand accounts of misbehavior. This will often circumvent the question of "being a snitch."
On being a snitch.
That said, being a snitch is a real concern: I've often had to balance my opinion on 'the right way to do something' with the perception that I'm over-concerned about what somebody else is doing on their own time. It can seem petty and excessive. I've found it helpful to stage the question in your own moral standpoint:
- Are you sure that the potential employee stands guilty as accused? You may be preventing someone from gainful employment based on a rumor, or you could be saving your employer months of pain.
- Would you feel comfortable working with the potential employee? If it doesn't bother you personally, what motivation do you have to mention something about someone's past?
Also, as some comments have reflected, the word 'snitch' casts the conversation in a negative light. You're not a snitch by telling your employer something important about a potential employee. You are a snitch if you happened to have been involved in the scheme to pilfer supplies from the previous employer.
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think the answer is very easy here:
- If you are 100% sure he was stealing with evidence, then you can give a hint to the hiring manager if you really want.
- However if you have even 1% doubt and only hints/possibilities of him "maybe" being a thief, then it's best to just leave it.
In my opinion, I would just let him loose and leave it for someone else to catch him and for him to get in trouble in the near future. So far it seems like petty theft.
As he gets more confident it should snowball and get him into a lot worse crimes, and of course the consequences will get worse which will have a better chance of fixing his behavior. As compared with right now if someone was to tell him "stop stealing pens".
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
How much have you seen personally?
In general, I've found that it's hard to know the whole story. There are situations where you have first-hand knowledge of co-workers violating policies or otherwise being obtrusive. However, you've said that you were told by a former co-worker that the potential employee was on medical leave weekly: Does the potential employee have any legitimate medical issues? Or, perhaps, does the former co-worker have any reason to exaggerate the claims that you've laid out?
Benefit of the doubt.
In general, I've found it's best to give the benefit of the doubt to individuals when you don't have first hand accounts of misbehavior. This will often circumvent the question of "being a snitch."
On being a snitch.
That said, being a snitch is a real concern: I've often had to balance my opinion on 'the right way to do something' with the perception that I'm over-concerned about what somebody else is doing on their own time. It can seem petty and excessive. I've found it helpful to stage the question in your own moral standpoint:
- Are you sure that the potential employee stands guilty as accused? You may be preventing someone from gainful employment based on a rumor, or you could be saving your employer months of pain.
- Would you feel comfortable working with the potential employee? If it doesn't bother you personally, what motivation do you have to mention something about someone's past?
Also, as some comments have reflected, the word 'snitch' casts the conversation in a negative light. You're not a snitch by telling your employer something important about a potential employee. You are a snitch if you happened to have been involved in the scheme to pilfer supplies from the previous employer.
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
How much have you seen personally?
In general, I've found that it's hard to know the whole story. There are situations where you have first-hand knowledge of co-workers violating policies or otherwise being obtrusive. However, you've said that you were told by a former co-worker that the potential employee was on medical leave weekly: Does the potential employee have any legitimate medical issues? Or, perhaps, does the former co-worker have any reason to exaggerate the claims that you've laid out?
Benefit of the doubt.
In general, I've found it's best to give the benefit of the doubt to individuals when you don't have first hand accounts of misbehavior. This will often circumvent the question of "being a snitch."
On being a snitch.
That said, being a snitch is a real concern: I've often had to balance my opinion on 'the right way to do something' with the perception that I'm over-concerned about what somebody else is doing on their own time. It can seem petty and excessive. I've found it helpful to stage the question in your own moral standpoint:
- Are you sure that the potential employee stands guilty as accused? You may be preventing someone from gainful employment based on a rumor, or you could be saving your employer months of pain.
- Would you feel comfortable working with the potential employee? If it doesn't bother you personally, what motivation do you have to mention something about someone's past?
Also, as some comments have reflected, the word 'snitch' casts the conversation in a negative light. You're not a snitch by telling your employer something important about a potential employee. You are a snitch if you happened to have been involved in the scheme to pilfer supplies from the previous employer.
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
How much have you seen personally?
In general, I've found that it's hard to know the whole story. There are situations where you have first-hand knowledge of co-workers violating policies or otherwise being obtrusive. However, you've said that you were told by a former co-worker that the potential employee was on medical leave weekly: Does the potential employee have any legitimate medical issues? Or, perhaps, does the former co-worker have any reason to exaggerate the claims that you've laid out?
Benefit of the doubt.
In general, I've found it's best to give the benefit of the doubt to individuals when you don't have first hand accounts of misbehavior. This will often circumvent the question of "being a snitch."
On being a snitch.
That said, being a snitch is a real concern: I've often had to balance my opinion on 'the right way to do something' with the perception that I'm over-concerned about what somebody else is doing on their own time. It can seem petty and excessive. I've found it helpful to stage the question in your own moral standpoint:
- Are you sure that the potential employee stands guilty as accused? You may be preventing someone from gainful employment based on a rumor, or you could be saving your employer months of pain.
- Would you feel comfortable working with the potential employee? If it doesn't bother you personally, what motivation do you have to mention something about someone's past?
Also, as some comments have reflected, the word 'snitch' casts the conversation in a negative light. You're not a snitch by telling your employer something important about a potential employee. You are a snitch if you happened to have been involved in the scheme to pilfer supplies from the previous employer.
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
How much have you seen personally?
In general, I've found that it's hard to know the whole story. There are situations where you have first-hand knowledge of co-workers violating policies or otherwise being obtrusive. However, you've said that you were told by a former co-worker that the potential employee was on medical leave weekly: Does the potential employee have any legitimate medical issues? Or, perhaps, does the former co-worker have any reason to exaggerate the claims that you've laid out?
Benefit of the doubt.
In general, I've found it's best to give the benefit of the doubt to individuals when you don't have first hand accounts of misbehavior. This will often circumvent the question of "being a snitch."
On being a snitch.
That said, being a snitch is a real concern: I've often had to balance my opinion on 'the right way to do something' with the perception that I'm over-concerned about what somebody else is doing on their own time. It can seem petty and excessive. I've found it helpful to stage the question in your own moral standpoint:
- Are you sure that the potential employee stands guilty as accused? You may be preventing someone from gainful employment based on a rumor, or you could be saving your employer months of pain.
- Would you feel comfortable working with the potential employee? If it doesn't bother you personally, what motivation do you have to mention something about someone's past?
Also, as some comments have reflected, the word 'snitch' casts the conversation in a negative light. You're not a snitch by telling your employer something important about a potential employee. You are a snitch if you happened to have been involved in the scheme to pilfer supplies from the previous employer.
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
edited 31 mins ago
BSMP
3,4601326
3,4601326
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
answered 2 hours ago
Christopher Regnier
311
311
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Christopher Regnier is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think the answer is very easy here:
- If you are 100% sure he was stealing with evidence, then you can give a hint to the hiring manager if you really want.
- However if you have even 1% doubt and only hints/possibilities of him "maybe" being a thief, then it's best to just leave it.
In my opinion, I would just let him loose and leave it for someone else to catch him and for him to get in trouble in the near future. So far it seems like petty theft.
As he gets more confident it should snowball and get him into a lot worse crimes, and of course the consequences will get worse which will have a better chance of fixing his behavior. As compared with right now if someone was to tell him "stop stealing pens".
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
I think the answer is very easy here:
- If you are 100% sure he was stealing with evidence, then you can give a hint to the hiring manager if you really want.
- However if you have even 1% doubt and only hints/possibilities of him "maybe" being a thief, then it's best to just leave it.
In my opinion, I would just let him loose and leave it for someone else to catch him and for him to get in trouble in the near future. So far it seems like petty theft.
As he gets more confident it should snowball and get him into a lot worse crimes, and of course the consequences will get worse which will have a better chance of fixing his behavior. As compared with right now if someone was to tell him "stop stealing pens".
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I think the answer is very easy here:
- If you are 100% sure he was stealing with evidence, then you can give a hint to the hiring manager if you really want.
- However if you have even 1% doubt and only hints/possibilities of him "maybe" being a thief, then it's best to just leave it.
In my opinion, I would just let him loose and leave it for someone else to catch him and for him to get in trouble in the near future. So far it seems like petty theft.
As he gets more confident it should snowball and get him into a lot worse crimes, and of course the consequences will get worse which will have a better chance of fixing his behavior. As compared with right now if someone was to tell him "stop stealing pens".
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
I think the answer is very easy here:
- If you are 100% sure he was stealing with evidence, then you can give a hint to the hiring manager if you really want.
- However if you have even 1% doubt and only hints/possibilities of him "maybe" being a thief, then it's best to just leave it.
In my opinion, I would just let him loose and leave it for someone else to catch him and for him to get in trouble in the near future. So far it seems like petty theft.
As he gets more confident it should snowball and get him into a lot worse crimes, and of course the consequences will get worse which will have a better chance of fixing his behavior. As compared with right now if someone was to tell him "stop stealing pens".
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
answered 12 mins ago
goamn
22614
22614
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120988%2fshould-i-tell-my-company-about-an-accusation-against-a-candidate%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
You're contemplating going out of your way to make trouble for your buddy?
– Kilisi
3 hours ago
Just an email or phone call away, not really that difficult
– Amanda
2 hours ago
I think 'snitch' is a terrible word that only serves to perpetuate a perverse culture of silence. That said, there really is nothing to report here but an unsubstantiated accusation.
– jcm
2 hours ago
yep, easy enough to make accusations without proof, but I'm just surprised you're trying to sabotage a 'buddy'. I must have a different interpretation of the word.
– Kilisi
58 mins ago
This buddy of mine has been accused of stealing office supplies... Who made the accusation and who told you?
– BSMP
37 mins ago