Best way to determine aerobic pace for running

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Context: Aerboic pace makes up a large volume of my weekly mileage. I use 1-2 easy paced runs (slower than aerobic), 1 workout, and 1 long run, and everything in between is aerobic (I've seen it called Z2 or Z3 or endurance)



After reading this study:
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ijes



and measuring my blood lactate at my previous aerobic pace, it seems that what I thought was aerobic based on my heart rate, is actually pretty easy for me.



Any ideas on how to determine my actual aerobic pace? The study seems to show the best correlation between RPE and blood lactate (which is the best indicator of what system is being trained) and the worst correlation between HR and lactate. For sure, I'm scrapping my HR readings.









share







New contributor




montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • How are you measuring your blood lactate?
    – JohnP♦
    58 mins ago










  • @JohnP Lactate Pro meter
    – montserrat
    51 mins ago










  • Nice. We had to do blood draws when I was in college. Sucked.
    – JohnP♦
    39 mins ago










  • Definitely an interesting study, nice find. A few more rep points and you will be able to join in chat as well. Are you a currently competing x-country runner?
    – JohnP♦
    36 mins ago










  • Thanks! Very new to SE in general :) I run road races, and am trying to improve everything from the 5K to the marathon. I'm not very fast though, still a new runner. I'm just a scientist/engineer who loves reading and experimenting as well, hence the lactate readings!
    – montserrat
    6 mins ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Context: Aerboic pace makes up a large volume of my weekly mileage. I use 1-2 easy paced runs (slower than aerobic), 1 workout, and 1 long run, and everything in between is aerobic (I've seen it called Z2 or Z3 or endurance)



After reading this study:
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ijes



and measuring my blood lactate at my previous aerobic pace, it seems that what I thought was aerobic based on my heart rate, is actually pretty easy for me.



Any ideas on how to determine my actual aerobic pace? The study seems to show the best correlation between RPE and blood lactate (which is the best indicator of what system is being trained) and the worst correlation between HR and lactate. For sure, I'm scrapping my HR readings.









share







New contributor




montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • How are you measuring your blood lactate?
    – JohnP♦
    58 mins ago










  • @JohnP Lactate Pro meter
    – montserrat
    51 mins ago










  • Nice. We had to do blood draws when I was in college. Sucked.
    – JohnP♦
    39 mins ago










  • Definitely an interesting study, nice find. A few more rep points and you will be able to join in chat as well. Are you a currently competing x-country runner?
    – JohnP♦
    36 mins ago










  • Thanks! Very new to SE in general :) I run road races, and am trying to improve everything from the 5K to the marathon. I'm not very fast though, still a new runner. I'm just a scientist/engineer who loves reading and experimenting as well, hence the lactate readings!
    – montserrat
    6 mins ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Context: Aerboic pace makes up a large volume of my weekly mileage. I use 1-2 easy paced runs (slower than aerobic), 1 workout, and 1 long run, and everything in between is aerobic (I've seen it called Z2 or Z3 or endurance)



After reading this study:
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ijes



and measuring my blood lactate at my previous aerobic pace, it seems that what I thought was aerobic based on my heart rate, is actually pretty easy for me.



Any ideas on how to determine my actual aerobic pace? The study seems to show the best correlation between RPE and blood lactate (which is the best indicator of what system is being trained) and the worst correlation between HR and lactate. For sure, I'm scrapping my HR readings.









share







New contributor




montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Context: Aerboic pace makes up a large volume of my weekly mileage. I use 1-2 easy paced runs (slower than aerobic), 1 workout, and 1 long run, and everything in between is aerobic (I've seen it called Z2 or Z3 or endurance)



After reading this study:
https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1358&context=ijes



and measuring my blood lactate at my previous aerobic pace, it seems that what I thought was aerobic based on my heart rate, is actually pretty easy for me.



Any ideas on how to determine my actual aerobic pace? The study seems to show the best correlation between RPE and blood lactate (which is the best indicator of what system is being trained) and the worst correlation between HR and lactate. For sure, I'm scrapping my HR readings.







running cardio long-distance-running lactate-threshold





share







New contributor




montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share







New contributor




montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share



share






New contributor




montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









montserrat

284




284




New contributor




montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






montserrat is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • How are you measuring your blood lactate?
    – JohnP♦
    58 mins ago










  • @JohnP Lactate Pro meter
    – montserrat
    51 mins ago










  • Nice. We had to do blood draws when I was in college. Sucked.
    – JohnP♦
    39 mins ago










  • Definitely an interesting study, nice find. A few more rep points and you will be able to join in chat as well. Are you a currently competing x-country runner?
    – JohnP♦
    36 mins ago










  • Thanks! Very new to SE in general :) I run road races, and am trying to improve everything from the 5K to the marathon. I'm not very fast though, still a new runner. I'm just a scientist/engineer who loves reading and experimenting as well, hence the lactate readings!
    – montserrat
    6 mins ago
















  • How are you measuring your blood lactate?
    – JohnP♦
    58 mins ago










  • @JohnP Lactate Pro meter
    – montserrat
    51 mins ago










  • Nice. We had to do blood draws when I was in college. Sucked.
    – JohnP♦
    39 mins ago










  • Definitely an interesting study, nice find. A few more rep points and you will be able to join in chat as well. Are you a currently competing x-country runner?
    – JohnP♦
    36 mins ago










  • Thanks! Very new to SE in general :) I run road races, and am trying to improve everything from the 5K to the marathon. I'm not very fast though, still a new runner. I'm just a scientist/engineer who loves reading and experimenting as well, hence the lactate readings!
    – montserrat
    6 mins ago















How are you measuring your blood lactate?
– JohnP♦
58 mins ago




How are you measuring your blood lactate?
– JohnP♦
58 mins ago












@JohnP Lactate Pro meter
– montserrat
51 mins ago




@JohnP Lactate Pro meter
– montserrat
51 mins ago












Nice. We had to do blood draws when I was in college. Sucked.
– JohnP♦
39 mins ago




Nice. We had to do blood draws when I was in college. Sucked.
– JohnP♦
39 mins ago












Definitely an interesting study, nice find. A few more rep points and you will be able to join in chat as well. Are you a currently competing x-country runner?
– JohnP♦
36 mins ago




Definitely an interesting study, nice find. A few more rep points and you will be able to join in chat as well. Are you a currently competing x-country runner?
– JohnP♦
36 mins ago












Thanks! Very new to SE in general :) I run road races, and am trying to improve everything from the 5K to the marathon. I'm not very fast though, still a new runner. I'm just a scientist/engineer who loves reading and experimenting as well, hence the lactate readings!
– montserrat
6 mins ago




Thanks! Very new to SE in general :) I run road races, and am trying to improve everything from the 5K to the marathon. I'm not very fast though, still a new runner. I'm just a scientist/engineer who loves reading and experimenting as well, hence the lactate readings!
– montserrat
6 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










I wouldn't completely scrap the HR readings, although I am definitely not a fan of HR based training. It can be an indicator of fatigue and recovery on a long term basis, however. I find it more useful to track as a trend, rather than an immediate assessment metric.



To be honest, if you want to find your own personal levels, is to pretty much follow the protocol laid out in the study (i.e. the initial 30 minute time trial, followed by the time trials at various percent paces over the following days).




Therefore, the first test run was a T-30 pace which, as stated, was used to determine each subject’s speed at MLSS. The second test run was completed at the predicted speed of recovery training (70 to 80% of MLSS). The third test run was completed at the predicted speed of
extensive endurance training (80 to 90% of MLSS). The fourth test run was completed at the predicted speed of intensive endurance training (to 95% of MLSS). The final test run was completed at the
predicted speed of aerobic power training (107-110% of MLSS).




Note: MLSS definition: Maximal Lactate Steady State (MLSS)



If you have a heart rate monitor, you can also use that to correlate your heart rate at the same paces. You can use a calculator such as this one or similar to get an idea of what your equivalent pace might be for each testing segment.



Run each trial, test your lactate, then see how that correlates with the amended training intensity targets (Table 7, page 157 on the PDF). If you fall within those guidelines, then you should be on target with your zones. If you fall short or go over, you know you need to adjust that range.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "216"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    montserrat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ffitness.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38916%2fbest-way-to-determine-aerobic-pace-for-running%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    I wouldn't completely scrap the HR readings, although I am definitely not a fan of HR based training. It can be an indicator of fatigue and recovery on a long term basis, however. I find it more useful to track as a trend, rather than an immediate assessment metric.



    To be honest, if you want to find your own personal levels, is to pretty much follow the protocol laid out in the study (i.e. the initial 30 minute time trial, followed by the time trials at various percent paces over the following days).




    Therefore, the first test run was a T-30 pace which, as stated, was used to determine each subject’s speed at MLSS. The second test run was completed at the predicted speed of recovery training (70 to 80% of MLSS). The third test run was completed at the predicted speed of
    extensive endurance training (80 to 90% of MLSS). The fourth test run was completed at the predicted speed of intensive endurance training (to 95% of MLSS). The final test run was completed at the
    predicted speed of aerobic power training (107-110% of MLSS).




    Note: MLSS definition: Maximal Lactate Steady State (MLSS)



    If you have a heart rate monitor, you can also use that to correlate your heart rate at the same paces. You can use a calculator such as this one or similar to get an idea of what your equivalent pace might be for each testing segment.



    Run each trial, test your lactate, then see how that correlates with the amended training intensity targets (Table 7, page 157 on the PDF). If you fall within those guidelines, then you should be on target with your zones. If you fall short or go over, you know you need to adjust that range.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      3
      down vote



      accepted










      I wouldn't completely scrap the HR readings, although I am definitely not a fan of HR based training. It can be an indicator of fatigue and recovery on a long term basis, however. I find it more useful to track as a trend, rather than an immediate assessment metric.



      To be honest, if you want to find your own personal levels, is to pretty much follow the protocol laid out in the study (i.e. the initial 30 minute time trial, followed by the time trials at various percent paces over the following days).




      Therefore, the first test run was a T-30 pace which, as stated, was used to determine each subject’s speed at MLSS. The second test run was completed at the predicted speed of recovery training (70 to 80% of MLSS). The third test run was completed at the predicted speed of
      extensive endurance training (80 to 90% of MLSS). The fourth test run was completed at the predicted speed of intensive endurance training (to 95% of MLSS). The final test run was completed at the
      predicted speed of aerobic power training (107-110% of MLSS).




      Note: MLSS definition: Maximal Lactate Steady State (MLSS)



      If you have a heart rate monitor, you can also use that to correlate your heart rate at the same paces. You can use a calculator such as this one or similar to get an idea of what your equivalent pace might be for each testing segment.



      Run each trial, test your lactate, then see how that correlates with the amended training intensity targets (Table 7, page 157 on the PDF). If you fall within those guidelines, then you should be on target with your zones. If you fall short or go over, you know you need to adjust that range.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted






        I wouldn't completely scrap the HR readings, although I am definitely not a fan of HR based training. It can be an indicator of fatigue and recovery on a long term basis, however. I find it more useful to track as a trend, rather than an immediate assessment metric.



        To be honest, if you want to find your own personal levels, is to pretty much follow the protocol laid out in the study (i.e. the initial 30 minute time trial, followed by the time trials at various percent paces over the following days).




        Therefore, the first test run was a T-30 pace which, as stated, was used to determine each subject’s speed at MLSS. The second test run was completed at the predicted speed of recovery training (70 to 80% of MLSS). The third test run was completed at the predicted speed of
        extensive endurance training (80 to 90% of MLSS). The fourth test run was completed at the predicted speed of intensive endurance training (to 95% of MLSS). The final test run was completed at the
        predicted speed of aerobic power training (107-110% of MLSS).




        Note: MLSS definition: Maximal Lactate Steady State (MLSS)



        If you have a heart rate monitor, you can also use that to correlate your heart rate at the same paces. You can use a calculator such as this one or similar to get an idea of what your equivalent pace might be for each testing segment.



        Run each trial, test your lactate, then see how that correlates with the amended training intensity targets (Table 7, page 157 on the PDF). If you fall within those guidelines, then you should be on target with your zones. If you fall short or go over, you know you need to adjust that range.






        share|improve this answer














        I wouldn't completely scrap the HR readings, although I am definitely not a fan of HR based training. It can be an indicator of fatigue and recovery on a long term basis, however. I find it more useful to track as a trend, rather than an immediate assessment metric.



        To be honest, if you want to find your own personal levels, is to pretty much follow the protocol laid out in the study (i.e. the initial 30 minute time trial, followed by the time trials at various percent paces over the following days).




        Therefore, the first test run was a T-30 pace which, as stated, was used to determine each subject’s speed at MLSS. The second test run was completed at the predicted speed of recovery training (70 to 80% of MLSS). The third test run was completed at the predicted speed of
        extensive endurance training (80 to 90% of MLSS). The fourth test run was completed at the predicted speed of intensive endurance training (to 95% of MLSS). The final test run was completed at the
        predicted speed of aerobic power training (107-110% of MLSS).




        Note: MLSS definition: Maximal Lactate Steady State (MLSS)



        If you have a heart rate monitor, you can also use that to correlate your heart rate at the same paces. You can use a calculator such as this one or similar to get an idea of what your equivalent pace might be for each testing segment.



        Run each trial, test your lactate, then see how that correlates with the amended training intensity targets (Table 7, page 157 on the PDF). If you fall within those guidelines, then you should be on target with your zones. If you fall short or go over, you know you need to adjust that range.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 34 mins ago

























        answered 39 mins ago









        JohnP♦

        19.6k33375




        19.6k33375




















            montserrat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            montserrat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            montserrat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            montserrat is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ffitness.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38916%2fbest-way-to-determine-aerobic-pace-for-running%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

            Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

            Confectionery