How do I insert sigma superscript hat and subscript beta 1 hat?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












What I want to write



I tried the following code with a badly rendered result: 



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Is there a better way to render it like the image shown?






math-mode







share|improve this question









New contributor




Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












What I want to write



I tried the following code with a badly rendered result: 



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Is there a better way to render it like the image shown?






math-mode







share|improve this question









New contributor




Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











What I want to write



I tried the following code with a badly rendered result: 



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Is there a better way to render it like the image shown?






math-mode







share|improve this question









New contributor




Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











What I want to write



I tried the following code with a badly rendered result: 



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Is there a better way to render it like the image shown?






math-mode




math-mode






share|improve this question









New contributor




Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Stefan Pinnow

19.1k83172




19.1k83172






New contributor




Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 hours ago









Latexboi

111




111




New contributor




Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Latexboi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Welcome to TeX.SE.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago
















  • Welcome to TeX.SE.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago















Welcome to TeX.SE.
– Mico
2 hours ago




Welcome to TeX.SE.
– Mico
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













The hat macro is designed to be placed over a single character. Hence, you should write



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Observe that the arguments of both hat instructions now consist of a single character (sigma and beta, resp.).



For an extra touch of (typographic!) class, consider "snugging up" the hatsigma and hatbeta_1 terms by starting the subscript term with a ! (negative thinspace) instruction.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
begindocument
$hatsigma_hatbeta_1 quad hatsigma_!hatbeta_1$
enddocument





share|improve this answer






















  • One could do widehatsigma_widehatbeta_1, but the output is painful to the eye. Even if the hat denotes the action of a function, it is customary to ignore the subscripts in order to apply the hat hatsigma_hatbeta_1; similarly barz_1 for “the conjugate of zee sub one” is perfectly acceptable and overlinez_1 not really necessary (it may be when dealing with beginners).
    – egreg
    20 mins ago


















up vote
0
down vote













Try this:



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


This will put the first hat above the sigma, and the second hat is just above the beta_1.

-- update: Mico mentions the second hat should be above the beta only, thanks to Mico.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • 1




    The OP's screenshot does not suggest that the second "hat" should be placed above both beta and 1.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Latexboi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455502%2fhow-do-i-insert-sigma-superscript-hat-and-subscript-beta-1-hat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













The hat macro is designed to be placed over a single character. Hence, you should write



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Observe that the arguments of both hat instructions now consist of a single character (sigma and beta, resp.).



For an extra touch of (typographic!) class, consider "snugging up" the hatsigma and hatbeta_1 terms by starting the subscript term with a ! (negative thinspace) instruction.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
begindocument
$hatsigma_hatbeta_1 quad hatsigma_!hatbeta_1$
enddocument





share|improve this answer






















  • One could do widehatsigma_widehatbeta_1, but the output is painful to the eye. Even if the hat denotes the action of a function, it is customary to ignore the subscripts in order to apply the hat hatsigma_hatbeta_1; similarly barz_1 for “the conjugate of zee sub one” is perfectly acceptable and overlinez_1 not really necessary (it may be when dealing with beginners).
    – egreg
    20 mins ago















up vote
3
down vote













The hat macro is designed to be placed over a single character. Hence, you should write



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Observe that the arguments of both hat instructions now consist of a single character (sigma and beta, resp.).



For an extra touch of (typographic!) class, consider "snugging up" the hatsigma and hatbeta_1 terms by starting the subscript term with a ! (negative thinspace) instruction.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
begindocument
$hatsigma_hatbeta_1 quad hatsigma_!hatbeta_1$
enddocument





share|improve this answer






















  • One could do widehatsigma_widehatbeta_1, but the output is painful to the eye. Even if the hat denotes the action of a function, it is customary to ignore the subscripts in order to apply the hat hatsigma_hatbeta_1; similarly barz_1 for “the conjugate of zee sub one” is perfectly acceptable and overlinez_1 not really necessary (it may be when dealing with beginners).
    – egreg
    20 mins ago













up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









The hat macro is designed to be placed over a single character. Hence, you should write



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Observe that the arguments of both hat instructions now consist of a single character (sigma and beta, resp.).



For an extra touch of (typographic!) class, consider "snugging up" the hatsigma and hatbeta_1 terms by starting the subscript term with a ! (negative thinspace) instruction.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
begindocument
$hatsigma_hatbeta_1 quad hatsigma_!hatbeta_1$
enddocument





share|improve this answer














The hat macro is designed to be placed over a single character. Hence, you should write



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


Observe that the arguments of both hat instructions now consist of a single character (sigma and beta, resp.).



For an extra touch of (typographic!) class, consider "snugging up" the hatsigma and hatbeta_1 terms by starting the subscript term with a ! (negative thinspace) instruction.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
begindocument
$hatsigma_hatbeta_1 quad hatsigma_!hatbeta_1$
enddocument






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 2 hours ago









Mico

266k30360746




266k30360746











  • One could do widehatsigma_widehatbeta_1, but the output is painful to the eye. Even if the hat denotes the action of a function, it is customary to ignore the subscripts in order to apply the hat hatsigma_hatbeta_1; similarly barz_1 for “the conjugate of zee sub one” is perfectly acceptable and overlinez_1 not really necessary (it may be when dealing with beginners).
    – egreg
    20 mins ago

















  • One could do widehatsigma_widehatbeta_1, but the output is painful to the eye. Even if the hat denotes the action of a function, it is customary to ignore the subscripts in order to apply the hat hatsigma_hatbeta_1; similarly barz_1 for “the conjugate of zee sub one” is perfectly acceptable and overlinez_1 not really necessary (it may be when dealing with beginners).
    – egreg
    20 mins ago
















One could do widehatsigma_widehatbeta_1, but the output is painful to the eye. Even if the hat denotes the action of a function, it is customary to ignore the subscripts in order to apply the hat hatsigma_hatbeta_1; similarly barz_1 for “the conjugate of zee sub one” is perfectly acceptable and overlinez_1 not really necessary (it may be when dealing with beginners).
– egreg
20 mins ago





One could do widehatsigma_widehatbeta_1, but the output is painful to the eye. Even if the hat denotes the action of a function, it is customary to ignore the subscripts in order to apply the hat hatsigma_hatbeta_1; similarly barz_1 for “the conjugate of zee sub one” is perfectly acceptable and overlinez_1 not really necessary (it may be when dealing with beginners).
– egreg
20 mins ago











up vote
0
down vote













Try this:



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


This will put the first hat above the sigma, and the second hat is just above the beta_1.

-- update: Mico mentions the second hat should be above the beta only, thanks to Mico.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • 1




    The OP's screenshot does not suggest that the second "hat" should be placed above both beta and 1.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago














up vote
0
down vote













Try this:



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


This will put the first hat above the sigma, and the second hat is just above the beta_1.

-- update: Mico mentions the second hat should be above the beta only, thanks to Mico.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • 1




    The OP's screenshot does not suggest that the second "hat" should be placed above both beta and 1.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









Try this:



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


This will put the first hat above the sigma, and the second hat is just above the beta_1.

-- update: Mico mentions the second hat should be above the beta only, thanks to Mico.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Try this:



hatsigma_hatbeta_1


This will put the first hat above the sigma, and the second hat is just above the beta_1.

-- update: Mico mentions the second hat should be above the beta only, thanks to Mico.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago





















New contributor




FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 2 hours ago









FYChan

13




13




New contributor




FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






FYChan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    The OP's screenshot does not suggest that the second "hat" should be placed above both beta and 1.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago












  • 1




    The OP's screenshot does not suggest that the second "hat" should be placed above both beta and 1.
    – Mico
    2 hours ago







1




1




The OP's screenshot does not suggest that the second "hat" should be placed above both beta and 1.
– Mico
2 hours ago




The OP's screenshot does not suggest that the second "hat" should be placed above both beta and 1.
– Mico
2 hours ago










Latexboi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Latexboi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Latexboi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Latexboi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455502%2fhow-do-i-insert-sigma-superscript-hat-and-subscript-beta-1-hat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What does second last employer means? [closed]

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0; up vote -3 down vote favorite Say, for example I have worked in the following companies, Company A => 2010 - 2011 Company B => 2011 - 2012 Company C => 2012 - Till Date Company D => Have offer Now assume Company D is asking to submit documents from my second last employer. So from the list of companies given, which company would be qualified as second last employer? software-industry employer share | improve this question asked Aug 10 '14 at 5:16 Rajaprabhu Aravindasamy 559 1 6 13 closed as off-topic by Jim G., jmort253 ♦ Aug 11 '14 at 1:58 This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason: "Questions seeking advice on company-specific regulations, agreements, or policies should be directed to your manager or HR department. Questions that address...
Read more

List of Gilmore Girls characters

Image
The season three cast—(Back row): Lane, Michel, Paris, Emily, Richard, Sookie, Miss Patty, Kirk; Front row: Jess, Luke, Lorelai, Rory, Dean This is a list of characters for the comedy-drama television series Gilmore Girls . Contents 1 Main characters 1.1 Lorelai Gilmore 1.2 Rory Gilmore 1.3 Sookie St. James 1.4 Lane Kim 1.5 Michel Gerard 1.6 Luke Danes 1.7 Emily Gilmore 1.8 Richard Gilmore 1.9 Paris Geller 1.10 Dean Forester 1.11 Jess Mariano 1.12 Kirk Gleason 1.13 Jason Stiles 1.14 Logan Huntzberger 2 Major recurring characters 2.1 Christopher Hayden 2.2 Jackson Belleville 2.3 Mrs. Kim 2.4 Tristin DuGray 2.5 Max Medina 2.6 Taylor Doose 2.7 Dave Rygalski 2.8 Marty 3 Recurring characters 3.1 Stars Hollow 3.2 Chilton 3.3 Yale 3.4 Other 4 Notable guest stars 5 Unseen characters 6 Notes 7 References Main characters Actor Character Appearances Season 1 Season 2 Season 3 Season 4 Season 5 Season 6 Season 7 A Year in the Life Lauren Graham Lorelai Gilmore...
Read more

Confectionery

Image
Prepared foods made with a lot of sugar or other cabohydrates "Sweetmeat" redirects here. For the racehorse, see Sweetmeat (horse). Not to be confused with Sweetbread. This Kransekake is a traditional Scandinavian baker's confection. Confectionery is the art of making confections , which are food items that are rich in sugar and carbohydrates. Exact definitions are difficult. [1] In general, though, confectionery is divided into two broad and somewhat overlapping categories, bakers' confections and sugar confections. [2] Bakers' confectionery, also called flour confections , includes principally sweet pastries, cakes, and similar baked goods. Sugar confectionery includes candies ( sweets in British English), candied nuts, chocolates, chewing gum, bubble gum, pastillage, and other confections that are made primarily of sugar. In some cases, chocolate confections (confections made of chocolate) are treated as a separate category, as are sugar-free versions of ...
Read more