Compare numbers

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Show the following inequality
$$
sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
$$

I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.










share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Show the following inequality
    $$
    sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
    $$

    I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Show the following inequality
      $$
      sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
      $$

      I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Show the following inequality
      $$
      sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
      $$

      I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.







      algebra-precalculus






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      stefano

      373




      373




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
          is
          $$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
          if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
          $$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
          Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.



          To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
          $f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
          By the Mean Value Theorem
          beginalign
          &f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
          (1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
          &=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
          endalign

          for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
            – bloomers
            55 mins ago

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$



          The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.



          Looking at 3, and a small number a,



          $f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$



          So,



          $f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $



          Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:



          $$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$



          If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.
























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
            $$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.



              Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.






              share|cite|improve this answer






















                Your Answer




                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: false,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2945577%2fcompare-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest






























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                2
                down vote













                The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
                is
                $$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
                if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
                $$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
                Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.



                To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
                $f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
                By the Mean Value Theorem
                beginalign
                &f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
                (1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
                &=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
                endalign

                for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                • Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
                  – bloomers
                  55 mins ago














                up vote
                2
                down vote













                The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
                is
                $$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
                if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
                $$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
                Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.



                To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
                $f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
                By the Mean Value Theorem
                beginalign
                &f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
                (1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
                &=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
                endalign

                for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                • Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
                  – bloomers
                  55 mins ago












                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
                is
                $$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
                if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
                $$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
                Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.



                To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
                $f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
                By the Mean Value Theorem
                beginalign
                &f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
                (1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
                &=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
                endalign

                for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
                is
                $$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
                if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
                $$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
                Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.



                To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
                $f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
                By the Mean Value Theorem
                beginalign
                &f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
                (1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
                &=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
                endalign

                for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 54 mins ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                Lord Shark the Unknown

                91.4k955118




                91.4k955118











                • Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
                  – bloomers
                  55 mins ago
















                • Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
                  – bloomers
                  55 mins ago















                Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
                – bloomers
                55 mins ago




                Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
                – bloomers
                55 mins ago










                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$



                The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.



                Looking at 3, and a small number a,



                $f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$



                So,



                $f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $



                Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:



                $$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$



                If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$



                  The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.



                  Looking at 3, and a small number a,



                  $f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$



                  So,



                  $f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $



                  Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:



                  $$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$



                  If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$



                    The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.



                    Looking at 3, and a small number a,



                    $f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$



                    So,



                    $f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $



                    Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:



                    $$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$



                    If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.






                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$



                    The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.



                    Looking at 3, and a small number a,



                    $f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$



                    So,



                    $f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $



                    Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:



                    $$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$



                    If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.







                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 55 mins ago





















                    New contributor




                    Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 1 hour ago









                    Neo

                    1397




                    1397




                    New contributor




                    Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
                        $$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
                          $$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.






                          share|cite|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
                            $$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
                            $$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 31 mins ago









                            Piquito

                            17.5k31335




                            17.5k31335




















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.



                                Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.






                                share|cite|improve this answer


























                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.



                                  Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote









                                    Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.



                                    Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.



                                    Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer














                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited 10 mins ago

























                                    answered 17 mins ago









                                    bloomers

                                    7261210




                                    7261210



























                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2945577%2fcompare-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest













































































                                        Comments

                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        What does second last employer means? [closed]

                                        List of Gilmore Girls characters

                                        Confectionery