Compare numbers
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Show the following inequality
$$
sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
$$
I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.
algebra-precalculus
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Show the following inequality
$$
sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
$$
I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.
algebra-precalculus
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Show the following inequality
$$
sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
$$
I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.
algebra-precalculus
Show the following inequality
$$
sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3.
$$
I tried to rise to power 3 the expresion above, but things went wrong.
algebra-precalculus
algebra-precalculus
asked 1 hour ago
stefano
373
373
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
is
$$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
$$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.
To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
$f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
By the Mean Value Theorem
beginalign
&f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
(1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
&=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
endalign
for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.
Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
– bloomers
55 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$
The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.
Looking at 3, and a small number a,
$f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$
So,
$f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $
Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:
$$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$
If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
$$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.
Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.
add a comment |Â
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
is
$$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
$$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.
To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
$f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
By the Mean Value Theorem
beginalign
&f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
(1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
&=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
endalign
for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.
Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
– bloomers
55 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
is
$$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
$$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.
To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
$f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
By the Mean Value Theorem
beginalign
&f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
(1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
&=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
endalign
for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.
Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
– bloomers
55 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
is
$$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
$$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.
To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
$f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
By the Mean Value Theorem
beginalign
&f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
(1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
&=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
endalign
for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.
The function $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave on $(0,infty)$, that
is
$$(1-t)f(a)+tf(b)<f((1-t)a+tb)$$
if $0<a<b$ and $0<t<1$. In particular
$$fracf(a)2+fracf(b)2<f(a/2+b/2).$$
Now take $a=3-sqrt[3]3$ and $b=3+sqrt[3]3$.
To show that $f(x)=x^1/3$ is strictly concave, observe that
$f''(x)<0$ for all $x>0$, so that $f'(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $(0,infty)$.
By the Mean Value Theorem
beginalign
&f((1-t)a+tb)-(1-t)f(a)-tf(b)\&=
(1-t)[f((1-t)a+tb)-f(a)]-t[f(b)-f((1-t)a+tb)]\
&=(b-a)f'(c)-(b-a)f'(d)>0
endalign
for some $cin(a,(1-t)+tb)$ and some $din((1-t)a+tb,b)$.
edited 54 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
Lord Shark the Unknown
91.4k955118
91.4k955118
Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
– bloomers
55 mins ago
add a comment |Â
Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
– bloomers
55 mins ago
Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
– bloomers
55 mins ago
Should the second tf(b) just be f(b)?
– bloomers
55 mins ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$
The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.
Looking at 3, and a small number a,
$f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$
So,
$f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $
Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:
$$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$
If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$
The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.
Looking at 3, and a small number a,
$f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$
So,
$f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $
Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:
$$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$
If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$
The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.
Looking at 3, and a small number a,
$f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$
So,
$f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $
Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:
$$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$
If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Consider the function $f(x) = sqrt[3]x$
The gradient of the gradient is constantly decreasing, can be observed on a graph.
Looking at 3, and a small number a,
$f(3+a)-f(3) < f(3) - f(3-a)$
So,
$f(3+a)+f(3-a) < 2f(3) $
Substituting $sqrt[3]3$ into a. We get:
$$sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3+sqrt[3]3-sqrt[3]3<2sqrt[3]3$$
If we think of the function as the distance traveled by a car from the origin wrt time, we can see that the gradient (velocity) is constantly reducing. The car never comes to a stop but is slowing down forever. As we slow down, we can see that the distance traveled in the last $sqrt[3]3$ seconds ($f(3) - f(3-a)$) is more than the distance($f(3+a)-f(3)$) traveled in the next $sqrt[3]3$ seconds.
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 55 mins ago
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 1 hour ago
Neo
1397
1397
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Neo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
$$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
$$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
$$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.
COMMENT.-It is also true that for all integers $n,m$ greater than $1$ (for $n=1$ there is equality) we have
$$sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m+sqrt[n]m-sqrt[n]mlt2sqrt[n]m$$ Try to prove this.
answered 31 mins ago


Piquito
17.5k31335
17.5k31335
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.
Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.
Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.
Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.
Another way to show this is to divide both sides by $sqrt[3]3$. Then the left is $sqrt[3]1+a +sqrt[3]1-a$ (for an $a$ which is in $[0,1)$) and we want to show that this is strictly less than $2$.
Let $f(x) = sqrt[3]1+x +sqrt[3]1-x$. Then $f(0)=2$. And it can be easily shown that $f'(x) < 0$ for all $xin (0,1)$ (since $(1+x)^frac23>(1-x)^frac23$ for all $x$ on that interval). Hence $f$ is strictly decreasing on $(0, 1)$, and therefore strictly less than 2.
edited 10 mins ago
answered 17 mins ago
bloomers
7261210
7261210
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2945577%2fcompare-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password