Prove that the quantity is an integer

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to prove that $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$.



I have thought to use induction.



Base Case: For $n=1$, $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=frac13-frac12+frac16=0 in mathbbZ$.



Induction hypothesis: We suppose that it holds for $n=k$, i.e. that $frack^33-frack^22+frack6 in mathbbZ$.



Induction step: We want to show that it holds for $n=k+1$.



$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16=frack^33+frack^22+frack6$$



Is everything right? If so, then we cannot use at the induction step the induction hypothesis, can we?



Or can we not get the desired result using induction?










share|cite|improve this question























  • Why would you think those expressions would be equal? The induction step would be to show that the integrality of the right hand implied that of the left hand.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago










  • (I've put an answer as it is almost done already.)
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Side note: I think it is easier to first argue that it's enough to check $nin 0,1,2,3,4,5$ and then check those cases. Or, alternatively, note that your expression is $frac 16 times n(n-1)(2n-1)$ and show, by cases, that at least one of the terms in $n$ is even and at least one is divisible by $3$.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I want to prove that $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$.



I have thought to use induction.



Base Case: For $n=1$, $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=frac13-frac12+frac16=0 in mathbbZ$.



Induction hypothesis: We suppose that it holds for $n=k$, i.e. that $frack^33-frack^22+frack6 in mathbbZ$.



Induction step: We want to show that it holds for $n=k+1$.



$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16=frack^33+frack^22+frack6$$



Is everything right? If so, then we cannot use at the induction step the induction hypothesis, can we?



Or can we not get the desired result using induction?










share|cite|improve this question























  • Why would you think those expressions would be equal? The induction step would be to show that the integrality of the right hand implied that of the left hand.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago










  • (I've put an answer as it is almost done already.)
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Side note: I think it is easier to first argue that it's enough to check $nin 0,1,2,3,4,5$ and then check those cases. Or, alternatively, note that your expression is $frac 16 times n(n-1)(2n-1)$ and show, by cases, that at least one of the terms in $n$ is even and at least one is divisible by $3$.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I want to prove that $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$.



I have thought to use induction.



Base Case: For $n=1$, $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=frac13-frac12+frac16=0 in mathbbZ$.



Induction hypothesis: We suppose that it holds for $n=k$, i.e. that $frack^33-frack^22+frack6 in mathbbZ$.



Induction step: We want to show that it holds for $n=k+1$.



$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16=frack^33+frack^22+frack6$$



Is everything right? If so, then we cannot use at the induction step the induction hypothesis, can we?



Or can we not get the desired result using induction?










share|cite|improve this question















I want to prove that $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$.



I have thought to use induction.



Base Case: For $n=1$, $fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=frac13-frac12+frac16=0 in mathbbZ$.



Induction hypothesis: We suppose that it holds for $n=k$, i.e. that $frack^33-frack^22+frack6 in mathbbZ$.



Induction step: We want to show that it holds for $n=k+1$.



$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16=frack^33+frack^22+frack6$$



Is everything right? If so, then we cannot use at the induction step the induction hypothesis, can we?



Or can we not get the desired result using induction?







elementary-number-theory induction






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









amWhy

191k27223434




191k27223434










asked 3 hours ago









Evinda

561412




561412











  • Why would you think those expressions would be equal? The induction step would be to show that the integrality of the right hand implied that of the left hand.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago










  • (I've put an answer as it is almost done already.)
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Side note: I think it is easier to first argue that it's enough to check $nin 0,1,2,3,4,5$ and then check those cases. Or, alternatively, note that your expression is $frac 16 times n(n-1)(2n-1)$ and show, by cases, that at least one of the terms in $n$ is even and at least one is divisible by $3$.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago
















  • Why would you think those expressions would be equal? The induction step would be to show that the integrality of the right hand implied that of the left hand.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago










  • (I've put an answer as it is almost done already.)
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Side note: I think it is easier to first argue that it's enough to check $nin 0,1,2,3,4,5$ and then check those cases. Or, alternatively, note that your expression is $frac 16 times n(n-1)(2n-1)$ and show, by cases, that at least one of the terms in $n$ is even and at least one is divisible by $3$.
    – lulu
    3 hours ago















Why would you think those expressions would be equal? The induction step would be to show that the integrality of the right hand implied that of the left hand.
– lulu
3 hours ago




Why would you think those expressions would be equal? The induction step would be to show that the integrality of the right hand implied that of the left hand.
– lulu
3 hours ago












(I've put an answer as it is almost done already.)
– metamorphy
3 hours ago




(I've put an answer as it is almost done already.)
– metamorphy
3 hours ago












Side note: I think it is easier to first argue that it's enough to check $nin 0,1,2,3,4,5$ and then check those cases. Or, alternatively, note that your expression is $frac 16 times n(n-1)(2n-1)$ and show, by cases, that at least one of the terms in $n$ is even and at least one is divisible by $3$.
– lulu
3 hours ago




Side note: I think it is easier to first argue that it's enough to check $nin 0,1,2,3,4,5$ and then check those cases. Or, alternatively, note that your expression is $frac 16 times n(n-1)(2n-1)$ and show, by cases, that at least one of the terms in $n$ is even and at least one is divisible by $3$.
– lulu
3 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If you want to use induction you want to show that
$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16$$ is an integer. You can expand all the terms and use the known fact about the expression for $k$ to get there.



Another approach is to note that $6$ is a common denominator and say you want to prove that the numerator $2k^3-3k^2+k$ is divisible by $6$. But $2k^3-3k^2+k=(2k-1)(k-1)k$ and one of $k$ or $k-1$ is even and one of the terms is a multiple of $3$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Why is one of the terms a multiple of $3$ ?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Just try the three possibilities for $k bmod 3$. If it is $0$, then $k$ is a multiple of $3$. If $1$, then $k-1$ is. And if $2$, then $2k-1$ is.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Ah, I see... And so we have that $2 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and $3 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and thus $2 cdot 3=6 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$, right?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • That is correct.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Great, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago

















up vote
2
down vote













Yes, we can. If $f(n)=fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6$, then $f(n+1)-f(n)=n^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • And since $f(n)$ is an integer and also $n^2$, we deduce that their sum, $f(n+1)=f(n)+n^2$, is also an integer, right? @metamorphy
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Exactly. There are other approaches noted above - I've just followed your way.
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Nice, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago

















up vote
2
down vote













$$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=fracn(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



You can see that for any n(odd or even) the numerator is always a multiple of 6, so the sum of fractions is an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago

















up vote
2
down vote













To prove $$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$$



We take common denominator and prove the numerator is a multiple of $6.$



The numerator factors as $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$



One of $n$ or $n-1$ is even so the product is multiple of $2$



The remainder of n in dividing by $3$ is either $0$ or $1$ or $2$



In either of these cases the product $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$ is divisible by $3$

Thus the numerator is always a multiple of $6$ which makes the fraction an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I haven't understood why the product is divisible by 3. Could you explain it to me?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • We have $n(n-1)(2n-1)$. For$ n=3k$ , $n$ is a multiple of $3$ so the product is a multiple of $3$. For $n=3k+1$ , $n-1$ is a multiple of $3$ and for $n=3k+2$, $2n-1 =6k+3$ which is a multiple of $3$.
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    3 hours ago










  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago

















up vote
2
down vote













If you put everything over a common denominator you get $$f(n)=frac 2n^3-3n^2+n6=frac n(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



Now it is easier, I think, to see what is going on for a straightforward induction, or you can write $2n-1=2n-4+3$ and split up into different fractions viz $$f(n)=frac n(n-1)(2n-4+3)6=frac n(n-1)(n-2)3+frac n(n-1)2$$ and this is easily the sum of two integers since the product of $r$ successive integers is divisible by $r$ (easily proved by induction), or you can do the induction on $n$ based on this form of $f(n)$, which will should work easily.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I like this approach. Thanks a lot :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2946269%2fprove-that-the-quantity-is-an-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If you want to use induction you want to show that
$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16$$ is an integer. You can expand all the terms and use the known fact about the expression for $k$ to get there.



Another approach is to note that $6$ is a common denominator and say you want to prove that the numerator $2k^3-3k^2+k$ is divisible by $6$. But $2k^3-3k^2+k=(2k-1)(k-1)k$ and one of $k$ or $k-1$ is even and one of the terms is a multiple of $3$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Why is one of the terms a multiple of $3$ ?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Just try the three possibilities for $k bmod 3$. If it is $0$, then $k$ is a multiple of $3$. If $1$, then $k-1$ is. And if $2$, then $2k-1$ is.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Ah, I see... And so we have that $2 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and $3 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and thus $2 cdot 3=6 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$, right?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • That is correct.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Great, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










If you want to use induction you want to show that
$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16$$ is an integer. You can expand all the terms and use the known fact about the expression for $k$ to get there.



Another approach is to note that $6$ is a common denominator and say you want to prove that the numerator $2k^3-3k^2+k$ is divisible by $6$. But $2k^3-3k^2+k=(2k-1)(k-1)k$ and one of $k$ or $k-1$ is even and one of the terms is a multiple of $3$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Why is one of the terms a multiple of $3$ ?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Just try the three possibilities for $k bmod 3$. If it is $0$, then $k$ is a multiple of $3$. If $1$, then $k-1$ is. And if $2$, then $2k-1$ is.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Ah, I see... And so we have that $2 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and $3 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and thus $2 cdot 3=6 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$, right?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • That is correct.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Great, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






If you want to use induction you want to show that
$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16$$ is an integer. You can expand all the terms and use the known fact about the expression for $k$ to get there.



Another approach is to note that $6$ is a common denominator and say you want to prove that the numerator $2k^3-3k^2+k$ is divisible by $6$. But $2k^3-3k^2+k=(2k-1)(k-1)k$ and one of $k$ or $k-1$ is even and one of the terms is a multiple of $3$.






share|cite|improve this answer












If you want to use induction you want to show that
$$frac(k+1)^33-frac(k+1)^22+frack+16$$ is an integer. You can expand all the terms and use the known fact about the expression for $k$ to get there.



Another approach is to note that $6$ is a common denominator and say you want to prove that the numerator $2k^3-3k^2+k$ is divisible by $6$. But $2k^3-3k^2+k=(2k-1)(k-1)k$ and one of $k$ or $k-1$ is even and one of the terms is a multiple of $3$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Ross Millikan

283k23191359




283k23191359











  • Why is one of the terms a multiple of $3$ ?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Just try the three possibilities for $k bmod 3$. If it is $0$, then $k$ is a multiple of $3$. If $1$, then $k-1$ is. And if $2$, then $2k-1$ is.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Ah, I see... And so we have that $2 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and $3 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and thus $2 cdot 3=6 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$, right?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • That is correct.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Great, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago
















  • Why is one of the terms a multiple of $3$ ?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Just try the three possibilities for $k bmod 3$. If it is $0$, then $k$ is a multiple of $3$. If $1$, then $k-1$ is. And if $2$, then $2k-1$ is.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Ah, I see... And so we have that $2 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and $3 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and thus $2 cdot 3=6 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$, right?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • That is correct.
    – Ross Millikan
    3 hours ago










  • Great, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago















Why is one of the terms a multiple of $3$ ?
– Evinda
3 hours ago




Why is one of the terms a multiple of $3$ ?
– Evinda
3 hours ago












Just try the three possibilities for $k bmod 3$. If it is $0$, then $k$ is a multiple of $3$. If $1$, then $k-1$ is. And if $2$, then $2k-1$ is.
– Ross Millikan
3 hours ago




Just try the three possibilities for $k bmod 3$. If it is $0$, then $k$ is a multiple of $3$. If $1$, then $k-1$ is. And if $2$, then $2k-1$ is.
– Ross Millikan
3 hours ago












Ah, I see... And so we have that $2 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and $3 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and thus $2 cdot 3=6 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$, right?
– Evinda
3 hours ago




Ah, I see... And so we have that $2 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and $3 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$ and thus $2 cdot 3=6 mid (2k-1)(k-1)k$, right?
– Evinda
3 hours ago












That is correct.
– Ross Millikan
3 hours ago




That is correct.
– Ross Millikan
3 hours ago












Great, thank you :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago




Great, thank you :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago










up vote
2
down vote













Yes, we can. If $f(n)=fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6$, then $f(n+1)-f(n)=n^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • And since $f(n)$ is an integer and also $n^2$, we deduce that their sum, $f(n+1)=f(n)+n^2$, is also an integer, right? @metamorphy
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Exactly. There are other approaches noted above - I've just followed your way.
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Nice, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote













Yes, we can. If $f(n)=fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6$, then $f(n+1)-f(n)=n^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • And since $f(n)$ is an integer and also $n^2$, we deduce that their sum, $f(n+1)=f(n)+n^2$, is also an integer, right? @metamorphy
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Exactly. There are other approaches noted above - I've just followed your way.
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Nice, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









Yes, we can. If $f(n)=fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6$, then $f(n+1)-f(n)=n^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer












Yes, we can. If $f(n)=fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6$, then $f(n+1)-f(n)=n^2$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









metamorphy

1,609111




1,609111











  • And since $f(n)$ is an integer and also $n^2$, we deduce that their sum, $f(n+1)=f(n)+n^2$, is also an integer, right? @metamorphy
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Exactly. There are other approaches noted above - I've just followed your way.
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Nice, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago
















  • And since $f(n)$ is an integer and also $n^2$, we deduce that their sum, $f(n+1)=f(n)+n^2$, is also an integer, right? @metamorphy
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • Exactly. There are other approaches noted above - I've just followed your way.
    – metamorphy
    3 hours ago










  • Nice, thank you :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago















And since $f(n)$ is an integer and also $n^2$, we deduce that their sum, $f(n+1)=f(n)+n^2$, is also an integer, right? @metamorphy
– Evinda
3 hours ago




And since $f(n)$ is an integer and also $n^2$, we deduce that their sum, $f(n+1)=f(n)+n^2$, is also an integer, right? @metamorphy
– Evinda
3 hours ago












Exactly. There are other approaches noted above - I've just followed your way.
– metamorphy
3 hours ago




Exactly. There are other approaches noted above - I've just followed your way.
– metamorphy
3 hours ago












Nice, thank you :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago




Nice, thank you :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago










up vote
2
down vote













$$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=fracn(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



You can see that for any n(odd or even) the numerator is always a multiple of 6, so the sum of fractions is an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote













$$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=fracn(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



You can see that for any n(odd or even) the numerator is always a multiple of 6, so the sum of fractions is an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









$$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=fracn(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



You can see that for any n(odd or even) the numerator is always a multiple of 6, so the sum of fractions is an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer












$$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6=fracn(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



You can see that for any n(odd or even) the numerator is always a multiple of 6, so the sum of fractions is an integer.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









sirous

1,108513




1,108513











  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago
















  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago















I see... Thanks :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago




I see... Thanks :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago










up vote
2
down vote













To prove $$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$$



We take common denominator and prove the numerator is a multiple of $6.$



The numerator factors as $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$



One of $n$ or $n-1$ is even so the product is multiple of $2$



The remainder of n in dividing by $3$ is either $0$ or $1$ or $2$



In either of these cases the product $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$ is divisible by $3$

Thus the numerator is always a multiple of $6$ which makes the fraction an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I haven't understood why the product is divisible by 3. Could you explain it to me?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • We have $n(n-1)(2n-1)$. For$ n=3k$ , $n$ is a multiple of $3$ so the product is a multiple of $3$. For $n=3k+1$ , $n-1$ is a multiple of $3$ and for $n=3k+2$, $2n-1 =6k+3$ which is a multiple of $3$.
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    3 hours ago










  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote













To prove $$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$$



We take common denominator and prove the numerator is a multiple of $6.$



The numerator factors as $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$



One of $n$ or $n-1$ is even so the product is multiple of $2$



The remainder of n in dividing by $3$ is either $0$ or $1$ or $2$



In either of these cases the product $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$ is divisible by $3$

Thus the numerator is always a multiple of $6$ which makes the fraction an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I haven't understood why the product is divisible by 3. Could you explain it to me?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • We have $n(n-1)(2n-1)$. For$ n=3k$ , $n$ is a multiple of $3$ so the product is a multiple of $3$. For $n=3k+1$ , $n-1$ is a multiple of $3$ and for $n=3k+2$, $2n-1 =6k+3$ which is a multiple of $3$.
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    3 hours ago










  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









To prove $$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$$



We take common denominator and prove the numerator is a multiple of $6.$



The numerator factors as $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$



One of $n$ or $n-1$ is even so the product is multiple of $2$



The remainder of n in dividing by $3$ is either $0$ or $1$ or $2$



In either of these cases the product $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$ is divisible by $3$

Thus the numerator is always a multiple of $6$ which makes the fraction an integer.






share|cite|improve this answer












To prove $$fracn^33-fracn^22+fracn6 in mathbbZ, forall n geq 1$$



We take common denominator and prove the numerator is a multiple of $6.$



The numerator factors as $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$



One of $n$ or $n-1$ is even so the product is multiple of $2$



The remainder of n in dividing by $3$ is either $0$ or $1$ or $2$



In either of these cases the product $$n(2n-1)(n-1)$$ is divisible by $3$

Thus the numerator is always a multiple of $6$ which makes the fraction an integer.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

33.9k41855




33.9k41855











  • I haven't understood why the product is divisible by 3. Could you explain it to me?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • We have $n(n-1)(2n-1)$. For$ n=3k$ , $n$ is a multiple of $3$ so the product is a multiple of $3$. For $n=3k+1$ , $n-1$ is a multiple of $3$ and for $n=3k+2$, $2n-1 =6k+3$ which is a multiple of $3$.
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    3 hours ago










  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago
















  • I haven't understood why the product is divisible by 3. Could you explain it to me?
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago










  • We have $n(n-1)(2n-1)$. For$ n=3k$ , $n$ is a multiple of $3$ so the product is a multiple of $3$. For $n=3k+1$ , $n-1$ is a multiple of $3$ and for $n=3k+2$, $2n-1 =6k+3$ which is a multiple of $3$.
    – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
    3 hours ago










  • I see... Thanks :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago















I haven't understood why the product is divisible by 3. Could you explain it to me?
– Evinda
3 hours ago




I haven't understood why the product is divisible by 3. Could you explain it to me?
– Evinda
3 hours ago












We have $n(n-1)(2n-1)$. For$ n=3k$ , $n$ is a multiple of $3$ so the product is a multiple of $3$. For $n=3k+1$ , $n-1$ is a multiple of $3$ and for $n=3k+2$, $2n-1 =6k+3$ which is a multiple of $3$.
– Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
3 hours ago




We have $n(n-1)(2n-1)$. For$ n=3k$ , $n$ is a multiple of $3$ so the product is a multiple of $3$. For $n=3k+1$ , $n-1$ is a multiple of $3$ and for $n=3k+2$, $2n-1 =6k+3$ which is a multiple of $3$.
– Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
3 hours ago












I see... Thanks :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago




I see... Thanks :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago










up vote
2
down vote













If you put everything over a common denominator you get $$f(n)=frac 2n^3-3n^2+n6=frac n(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



Now it is easier, I think, to see what is going on for a straightforward induction, or you can write $2n-1=2n-4+3$ and split up into different fractions viz $$f(n)=frac n(n-1)(2n-4+3)6=frac n(n-1)(n-2)3+frac n(n-1)2$$ and this is easily the sum of two integers since the product of $r$ successive integers is divisible by $r$ (easily proved by induction), or you can do the induction on $n$ based on this form of $f(n)$, which will should work easily.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I like this approach. Thanks a lot :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote













If you put everything over a common denominator you get $$f(n)=frac 2n^3-3n^2+n6=frac n(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



Now it is easier, I think, to see what is going on for a straightforward induction, or you can write $2n-1=2n-4+3$ and split up into different fractions viz $$f(n)=frac n(n-1)(2n-4+3)6=frac n(n-1)(n-2)3+frac n(n-1)2$$ and this is easily the sum of two integers since the product of $r$ successive integers is divisible by $r$ (easily proved by induction), or you can do the induction on $n$ based on this form of $f(n)$, which will should work easily.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I like this approach. Thanks a lot :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









If you put everything over a common denominator you get $$f(n)=frac 2n^3-3n^2+n6=frac n(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



Now it is easier, I think, to see what is going on for a straightforward induction, or you can write $2n-1=2n-4+3$ and split up into different fractions viz $$f(n)=frac n(n-1)(2n-4+3)6=frac n(n-1)(n-2)3+frac n(n-1)2$$ and this is easily the sum of two integers since the product of $r$ successive integers is divisible by $r$ (easily proved by induction), or you can do the induction on $n$ based on this form of $f(n)$, which will should work easily.






share|cite|improve this answer












If you put everything over a common denominator you get $$f(n)=frac 2n^3-3n^2+n6=frac n(n-1)(2n-1)6$$



Now it is easier, I think, to see what is going on for a straightforward induction, or you can write $2n-1=2n-4+3$ and split up into different fractions viz $$f(n)=frac n(n-1)(2n-4+3)6=frac n(n-1)(n-2)3+frac n(n-1)2$$ and this is easily the sum of two integers since the product of $r$ successive integers is divisible by $r$ (easily proved by induction), or you can do the induction on $n$ based on this form of $f(n)$, which will should work easily.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









Mark Bennet

78.4k777177




78.4k777177











  • I like this approach. Thanks a lot :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago
















  • I like this approach. Thanks a lot :)
    – Evinda
    3 hours ago















I like this approach. Thanks a lot :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago




I like this approach. Thanks a lot :)
– Evinda
3 hours ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2946269%2fprove-that-the-quantity-is-an-integer%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long meetings (6-7 hours a day): Being “babysat” by supervisor

Is the Concept of Multiple Fantasy Races Scientifically Flawed? [closed]

Confectionery